Effect of Poly-L-Lactic Acid Mesh Augmentation on Cyclic Gap Formation in Transosseous Patellar Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Study

Abstract

No previous study has investigated poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) surgical mesh augmentation in the repair of inferior pole patellar tendon rupture. We compared the biomechanical properties of transosseous patellar tendon repair with PLLA surgical mesh augmentation to transosseous repair without augmentation. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric knees were used. Specimens in each pair were randomized to undergo the transosseous technique alone or the transosseous technique augmented with a PLLA surgical mesh. An inferior pole patellar tendon rupture was simulated and the repair procedure was performed. Specimens were cyclically loaded for 500 cycles. Gap formation was measured using two sensors placed medial and lateral to the repair site. After cyclic loading, load to failure was determined by pulling the tendon at a constant rate until a sudden decrease in load occurred. The primary outcome measure was cyclic gap formation at the medial and lateral sensors. Compared with controls, specimens that underwent PLLA mesh-augmented repair had significantly lower medial gap formation at all testing intervals up to 500 cycles (p < 0.05) and significantly lower lateral gap formation at all testing intervals from 10 to 500 cycles (p < 0.05). Transosseous patellar tendon repair augmented with a PLLA woven mesh device provided significantly greater resistance to gap formation compared with transosseous repair alone. These results suggest that PLLA mesh augmentation of the transosseous technique is biomechanically effective for patellar tendon repair.

Keywords

patellar - tendon - poly-L-lactic acid - mesh - cadaveric - biomechanics

Note

Synthasome, Inc. donated hardware for this study; Arthrex, Inc. donated hardware for this study; all authors have no disclosures to report.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 22. Juni 2021

Angenommen: 19. Juni 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. September 2022

• References

• 1 Ong BC, Sherman O. Acute patellar tendon rupture: a new surgical technique. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (08) 869-870
• 2 Bouget P, Breque C, Beranger JS, Faure JP, Khiami F, Vendeuvre T. Biomechanical cadaveric comparison of patellar ligament suture protected by a steel cable versus a synthetic cable. J Exp Orthop 2017; 4 (01) 9
• 3 Black JC, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ. et al. Novel augmentation technique for patellar tendon repair improves strength and decreases gap formation: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (12) 2611-2618
• 4 Rothfeld A, Pawlak A, Liebler SAH, Morris M, Paci JM. Patellar tendon repair augmentation with a knotless suture anchor internal brace: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (05) 1199-1204
• 5 Meyer Z, Ricci WM. Knee extensor mechanism repairs: standard suture repair and novel augmentation technique. J Orthop Trauma 2016; 30 (Suppl. 02) S30-S31
• 6 Gould HP, Weiner DA, Tomaszewski PM, Parks BG, Abbasi P, Fillar AL. High-strength suture tape augmentation improves cyclic gap formation in transosseous patellar tendon repair: a biomechanical study. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2020; 2 (05) e469-e473
• 7 Mihalko WM, Vance M, Fineberg MJ. Patellar tendon repair with hamstring autograft: a cadaveric analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25 (04) 348-351
• 8 Van der Bracht H, Verdonk R, Stuyts B. Augmentation of a patellar tendon repair with an autologous semitendinosus graft. Acta Orthop Belg 2009; 75 (03) 417-419
• 9 Wuller TG, Jansson KA, Bruner BW. Augmentation of the patellar ligament with a bone-patellar tendon-bone inlay allograft. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (01) 89-93
• 10 Woodmass JM, Johnson JD, Wu IT, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ. Patellar tendon repair with ipsilateral semitendinosus autograft augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 2017; 6 (06) e2177-e2181
• 11 Espregueira-Mendes J, Andrade R, Michael MJSF. et al. Augmentation of patellar tendon repair with autologous semitendinosus Graft-Porto technique. Arthrosc Tech 2017; 6 (06) e2271-e2276
• 12 Merloz P, Minfelde R, Schelp C. et al. In vitro study of the properties of bioresorbable lactic acid polymer materials [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1995; 81 (05) 433-444
• 13 Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GG, Agrawal CM. Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymers. Biomaterials 1996; 17 (02) 93-102
• 14 Yoon SD, Kwon YS, Lee KS. Biodegradation and biocompatibility of poly l–lactic acid implantable mesh. Int Neurourol J 2017; 21 (Suppl. 01) S48-S54
• 15 Derwin KA, Codsi MJ, Milks RA, Baker AR, McCarron JA, Iannotti JP. Rotator cuff repair augmentation in a canine model with use of a woven poly-L-lactide device. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (05) 1159-1171
• 16 Smith RDJ, Zargar N, Brown CP. et al. Characterizing the macro and micro mechanical properties of scaffolds for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26 (11) 2038-2046
• 17 Smith RD, Carr A, Dakin SG, Snelling SJ, Yapp C, Hakimi O. The response of tenocytes to commercial scaffolds used for rotator cuff repair. Eur Cell Mater 2016; 31: 107-118
• 18 McCarron JA, Milks RA, Chen X, Iannotti JP, Derwin KA. Improved time-zero biomechanical properties using poly-L-lactic acid graft augmentation in a cadaveric rotator cuff repair model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19 (05) 688-696
• 19 Proctor CS. Long-term successful arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears with a functional and degradable reinforcement device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23 (10) 1508-1513
• 20 Inui A, Kokubu T, Fujioka H. et al. Application of layered poly (L-lactic acid) cell free scaffold in a rabbit rotator cuff defect model. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2011; 3: 29
• 21 Lenart BA, Martens KA, Kearns KA, Gillespie RJ, Zoga AC, Williams GR. Treatment of massive and recurrent rotator cuff tears augmented with a poly-l-lactide graft, a preliminary study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24 (06) 915-921
• 22 Krushinski EM, Parks BG, Hinton RY. Gap formation in transpatellar patellar tendon repair: pretensioning Krackow sutures versus standard repair in a cadaver model. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (01) 171-175
• 23 Ravalin RV, Mazzocca AD, Grady-Benson JC, Nissen CW, Adams DJ. Biomechanical comparison of patellar tendon repairs in a cadaver model: an evaluation of gap formation at the repair site with cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (04) 469-473
• 24 Marder RA, Timmerman LA. Primary repair of patellar tendon rupture without augmentation. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27 (03) 304-307
• 25 Janssen RP, Scheffler SU. Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (09) 2102-2108
• 26 Lindy PB, Boynton MD, Fadale PD. Repair of patellar tendon disruptions without hardware. J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9 (03) 238-243
• 27 Ratcliffe A, Butler DL, Dyment NA. et al. Scaffolds for tendon and ligament repair and regeneration. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43 (03) 819-831
• 28 Massey PA, Myers M, McClary K, Brown J, Barton RS, Solitro GF. Biomechanical analysis of patellar tendon repair with knotless suture anchor tape versus transosseous suture. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (10) 2325967120954808
• 29 Almazán A, Miguel A, Odor A, Ibarra JC. Intraoperative incidents and complications in primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (11) 1211-1217