Key words
ectopic pregnancy - human chorionic gonadotropin - methotrexate - single dose - multiple
dose - gynecology - infertility
Schlüsselwörter
ektope Schwangerschaft - humanes Choriongonadotropin - Methotrexat - Einzeldosis -
mehrfache Dosen - Gynäkologie - Infertilität
Introduction
Ectopic pregnancy (EP), defined as the implantation of a fertilized ovum outside of
the endometrial cavity, accounts for approximately 1.3 – 2% of all pregnancies, and
it is the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in the first trimester [1], [2]. While several mechanisms have been proposed in the etiopathogenesis of EP, the
main reasons for it are the partial obstruction of and defective ciliar movements
in fallopian tubes [3].
It is important to remember that the risk factors of EP include a history of pelvic
inflammatory disease, intrauterine device use (especially with progesterone), advanced
maternal age, smoking, a history of tubal surgery, and a history of infertility, endometriosis
and assisted reproductive technology therapy; it is important to note that risk factors
can be undetected in more than half of all EP cases [4], [5]. Pelvic or abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and amenorrhea are the most common
symptoms in EP, which most often occurs in the fallopian tubes [3], [6].
Due to the widespread use of sensitive quantitative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin
(β-hCG) assays and high-resolution ultrasonography (USG) in recent years, the possibility
of early diagnosis in EP has increased, and a mortality rate decrease of up to 90%
is possible with early intervention [7], [8]. Nevertheless, the relative mortality risk is 10 times greater with EP than with
vaginal birth, and it is 50 times greater than with a legal abortion [9]. Today, the goal of EP treatment is not only to save a motherʼs life; it should
also aim to preserve fertility and reduce the cost of infertility treatment [10].
Based on the clinical situation of each patient, three basic approaches are used to
treat and manage EP: expectant management, medical treatment and surgical treatment.
Patients who are hemodynamically stable, suitable for long-term follow-up, have a
small ectopic mass and no rupture findings (blood or coagulum) on transvaginal USG
are candidates for expectant management, and they can be followed using serial serum
β-hCG measurement (8,10). Immediate surgical intervention should be considered for
patients that are hemodynamically unstable and have acute abdominal findings of ruptured
EP [11].
Medical treatment is the logical and cost-effective choice for unruptured EP, and
the most commonly used and preferred agent in the world is methotrexate (MTX), which
was first used in 1982 and which is a folic acid antagonist preventing purin-pyrimidine
synthesis [12]. The two most common MTX treatment protocols are a single-dose regimen and a multiple-dose
regimen, and the literature has reported success rates of 88 and 92.7%, respectively.
Previous studies have found that there was no difference in success rates between
a single dose of MTX and multiple-dose MTX treatment [4], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Adverse effects, such as stomatitis, conjunctivitis, gastritis, enteritis, dermatitis,
pneumonitis, alopecia, elevated liver enzymes, and bone marrow suppression, are rarely
seen because the doses of MTX used in EP treatment are lower than the doses used to
treat malignancies [4].
The single-dose regimen is preferred because it is low in cost, only requires a single
injection, requires fewer hospital visits, does not require the use of folinic acid
to rescue the treatment, and 50 mg/m2 of MTX can be administered intramuscularly on the day of diagnosis [4], [14]. In the literature, a > 15% decrease in the level of β-hCG between Day 0 and Day
4 is considered to be a successful treatment [13], [14], and a > 15% β-hCG decrease between Day 4 and Day 7 is generally acceptable [17].
In this present study, we aimed to compare the results of expectant management, single
and multidose methotrexate and surgical management of EP cases between May 2009 and
December 2016 in our clinic.
Materials and Method
Study design and population
This retrospective cohort study was performed on women diagnosed with EP between May
1, 2009 and December 31, 2016 at the Gynecology Department of Konya Education and
Research Hospital (a tertiary referral center), in Konya, Turkey. This study was approved
by the institutionʼs local ethics committee, and all the women provided written informed
consent before undergoing treatment. Data on the EP treatment were collected from
the patientsʼ files and the hospital medical records, and were analyzed retrospectively.
Sociodemographic characteristics included age, body mass index (BMI), clinical presentation,
the use of contraceptive methods, a history of EP, a history of previous abdominal
or pelvic surgery, a history of infertility treatment, smoking, gravidity, parity,
miscarriage, gestational age, pelvic USG findings (gestational sac, ectopic mass appearance,
positive fetal cardiac activity), serum β-hCG levels on Day 0, Day 4, and Day 7, and
a history of surgical procedures and hospital stays for women who underwent surgical
interventions.
Diagnosis and treatment protocol
At our clinic, the diagnosis of EP was performed via persistent increase in β-hCG
levels without the presence of intrauterine pregnancy or not showing the villi histopathologically
in an endometrial biopsy. Patients that were hemodynamically stable and had a > 15%
decrease in their daily β-hCG measurement were treated using expectant management,
and spontaneous resorption of EP was expected. Patients who were hemodynamically unstable,
had signs of intra-abdominal bleeding, desired elective surgery, were breastfeeding
a baby, or who had peptic ulcer, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, hematological, or immunological
diseases underwent surgery. Patients that were hemodynamically stable and had an abnormal
serum β-hCG increase (< 50% increase over two consecutive days or whose levels had
plateaued) were given MTX. For the single-dose protocol, after calculating the patientʼs
body surface area, 50 mg/m2 MTX was administered intramuscularly and the serum β-hCG levels were measured on
Day 0, Day 4, and Day 7. If the β-hCG value measured on the seventh day decreased
by > 15% in comparison to the β-hCG value measured on the fourth day, serial β-hCG
measurements were performed until the β-hCG level was < 15 mIU/L. If the decrease
in β-hCG levels was < 15% between Day 4 and Day 7, a second dose of MTX was administered.
Similarly, for the single-dose regimen, it was expected that the β-hCG level measured
on the seventh day would decrease by > 15% from the β-hCG level measured on the fourth
day. If that did not occur, a third and final dose of MTX was administered. After
receiving three doses of MTX, if the decrease in the β-hCG level was not > 15% between
Day 4 and Day 7, surgical intervention was required.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL,
USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was used to determine if the continuous
variables had normal or abnormal distributions, while one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) and paired-sample t-tests were used for the normally distributed continuous
variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the abnormally distributed
continuous variables. When the Kruskal-Wallis test indicated statistically significant
differences, the causes of those differences were determined using a Bonferroni-adjusted
Mann-Whitney U test. The nominal variables were analyzed using either Pearsonʼs chi-squared
test or Fisherʼs exact test, when applicable. The continuous variables were presented
as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the categorical variables were presented
as the number of cases and the percentage. Logistic regression analysis was used to
identify the factors that required the use of additional doses of MTX. A receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the threshold values
for changes in the β-hCG levels between Day 0 and Day 4 and Day 4 and Day 7 for an
additional MTX dose. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Demographic data
A total of 233 diagnosed cases of EP were reviewed. According to our clinical protocol,
24 of the 233 patients were treated using expectant management (Group 1), 144 were
treated with a single dose of MTX (Group 2), 25 were treated with a multiple dose
of MTX (Group 3), and the remaining 40 patients underwent surgical intervention (Group
4).
The sociodemographic characteristics and USG findings of the patients with EP are
presented in [Table 1]. The patients in all four groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, BMI,
the main complaint on admission, contraceptive method use, history of EP, previous
abdominal or pelvic surgery, history of infertility treatment, smoking, gravidity,
parity and miscarriage. Gestational age was lower in Group 1 than in the other groups
(p = 0.007). The percentage of ectopic mass appearance and positive fetal cardiac
activity measured using transvaginal USG was greater in Group 4 than in the other
groups (p < 0.001). While the diameter of the ectopic mass was smaller in Group 1
than in the other groups, it was larger in Group 4 (p < 0.001).
Table 1 Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics and USG findings in patients with
ectopic pregnancy.
|
Group 1
Expectant management (n = 24)
|
Group 2
Single dose methotrexate (n = 144)
|
Group 3
Multiple dose methotrexate (n = 25)
|
Group 4
Surgical intervention (n = 40)
|
p-value
|
BMI: body mass index; USG: ultrasonography
* statistically significant
1 group 1 vs. group 2, 2 group 1 vs. group 3, 3 group 1 vs. group 4, 4 group 2 vs. group 3, 5 group 2 vs. group 4, 6 group 3 vs. group 4
|
Age (years)
|
29.88 ± 4.94
|
31.64 ± 4.97
|
31.76 ± 4.38
|
31.10 ± 4.40
|
0.387
|
BMI (kg/m2)
|
23.28 ± 1.91
|
23.72 ± 1.96
|
23.96 ± 2.19
|
24.35 ± 2.16
|
0.176
|
Clinical presentation (%)
|
|
|
|
|
0.486
|
|
4 (16.7)
|
44 (30.6)
|
6 (24.0)
|
12 (30.0)
|
|
|
2 (8.3)
|
36 (25.0)
|
6 (24.0)
|
11 (27.5)
|
|
|
4 (16.7)
|
29 (20.1)
|
5 (20.0)
|
8 (20.0)
|
|
|
3 (12.5)
|
7 (4.9)
|
2 (8.0)
|
1 (2.5)
|
|
|
6 (25.0)
|
15 (10.4)
|
4 (16.0)
|
4 (10.0)
|
|
|
5 (20.8)
|
13 (9.0)
|
2 (8.0)
|
4 (10.0)
|
|
Contraception (%)
|
|
|
|
|
0.115
|
|
16 (66.7)
|
97 (67.4)
|
10 (40.0)
|
17 (42.5)
|
|
|
2 (8.3)
|
15 (10.4)
|
3 (12.0)
|
5 (12.5)
|
|
|
1 (4.2)
|
6 (4.2)
|
2 (8.0)
|
3 (7.5)
|
|
|
1 (4.2)
|
4 (2.8)
|
4 (16.0)
|
4 (10.0)
|
|
|
4 (16.7)
|
22 (15.3)
|
6 (24.0)
|
11 (27.5)
|
|
History of ectopic pregnancy (%)
|
3 (12.5)
|
16 (11.1)
|
3 (12.0)
|
9 (22.5)
|
0.310
|
Previous intra-abdominal or pelvic surgery (%)
|
1 (4.2)
|
8 (5.6)
|
3 (12.0)
|
6 (15.0)
|
0.173
|
History of infertility treatment (%)
|
2 (8.3)
|
16 (11.1)
|
4 (12.0)
|
9 (22.5)
|
0.240
|
Smoking (%)
|
4 (16.7)
|
24 (16.8)
|
6 (24.0)
|
12 (30.0)
|
0.267
|
Gravidity
|
2.08 ± 1.65
|
2.51 ± 1.33
|
2.80 ± 1.25
|
2.85 ± 1.64
|
0.115
|
Parity
|
1.42 ± 0.80
|
1.87 ± 0.94
|
1.72 ± 1.24
|
2.10 ± 1.25
|
0.063
|
Miscarriage
|
0.67 ± 0.53
|
0.64 ± 0.54
|
1.08 ± 0.75
|
0.88 ± 0.58
|
0.056
|
Gestational age (day)
|
49.58 ± 4.791,2,3
|
53.63 ± 9.141
|
55.96 ± 7.642
|
56.30 ± 4.433
|
0.007*
|
Findings on USG (%)
|
|
|
|
|
< 0.001*
|
|
8 (33.3)
|
55 (38.2)
|
12 (48.0)
|
7 (17.5)
|
|
|
16 (66.)
|
87 (60.4)
|
11 (44.0)
|
24 (60.0)
|
|
|
0 (0)
|
2 (1.4)
|
2 (8.0)
|
9 (22.5)
|
|
Diameter of ectopic mass (mm)
|
18.04 ± 4.901,2,3
|
22.60 ± 6.911,5
|
23.80 ± 6.482,6
|
30.25 ± 3.123,5,6
|
< 0.001*
|
Laboratory outcomes
A comparison of the β-hCG concentrations on Day 0, Day 4, and Day 7 between the groups
is shown in [Table 2]. A statistically significant difference between the groups was observed (p < 0.001).
The changes in the β-hCG values in the groups from Day 0 to Day 4 and from Day 4 to
Day 7 after administration of MTX are presented in [Table 3]. A statistically significant difference between the groups was observed (p < 0.001).
Table 2 The β-hCG levels in all four groups on Day 0, Day 4, and Day 7.
β-hCG
|
Group 1
Expectant management (n = 24)
|
Group 2
Single dose methotrexate (n = 144)
|
Group 3
Multiple dose methotrexate (n = 25)
|
Group 4
Surgical intervention (n = 40)
|
p-value
|
* statistically significant
1 group 1 vs. group 2, 2 group 1 vs. group 3, 3 group 1 vs. group 4, 4 group 2 vs. group 3, 5 group 2 vs. group 4, 6 group 3 vs. group 4
|
Day 0
|
1160.00 ± 289.601,2,3
|
1667.43 ± 677.191,4,5
|
2356.20 ± 675.682,4,6
|
4469.13 ± 1194.003,5,6
|
< 0.001*
|
Day 4
|
756.25 ± 177.331,2
|
1445.16 ± 630.611,4
|
2024.00 ± 620.562,4
|
–
|
< 0.001*
|
Day 7
|
539.17 ± 134.521,2
|
1144.84 ± 593.71,4
|
1626.64 ± 580.352,4
|
–
|
< 0.001*
|
Table 3 Changes in the β-hCG values in all four groups from Day 0 to Day 4 and from Day 4
to Day 7 after methotrexate administration.
|
Group 1
Expectant management (n = 24)
|
Group 2
Single dose methotrexate (n = 144)
|
Group 3
Multiple dose methotrexate (n = 25)
|
p-value
|
* statistically significant
1 group 1 vs. group 2, 2 group 1 vs. group 3, 3 group 2 vs. group 3
|
Day 4 – 0
|
403.75 ± 132.281,2
|
222.27 ± 65.821,3
|
332.20 ± 76.752,3
|
< 0.001*
|
Day 7 – 4
|
217.08 ± 61.371,2
|
300.31 ± 72.541,3
|
397.35 ± 81.042,3
|
< 0.001*
|
p-value
|
< 0.001*
|
< 0.001*
|
0.006*
|
|
In the ROC analysis ([Fig. 1]), the cut-off value for changes in the β-hCG level was 18% between Day 0 and Day
4 (AUC = 0.726, p < 0.001); for Day 4 and Day 7 the cut-off value was 15% (AUC = 0.874,
p < 0.001) for an additional MTX dose. The logistic regression analysis results showed
that the probability of the requirement for an additional dose of methotrexate was
0.78 (95% CI 0.71 – 0.87; p < 0.001) times lower in patients who had a > 18% decrease
in β-hCG levels from Day 0 to Day 4 in comparison to those who had a decrease < 18%
in those levels from Day 0 to Day 4. Moreover, the probability of the requirement
for an additional dose of MTX was 1.64 (95% CI 1.25 – 2.16; p < 0.001) times greater
in patients who had a < 15% decrease in β-hCG levels from Day 4 to Day 7 in comparison
to those who had a > 15% decrease from Day 4 to Day 7.
Fig. 1 ROC curve for changes in the β-hCG level between Days 0 – 4 and Days 4 – 7 for an
additional MTX dose.
Serum β-hCG concentrations were decreased on Day 4 in comparison to Day 0 in 76.39%
of the patients who received a single dose of MTX and in 32.0% of patients who received
two or more doses of MTX. The positive predictive value (93.22%), the negative predictive
value (33.33%), sensitivity (76.39%), and specificity (68.0%) were calculated ([Table 4]). However, the β-hCG concentrations increased on Day 7 in comparison to Day 4 in
12.0% of the patients who received two or more doses of MTX and in 16.67% of the patients
who received a single dose of MTX (positive predictive value: 84.51%; negative predictive
value: 11.11%; sensitivity: 83.33%; specificity:12.0%) ([Table 5]).
Table 4 Analysis of patients based on differences between the β-hCG levels from Day 0 to
Day 4.
|
Single dose methotrexate (n = 144)
|
Multiple dose methotrexate (n = 25)
|
Total
|
PPV
|
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
|
|
Negative value
|
110
|
76.39
|
8
|
32.0
|
118
|
93.22%
|
Positive value
|
34
|
23.61
|
17
|
68.0
|
51
|
NPV
|
Total
|
144
|
100
|
25
|
100
|
169
|
33.33%
|
|
Sensitivity: 76.39
|
Specificity: 68.0
|
|
Table 5 Analysis of patients based on differences between the β-hCG levels from Day 4 to
Day 7.
|
Single dose methotrexate (n = 144)
|
Multiple dose methotrexate (n = 25)
|
Total
|
PPV
|
|
n
|
%
|
n
|
%
|
|
|
PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value
|
Negative value
|
120
|
83.33
|
22
|
88.0
|
142
|
84.51%
|
Positive value
|
24
|
16.67
|
3
|
12.0
|
27
|
NPV
|
Total
|
144
|
100
|
25
|
100
|
169
|
11.11%
|
|
Sensitivity: 83.33
|
Specificity: 12.0
|
|
The surgical procedures and hospital stay duration for patients with EP that underwent
surgical treatment are summarized in [Table 6]. In terms of surgical procedures, there was no difference between the laparatomy
and laparoscopy groups (p = 0.133), but the duration of hospital stay was less in
the laparoscopy group (p = 0.009).
Table 6 Surgical procedures and hospital stay duration in patients with ectopic pregnancy
who underwent surgical treatment.
|
Laparoscopy (n = 36)
|
Laparatomy (n = 4)
|
p-value
|
* statistically significant
|
Salpingostomy (%)
|
25 (69.4)
|
1 (25.0)
|
0.133
|
Salpingectomy (%)
|
9 (25.0)
|
3 (75.0)
|
Tubal abortion (%)
|
2 (5.6)
|
–
|
Hospital stay (days)
|
1.44 ± 0.50
|
2.75 ± 0.50
|
0.009*
|
While the number of days for resolution of the β-hCG levels in patients with EP was
lowest in Group 4, which consisted of patients that underwent a surgical intervention
(14.45 ± 4.43 days), it was highest in Group 2, which consisted of patients treated
with a single dose of MTX (21.85 ± 7.35 days) (p < 0.001).
Discussion
The current study investigated the results of EP treatment. Its findings show that
as the percentage of ectopic mass appearance, the presence of fetal cardiac activity,
the diameter of the ectopic mass and the initial serum β-hCG levels increase, the
rate of surgical intervention increases. Initial β-hCG values < 1500 mIU/L appear
to benefit from expectant management, while β-hCG values 1500 – 2000 mIU/L appear
to benefit from single-dose MTX therapy, and β-hCG values > 2000 mIU/L appear to benefit
from multiple-dose MTX therapy. This study also found that patients with a decrease
in the serum β-hCG levels > 18% between Day 0 and Day 4 were 0.78 times less likely
to require additional doses of MTX, and patients with a serum β-hCG level decrease
< 15% between Day 4 and day 7 were 1.64 times more likely to require additional doses
of MTX.
EP treatment depends on a patientʼs hemodynamic stability, compliance with long-term
follow-up, β-hCG levels, fertility needs, the size of the EP and the presence of fetal
cardiac activity [10].
Previous studies have reported that if the initial serum β-hCG values are < 1500 mIU/L
in unruptured tubal EP cases, routine use of MTX is not recommended, and these cases
may benefit from expectant management [10], [18], [19]. Pregnancies of unknown location with abnormal beta-human chorionic gonadotropin
trends are frequently treated as presumed ectopic pregnancies with methotrexate. Endometrial
aspiration with Karman cannula may be useful to diagnose pregnancy location so it
prevents women from exposure to MTX [18], [19]. It has been reported that the spontaneous resolution rate was 21% in patients with
initial serum β-hCG values > 1500 mIU/L and 15% in patients with initial serum β-hCG
values > 2000 mIU/L [20], [21]. Our study found that expectant management patients (10.3%) had initial serum β-hCG
values < 1500 mIU/L, which is lower than the rates reported in the literature because
our clinic is a tertiary center. Patients with EP are usually referred to our clinic
for medical treatment or surgical intervention.
MTX is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with appropriate criteria
for medical treatment (e.g., hemodynamic stability, fertility demand). The single-dose
MTX protocol is the most commonly used method for selected patients with EP, and the
success rate of this treatment has been reported in the literature to range between
52 and 94% [22], [23]. In our study, the treatment success rate was 83.33%. The success of single-dose
MTX therapy can be affected by the patientʼs serum β-hCG levels, positive fetal cardiac
activity, the presence of a yolk sac, and the size of the ectopic mass [14]. It has been suggested in the literature that treatment success is correlated with
serum β-hCG values, and different cut-off values, such as 1790 mIU/L and 2000 mIU/L,
have been reported [11], [14], [22], [24]. However, it has also been claimed that β-hCG levels do not affect the success of
MTX treatment [25]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Guidelines also suggest that
the single-dose MTX treatment regimen fails at high initial serum β-hCG levels, and
this treatment regimen is preferred over relatively low initial serum β-hCG levels.
In addition, hemodynamic unstability (signs of tubal rupture), severe abdominal or
pelvic pain, regardless of the change in β-hCG levels, and a > 53% increase in the
β-hCG levels after administration of a second dose of MTX in a single-dose MTX regimen
are accepted as a poor response to medical treatment [26]. We also observed that the success rate of single-dose MTX treatment decreased when
the initial serum β-hCG values were > 2000 mIU/L, which is consistent with the findings
reported in the literature. Medical treatment was not successful in patients with
positive fetal cardiac activity in MTX treatment groups. So, extrauterine pregnancies
with positive heart action should not be treated with MTX.
In a prospective randomized trial [4] comparing the success of single-dose MTX treatment versus multiple-dose MTX in patients
with unruptured EP, no difference was found between the two MTX treatment regimens;
this result is similar to the findings reported in previous studies [25], [27]. We suggest that single-dose MTX regimens should be preferred when the side effects
of multiple-dose MTX are considered. We did not find any difference in treatment success
between the two MTX regimens, which is in accordance with the results reported in
the literature.
It has been suggested that changes in the β-hCG values at Day 4 and Day 7, which were
used to measure MTX treatment success, extended the length of hospital stay, caused
unnecessary anxiety in patients, and increased the cost of treatment, so it has recently
been claimed that early changes in β-hCG values at Day 0 and Day 4 could predict treatment
success, and some cut-off values have been reported. The β-hCG values reported in
the literature are very different, ranging from a 9.08% decrease to a 22.0% decrease
in β-hCG levels between Day 0 and Day 4 [13], [14], [28], [29]. Agostini et al. [28] stipulated that a > 20% decrease in the β-hCG levels might predict the success rate
of treatment as a 97% positive predictive value. Ustunyurt et al. [13] proposed that a > 22% decrease in the β-hCG level might predict the treatment success
rate. Yildirim et al. [14] claimed that a > 22% decrease in β-hCG values might predict the treatment success
rate with 86.6% sensitivity. Bottin et al. [29] reported a 100% treatment success rate if the decrease in the β-hCG value is > 20%.
However, Dogan et al. [11] found that the decrease in β-hCG levels between Day 0 and Day 4 might not predict
treatment success. We found that a > 18% decrease in the β-hCG values between Day
0 and Day 4 might predict the treatment success rate with a sensitivity of 76.39%
and a positive predictive value of 93.22%.
A study conducted by Atkinson et al. [30] reported that a decrease in the β-hCG values between Day 4 and Day 7 was better
than a decrease in the β-hCG values between Day 0 and Day 4 in predicting the need
for an additional dose of MTX. When we analyzed our study results, we found that a > 15%
decrease in the β-hCG values between Day 4 and Day 7 might predict the treatment success
rate with a sensitivity of 83.33% and a positive predictive value of 84.51%.
The limitation of this study is its retrospective design, the strength of the article
is that all EP treatment options were compared.
In conclusion, if the initial serum β-hCG values are < 1500 mIU/L, expectant management
is the preferred course of treatment, without any medical or surgical intervention.
However, if the initial serum β-hCG values are > 1500 mIU/L, a single-dose MTX regimen
should be the first option for medical treatment. Optimal treatment in EP should be
based on the knowledge and skill of the physician as well as the patientʼs hemodynamic
status and fertility request, and the choice of treatment should be determined by
consulting with the patient. The changes in β-hCG values at Day 0 and Day 4 after
MTX administration can be considered to be criteria upon which to base the treatment;
however, prospective randomized studies involving a larger series are needed to substantiate
this claim and elucidate this issue.
Financial Support: None
Presented at a meeting: The abstract was presented as a poster presentation at ESGE
26th Annual Congress, 18th – 21st October 2017, Antalya Turkey.