Keywords youth - teens - adolescents - mental well-being - wellness - preuniversity colleges
Introduction
Teenage is a vital phase for building social and emotional elements that are significant
for overall well-being. Considering the physical and physiological development that
occurs in this period, the early and late adolescent groups are at quite distinct
life stages and are biologically, cognitively, socially, and emotionally noticeable.[1 ] Researchers have predicted that worldwide, nearly 20% of teens have behavioral or
mental health issues. The data showed that nearly 12.5% of children aged between 0
and 16 years were reported to have mental disorders.[2 ] In India, the highest number of suicide rates among adolescents was recorded in
the world. Juvenile delinquency, physical or sexual abuse, addiction to psychoactive
substances, academic rivalry, arrogance, frequent absenteeism from school, or dropping
out are the major concerns among teens.[3 ] These problems have a great impact on their involvement in curricular activities,
scholastic achievement, relationship building, and mental and emotional well-being.[1 ]
[4 ]
Around the globe, from the data, it is evident that nearly 10 to 20% of adolescents
experience mental health issues; yet they remain underdiagnosed and unsorted.[5 ] A report published in Mental Health America, 2022, depicted that 15.08% of youth
(between the age of 12 and 17 years) reported suffering from at least one major depressive
episode in the past year. Indicators of mental illness can be neglected for a number
of reasons, such as poor knowledge or understanding about mental well-being among
parents or stigma that prevents them from obtaining care.[5 ]
[6 ]
[7 ] Emotional instability commonly arises during the adolescent period. Hence, numerous
risk-taking behaviors, such as the use of psychoactive substances or sexual violence,
emerge during adolescence.[1 ]
[8 ] These behaviors can be an unfavorable approach to dealing with mental health issues
and can adversely affect and greatly influence the mental well-being of adolescents.[8 ]
Based on the literature available on youth, there are distinct aspects that are anticipated
to be problematic in nature and impede their mental well-being.[1 ] The results of the 2015 survey done by the National Crime Records Bureau stated
that around 8,934 adolescents commit suicide every year. In India, numerous studies
show the prevalence of mental illness among the teenage population ranges from 0.48
to 29.40%. School-going teenage girls are more prone to stress and depressive symptoms.
Almost 40 to 90% of the young population diagnosed with depressive disorder also showed
symptoms of anxiety disorders, substance abuse, conduct disorders, and personality
disorders.[5 ] Substance abuse is a national concern in developing countries. The survey conducted
in 2016 showed that the existence of binge drinking among the adolescent population
was almost one-fourth of a percentage point; furthermore, males were at great risk.[1 ]
[5 ]
It is vital to provide the necessary interventions to safeguard the mental health
of youth, which are driven to enhance the protective factors and upgrade the opportunities
to prevent risk-taking behaviours.[8 ]
[9 ] There are certain measures to be implemented to promote adolescent mental health
that aid in heightening resilience, so they can confront challenging circumstances
or hardships in a positive way.[1 ]
[2 ] Early detection and treatment involve addressing the needs of adolescents with defined
mental health conditions.[10 ] School and community-based interventions such as cognitive behavior models, life
skills, problem solving, and stress management are known to decrease anxiety and depressive
symptoms among youth.[6 ]
[11 ] Hence, health professionals need to take specific actions to promote mental well-being,
prevent mental disorders, provide care, enhance recovery, and reduce the mortality,
morbidity, and disability of persons with mental disorders, including adolescents.[1 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]
Materials and Methods
A cross-sectional descriptive survey was undertaken to assess the mental well-being
of adolescents. The investigator prepared a list of preuniversity colleges in Mangalore's
urban zone and selected six preuniversity colleges using cluster random sampling techniques.
A total of 720 adolescents between the ages of 16 and 17 years studying in the First
Year Arts, Commerce, and Science streams were selected for the study. The adolescents
who were studying at preuniversity colleges on part-time or evening courses as well
as being diagnosed with mental illness were excluded from the study. The sample size
was calculated based on the previous study results conducted by Kaur et al[14 ] by using a statistical formula:
where Zα =1.96 at 95% of C I,
p = 78.6% (80%),
allowable error (e) = 3%,
n = 718, and
final sample size = 720.
Data Collection Instruments
Part I: The demographic proforma consists of 13 items such as age (in years), gender, number
of siblings, stream of study, area of residence, family type, educational status of
the parents, occupational status of parents, family monthly income, and history of
alcohol or drug abuse among parents.
Part II: The Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS).[15 ] A standardized tool consisting of 14 items on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, 1 = none of
the time to 5 = all of the time, was used to assess the mental well-being of adolescents.
Scores range from a minimum of 14 to a maximum of 70 points. The reliability of the
instrument was found to be 0.89, which indicated that the tool was highly reliable.
The study was approved by the Institutional Central Ethics Committee with registration
number: NU/CEC/2020/0332 to carry out the study. Formal written permissions were obtained
from the author of the WEMWB scale and the principals of six selected preuniversity
colleges in the Mangalore zone. The pilot study was conducted in two preuniversity
colleges at Mangalore, and it was found feasible and practicable. The main study was
carried out from September 2021 to December 2021. Prior to the data collection, parental
assent and informed consent were obtained by the investigator. The subjects were briefed
on the aims and objectives of the study, and confidentiality was assured.
Statistical Analysis
The data analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
(SPSS) version 23.0. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, and
standard deviation were used to describe the demographic variables and total scores
of the WEMWB scale. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to find the association
between mental well-being and selected demographic variables.
Results
The demographic data of the adolescents showed that the mean age was 17 years. The
majority (n = 515, 71.9%) were males. With regard to the number of siblings, more than half (n = 417, 57.9%) of the adolescents had one to two siblings. The highest number of participants
(n = 460, 63.8%) belonged to commerce, 26.3% to science, and 9.9% to the arts streams.
Three-fourths of the participants (n = 515, 75.8%) were from nuclear families, 53.5% lived in urban areas. The majority
of them (n = 291:298, 40%) reported that their parents had a high-school education. Considering
the family's monthly income, 24.6% had a monthly income of Rs. 10,001 to Rs. 15,000
and 4.5% of the participants stated that their father consumed alcohol.
<insert [Table 1 ] here>
Table 1
Frequency, percentage distribution, mean, and standard deviation of mental well-being
among adolescents (N = 720).
Variable
Grading
Range of score
Frequency
(f)
Percentage
(%)
Mean ± SD
Mean %
Level of mental well-being
High mental well-being
70–61
530
73.61
53.61 ± 8.46
76.58
Moderate mental well-being
60–43
175
24.30
Low mental well-being
42–14
15
2.08
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Note: Minimum score = 14.
Note: Maximum score = 70.
The data in [Table 1 ] depict that the majority of the adolescents (73.61%) had high mental well-being,
24.30% had moderate mental well-being, and 2.08% had low mental well-being with a
mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 53.61 ± 8.46.
<insert [Table 2 ] here>
Table 2
Association between mental well-being among adolescents with selected demographic
variables (N = 720).
Sl. No
Variable
Chi-square value
df
p -Value
1.
Age (in years)
1.000
1
1.000
2.
Gender
1.656
(Fisher's exact)
1
0.198
3.
No. of siblings
3.761
3
0.288
4.
Stream under study
48.865
2
0.001[a ]
5.
Type of family
12.547
2
0.006[a ]
6.
Area of residence
14.212
1
0.001[a ]
7.
Educational status of father
16.649
5
0.011[a ]
8.
Educational status of mother
11.894
5
0.064
9.
Occupational status of father
24.193
5
0.001[a ]
10.
Occupational status of mother
8.668
5
0.123
11.
Family monthly income
(in rupees)
6.122
4
0.190
12.
History of alcohol/drug abuse of father
4.778
1
0.092
13
History of alcohol/drug abuse of mother
3.151
1
0.207
Abbreviation: df, degree of freedom.
Note: p -Value > 0.05.
a Highly significant.
[Table 2 ] showed a highly significant association between mental well-being and selected demographic
variables such as stream under study (p = 0.001), type of family (p = 0.006), area of residence (p = 0.001), educational status of the father (p = 0.011), and occupational status of the father (p = 0.001).
Discussion
The present study findings depict that the majority of the adolescents (73.61%) had
good mental well-being, 24.30% had average mental well-being, and 2.08% had poor mental
well-being with mean ± SD of 53.61 ± 8.46. The findings are compatible with the study
conducted by Khan et al, in which half the number of adolescents (43.4%) showed a
moderate level of psychological well-being, 33.3% had a high level, and 23.2% reported
a low level of psychological well-being.[16 ] The findings of a similar study conducted by Lekshmi et al showed the mean ± SD
of the well-being score as 85.17 + 11.38 with a 95% CI.[7 ] These findings concur with the study conducted by Brandseth et al, which depicted
the mean ± SD of the adolescent mental well-being score as 3.50 + 0.88.[7 ]
[16 ]
[17 ]
The current study results showed a significant association between mental well-being
and selected demographic variables such as stream under study (p = 0.001), type of family (p = 0.006), area of residence (p = 0.001), educational status of the father (p = 0.011), and occupational status of the father (p = 0.001). The present study results are congruent with the study carried out by Lekshmi
et al, and they show a significant association between the well-being of adolescents
and sociodemographic variables such as age (p = 0.001), domicile (p = 0.023), and type of school (p = 0.042).[7 ]
Conclusion
The present study revealed that nearly one-fourth of adolescents need interventions
to promote their mental well-being. Serious efforts by the health care professionals
in collaboration with the colleges and the parents are therefore essential to safeguarding
the wellness of adolescents.
