J Neurol Surg B Skull Base
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769114
Technical Note

Soft Tissue Dissection in the Transcondylar Approach: A Modified Layered Technique to Maximize Lateral Access

Xiaochun Zhao
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
,
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
,
Sherwin A. Tavakol
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
,
Panayiotis E. Pelargos
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
,
Ian F. Dunn
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective While the transcondylar approach is technically challenging, it provides generous ventral and caudal exposure to the craniovertebral junction. This approach requires navigation around multiple eloquent neurovascular structures including the lower cranial nerves, vertebral artery and its branches, and the brainstem. Superficial exposure, including incision location and muscle dissection, can dramatically affect the surgical angle and maneuverability at depth.

Methods We demonstrate the transcondylar approach in a step-by-step fashion in a formalin-embalmed, latex-injected cadaver head. Dissection within each layer of the suboccipital muscles was performed. A small cohort with an illustrative case is also included herein.

Results The sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle was retracted anteriorly; the splenium capitis, semispinalis capitis, and longissimus capitis muscles were disconnected from the superior nuchal line and reflected inferomedially. The suboccipital muscle group was fully exposed. The superior and inferior oblique muscles were disconnected from the transverse process of C1. The superior oblique and the rectus capitis posterior major muscles were then dissected off the inferior nuchal line, and the suboccipital muscle group was retracted inferomedially en bloc. The greater auricular nerve was retracted laterally with the SCM, and the greater occipital nerve was retracted inferomedially with the suboccipital muscle group.

Conclusions This technique avoids the obstructive muscle bulk that results from a myocutaneous approach while maximizing deep exposure. Understanding the detailed muscular anatomical relationship with the insertion location and suboccipital nerves is key to complete and safe extracranial dissection. Diligent dissection helps minimize postoperative pain and muscle spasm while optimizing the closure technique.



Publication History

Received: 18 December 2022

Accepted: 24 April 2023

Article published online:
19 May 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Heros RC. Lateral suboccipital approach for vertebral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J Neurosurg 1986; 64 (04) 559-562
  • 2 George B, Dematons C, Cophignon J. Lateral approach to the anterior portion of the foramen magnum. Application to surgical removal of 14 benign tumors: technical note. Surg Neurol 1988; 29 (06) 484-490
  • 3 Bertalanffy H, Seeger W. The dorsolateral, suboccipital, transcondylar approach to the lower clivus and anterior portion of the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 1991; 29 (06) 815-821
  • 4 Babu RP, Sekhar LN, Wright DC. Extreme lateral transcondylar approach: technical improvements and lessons learned. J Neurosurg 1994; 81 (01) 49-59
  • 5 Meybodi AT, Lawton MT, Moreira LB. et al. Retromastoid-transmuscular identification and harvest of the occipital artery during retrosigmoid craniotomy. J Neurosurg 2019; 133: 538-545
  • 6 Tayebi Meybodi A, Zhao X, Borba Moreira L. et al. The inferior nuchal line as a simple landmark for identifying the vertebral artery during the retrosigmoid approach. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2020; 18 (03) 302-308
  • 7 Tayebi Meybodi A, Borba Moreira L, Zhao X, Preul MC, Lawton MT. Anatomical analysis of the vagoaccessory triangle and the triangles within: the suprahypoglossal, infrahypoglossal, and hypoglossal–hypoglossal triangles. World Neurosurg 2019; 126: e463-e472
  • 8 Lau T, Reintjes S, Olivera R, van Loveren HR, Agazzi S. C-shaped incision for far-lateral suboccipital approach: anatomical study and clinical correlation. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (02) 117-121
  • 9 McKinney P, Gottlieb J. The relationship of the great auricular nerve to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system. Ann Plast Surg 1985; 14 (04) 310-314
  • 10 Benet A, Tabani H, Ding X. et al. The transperiosteal “inside-out” occipital artery harvesting technique. J Neurosurg 2018; 130 (01) 207-212
  • 11 Zhao X, Tayebi Meybodi A, Borba Moreira L. et al. Efficient harvest of the occipital artery in the retrosigmoid approach: technical note. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 67: 231-233
  • 12 Tabani H, Gandhi S, Burkhardt J-K, Benet A, Lawton MT. Transperisosteal “Inside out” occipital artery harvest and occipital artery-anterior inferior cerebellar artery bypass for vertebrobasilar ischemia: 3-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 15 (01) 101
  • 13 Farooq J, Piper K, Yeung E. et al. Outcomes of arterial bypass for posterior circulation atherosclerosis: a case series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 24 (02) 145-153
  • 14 Campero A, Villalonga JF, Elizalde RL, Ajler P. The nuchal lines as anatomic landmarks to dissect the muscles in the far lateral approach. World Neurosurg 2018; 113: 188-194