Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776792
Health Information Technology Supporting Adherence Memory Disorder Patients: A Systematic Literature Review
- Abstract
- Background and Significance
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Highlights
- Clinical Relevance Statement
- Multiple Choice Questions
- References
Abstract
Background People with memory disorders have difficulty adhering to treatments. With technological advances, it remains important to investigate the potential of health information technology (HIT) in supporting medication adherence among them.
Objectives This review investigates the role of HIT in supporting adherence to medication and therapies among patients with memory issues. It also captures the factors that impact technology adherence interventions.
Methods We searched the literature for relevant publications published until March 15, 2023, using technology to support adherence among patients with memory issues (dementia, Alzheimer's, amnesia, mild cognitive impairment, memory loss, etc.). The review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a quality assessment of the papers following the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Results Fifteen studies were included after carefully reviewing the 3,773 articles in the search. Methodological quality, as appraised, ranged from 80 to 100% with eight studies rated 100%. The studies overall did not have a high risk of bias. Thus, all of the 15 studies were included. Technologies investigated were classified into four groups based on their impact: therapeutic patient education, simplifying treatment regimens, early follow-up visits and short-term treatment goals, and reminder programs. Different technologies were used (automatic drug dispensers or boxes, mobile health-based interventions, game-based interventions, e-health-based interventions, patient portals, and virtual reality). The factors impacting patients' adherence to technology-based treatment and medication were clustered into human–computer interaction and integration challenges.
Conclusion This study contributes to the literature by classifying the technologies that supported medication adherence among patients with memory issues in four groups. It also explores and presents the possible limitations of existing solutions to drive future research in supporting care for people with memory disorders.
Keywords
health information technology - memory disorder - Alzheimer's - dementia - medication adherenceBackground and Significance
Memory disorder issues are unusual forgetfulness that prevents people from remembering new events, recalling memories of the past, or both.[1] [2] This decline in memory can be associated with age, or, in severe cases, with diseases such as Alzheimer's, dementia, or other brain disorders.[3] This problem is very common globally. For instance, the Alzheimer's Association International Conference reported in 2021 that each year, 10 in every 100,000 individuals develop dementia with early onset.[4] This is the equivalent of 350,000 new-onset cases every year globally.[4] Additionally, the global rate of dementia is estimated to increase from 57.4 million cases in 2019 to 152.8 million cases in 2050.[5] In the United States specifically, the mortality rate from Alzheimer's increased in the overall population from 16 per 100,000 in 1999 to 30 in 2019, equivalent to an 88% increase in rate.[4] [5]
Memory loss has serious consequences on patients' lives. Because of their difficulties, people can begin withdrawing from social relationships and activities.[6] They may also experience various psychological symptoms (e.g., agitation, depression) that can negatively impact their behavior and quality of life.[7] But mainly, impairment of this cognitive function may substantially compromise the person's medication adherence behavior, resulting in discontinuous access to care (problems with drug adherence, medical engagement, persistence, etc.).[8] [9] Medication adherence is the extent to which a patient's behavior corresponds to the health care goals established by his doctors, including taking medication and executing a lifestyle change.[9] [10] [11] [12] It can be evaluated based on the patient's respect for doses and how much medication was prescribed (compliance) or for the therapy continuity and duration over time (persistence).[10]
Both compliance and persistence affect directly the clinical outcomes.[10] Medication adherence can affect quality and length of life, health outcomes, and overall health care costs.[13] [14] Nonadherence can account for up to 50% of treatment failures, around 125,000 deaths, and up to 25% of hospitalizations each year in the United States.[13] [14] Considering the high risk of nonadherence among patients with memory decline, it remains important to support their adherence to treatment. A review by Smith et al highlighted the importance of medication adherence among people with dementia or cognitive impairment suggesting the need for more diving into the possible ways to support compliance and persistence among this population.[15]
Over the last decades, the approaches aimed to improve the continuity of therapies among patients with chronic diseases have witnessed major developments focusing on patients, providers' roles, systems' design, and environments' management.[9] With the widespread use of technology in health care, health information technologies have become promising medication adherence aids thanks to simplicity, user-friendliness, and accessibility for the public.[16] For instance, different mHealth applications were shown to be effective in supporting medication adherence.[16] [17] A study by Peng et al showed that, compared with conventional care, mHealth interventions, such as short message service and electronic pillboxes, are shown to have better effects on medication adherence.[18] Many reviews have also highlighted the potential that technology has in supporting medication adherence.[19] [20] [21] [22] Yet, most of them focus on general populations or on patients with chronic diseases.[17] [23] To our knowledge, no review has investigated its effectiveness among people with memory disorders. This review, thus, fills a gap in the literature by exploring the use of technology in supporting medication adherence among patients with memory issues by answering the following questions:
-
(1) How can information technology support medication adherence among people with memory disorders?
-
(2) What are the factors that impact the success of technology-based medication adherence interventions among these patients?
We define medication adherence in this article as the adherence to medication or care interventions prescribed by doctors or health care professionals.
Methods
This review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework on July 30, 2022.[24]
Search Strategy
Five databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest CENTRAL, IEEE Xplore) were searched for relevant publications published until March 15, 2023, when the search was conducted. Any study published prior to the date of search was included. The search strategy was developed based on the People, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) criteria.[25] The population was patients with memory disorders, the outcome was medication adherence, the intervention was technology-based, and the comparison was done by classifying the technology-based interventions based on their functions (reminder program, therapeutic education, treatment regimen simplification, or follow-up visits). For each of the PICO components, we associated a range of keywords that can help improve the inclusiveness of the searches. The search terms used are summarized in [Fig. 1], with more details regarding the search terms used to find technology-based interventions summarized in [Supplementary Appendix A] (available online only). To select articles that have a population of people with memory issues, we followed a systematic method. We first identified review studies dealing with the same population,[26] [27] extracted the list of keywords they used, and then validated it with the librarian who updated and validated the list as they saw fit.


The search was conducted in a way to include any articles with any combination of these different search keywords in the title, abstract, keywords, or topic/summary (if available), depending on the database searched. For instance, the search was conducted in PubMed's title, abstract, and MeSH words. In ProQuest CENTRAL, the search was conducted in “all abstract & summary text.” In Scopus, the search was conducted in article title, abstract, and keywords. In Web of Science, the search was conducted in “Topic,” which includes the title, abstract, and indexing of the papers. The search queries used are provided in [Supplementary Appendix B] (available online only).
We exported the records retrieved to Endnote 20.1 (New Jersey, United States) for duplication removal and selection processes. It is noteworthy that some duplicates were found later in the cleaning process and were not captured initially by EndNote considering some differences in the titles and details across databases.
Selection Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
In this review we included studies that (1) are empirical (using surveys, interviews, experiments, and observational studies), (2) report outcomes related to the use of technology to support medication adherence, (3) conduct studies on people with memory disorders (Alzheimer's, amnesia, dementia, memory issues or disorders, or mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), (4) are peer-reviewed, and (5) are written in English.
Exclusion Criteria
We excluded any articles that (1) focus solely on healthy individuals or individuals with other health issues than memory disorders, (2) do not involve the use of technology-based interventions, (3) do not explore medication adherence issues, (4) are not peer-reviewed, or (5) that are not empirical. For instance, opinion papers, editorials, commentaries, and reviews were excluded.
Screening and Selection Process
We removed 58 duplicates from the studies (1.53% of the studies). We then downloaded the remaining 3,715 studies for title and abstract screening. This step resulted in the exclusion of 3,404 articles (90.21%) for noncompliance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, a full review of the text for the remaining 311 articles was conducted. We excluded articles that were not relevant to the scope. Reviews, commentaries, and conceptual papers were also excluded. [Fig. 2] outlines the PRISMA diagram illustrating the review flow and the number of articles in each step. A data extraction form was used to extract standardized information from each paper.


Synthesis of the Results
Information regarding the population was reported as age and disease.[28] [29] To report the findings related to the role of technology in supporting medication adherence among the population selected, we used two frameworks adopted for this use case. We used the framework of Eicher et al[30] developed to classify the strategies adopted to improve medication adherence through technology applications. To screen for the factors impacting medication adherence, we used an adapted version of the conceptual framework developed by Peh et al and the World Health Organization's five dimensions of medication adherence.[9] [31] The review team discussed and synthesized information in an iterative process, considering the strengths and weaknesses of each conceptual model, as well as common factors and gaps across models in each patient group. [Fig. 3] summarizes the conceptual model adopted in this study.


We define reminder programs as any electronic alerts communicated to patients or clinicians to remind them of an appointment, medication times, and doses designed to help alleviate the burden of manual reminders and improve scheduling and patient self-service. Therapeutic education tools refer to the technologies designed to teach patients how to adhere to medical processes through training or guides delivered electronically. All the phases of screening, labeling, and data extraction were conducted by the three reviewers. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion and consensus.
Quality Assessment and Risk of Bias
To ensure good quality of reporting, all the steps of selection were subject to consensus by all the authors. We also conducted a quality assessment of the papers following the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).[32] The MMAT assesses the quality of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies.[32] It focuses on methodological criteria and includes the nature of the study (randomized or nonrandomized clinical trial).[32] The reviewers made a separate judgment for each item (i.e., low risk of bias, high risk of bias, or unclear risk of bias). If a study fully met these criteria, the likelihood of various biases was low, and the quality grade was “A.” If these criteria were partially met, the probability of bias was moderate, and the quality grade was “B.” If these criteria were not met at all, the probability of bias was high, and the quality grade was “C.” Articles with an overall quality level of A or B were included, and articles with an overall quality level of C were excluded.
Results
[Fig. 2] illustrates the process of selection followed in this systematic review. After removing the duplicates and reading the full text, 15 studies were found to fit the scope of our study with consent from the authors. We used Endnote to manage the filtering process. Selected studies show that technology to support medication adherence started getting more attention in 2015. We used a systematic approach to extract information from the selected studies as the specific findings to report were agreed upon and for each of the articles, the author S.E. filled the columns after careful reading of the articles, then the other authors commented on the findings reported and enriched the reported outcomes. The findings are listed in [Table 1]. Only 33.33% of the included studies focused on both compliance and persistence of patients to the treatment suggested by doctors. In addition, 40% of them focused on supporting their compliance (duration/time wise) and 26.67% focused on the persistence of specific doses or movements.
Ref. Year |
The objective of the study |
Study design |
Population supported |
Type of technology |
Name of the tool |
How does technology impact adherence? |
Factor impacting adherence |
How was adherence evaluated? |
Was the focus on compliance or persistence? |
Findings |
Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[42] 2006 |
Using an electronic pillbox improves the quality of patient life and cognitive functions to maintain treatment adherence. |
Experiment (N = 480 patients) |
Dementia |
Electronic pillbox |
MedTracker pillbox |
Reminder programs |
– |
Overall adherence/regimen adherence: percentage of taking medication within 1–2 hours before or after the prescribed times |
Compliance and persistence |
Using a 7-day electronic pillbox called the MedTracker, which records the time of day when a day's compartment is opened, a 5-week drug adherence trial using vitamin C supplements was conducted. Participants took this supplement from the MedTracker twice daily at prespecified times approximately 12 hours apart, ensuring that each person faced the same daily challenge. Improvement in patients' adherence to medication was observed. |
The project is part of a bigger project for smart home monitoring systems. Physical activity was also tracked, not only medication adherence. But it was hard to track with the sensors because of the lack of spatial data (cannot know whether the user is in the kitchen or the living room) |
[43] 2015 |
Exploring the role of game-based rehabilitation training in improving the patients' physical and cognitive performance and adherence to rehabilitation sessions |
Experiment (N = 10 patients) |
Dementia |
Virtual reality-based training (VRT) |
BrightBrainer |
Simplifying treatment regimes |
Patient-related factors |
Cognitive performance, completion of tasks |
Compliance |
Integrative rehabilitation through games combining cognitive (memory, focusing, executive function) and physical (bimanual whole arm movement, grasping, task sequencing) elements are enjoyable for this population. Individual simulations adapted automatically to each participant's level of motor functioning to help him adhere to the training. The performance of patients using the system was better than the conventional physical rehabilitation sessions. The success of the intervention was related to the patients' need to remain physically and mentally fit; not only patients facing problems would want to use the tool. |
Some limitations of this study include the relatively small sample size, lack of control participants, and the general severity of dementia |
[34] 2016 |
Comparing patients' performance and engagement to treatment with cognitive training (online and traditional training) |
Experiment (N = 74 patients) |
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), early Alzheimer's |
Computer-based cognitive training (CCT) |
Posit Science's BrainFitness |
Therapeutic patient education |
Patient-related factor, condition-related factor, therapy-related factor |
Performance on the mental state examination, verbal learning, verbal memory, adherence to the training |
Compliance |
Computerized cognitive training offers the most benefit when incorporated into a therapeutic milieu rather than administered alone, although both appear superior to more generic forms of cognitive stimulation. The patients' memory decline impacts their adherence to cognitive training. The engagement in a specific training depends on the type of training delivered (computerized or not) |
The sample size was relatively small which may limit the statistical power of the results. The study did not include a control group that received no cognitive training which makes it hard to conclude the effects. |
[46] 2016 |
Exploring the role of mealth and wearable devices in promoting adherence to prescribed physical activity |
Experiment (N = 21 patients) |
Alzheimer's |
Mobile Health (mHealth) technology-supported physical activity prescription |
Zip, Fitbit Inc |
Early follow-up visits and short-term treatment goals |
Socio-economic factors |
Adherence to physical activity (number of steps) |
Persistence |
The mobile health technology helped improve patients' adherence to physical activity as prescribed (more steps). The requirement of access to a wireless network may introduce socio-economic bias to the sample size. |
Variability in measures was observed, but the sample is too small to assess potential reasons for the variability |
[35] 2017 |
Improving patients' episodic memory and engagement with cognitive training through a gamified training |
Experiment (N = 42 patients) |
Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) |
Memory game on an iPad for cognitive training |
Game Show |
Therapeutic patient education |
Patient-related factor |
Episodic memory and motivation to continue the training |
Compliance |
The memory game helped improve the patients' adherence to treatment plans by improving their enjoyment and cognition to impact their motivation to continue after each hour. Factor impacting the adherence was: motivation. |
Larger, more controlled trials are needed to replicate and extend these findings. |
[33] 2019 |
Investigating older adults' adherence to a long-term computerized cognitive training program and determining participant characteristics associated with adherence to the training. |
Experiment (N = 631 patients) |
Dementia |
CCT |
FINGER initiative |
Therapeutic patient education |
Condition-related factor, patient-related factor |
The number of completed CCT sessions |
Persistence |
CCTs can help improve older patients' adherence to training. Encouraging computer use and considering the level of cognitive functioning may help boost adherence to CCT. Previous computer use was the only factor associated with more training sessions completed. |
Technology difficulty of use among elderly people can impact the study outcomes |
[47] |
Improving patients' adherence to treatment improves their working memory, delayed memory, immediate memory, and cognitive function. |
Experiment (N = 66 patients) |
MCI |
Virtual interactive working memory training (VIMT) |
CogniPlus |
Early follow-up visits and short-term treatment goals |
Condition-related factor |
Working memory, number of completed sessions |
Compliance |
Memory deterioration impacts the patients' ability to adhere to treatment plans |
The study used a single-blind design, which may introduce bias as the participants were aware of their group assignment. |
[41] 2019 |
Exploring the impact of using an automatic medication dispenser on patients' adherence to medication. |
Experiment (N = 4 patients) |
Alzheimer's |
Automatic medication dispenser (AMD) |
Pivotell |
Reminder programs |
– |
Medication adherence: medications remaining during 1 week |
Compliance |
The tool improved medication adherence throughout the years (3–4.5). |
Very small sample size and not all subjects adhered to the intervention. |
[40] 2020 |
Assessing the effectiveness of employing the MeMo (Memory Motivation) Web app concerning cognitive and behavioral symptoms in patients with neurocognitive disorders. |
Experiment (N = 46 patients) |
Neurocognitive disorders |
Web-app |
MeMo |
Reminder programs |
Health care systems-related factors |
Motivation, attention, completed tasks |
Compliance and persistence |
Reminding patients about regular use at the moment of prescription and possibly the requirement of regular follow-ups to check prescription adherence are important in deciding their compliance with the planned treatment. The web app has two parts; memory and mental flexibility/attention. It helped improve the regular use of the training by patients, their attention, and their motivation. It has cognitive and behavioral efficacies. |
Short-term interventions cannot inform as well as regular-use interventions. |
[36] 2020 |
Exploring the role of gamification in enhancing patients' adherence to cognitive training |
Experiment (N = 41 patients) |
MCI, Parkinson's disease |
Game-based cognitive training (GCT) |
AquaSnap |
Therapeutic patient education |
Patient-related factors |
Medication adherence, cognitive assessment questionnaire, adherence to training |
Compliance and persistence |
The technology used is an adaptive cognitive training game exercising five cognitive domains: attention, working memory, episodic memory, psychomotor speed, and executive function. Various game elements are incorporated to promote adherence, such as goals, challenges/missions, reward systems, personalization, and 3D environments. To assess the feasibility of stand-alone CT, patients were trained unsupervised at home, and only reactive support was provided when requested by the patient. One of the factors impacting patients' adherence to treatment is the need to travel to an institute for the assessments. |
The usability and feasibility of the gamified interventions should be investigated to generalize the findings. Longer follow-up periods are needed. Larger studies with robust cognitive outcomes that also focus on translational aspects of daily life are needed to determine the effectiveness of this intervention. |
[39] 2020 |
Exploring the impact of medication ambient display system on medication adherence. |
Experiment (N = 16 patients) |
MCI |
Patient Portal |
Medication Ambient Display (MAD) |
Reminder programs |
Therapies-related factors |
Pills counting, MAQ (Medication Adherence Questionnaire) |
The system uses different abstract modalities to provide external cues that enable older adults to easily take their medications on time and be aware of their medication adherence. Some participants face problems managing their medications, such as accumulating and confusing medications because they look alike. |
The use of financial incentives has been questioned because they may provide inducements to participate in a study for financial purposes only, and vulnerable populations are prone to be enticed by the financial reward and be more willing to accept any study risks |
|
[37] 2021 |
Exploring the feasibility of the tool as a real-time potential balance training and falls prevention intervention for older adults with MCI. |
Experiment (N = 15 patients) |
Mild cognitive impairment |
Online falls prevention intervention |
Tai Ji Quan program |
Exploring the feasibility of the tool as a real-time potential balance training and falls prevention intervention for older adults with MCI. |
Patient-related factors, therapy-related factors |
Attendance rate, number of falls |
Compliance |
The patients showed compliance and potential benefit from the at-home virtual interactive program delivered in real-time to improve balance training. Older adults with minimal computer or smart phone experience may feel uncomfortable accessing this new exercise platform, which requires completing various logistical tasks, ranging from tracking the online (Zoom) class link, signing on to a session, and positioning their device(s) for better viewing of the instructor (or vice versa) to controlling audio, video, and recording for high-quality instruction delivery and better learning and practice experiences. Other implementation challenges were faced such as hearing difficulties, muting classes for effective clear communication, and engagement during teaching |
People without access to technology resources would not be able to participate in technology-driven virtual exercise interventions. |
[38] 2021 |
Examining how a technology system can help augment traditional rehabilitation strategies for patients by improving engagement in therapy sessions and achieving better functional outcomes |
Experiment (N = 48 patients) |
Dementia |
Patient portal |
It's Never 2 Late (iN2L) |
Examining how a technology system can help augment traditional rehabilitation strategies for patients by improving engagement in therapy sessions and achieving better functional outcomes |
Patient-related factors |
Pittsburgh rehabilitation participation scale (PRPS) for rehabilitation engagement, goal attainment |
Persistence |
N2L technology was able to increase treatment engagement and enhance rehabilitation outcomes among older adults with dementia. The time issues were impacting patients' adherence to the plans. |
Limited sample size |
[44] 2022 |
Improving patients' spatial cognition and hippocampal function using virtual reality training program that uses active navigation instead of passive navigation. |
Experiment (N = 56 patients) |
MCI |
Virtual reality-based spatial cognitive training (VRST) |
VR-SCT |
Improving patients' spatial cognition and hippocampal function using virtual reality training program that uses active navigation instead of passive navigation. |
Condition-related factor |
Completion of sessions |
Compliance and persistence |
To improve patients' adherence to treatment, this training aims to improve their hippocampal function (spatial cognition and episodic memory) |
Limited sample size |
[45] 2022 |
Describing older adults' engagement with an eHealth intervention, identifying factors associated with engagement, and examining associations between engagement and changes in dementia risk factors |
Experiment (N = 1389 patients) |
Cognitive decline |
eHealth |
Healthy Aging Through Internet Counselling in the Elderly (HATICE) |
Describing older adults' engagement with an eHealth intervention, identifying factors associated with engagement, and examining associations between engagement and changes in dementia risk factors |
Patient-related factors, therapies-related factors |
Engagement in eHealth interventions; log-in frequency, number of lifestyle goals set, measurements entered, and messages sent to coaches, and percentage of education materials read. |
Persistence |
Limited computer experience, lower level of education, and poorer cognition negatively impacted patients' engagement in the plans. Greater engagement with an eHealth lifestyle intervention was associated with greater improvement in risk factors in older adults. |
Limited computer experience, lower level of education and poorer cognition negatively impacted patients' engagement in the plans. |
Role of Technology in Supporting Medication Adherence among People with Memory Disorders
Therapeutic Patient Education
The role of technology in supporting medication adherence, particularly through effective therapeutic patient education, has emerged as a critical avenue in health care, with a specific focus on patients with MCI and dementia. Five studies examined the potential of therapeutic education enhanced by technology-based interventions to improve medication adherence. These studies have illuminated the substantial benefits that mobile technology (e.g., computer-based cognitive training [CCT], memory games, etc.) can offer in enhancing patients' commitment to their medical treatment plans. For instance, Turunen et al investigated the efficacy of CCT in older patients with dementia through the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER).[33] The authors showcased that patients who completed the training exhibited improved memory performance.[33] These findings underscore the positive impact of tailored interventions and memory training in educating patients on how to better adhere to the prescribed treatments.[33] This study also emphasizes the importance of considering the level of cognitive functioning when designing therapeutic interventions to boost adherence to CCT.[33] Adherence was measured through the number of sessions completed by patients. Participants who completed the training showed better memory performance.[33] Similarly, Gooding et al demonstrated that embedding CCT within a therapeutic milieu, BrainFitness, rather than as a standalone intervention, fostered better adherence to cognitive rehabilitation exercises among patients with MCI and Alzheimer's suggesting the importance of the therapeutic milieu in the success of such technologies in educating patients.[34]
Furthermore, the integration of gamified experiences, as seen in studies such as Savulich et al, demonstrated the power of motivation in promoting adherence through memory games on iPads.[35] This study highlighted the importance of therapeutic education of patients through Game Shows in supporting their engagement in cognitive training.[35] The study found that the main factor impacting adherence is motivation, which suggests designing therapeutic education and training sessions that can motivate patients with memory problems continuously to engage and improve their enjoyment and cognition.[35] The incorporation of game-based cognitive training mobile tools like AquaSnap further emphasizes the significance of integrating personalized elements such as goals, rewards, and challenges in therapeutic education interventions to foster adherence.[36] Finally, online interventions such as Tai Ji Quan showcased how technology could offer multifaceted solutions, as Li et al employed an online platform to ensure patients' commitment to balance training and fall prevention, leveraging both education and interactive engagement.[37]
Reminder Programs
Five studies harnessed the potential of technology to bolster adherence through innovative reminder programs, strategically designed to bolster patients' adherence to treatments. These interventions leveraged a variety of platforms, including patient portals, web applications, and innovative solutions for medication consumption, such as automatic medication dispensers (AMDs) and electronic pillboxes. For instance, Zarit et al ingeniously employed the patient portal “It's Never 2 Late” to foster adherence among patients with dementia, ensuring their commitment to rehabilitation exercises and therapy sessions by providing them with continuous reminders from doctors on the importance of the interventions and facilitating their communication.[38]
The integration of medication ambient display systems, shared via patient portals, ingeniously employed various abstract modalities. This approach provided external cues that proved invaluable for older adults with MCI, facilitating the timely intake of medications while enhancing awareness of adherence to prescribed regimens.[39] In the same vein, technology-driven medication consumption tools, exemplified by the web-app MeMo (Memory Motivation), embraced the potential of health information technology. By engaging patients with neurocognitive disorders in regular reminders about their prescriptions and emphasizing the significance of compliance, these interventions emerged as powerful agents of adherence support through continuous reminder programs.[40] The transformative role of health information technology was further underscored by Kamimura, who introduced patients to an AMD named Pivotell. Over a span of 3 to 4.5 years, Pivotell emerged as an agent of change by significantly enhancing medication adherence among patients grappling with Alzheimer's.[41] The pinnacle of this technology-driven approach to adherence enhancement was epitomized by the electronic pillbox, MedTracker.[42] This advanced tool, equipped with the ability to record the precise time of day when each compartment was opened, ensured a sophisticated level of monitoring. Hayes et al's drug adherence trial, encompassing vitamin C supplements, highlighted how MedTracker's strategic design facilitated adherence improvements.[42] By orchestrating a regimen wherein participants took the supplement twice daily, precisely 12 hours apart, MedTracker not only introduced consistency but also embraced health information technology to standardize the daily challenge across all individuals.[42]
Simplifying Treatment Regimens
Three innovative interventions prioritized the simplification of treatment regimens as a means to enhance patients' adherence. Among these interventions, two harnessed the potential of virtual reality (VR), while the third leveraged an electronic health tool (eHealth). The integration of VR training (VRT), exemplified by platforms like BrightBrainer, ingeniously merged cognitive and physical elements within interactive games. This approach not only encouraged patients with dementia to actively engage in rehabilitation training but also facilitated adherence regimens through immersive experiences.[43] Additionally, a distinct spatial cognitive VRT tool emerged as a potent strategy to enhance adherence. This tool effectively targeted patients with MCI, aiming to enhance their hippocampal function encompassing spatial cognition and episodic memory.[44] By aligning treatment regimens with spatial training, this intervention embraced technology to optimize adherence and facilitate it among individuals facing cognitive challenges.[44] Furthermore, the advent of technology-driven eHealth initiatives ushered in a paradigm shift in supporting adherence by simplifying treatment regimens.[45] “Healthy Ageing Through Internet Counselling in the Elderly” (HATICE), for instance, capitalized on the power of eHealth to provide comprehensive support to elderly patients with cognitive decline.[45] By facilitating personalized training, empowering patients to achieve lifestyle objectives, sharing educational resources, and facilitating consistent communication with coaches, this initiative symbolized the transformational role of technology in streamlining treatment regimens for optimized adherence.[45] Collectively, these interventions underscore the pivotal role of technology in advancing patient-centric approaches, ultimately fostering adherence by strategically simplifying treatment regimens.
Early Follow-Up Visits
The transformative potential of technology was prominently evident in the realm of medication adherence, particularly concerning patients grappling with Alzheimer's. mHealth and wearable devices, exemplified by Zip from Fitbit Inc., emerged as remarkable allies in promoting adherence to prescribed physical activity.[46] This technological synergy facilitated seamless remote monitoring, allowing health care providers to remotely track changes in patients' weekly step counts, an innovative approach that revolutionized follow-up practices.[46] Furthermore, the dawn of virtual interactive working memory training (VIMT) showcased technology's indispensable role in supporting medication adherence among elderly patients with MCI.[47] Yang et al illuminated how the implementation of the CogniPlus VIMT fostered memory training. This visionary program not only empowered patients to uphold their working memory but also remarkably curtailed the pace of cognitive deterioration. The hallmark of this approach lies in its continuous professional oversight, where technology served as the conduit for ongoing follow-up visits, ensuring sustained medication adherence.[47] In essence, these findings underscored how technology, particularly through facilitated early follow-up visits, stands as an instrumental force in reinforcing medication adherence among patients battling cognitive challenges.
Factors Challenging Technology-Based Medication Adherence Interventions among People with Memory Disorders
Based on our study's findings, different factors impact medication adherence among patients with memory disorders.
Human–Computer Interaction
Several key factors influencing medication adherence were closely intertwined with the patients themselves, underlining the significance of information technology in facilitating their commitment to treatment plans. Despite a genuine need for treatment, patients' dedication to maintaining mental and physical well-being emerged as a pivotal determinant of adherence.[43] Their motivation to persist with specialized technology-based training substantially impacted their engagement throughout the duration of interventions.[35] Moreover, the ease of technology utilization and user experience stood out as critical elements shaping intervention effectiveness.[33] [34] [37] Intriguingly, prior familiarity with computer use often emerged as a pivotal factor influencing the completion of training sessions.[33] Additionally, low education levels, memory decline, and diminished cognitive function had negative influences on patients' active involvement in the technology-based intervention plans.[33] [34] [45] [47] Some individuals faced auditory impairments due to aging, further complicating communication with trainers and health care providers through online tools, thereby hindering engagement in similar treatment interventions.[37] The perpetual challenge of time scarcity further resonated as an impediment to adherence, given the extensive commitments associated with prescribed technology-based training regimens despite its flexibility.[38]
Challenges Related to Technology Integration in Health Care Systems and Interventions' Design
On another tangent, several adherence-related factors were rooted not in the patients but rather in the integration of technologies in therapy design and in the health care systems' frameworks, spotlighting the transformative role of information technology. Foremost, the necessity for regular follow-ups to enhance compliance underscored the potential of technology-enabled remote monitoring and communication, although not all interventions seamlessly provided this advantage.[40] Adherence also pivoted on the delivery mode of training, whether online or in-person and the structure of interventions, influencing their effectiveness.[34] Particularly, interventions yielded greater benefits when nested within a therapeutic environment, emphasizing technology's potential to foster an augmented, synergistic approach to adherence enhancement.[34] Some interventions involved intricate tasks and steps that not all patients found comfortable, ranging from online session sign-ins to tracking links and positioning devices, underlining the importance of user-friendly technology interfaces and interventions.[37] Additionally, advanced technology in some interventions inadvertently acted as a barrier, impeding user progress and highlighting the necessity for seamless user experiences.[45] Unequal access to care due to varied internet connectivity underscored the importance of equitable technological provisions for all patients.[36] [46] The time-intensive nature of medication adherence-supporting interventions, culminating from complex health care regimens, emerged as a consistent challenge, thereby emphasizing the challenge that technology can face in managing and streamlining adherence activities.[38] Lastly, the conundrum of medication accumulation and confusing labels can make it hard for technology-based intervention designers to simulate reality and support patients' adherence.[39]
Risk of Bias and Quality Assessment
[Supplementary Appendix C] (available online only) and [Fig. 4] summarize the quality assessment results run by the three authors. All articles reported adequate random sequence generation and thus had a low risk of selection bias. Methodological quality, as appraised by MMAT for the included studies, ranged from 80 to 100% with eight studies rated 100%. The studies overall did not have a high risk of bias. The data collection methods in the studies chosen were found to adequately answer the research questions, and the data found addressed the objectives. The interpretation of the data was consistent with the methods, and confounding factors were taken into consideration.


As shown in [Fig. 4], no study had any detection bias related to binding outcomes assessment, or attrition bias related to providing complete outcome data. Also, all studies provided comparison at baseline with control groups. However, three studies had selection bias (random sequence generation),[34] [38] [41] and some participants in four studies dropped out of the intervention (performance bias).[33] [36] [37] [47]
Discussion
The present study systematically reviewed and analyzed the role of technology in supporting medication adherence among individuals with memory disorders. The results indicate a growing interest in the field since 2015, suggesting an increasing recognition of the potential of this technology in enhancing the adherence of these patients. Studies investigating patients' adherence focus only on the medication side.[48] [49] [50] This is, to our knowledge, the first review investigating the technology-based interventions that support medication adherence among people with memory disorders. [Fig. 5] highlights the most important recommendations resulting from the review findings.


The findings of the 15 included studies have elucidated the potential of technology in supporting medication adherence among patients with memory disorders. The selected studies underscore the multifaceted ways in which technology can enhance patients' commitment to treatment plans, thereby addressing the intricate challenges posed by memory impairments. The exploration of therapeutic patient education, reminder programs, simplifying treatment regimens, and early follow-up visits through technology-driven interventions highlights the diverse avenues through which technology can contribute to fostering medication adherence. Patients with memory issues require more assistance to meet their medication adherence targets, as a decline in memory and cognitive functions interferes with their ability to successfully perform a routine of daily living and instrumental activities.[51] Many technologies have shown reliable results in supporting medication adherence among different populations,[52] [53] and especially people with memory disorders as shown through our review findings. Through the discussion of the findings of this review, we wanted to highlight important recommendations that can help in the design of future technology-based adherence programs.
Therapeutic Patient Education
These technologies were shown by our review to be able to support medication adherence through different strategies such as supporting therapeutic patient education.[33] [34] [35] These findings coincide with other findings showing that shaping the patients' beliefs related to medications and educating them can strongly influence the patients' adherence to treatment.[54] [55] Thus, we conclude that technologies should be able to educate patients on how and why they should adhere to treatments to raise their awareness of the importance of complying with their medication and treatment regimens. In addition, the findings showed that personalization, gamification, and motivation were factors that impacted the success of the used technologies.[33] [34] [35] [36] First, tailoring the interventions to patients' cognitive abilities can contribute to the success of the technology used.[36] This finding suggests that technologies should be personalized to the cognitive functioning of the patient by incorporating adaptive features that assess patients' abilities and adjust the educational content accordingly to optimize the outcomes. Second, we found that gamified experiences can enhance motivation among patients with memory issues to adhere to the technology-based adherence interventions.[35] This finding coincides with other studies showing that gamification features can improve patients' adherence to mental well-being interventions.[56] We thus conclude that technology developers should consider integrating gamification elements like rewards, challenges, and engaging interfaces into therapeutic interventions to maintain patient motivation. Considering the importance of motivation in the adherence of our patients to the interventions as shown by Savulich et al,[35] technologies used for adherence support should focus on incorporating interactive elements and progress-tracking features to ensure sustained engagement and enjoyment.
Reminder Programs
Studies have shown that reminder-based interventions have the potential to improve adherence to medications among patients with chronic conditions.[57] This can explain why technology-based interventions were found to support adherence among patients with memory issues in our review.[33] [46] With the deterioration of memory capabilities among vulnerable populations, reminder programs can help them cope with their daily lives and adapt to their physiological changes.[58] [59] Thus, adherence technologies should consider incorporating reminders to assist patients with their medical and treatment goal achievement. In addition, the findings of this review showed that user-friendly interfaces that facilitate communication and the versatility aspects of the technologies can help in its success in supporting adherence, which should be considered by technology designers and developers. Technologies should facilitate timely reminders and easy-to-access intuitive updates that build a bridge of communication between health care providers and patients with memory issues. Furthermore, as captured by our findings, patients have different levels of technology familiarity which would impact their adherence to the interventions.[33] Thus, reminder systems should have clear and simple interfaces that can accommodate various technological ease-of-use levels. Lastly, considering that the different solutions offered in this review were shown to be beneficial, it is important to notice that technology-driven medication adherence tools should be adaptable to the preferences of patients by making them available on multiple devices and different formats accommodating the different user needs.
Early Follow-Up Visits
Through the different technologies used, this review underscored the importance of technology in supporting medication adherence among patients with memory problems through early follow-up visits.[46] [47] These studies showed that by enabling remote monitoring accountability and consistent follow-ups, this technological synergy facilitated medication adherence among patients with memory loss.[46] [47] Maintaining consistent and timely follow-up components should be considered by designers of similar technologies. The technology should provide accurate data on patients' activities and ensure a seamless experience for both patients and health care providers. In addition, VIMT was successful because it incorporated ongoing professional oversight.[46] [47] Thus, technology designers should consider enabling not only remote progress monitoring but also the possibility to intervene and provide support when needed.
Challenges of Medication Adherence Technology-Based Interventions Success
The findings of this study related to the challenges of the technology-based interventions success shed light on various dimensions (other than the technology design) that may impact the effectiveness and feasibility of theses interventions. These factors highlight the important interplay between technology design, patient acceptance, and implementation within the larger health care context, underscoring the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing adherence challenges. For instance, we found that the successful human–computer interaction experience was crucial to the success or failure of some of the interventions.[43] Many studies have shown that difficulty in technology use can limit the success of interventions in health care settings which not only impact small-scale organizations but also cover large-scale clinical implementations.[60] Thus, future large-scale interventions should consider addressing difficulty challenges to ensure a higher probability of the interventions.
Despite the memory disorders, patients who were motivated to maintain their well-being tended to exhibit better adherence results.[35] We thus conclude that for the technology to succeed in enhancing adherence, it should align with the patients' motivations and goals. Furthermore, user experience and ease of use emerged as pivotal factors as patients with technology familiarity showed better adherence and completion rates while lower educational levels and cognitive impairments hindered active engagement.[35] Thus, the design of technology-based interventions in small- and large-scale implementation settings should account for users with varying levels of technology literacy and cognitive abilities and test the usability of the technologies to ensure iterative improvements in the design based on the users' feedback. Additionally, as shown in this review, as important as technology-enabled remote monitoring can be, adherence interventions should not only be technology-oriented but proper supervision and oversight by health care professionals is needed on a regular basis to ensure consistent communication between doctors and their patients. Moreover, we found that the mode of delivering the intervention (in-person or online) and the overall structure of the interventions influenced their effectiveness as one of the studies showed that embedding interventions within a therapeutic milieu yields better results.[34] This finding suggests that technology-based adherence interventions should be designed in a way that minimizes the logistical barriers that may occur preventing patients from continuing to adhere. Considering the time constraints reported by some of our patients, the designers of technology-based interventions should carefully consider their complexity to avoid overwhelming patients. Finally, considering both compliance and persistence is pivotal when crafting interventions that aim to enhance adherence among patients with memory issues. These factors collectively ensure the proper execution of treatment plans and the sustained commitment to them. Neglecting either element could undermine the intervention's effectiveness and hinder positive health outcomes. By encompassing both compliance and persistence in intervention design, health care professionals can create holistic strategies that maximize treatment impact and foster lasting improvements for individuals facing memory-related challenges.
Limitations
This study is, to our knowledge, among the first studies to acknowledge the importance of using technology to support medication adherence among patients with memory disorders. However, it has some limitations that are worth acknowledging. First, despite the importance of the results in some studies, findings cannot be generalized because of the sample size. Also, only studies in the English literature were included as done in previous studies. However, we acknowledge that because of this restriction, we may have missed potential studies with important findings. In addition, some studies do not account for demographics, implying that some groups of people may not be well represented. Also, the chosen keywords employed in this systematic review were thoughtfully selected to comprehensively cover the relevant literature within the scope of our research question. However, it is important to acknowledge that despite our best efforts, it is possible that some pertinent articles may have been inadvertently excluded. We recognize that systematic reviews strive for completeness, and while our approach was designed to capture a wide range of relevant studies, there may still be valuable contributions that lie beyond the boundaries of our chosen keywords. Lastly, some studies have a limited sample size, which makes it hard to generalize the results to broader populations. Additionally, it's important to note that the generalizability of certain studies may be limited due to variations in their quality assessment scores. This limitation is particularly evident in feasibility and exploratory studies, as well as in some randomized control trials where participants did not fully adhere to the intervention throughout the study duration. Consequently, to arrive at more robust and widely applicable conclusions, additional evidence is required. Another point to consider is that the few patients who did not adhere to the interventions were not asked about the reasons behind dropping out of the experiments. It is noteworthy that nonadherence to the intervention may be related to the fact that technology use added extra burden on the participants who already are suffering from the medication adherence burden. Future studies should investigate the burden bias related to the different interventions on medication adherence among patients with memory disorders.
Conclusion
This systematic review addressed an important gap in the area of medication adherence. It focuses on the role of health information technology in supporting medication adherence among patients with memory disorders. It also captures the factors that impact patients' medication adherence in the selected studies. This study adds to the literature by summarizing the main four areas where technology can contribute to medication adherence support: therapeutic education, reminder programs, simplifying treatment regimens, and early follow-up visits. The factors that impacted patients' adherence to technology-based treatment and medication were clustered into human–computer interaction challenges and system–computer integration challenges.
Highlights
-
(1) Health information technology solutions have the potential to support medical adherence among patients with memory disorders.
-
(2) The available technologies fall under four categories based on their impact: therapeutic patient education, simplifying treatment regimens, early follow-up visit and short-term treatment goals, and reminder programs.
-
(3) Technology-based adherence interventions are impacted by human–computer interaction factors and technology–system integration factors.
Clinical Relevance Statement
Medication adherence is a real challenge for people who suffer from memory disorders. This review aims to show the potential that health information technology has in supporting medication adherence among this population. The findings shed light on the factors that should be considered when designing a technology that aims to support medication adherence.
Multiple Choice Questions
-
What is medication adherence?
-
Ability to adhere to a treatment plan prescribed by a health care professional.
-
Health information technology
-
Patient-centered initiative
-
Compliance to laws
Correct Answer: The correct answer is option a. Medication adherence is defined by the World Health Organization as “the degree to which the person's behavior corresponds with the agreed recommendations from a health care provider.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3191684/.
-
-
Who has memory disorder?
-
People with dementia, Alzheimer's, etc.
-
Type of technology
-
Health system environment
-
Cardiovascular problem.
Correct Answer: The correct answer is option a. Memory disorders occur when damage to certain parts of the brain prevents or reduces the ability to store, retain, or remember memories. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/memory-loss-and-forgetfulness/memory-problems-forgetfulness-and-aging.
-
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
No human subjects were involved in the project.
-
References
- 1 Jahn H. Memory loss in Alzheimer's disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2013; 15 (04) 445-454
- 2 Nørby S. Why forget? On the adaptive value of memory loss. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015; 10 (05) 551-578
- 3 National Institute of Aging. Memory, forgetfulness, and aging: what's normal and what's not? 2020. Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/memory-forgetfulness-and-aging-whats-normal-and-whats-not#:∼:text=Memory%20and%20other%20thinking%20problems,disease%2C%20which%20cannot%20be%20reversed
- 4 Global dementia cases forecasted to triple by 2050. 2021. Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://aaic.alz.org/releases_2021/global-prevalence.asp#:∼:text=Also%20reported%20at%20AAIC%202021,onset%20dementia%20per%20year%2C%20globally
- 5 Nichols E. Estimating the global mortality from Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a new method and results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. 2019. Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/alz.042236
- 6 Lyketsos CG, Lopez O, Jones B, Fitzpatrick AL, Breitner J, DeKosky S. Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and mild cognitive impairment: results from the cardiovascular health study. JAMA 2002; 288 (12) 1475-1483
- 7 Weise L, Jakob E, Töpfer NF, Wilz G. Study protocol: individualized music for people with dementia - improvement of quality of life and social participation for people with dementia in institutional care. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18 (01) 313
- 8 Arlt S, Lindner R, Rösler A, von Renteln-Kruse W. Adherence to medication in patients with dementia: predictors and strategies for improvement. Drugs Aging 2008; 25 (12) 1033-1047
- 9 Sabaté E, Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. 2003 . Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42682
- 10 Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A. et al. Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health 2008; 11 (01) 44-47
- 11 Haynes RB. Determinant of compliance: The disease and the mechanics of treatment. In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. eds. Compliance in Health Care. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins; 1979: 13-15
- 12 Rand CS. Measuring adherence with therapy for chronic diseases: implications for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72 (10) 68D-74D
- 13 Kim J, Combs K, Downs J, Tillman F. Medication adherence: the elephant in the room. US Pharm 2018; 43 (01) 30-34
- 14 Brown MT, Bussell J, Dutta S, Davis K, Strong S, Mathew S. Medication adherence: truth and consequences. Am J Med Sci 2016; 351 (04) 387-399
- 15 Smith D, Lovell J, Weller C. et al. A systematic review of medication non-adherence in persons with dementia or cognitive impairment. PLoS One 2017; 12 (02) e0170651
- 16 Backes C, Moyano C, Rimaud C, Bienvenu C, Schneider MP. Digital medication adherence support: could healthcare providers recommend mobile health apps?. Front Med Technol 2021; 2: 616242
- 17 Gromisch ES, Turner AP, Haselkorn JK, Lo AC, Agresta T. Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. JAMIA Open 2020; 4 (03) ooaa067
- 18 Peng Y, Wang H, Fang Q. et al. Effectiveness of mobile applications on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26 (04) 550-561
- 19 Aldeer M, Javanmard M, Martin RP. A review of medication adherence monitoring technologies. Appl Syst Innov 2018; 1 (02) 14
- 20 Mason M, Cho Y, Rayo J, Gong Y, Harris M, Jiang Y. Technologies for medication adherence monitoring and technology assessment criteria: narrative review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10 (03) e35157
- 21 Misono AS, Cutrona SL, Choudhry NK. et al. Healthcare information technology interventions to improve cardiovascular and diabetes medication adherence. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16 (12, Suppl HIT): SP82-SP92
- 22 Rootes-Murdy K, Glazer KL, Van Wert MJ, Mondimore FM, Zandi PP. Mobile technology for medication adherence in people with mood disorders: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2018; 227: 613-617
- 23 Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, Green BB, Ginsburg AS. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e52
- 24 Elkefi S. Medical adherence and memory problems. 2022 Available at: https://osf.io/kq4sz/
- 25 Eriksen MB, Frandsen TF. The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc 2018; 106 (04) 420-431
- 26 Bailey C, Poole N, Blackburn DJ. Identifying patterns of communication in patients attending memory clinics: a systematic review of observations and signs with potential diagnostic utility. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68 (667) e123-e138
- 27 Sie-Yi L, ChePa N. Criteria of mobile psychotherapy games for memory disorder: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol 2020; 14 (05) 57-72
- 28 Boukhechba M, Baee S, Nobles AL, Gong J, Wells K, Barnes LE. A social cognitive theory-based framework for monitoring medication adherence applied to endocrine therapy in breast cancer survivors. IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform 2018; 2018: 275-278
- 29 McLoughlin A, Bennett K, Cahir C. Developing a model of the determinants of medication nonadherence in older community-dwelling patients. Ann Behav Med 2019; 53 (11) 942-954
- 30 Eicher L, Knop M, Aszodi N, Senner S, French LE, Wollenberg A. A systematic review of factors influencing treatment adherence in chronic inflammatory skin disease - strategies for optimizing treatment outcome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33 (12) 2253-2263
- 31 Peh KQE, Kwan YH, Goh H. et al. An adaptable framework for factors contributing to medication adherence: results from a systematic review of 102 conceptual frameworks. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36 (09) 2784-2795
- 32 Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G. et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf 2018; 34 (04) 285-291
- 33 Turunen M, Hokkanen L, Bäckman L. et al. Computer-based cognitive training for older adults: determinants of adherence. PLoS One 2019; 14 (07) e0219541
- 34 Gooding AL, Choi J, Fiszdon JM. et al. Comparing three methods of computerised cognitive training for older adults with subclinical cognitive decline. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2016; 26 (5–6): 810-821
- 35 Savulich G, Piercy T, Fox C. et al. Cognitive training using a novel memory game on an iPad in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2017; 20 (08) 624-633
- 36 van de Weijer SCF, Duits AA, Bloem BR. et al. Feasibility of a cognitive training game in Parkinson's disease: the randomized Parkin'Play study. Eur Neurol 2020; 83 (04) 426-432
- 37 Li F, Harmer P, Voit J, Chou L-S. Implementing an online virtual falls prevention intervention during a public health pandemic for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a feasibility trial. Clin Interv Aging 2021; 16: 973-983
- 38 Zarit SH, Chiusano C, Harrison AS, Sewell L, Krause C, Liu Y. Rehabilitation of persons with dementia: using technology to improve participation. Aging Ment Health 2021; 25 (03) 543-550
- 39 Zárate-Bravo E, García-Vázquez J-P, Torres-Cervantes E. et al. Supporting the medication adherence of older Mexican adults through external cues provided with ambient displays: feasibility randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 (03) e14680
- 40 Robert P, Manera V, Derreumaux A. et al. Efficacy of a web app for cognitive training (MeMo) regarding cognitive and behavioral performance in people with neurocognitive disorders: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (03) e17167
- 41 Kamimura T. Older adults with Alzheimer's disease who have used an automatic medication dispenser for 3 or more years. Clin Gerontol 2019; 42 (01) 127-133
- 42 Hayes TL, Hunt JM, Adami A, Kaye JA. An electronic pillbox for continuous monitoring of medication adherence. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006; 1: 6400-6403
- 43 Burdea G, Polistico K, Krishnamoorthy A. et al. Feasibility study of the BrightBrainer™ integrative cognitive rehabilitation system for elderly with dementia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2015; 10 (05) 421-432
- 44 Park J-H. Effects of virtual reality-based spatial cognitive training on hippocampal function of older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr 2022; 34 (02) 157-163
- 45 Coley N, Andre L, Hoevenaar-Blom MP. et al; HATICE study group, PRODEMOS study group. Factors predicting engagement of older adults with a coach-supported ehealth intervention promoting lifestyle change and associations between engagement and changes in cardiovascular and dementia risk: secondary analysis of an 18-month multinational randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24 (05) e32006
- 46 Vidoni ED, Watts AS, Burns JM. et al. Feasibility of a memory clinic-based physical activity prescription program. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 53 (01) 161-170
- 47 Yang H-L, Chu H, Kao C-C. et al. Development and effectiveness of virtual interactive working memory training for older people with mild cognitive impairment: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2019; 48 (04) 519-525
- 48 Stentzel U, van den Berg N, Schulze LN. et al. Predictors of medication adherence among patients with severe psychiatric disorders: findings from the baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial (Tecla). BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18 (01) 155
- 49 Abdisa E, Fekadu G, Girma S. et al. Self-stigma and medication adherence among patients with mental illness treated at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. Int J Ment Health Syst 2020; 14 (01) 56
- 50 Deng M, Zhai S, Ouyang X, Liu Z, Ross B. Factors influencing medication adherence among patients with severe mental disorders from the perspective of mental health professionals. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22 (01) 22
- 51 Khanassov V, Rojas-Rozo L, Sourial R, Yang XQ, Vedel I. Needs of patients with dementia and their caregivers in primary care: lessons learned from the Alzheimer plan of Quebec. BMC Fam Pract 2021; 22 (01) 186
- 52 Mason M, Cho Y, Rayo J, Gong Y, Harris M, Jiang Y. Technologies for medication adherence monitoring and technology assessment criteria: narrative review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10 (03) e35157
- 53 Granger BB, Bosworth HB. Medication adherence: emerging use of technology. Curr Opin Cardiol 2011; 26 (04) 279-287
- 54 Vargas-Schaffer G, Cogan J. Patient therapeutic education: placing the patient at the centre of the WHO analgesic ladder. Can Fam Physician 2014; 60 (03) 235-241
- 55 Driever EM, Brand PL. Education makes people take their medication: myth or maxim?. Breathe (Sheff) 2020; 16 (01) 190338
- 56 Brown M, O'Neill N, van Woerden H, Eslambolchilar P, Jones M, John A. Gamification and adherence to web-based mental health interventions: a systematic review. JMIR Ment Health 2016; 3 (03) e39
- 57 Fenerty SD, West C, Davis SA, Kaplan SG, Feldman SR. The effect of reminder systems on patients' adherence to treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012; 6: 127-135
- 58 Airehrour D, Madanian S, Abraham AM. Designing a memory-aid and reminder system for dementia patients and older adults. In: Filip FG. ed., Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on INFORMATICS in ECONOMY (IE 2018). 2018: 75-81
- 59 Abu-Dalbouh H, Al-Habeeb A, Al-Kholifi A, Al-Motiry I, Al-Buhairy M. A mobile reminder system for elderly and Alzheimer's patients. Int J Comput Sci Iss 2015; 12 (05) 95
- 60 Aggarwal R, Visram S, Martin G. et al. Defining the enablers and barriers to the implementation of large-scale, health care-related mobile technology: qualitative case study in a tertiary hospital setting. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10 (02) e31497
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 07 September 2023
Accepted: 09 October 2023
Article published online:
31 January 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Jahn H. Memory loss in Alzheimer's disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2013; 15 (04) 445-454
- 2 Nørby S. Why forget? On the adaptive value of memory loss. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015; 10 (05) 551-578
- 3 National Institute of Aging. Memory, forgetfulness, and aging: what's normal and what's not? 2020. Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/memory-forgetfulness-and-aging-whats-normal-and-whats-not#:∼:text=Memory%20and%20other%20thinking%20problems,disease%2C%20which%20cannot%20be%20reversed
- 4 Global dementia cases forecasted to triple by 2050. 2021. Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://aaic.alz.org/releases_2021/global-prevalence.asp#:∼:text=Also%20reported%20at%20AAIC%202021,onset%20dementia%20per%20year%2C%20globally
- 5 Nichols E. Estimating the global mortality from Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a new method and results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. 2019. Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/alz.042236
- 6 Lyketsos CG, Lopez O, Jones B, Fitzpatrick AL, Breitner J, DeKosky S. Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and mild cognitive impairment: results from the cardiovascular health study. JAMA 2002; 288 (12) 1475-1483
- 7 Weise L, Jakob E, Töpfer NF, Wilz G. Study protocol: individualized music for people with dementia - improvement of quality of life and social participation for people with dementia in institutional care. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18 (01) 313
- 8 Arlt S, Lindner R, Rösler A, von Renteln-Kruse W. Adherence to medication in patients with dementia: predictors and strategies for improvement. Drugs Aging 2008; 25 (12) 1033-1047
- 9 Sabaté E, Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. 2003 . Accessed October 19, 2023 at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42682
- 10 Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A. et al. Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health 2008; 11 (01) 44-47
- 11 Haynes RB. Determinant of compliance: The disease and the mechanics of treatment. In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. eds. Compliance in Health Care. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins; 1979: 13-15
- 12 Rand CS. Measuring adherence with therapy for chronic diseases: implications for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72 (10) 68D-74D
- 13 Kim J, Combs K, Downs J, Tillman F. Medication adherence: the elephant in the room. US Pharm 2018; 43 (01) 30-34
- 14 Brown MT, Bussell J, Dutta S, Davis K, Strong S, Mathew S. Medication adherence: truth and consequences. Am J Med Sci 2016; 351 (04) 387-399
- 15 Smith D, Lovell J, Weller C. et al. A systematic review of medication non-adherence in persons with dementia or cognitive impairment. PLoS One 2017; 12 (02) e0170651
- 16 Backes C, Moyano C, Rimaud C, Bienvenu C, Schneider MP. Digital medication adherence support: could healthcare providers recommend mobile health apps?. Front Med Technol 2021; 2: 616242
- 17 Gromisch ES, Turner AP, Haselkorn JK, Lo AC, Agresta T. Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. JAMIA Open 2020; 4 (03) ooaa067
- 18 Peng Y, Wang H, Fang Q. et al. Effectiveness of mobile applications on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26 (04) 550-561
- 19 Aldeer M, Javanmard M, Martin RP. A review of medication adherence monitoring technologies. Appl Syst Innov 2018; 1 (02) 14
- 20 Mason M, Cho Y, Rayo J, Gong Y, Harris M, Jiang Y. Technologies for medication adherence monitoring and technology assessment criteria: narrative review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10 (03) e35157
- 21 Misono AS, Cutrona SL, Choudhry NK. et al. Healthcare information technology interventions to improve cardiovascular and diabetes medication adherence. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16 (12, Suppl HIT): SP82-SP92
- 22 Rootes-Murdy K, Glazer KL, Van Wert MJ, Mondimore FM, Zandi PP. Mobile technology for medication adherence in people with mood disorders: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2018; 227: 613-617
- 23 Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, Green BB, Ginsburg AS. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e52
- 24 Elkefi S. Medical adherence and memory problems. 2022 Available at: https://osf.io/kq4sz/
- 25 Eriksen MB, Frandsen TF. The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc 2018; 106 (04) 420-431
- 26 Bailey C, Poole N, Blackburn DJ. Identifying patterns of communication in patients attending memory clinics: a systematic review of observations and signs with potential diagnostic utility. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68 (667) e123-e138
- 27 Sie-Yi L, ChePa N. Criteria of mobile psychotherapy games for memory disorder: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol 2020; 14 (05) 57-72
- 28 Boukhechba M, Baee S, Nobles AL, Gong J, Wells K, Barnes LE. A social cognitive theory-based framework for monitoring medication adherence applied to endocrine therapy in breast cancer survivors. IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform 2018; 2018: 275-278
- 29 McLoughlin A, Bennett K, Cahir C. Developing a model of the determinants of medication nonadherence in older community-dwelling patients. Ann Behav Med 2019; 53 (11) 942-954
- 30 Eicher L, Knop M, Aszodi N, Senner S, French LE, Wollenberg A. A systematic review of factors influencing treatment adherence in chronic inflammatory skin disease - strategies for optimizing treatment outcome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33 (12) 2253-2263
- 31 Peh KQE, Kwan YH, Goh H. et al. An adaptable framework for factors contributing to medication adherence: results from a systematic review of 102 conceptual frameworks. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36 (09) 2784-2795
- 32 Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G. et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf 2018; 34 (04) 285-291
- 33 Turunen M, Hokkanen L, Bäckman L. et al. Computer-based cognitive training for older adults: determinants of adherence. PLoS One 2019; 14 (07) e0219541
- 34 Gooding AL, Choi J, Fiszdon JM. et al. Comparing three methods of computerised cognitive training for older adults with subclinical cognitive decline. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2016; 26 (5–6): 810-821
- 35 Savulich G, Piercy T, Fox C. et al. Cognitive training using a novel memory game on an iPad in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2017; 20 (08) 624-633
- 36 van de Weijer SCF, Duits AA, Bloem BR. et al. Feasibility of a cognitive training game in Parkinson's disease: the randomized Parkin'Play study. Eur Neurol 2020; 83 (04) 426-432
- 37 Li F, Harmer P, Voit J, Chou L-S. Implementing an online virtual falls prevention intervention during a public health pandemic for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a feasibility trial. Clin Interv Aging 2021; 16: 973-983
- 38 Zarit SH, Chiusano C, Harrison AS, Sewell L, Krause C, Liu Y. Rehabilitation of persons with dementia: using technology to improve participation. Aging Ment Health 2021; 25 (03) 543-550
- 39 Zárate-Bravo E, García-Vázquez J-P, Torres-Cervantes E. et al. Supporting the medication adherence of older Mexican adults through external cues provided with ambient displays: feasibility randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 (03) e14680
- 40 Robert P, Manera V, Derreumaux A. et al. Efficacy of a web app for cognitive training (MeMo) regarding cognitive and behavioral performance in people with neurocognitive disorders: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (03) e17167
- 41 Kamimura T. Older adults with Alzheimer's disease who have used an automatic medication dispenser for 3 or more years. Clin Gerontol 2019; 42 (01) 127-133
- 42 Hayes TL, Hunt JM, Adami A, Kaye JA. An electronic pillbox for continuous monitoring of medication adherence. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006; 1: 6400-6403
- 43 Burdea G, Polistico K, Krishnamoorthy A. et al. Feasibility study of the BrightBrainer™ integrative cognitive rehabilitation system for elderly with dementia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2015; 10 (05) 421-432
- 44 Park J-H. Effects of virtual reality-based spatial cognitive training on hippocampal function of older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr 2022; 34 (02) 157-163
- 45 Coley N, Andre L, Hoevenaar-Blom MP. et al; HATICE study group, PRODEMOS study group. Factors predicting engagement of older adults with a coach-supported ehealth intervention promoting lifestyle change and associations between engagement and changes in cardiovascular and dementia risk: secondary analysis of an 18-month multinational randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24 (05) e32006
- 46 Vidoni ED, Watts AS, Burns JM. et al. Feasibility of a memory clinic-based physical activity prescription program. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 53 (01) 161-170
- 47 Yang H-L, Chu H, Kao C-C. et al. Development and effectiveness of virtual interactive working memory training for older people with mild cognitive impairment: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2019; 48 (04) 519-525
- 48 Stentzel U, van den Berg N, Schulze LN. et al. Predictors of medication adherence among patients with severe psychiatric disorders: findings from the baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial (Tecla). BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18 (01) 155
- 49 Abdisa E, Fekadu G, Girma S. et al. Self-stigma and medication adherence among patients with mental illness treated at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. Int J Ment Health Syst 2020; 14 (01) 56
- 50 Deng M, Zhai S, Ouyang X, Liu Z, Ross B. Factors influencing medication adherence among patients with severe mental disorders from the perspective of mental health professionals. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22 (01) 22
- 51 Khanassov V, Rojas-Rozo L, Sourial R, Yang XQ, Vedel I. Needs of patients with dementia and their caregivers in primary care: lessons learned from the Alzheimer plan of Quebec. BMC Fam Pract 2021; 22 (01) 186
- 52 Mason M, Cho Y, Rayo J, Gong Y, Harris M, Jiang Y. Technologies for medication adherence monitoring and technology assessment criteria: narrative review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10 (03) e35157
- 53 Granger BB, Bosworth HB. Medication adherence: emerging use of technology. Curr Opin Cardiol 2011; 26 (04) 279-287
- 54 Vargas-Schaffer G, Cogan J. Patient therapeutic education: placing the patient at the centre of the WHO analgesic ladder. Can Fam Physician 2014; 60 (03) 235-241
- 55 Driever EM, Brand PL. Education makes people take their medication: myth or maxim?. Breathe (Sheff) 2020; 16 (01) 190338
- 56 Brown M, O'Neill N, van Woerden H, Eslambolchilar P, Jones M, John A. Gamification and adherence to web-based mental health interventions: a systematic review. JMIR Ment Health 2016; 3 (03) e39
- 57 Fenerty SD, West C, Davis SA, Kaplan SG, Feldman SR. The effect of reminder systems on patients' adherence to treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012; 6: 127-135
- 58 Airehrour D, Madanian S, Abraham AM. Designing a memory-aid and reminder system for dementia patients and older adults. In: Filip FG. ed., Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on INFORMATICS in ECONOMY (IE 2018). 2018: 75-81
- 59 Abu-Dalbouh H, Al-Habeeb A, Al-Kholifi A, Al-Motiry I, Al-Buhairy M. A mobile reminder system for elderly and Alzheimer's patients. Int J Comput Sci Iss 2015; 12 (05) 95
- 60 Aggarwal R, Visram S, Martin G. et al. Defining the enablers and barriers to the implementation of large-scale, health care-related mobile technology: qualitative case study in a tertiary hospital setting. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10 (02) e31497









