Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759845
Chest X-Ray as the First Pointer in Various Skeletal Dysplasia and Related Disorders
- Introduction
- Imaging Features in Specific Skeletal Dysplasias
- Normal Bone Density
- Reduced Bone Density
- Increased Bone Density
- The Role of Chest X-Ray Alone in Making the Diagnosis
- Conclusion
- References
Abstract
Chest X-ray (CXR) is the most commonly used imaging modality. It is commonly used for respiratory or cardiac ailments; however, it is also used routinely as a part of skeletal surveys. In the case of suspected skeletal dysplasia, the viewer is alerted regarding the presence of some skeletal abnormality. But in case of a routine CXR performed for some other reason, it is not uncommon to miss subtle pointers of skeletal dysplasia. Sometimes routine CXR is the first pointer to alert a radiologist toward some generalized skeletal anomaly and therefore, initiate its proper evaluation by the skeletal survey.
#
Introduction
Skeletal dysplasia comprises a group of disorders involving abnormalities in the bones and cartilages. According to the current nosology of skeletal dysplasias,[1] there are 461 diseases and 42 classes of disorders. The skeletal survey is the most important radiological investigation in the assessment of dysplasias. Chest X-ray (CXR) forms an integral part of the skeletal survey. While assessing chest radiographs, a systematic approach is to be followed. Chest radiographs can reveal characteristic findings in the bones (including clavicles, ribs, vertebrae, sternum, scapula, humeral head) in a large number of skeletal dysplasias. In an unsuspected case, CXR can even provide the first diagnostic clue to skeletal dysplasia. This article will review the chest radiograph findings in various common and clinically important skeletal dysplasias.
#
Imaging Features in Specific Skeletal Dysplasias
Since a detailed discussion of all dysplasias is beyond the scope of this article, we shall have an imaging feature-based discussion, based on the information a chest radiograph ([Fig. 1]) can provide.


An assessment of the bone density should be the first step. A generalized decrease in bone density points toward a metabolic bone disease or a specific group of bone dysplasia (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta). On the contrary, an increased bone density can be indicative of sclerosing bone dysplasia, besides other diagnostic considerations.
#
Normal Bone Density
Abnormality in the Ribs
Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS): Defect in mucopolysaccharide degradation pathway leads to its progressive accumulation in the body, predominantly in central nervous system, bones, and heart.
Prominent imaging finding on a chest radiograph (CXR) includes paddle shaped/spatulated appearance of ribs ([Fig. 2]). Inferior beaking of vertebrae in MPS type I and central beaking in MPS type 4 is evident on a lateral radiograph.[2] Other imaging findings include platyspondyly and widening of disk spaces, varus deformity of humerus with mildly hypoplastic epiphysis and proximal humeral notching, small scapula with glenoid cavities flattening, and thick and short clavicles.[2] Other characteristic imaging findings are discussed in [Table 1].[2]


Mucolipidoses: This group of disorders has overlapping imaging features with MPS. Apart from paddle-shaped ribs in CXR, other indicative findings include undermodeling of the long bones (humeri), and periosteal “cloaking” in long bones ([Fig. 3]). The latter feature is more evident in infancy and decreases thereafter.[3]


Pseudoachondroplasia: This is a type of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia presenting as rhizomelic dwarfism, resulting from a mutation in COMP gene. On a frontal CXR, the striking imaging finding is the prominence and widening of posterior costochondral and costovertebral junctions[4] ([Fig. 4]). Other features in CXR include irregular and fragmented humeral epiphysis and metaphyseal flaring. Characteristic vertebral changes are evident on a lateral radiograph and include platyspondyly and anterior tongue-like projections[4].Other imaging findings in the skeletal survey are listed in [Table 1].[4]


Hereditary multiple exostoses: It is caused by an abnormality in bone remodeling of epiphyseal growth plate cartilage. CXR may show bony outgrowth having continuity with underlying ribs[5] (sessile form may not be very apparent; [Fig. 5]). Similar exostoses may be evident on other visible bones as well.


Encondromatosis: In this disorder, multiple enchondromas are associated with faulty cartilaginous development and abnormal formation of intraosseous cartilaginous foci. Enchondromas may be seen on CXR as expansile lytic rib lesions, with/without ring or arc-like calcific foci within[6] ([Fig. 6]). When no calcific focus is apparent, it closely mimics fibrous dysplasia.


Fibrous dysplasia: It is characterized by the localized developmental defect of osteoblast with its replacement by fibrous tissue and immature woven bone. On CXR, the lesions are seen as smooth expansile lytic ground glass lesion with “rind sign”[7] ([Fig. 7]). Polyostotic fibrous dysplasia may be associated with deformity of the long bones as well.


Spondylocostal dysostosis: Various types of spondylocostal dysostosis are described. The rib anomalies on CXR include absence, abnormal fusion, abnormal bifid ribs, etc., always associated with variable segmentation anomalies involving ≥ 10 thoracic vertebrae[8] ([Fig. 8]).


Nonaccidental injury: Its hallmark is evidence of repeated injury clinically and radiologically as a consequence of child abuse in infants/young children. Sinister findings include multiple posterior rib fractures of different ages.[9] Other imaging clues on a CXR include scapular fracture ([Fig. 9]), sternal fracture (difficult to detect on CXR), and the classic metaphyseal lesion or bucket-handle type of fracture involving the proximal/ distal humeri[9]. Other imaging findings are enlisted in [Table 1].[9]


Dysplasias with short ribs: Normally, the anterior ends of the true ribs are seen anteriorly for about half the hemithoracic diameter. When the ribs are not seen in the anterior part/stops right after the lateral ends, a short-rib dysplasia may be looked for. Important entities in this group are short-rib polydactyly syndromes (SRPS), Jeune's asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy (JATD), and Ellis Van Creveld syndrome (EVC). On a molecular basis, they all fall in the spectrum of ciliary disorders (ciliopathy).[10] CXR gives a clue to diagnosis; however, imaging differentiation between them is not always possible based on a CXR alone and may need a complete skeletal survey. SRPS has polydactyly and a small narrow thorax with short ribs.[10] JATD shows a typical narrow “bell-shaped” thorax and elevated “handle-bar” clavicles[11] ([Fig. 10]). EVC clinically presents with postaxial polydactyly, disproportionate dwarfism (acromesomelia), congenital heart defects (ASD most common), nail, and teeth changes. Apart from short ribs,[12] one typical imaging finding is the outward bowing of the humerus along with short forearm bones[13] ([Fig. 11]).




Caffey's disease: It is a self-limiting disease usually presenting before 5 months of birth. Pathological hallmark is periosteal new bone formation with associated cortical thickening. The common clinical manifestation is classic triad including hyperirritability, soft tissue swelling, and hard mass over affected bones (most commonly involving mandible, clavicle, and ribs symmetrically). The imaging findings in CXR in Caffey's disease include thickened cortex and widened clavicle, cortical hyperostosis involving lateral ribs, unilateral involvement of scapula common (may be confused with malignancy), thick cortex involving diaphysis of tubular bones, and sparing epiphysis (ulnar involvement more common; [Fig. 12]). Interosseous bridging can be seen in ribs and between radius and ulna.[14] Vertebrae are spared. The close differential is child abuse, however symmetrical involvement of clavicle and ribs is seen in Caffey's disease.[15]


Other diseases having abnormal shapes of ribs include neurofibromatosis 1 (twisted ribbon ribs)[16] and Melnick–Needles syndrome (wavy ribs with diaphyseal constrictions and curvature in long bones),[17] among others ([Fig. 13]).


#
Abnormality in the Thoracic Spine
Campomelic dysplasia: It is diagnosed antenatally commonly with key features including narrow thorax, bowed femur and tibia, and hypoplastic scapulae. Imaging findings include the absence of thoracic vertebral pedicles. Other important features include hypoplastic scapulae, occasional short bowed upper limbs, and 11 pairs of ribs[18] ([Fig. 14]). Other imaging features are listed in [Table 1].


Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita (SEDC): This is a form of collagenopathy, having clinical features secondary to multiple organ affection. CXR shows universal platyspondyly (more evident on a lateral view) with maintained bone density, kyphoscoliosis, and delayed ossification of humeral epiphysis.[19] Secondary to the epiphyseal abnormality, early degenerative changes may be evident at multiple joints. Other imaging features are listed in [Table 1].
Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia tarda (SEDT): Many forms exist. Diagnostic imaging findings on a CXR include platyspondyly with posterior “heaping” of vertebral bodies ([Fig. 15]). Visualized epiphyses show irregularity and early degenerative changes.[20]


Chondrodysplasia punctate (CDP): It has an abnormal epiphyseal osseous nucleus and has two main forms, rhizomelic type (lethal) and Conradi–Hünermann variety (milder type). Imaging findings on a CXR include stippling of vertebral bodies ([Fig. 16]), coronal clefting (lateral radiograph), kyphoscoliosis, and stippled epiphysis of the humerus. Short humeri are evident in the rhizomelic form.[21]


Spondylometaphyseal dysplasias (SMD): On a frontal CXR, the most prominent abnormalities lie in the long bone metaphyses[22] (discussed later).
#
Long Bone (Humerus/Ulna) Abnormal
Achondroplasia: It is the most common cause of congenital dwarfism (rhizomelic) resulting from disturbance in FGFR3 gene.[23] On a CXR, the most striking abnormality is a shortening of humeri (rhizomelic shortening).[24] The proximal humeral metaphyses are flared, and the inferior angle of scapula are square in shape ([Fig. 17]). On lateral CXR, several other imaging findings may be appreciated, namely, posterior scalloping of vertebral bodies, kyphoscoliosis, and short and thick pedicles[24]. Other characteristic imaging findings are discussed in [Table 1].[24]


Metaphyseal chondrodysplasia (MCD): Several forms exist (e.g., Schmid, McKusick, and Jansen type). The common imaging finding evident on a frontal CXR is irregularity and broadening of proximal humeral metaphyses[25] ([Fig. 18]). It is important to differentiate them from metabolic bone disease (rickets)[25] and spondylometaphyseal group of disorders. While rickets show reduced bone density, widening of growth plate, and widening of anterior rib ends, MCDs usually have normal bone density. A differentiation of MCD from SMD requires evaluation of a complete skeletal survey although a lateral CXR can also provide a clue about the shape and size of vertebrae. Differentiation between various types requires the analysis of patterns of metaphyseal involvement. Characteristic imaging findings are discussed in [Table 1].


SMD: It is a heterogeneous group of disorders consisting of several different varieties; SMD is manifested on radiographs as a combination of metaphyseal and spinal abnormalities. The spinal manifestations vary, ranging from universal platyspondyly and medially located rounded pedicles (in Kozlowski subtype) to rounded vertebral bodies (in Sutcliffe subtype)[22] ([Fig. 19]).


SEDC and SEDT: These entities are discussed above in the section “Abnormality in the Thoracic Spine.”
Non-accidental injury: This entity is mentioned above in the section “Abnormality in the Ribs.”
Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED): On a CXR, notable imaging findings of MED include delayed ossification of epiphysis with irregular flattened epiphysis, early osteoarthritic changes, and metaphyseal widening.[26]
Metatropic dysplasia: This rare dysplasia is evidenced on a frontal CXR with rhizomelic shortening with prominent metaphyseal flaring (resembling dumbbell appearance) of the humeri[27] ([Fig. 20]). Other features in chest radiograph include marked platyspondyly and kyphoscoliosis.[27]


Diastrophic dysplasia: Clinical clues in this dysplasia include a deformed “Hitchhiker's thumb” and cauliflower ear. On a frontal CXR, imaging findings include shortened long bones with metaphyseal flaring.[28]
Pseudoachondroplasia, MPS, EVC, HME, SEDC, and CDP also show abnormality in the long bones (discussed earlier).
#
Clavicle Abnormal
Cleidocranial dysostosis: It is characterized by defective ossification of membranous and enchondral bones ([Fig. 21]). Diagnostic imaging finding is an anomalous clavicular development (partly/completely absent). Other features in CXR include supernumerary ribs, short or oblique ribs, hemivertebrae, spina bifida occulta, biconvex bodies, and kyphoscoliosis (upper thoracic predominantly).[29] Other features are listed in [Table 1].[29]


Nonaccidental injury, MPS, JATD, and Caffey's disease also show abnormality in clavicles (discussed above).
#
Soft Tissue Abnormality
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: It involves progressive ossification of soft tissue (striated muscle, ligaments, tendon, fascia, and aponeuroses) with associated congenital microdactyly of great toe, and hallux valgus. CXR may show sheet-like soft tissue ossification in the lateral chest wall, axilla, and neck ([Fig. 22]).[30] Secondary to these heterotopic ossifications, variable spinal deformities may ensue, eventually leading to restrictive lung disease and respiratory failure.[30]


Calcinosis universalis: It is characterized by the diffusion of calcium deposition (extensive sheet like) in skin, subcutaneous tissue, tendons, or muscles.[31]
#
#
Reduced Bone Density
Abnormality in Ribs and/or Thoracic Spine
Achondrogenesis: This lethal dysplasia is characterized by decreased bone mineralization, micromelia, short trunk, and macrocranium. On a CXR, the crucial imaging finding is poor ossification of vertebral bodies[32] (nonvisualized vertebral bodies and only pedicles visualized). Other features in chest radiograph include shortened long bones (as a result of multiple intrauterine fractures) and thin ribs with/without fracture (fracture in Type 1A).[32]
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI): It is characterized by reduced bone density with increased fragility due to abnormal type I collagen. It has different types of varying severity. Imaging findings include diffuse osteopenia, platyspondyly/codfish vertebra, thin ribs, and multiple fractures with/without hypertrophic callus formation[33] ([Fig. 23]). Secondary to multiple repeated fractures, several deformities may be evident. Ossification of interosseous membrane is a typical imaging finding in type V OI. Popcorn calcification and dense metaphyseal bands can be seen.[33] Other characteristic imaging findings are discussed in [Table 1].[33]


#
Abnormality in Long Bones
Achondrogenesis: It is explained in “Reduced Bone Density” section.
OI: It is mentioned above
#
#
Increased Bone Density
There are few skeletal dysplasias which present with diffuse increased bone density; however, increased bone density can be a normal finding in a neonatal CXR and needs to be meticulously evaluated.
Abnormality in the Ribs/Spine
Osteopetrosis: It is caused by defective osteoclastic resorption leading to abnormal bone maturation with the formation of dense and brittle bones. Severe cases are diagnosed in infancy with clinical features including anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, bleeding episodes, fractures, and failure to thrive. Diagnostic imaging pointers are sclerotic ribs with obliteration of medullary cavity, sclerotic clavicle, and humeri with “bone within bone” appearance, sandwich vertebrae on a lateral CXR, and evidence of repeated fractures[34] ([Fig. 24]).


Pyknodysostosis: This often comes as an imaging differential of osteopetrosis. It is characterized by osteosclerosis; however, medullary canal of long bones is preserved (versus osteopetrosis).[35] Dense vertebral bodies with sparing of the transverse processes and a typical “spool shape” are described. Other important associated findings are acro-osteolysis, wide open sutures, obtuse mandibular angle, etc.[36]
#
Long Bone (Humerus/Ulna) Abnromal
Several other sclerosing bone dysplasias may present with sclerosis of long bones, namely, osteopathia striata, melorheostosis, progressive diaphyseal dysplasias, and craniodiaphyseal dysplasias ([Fig. 25]). While some (melorrheostosis) may have characteristic imaging findings on a single CXR,[37] most of them require a full skeletal survey and clinical details to reach a diagnosis.


#
#
The Role of Chest X-Ray Alone in Making the Diagnosis
Most often, CXR is useful as a part of the whole skeletal survey. However, there are a few conditions where the diagnosis of the specific skeletal dysplasia/close differential can be reasonably accurately made on a CXR alone. These are listed in [Table 2]. There are few dysplasias where CXR is diagnostic at birth as listed in [Table 3].
Abbreviation: CXR, chest X-ray.
JATD SRPS Achondroplasia Osteogenesis imperfecta |
Abbreviations: CXR, chest X-ray; JATD, Jeune's asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy; SRPS, short-rib polydactyly syndromes.
#
Conclusion
Skeletal dysplasia is not a single-film imaging diagnosis. It requires evaluation of the complete skeletal survey, along with appropriate clinical details. However, often the CXR may be the first imaging clue to an unsuspecting case, being evaluated for unrelated causes. Hence, radiologists should be aware of the various subtle and overt imaging findings of different dysplasias on a CXR. Segment-wise approach toward skeletal abnormalities in a CXR is given in [Fig. 26].


#
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Declaration of Patient Consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Availability of Data and Material
Data available on request.
Contribution of Authors
R.J. contributed to data collection, literature review, and analysis and drafted the manuscript and critical revision. P.N. contributed to data collection, literature review, and analysis and drafted the manuscript and critical revision. N.G. contributed to data collection, literature review, analysis, and critical revision. P.S. contributed to data collection, literature review, and analysis and drafted the manuscript. M.K. contributed to data collection, literature review, analysis, and critical revision. A.K.G. contributed to data collection, literature review, analysis, and critical revision. M.J. contributed to data collection, literature review, and analysis and drafted the manuscript and critical revision.
-
References
- 1 Mortier GR, Cohn DH, Cormier-Daire V. et al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2019 revision. Am J Med Genet A 2019; 179 (12) 2393-2419
- 2 Palmucci S, Attinà G, Lanza ML. et al. Imaging findings of mucopolysaccharidoses: a pictorial review. Insights Imag 2013; 4 (04) 443-459
- 3 Lai LM, Lachman RS. Early characteristic radiographic changes in mucolipidosis II. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46 (12) 1713-1720
- 4 Tandon A, Bhargava SK, Goel S, Bhatt S. Pseudoachondroplasia: a rare cause of rhizomelic dwarfism. Indian J Orthop 2008; 42 (04) 477-479
- 5 Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20 (05) 1407-1434
- 6 Park Y-K. Multiple enchondromatosis (Ollier's Disease). In: Santini-Araujo E, Kalil RK, Bertoni F, Park Y-K. eds. Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of Bone: For Surgical Pathologists, Orthopedic Surgeons and Radiologists. London: Springer; 2015: 253-258
- 7 Kushchayeva YS, Kushchayev SV, Glushko TY. et al. Fibrous dysplasia for radiologists: beyond ground glass bone matrix. Insights Imag 2018; 9 (06) 1035-1056
- 8 Turnpenny PD, Sloman M, Dunwoodie S. ICVS (International Consortium for Vertebral Anomalies and Scoliosis). Spondylocostal Dysostosis, Autosomal Recessive. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ, Stephens K. et al., eds. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1993. [cited 2020 Dec 20].
- 9 Dwek JR. The radiographic approach to child abuse. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (03) 776-789
- 10 Handa A, Voss U, Hammarsjö A, Grigelioniene G, Nishimura G. Skeletal ciliopathies: a pattern recognition approach. Jpn J Radiol 2020; 38 (03) 193-206
- 11 de Vries J, Yntema JL, van Die CE, Crama N, Cornelissen EAM, Hamel BCJ. Jeune syndrome: description of 13 cases and a proposal for follow-up protocol. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169 (01) 77-88
- 12 Popli MB, Popli V. Ellis-van Creveld syndrome. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2002; 12 (04) 549-550
- 13 Ohashi I, Enomoto Y, Naruto T. et al. A severe form of Ellis-van Creveld syndrome caused by novel mutations in EVC2 . Hum Genome Var 2019; 6: 40
- 14 Phatak SV, Kolwadkar PK, Phatak MS. Pictorial essay: infantile cortical hyperostosis (Caffey's disease). Indian J Radiol Imaging 2004; 14 (02) 185-186
- 15 Yochum TR, Rowe LJ. Yochum and Rowe's Essentials of Skeletal Radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins; 2005
- 16 Glass RBJ, Norton KI, Mitre SA, Kang E. Pediatric ribs: a spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 2002; 22 (01) 87-104
- 17 Oh CH, Lee CH, Kim SY, Lee S-Y, Jun HH, Lee S. A family of Melnick-Needles syndrome: a case report. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20 (01) 1-6
- 18 Kaissi AA, van Egmond-Fröhlich A, Ryabykh S. et al. Spine malformation complex in 3 diverse syndromic entities: case reports. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (50) e5505
- 19 Themes UFO. Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia Congenita. 2020 [cited 20 Dec 2020]. Accessed November 29, 2022 at: https://radiologykey.com/spondyloepiphyseal-dysplasia-congenita/
- 20 Lakhkar BN, Raphael R. Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia: an evaluation of six cases. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2003; 13: 199-202
- 21 Morthy NL, Venkataratnam I, Rao RP, Rani MS. Images: Chondro- dysplasia punctata. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2002; 12 (03) 397-398
- 22 Duarte ML, Duarte ÉR, Solorzano DB, Solorzano EB, Ferreira Jde A. Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia: an uncommon disease. Radiol Bras 2017; 50 (01) 63-63
- 23 Aviezer D, Golembo M, Yayon A. Fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 as a therapeutic target for achondroplasia—genetic short limbed dwarfism. Curr Drug Targets 2003; 4 (05) 353-365
- 24 Sargar KM, Singh AK, Kao SC. Imaging of skeletal disorders caused by fibroblast growth factor receptor gene mutations. Radiographics 2017; 37 (06) 1813-1830
- 25 Pediatrics - Orthobullets Metaphyseal Chondrodysplasia - Pediatrics - Orthobullets. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 28]. Accessed November 29, 2022 at: https://www.orthobullets.com/pediatrics/4099/metaphyseal-chondrodysplasia
- 26 Yadav P, Narula M. Dysplasia epiphysealis multiplex. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2000; 10: 267-268
- 27 Kannu P, Aftimos S, Mayne V, Donnan L, Savarirayan R. Metatropic dysplasia: clinical and radiographic findings in 11 patients demonstrating long-term natural history. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A (21) 2512-2522
- 28 Bonafé L, Mittaz-Crettol L, Ballhausen D, Superti-Furga A. Diastrophic dysplasia. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ, Stephens K. et al., eds. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1993. [cited 2020 Dec 20].
- 29 Patil PP, Barpande SR, Bhavthankar JD, Humbe JG. Cleidocranial dysplasia: a clinico-radiographic spectrum with differential diagnosis. J Orthop Case Rep 2015; 5 (02) 21-24
- 30 Al-Salmi I, Raniga S, Hadidi AA. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva—radiological findings: a case report. Oman Med J 2014; 29 (05) 368-370
- 31 Hwang Z-A, Suh KJ, Chen D, Chan WP, Wu JS. Imaging features of soft-tissue calcifications and related diseases: a systematic approach. Korean J Radiol 2018; 19 (06) 1147-1160
- 32 Hattapoğlu S, Durmaz MS. Radiological features of achondrogenesis type 1A: case report and review of the literature. Med J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 6 (01) 1115-1118
- 33 Renaud A, Aucourt J, Weill J. et al. Radiographic features of osteogenesis imperfecta. Insights Imaging 2013; 4 (04) 417-429
- 34 Gangadhar SR, Prakashchandra SP, Rupal P. Osteopetrosis with typical radiological findings. Rare case report. Int J Anatomy, Radiol Surg 2015; 4: 36-38
- 35 Ihde LL, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CJ. et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: review and differentiation from other causes of osteosclerosis. Radiographics 2011; 31 (07) 1865-1882
- 36 Pawar SS, Bhorge V. Pyknodystosis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2001; 11 (03) 151-151
- 37 Boulet C, Madani H, Lenchik L. et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: genetic, clinical and radiology update of hereditary and non-hereditary disorders. Br J Radiol 2016; 89 (1062): 20150349
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
19 September 2023
© 2022. Indographics. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Mortier GR, Cohn DH, Cormier-Daire V. et al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2019 revision. Am J Med Genet A 2019; 179 (12) 2393-2419
- 2 Palmucci S, Attinà G, Lanza ML. et al. Imaging findings of mucopolysaccharidoses: a pictorial review. Insights Imag 2013; 4 (04) 443-459
- 3 Lai LM, Lachman RS. Early characteristic radiographic changes in mucolipidosis II. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46 (12) 1713-1720
- 4 Tandon A, Bhargava SK, Goel S, Bhatt S. Pseudoachondroplasia: a rare cause of rhizomelic dwarfism. Indian J Orthop 2008; 42 (04) 477-479
- 5 Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20 (05) 1407-1434
- 6 Park Y-K. Multiple enchondromatosis (Ollier's Disease). In: Santini-Araujo E, Kalil RK, Bertoni F, Park Y-K. eds. Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of Bone: For Surgical Pathologists, Orthopedic Surgeons and Radiologists. London: Springer; 2015: 253-258
- 7 Kushchayeva YS, Kushchayev SV, Glushko TY. et al. Fibrous dysplasia for radiologists: beyond ground glass bone matrix. Insights Imag 2018; 9 (06) 1035-1056
- 8 Turnpenny PD, Sloman M, Dunwoodie S. ICVS (International Consortium for Vertebral Anomalies and Scoliosis). Spondylocostal Dysostosis, Autosomal Recessive. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ, Stephens K. et al., eds. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1993. [cited 2020 Dec 20].
- 9 Dwek JR. The radiographic approach to child abuse. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (03) 776-789
- 10 Handa A, Voss U, Hammarsjö A, Grigelioniene G, Nishimura G. Skeletal ciliopathies: a pattern recognition approach. Jpn J Radiol 2020; 38 (03) 193-206
- 11 de Vries J, Yntema JL, van Die CE, Crama N, Cornelissen EAM, Hamel BCJ. Jeune syndrome: description of 13 cases and a proposal for follow-up protocol. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169 (01) 77-88
- 12 Popli MB, Popli V. Ellis-van Creveld syndrome. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2002; 12 (04) 549-550
- 13 Ohashi I, Enomoto Y, Naruto T. et al. A severe form of Ellis-van Creveld syndrome caused by novel mutations in EVC2 . Hum Genome Var 2019; 6: 40
- 14 Phatak SV, Kolwadkar PK, Phatak MS. Pictorial essay: infantile cortical hyperostosis (Caffey's disease). Indian J Radiol Imaging 2004; 14 (02) 185-186
- 15 Yochum TR, Rowe LJ. Yochum and Rowe's Essentials of Skeletal Radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins; 2005
- 16 Glass RBJ, Norton KI, Mitre SA, Kang E. Pediatric ribs: a spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 2002; 22 (01) 87-104
- 17 Oh CH, Lee CH, Kim SY, Lee S-Y, Jun HH, Lee S. A family of Melnick-Needles syndrome: a case report. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20 (01) 1-6
- 18 Kaissi AA, van Egmond-Fröhlich A, Ryabykh S. et al. Spine malformation complex in 3 diverse syndromic entities: case reports. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (50) e5505
- 19 Themes UFO. Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia Congenita. 2020 [cited 20 Dec 2020]. Accessed November 29, 2022 at: https://radiologykey.com/spondyloepiphyseal-dysplasia-congenita/
- 20 Lakhkar BN, Raphael R. Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia: an evaluation of six cases. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2003; 13: 199-202
- 21 Morthy NL, Venkataratnam I, Rao RP, Rani MS. Images: Chondro- dysplasia punctata. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2002; 12 (03) 397-398
- 22 Duarte ML, Duarte ÉR, Solorzano DB, Solorzano EB, Ferreira Jde A. Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia: an uncommon disease. Radiol Bras 2017; 50 (01) 63-63
- 23 Aviezer D, Golembo M, Yayon A. Fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 as a therapeutic target for achondroplasia—genetic short limbed dwarfism. Curr Drug Targets 2003; 4 (05) 353-365
- 24 Sargar KM, Singh AK, Kao SC. Imaging of skeletal disorders caused by fibroblast growth factor receptor gene mutations. Radiographics 2017; 37 (06) 1813-1830
- 25 Pediatrics - Orthobullets Metaphyseal Chondrodysplasia - Pediatrics - Orthobullets. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 28]. Accessed November 29, 2022 at: https://www.orthobullets.com/pediatrics/4099/metaphyseal-chondrodysplasia
- 26 Yadav P, Narula M. Dysplasia epiphysealis multiplex. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2000; 10: 267-268
- 27 Kannu P, Aftimos S, Mayne V, Donnan L, Savarirayan R. Metatropic dysplasia: clinical and radiographic findings in 11 patients demonstrating long-term natural history. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A (21) 2512-2522
- 28 Bonafé L, Mittaz-Crettol L, Ballhausen D, Superti-Furga A. Diastrophic dysplasia. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ, Stephens K. et al., eds. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1993. [cited 2020 Dec 20].
- 29 Patil PP, Barpande SR, Bhavthankar JD, Humbe JG. Cleidocranial dysplasia: a clinico-radiographic spectrum with differential diagnosis. J Orthop Case Rep 2015; 5 (02) 21-24
- 30 Al-Salmi I, Raniga S, Hadidi AA. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva—radiological findings: a case report. Oman Med J 2014; 29 (05) 368-370
- 31 Hwang Z-A, Suh KJ, Chen D, Chan WP, Wu JS. Imaging features of soft-tissue calcifications and related diseases: a systematic approach. Korean J Radiol 2018; 19 (06) 1147-1160
- 32 Hattapoğlu S, Durmaz MS. Radiological features of achondrogenesis type 1A: case report and review of the literature. Med J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 6 (01) 1115-1118
- 33 Renaud A, Aucourt J, Weill J. et al. Radiographic features of osteogenesis imperfecta. Insights Imaging 2013; 4 (04) 417-429
- 34 Gangadhar SR, Prakashchandra SP, Rupal P. Osteopetrosis with typical radiological findings. Rare case report. Int J Anatomy, Radiol Surg 2015; 4: 36-38
- 35 Ihde LL, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CJ. et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: review and differentiation from other causes of osteosclerosis. Radiographics 2011; 31 (07) 1865-1882
- 36 Pawar SS, Bhorge V. Pyknodystosis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2001; 11 (03) 151-151
- 37 Boulet C, Madani H, Lenchik L. et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: genetic, clinical and radiology update of hereditary and non-hereditary disorders. Br J Radiol 2016; 89 (1062): 20150349



















































