Keywords
venous thromboembolism - children - rivaroxaban
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children is rare, with an estimated 0.01 to 0.05 events
occurring per 1,000 children per year.[1]
[2] If we consider only the population of hospitalized children, however, the incidence
is approximately 1/200. The incidence of VTE in adults is approximately 15- to 200-fold
higher than in children[3]; however, with advances in treatment for life-threatening or chronic medical conditions
and an increased awareness of VTE among pediatricians, reports of VTE in children
are increasing.[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8] An increase in VTE incidence has also been observed in adults; however, these increases
are believed to be a result of improvements in imaging techniques rather than improved
survival of patients with chronic diseases.[9] Approximately 95% of cases of pediatric VTE are provoked, often as a complication
with the use of central venous catheters (CVCs).[10]
[11] In adults, the proportion of VTE that is provoked is lower than in children, with
approximately 60% of cases of VTE in adults being unprovoked.[12]
[13] CVC-associated complications are a particularly common cause of VTE in children
aged < 2 years, accounting for approximately two-thirds of cases of VTE.[11] As observed in adults, active cancer and chemotherapy can also increase the risk
of VTE in children.[10]
[14] The incidence of VTE is also higher in children with comorbidities, e.g., severe
infection, sickle cell disease, trauma, antiphospholipid syndrome, nephrotic syndrome,
homocystinuria, and with some congenital anomalies that constitute the equivalent
of an anatomical thrombophilia, e.g., agenesis of the inferior vena cava, May–Thurner
syndrome with compression of one or both iliac veins, and upper thoracic outlet syndrome.[10]
[14] The diagnosis of VTE in neonatal and pediatric age is often particularly difficult
because, beyond the practical problems of performing assessments in children, the
vascular diagnostic techniques have been almost exclusively validated in adults and
the diagnostic criteria have been extrapolated tout court to the child.
Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Children
Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Children
At the beginning of 2021, the European Medicines Agency recommended the approval of
the new indication of rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, for the treatment
and prevention of VTE in children aged 0 to 17 years, including those with catheter-related
thrombosis and cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Until then, the treatment of VTE
in children was mainly based on observational data or extrapolated from studies in
adults. Nevertheless, the use of anticoagulant drugs in pediatric patients is different
from that in adults for many reasons including: (1) the epidemiology of VTE; (2) the
fact that the hemostatic system in children changes with age; (3) the pharmacokinetics
(PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of anticoagulants, which also depends on age; (4) the
difficulty of the administration routes, which can influence the choice of the drug;
(5) the type of diet can strongly influence the absorption of the drug, especially
in newborns. Before rivaroxaban approval the recommended treatment options for VTE
were unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux, and
vitamin K antagonists (VKA). There is therefore no type of treatment for children
with VTE that does not require subcutaneous or intravenous injections for long periods
of time or laboratory monitoring, which can pose a serious burden to young children,
especially newborns, as well as their parents or caregivers. To address this problem,
Bayer has developed granules for an oral suspension of rivaroxaban, which does not
require injections or regular monitoring, and which allows for precise dosing and
more manageable treatment for children with VTE.
Rivaroxaban Pediatric Investigational Program
Rivaroxaban Pediatric Investigational Program
Due to the low incidence of VTE in children, and the recruitment challenges associated
with pediatric trials, a novel approach was required to determine the dosing schedule
for rivaroxaban in children. Changes to the hemostatic system that occur during a
child's development can have an impact on the PD of a medication, and therefore, it
was important to first confirm the PK/PD properties of rivaroxaban in children and
neonates using in vitro testing.[15]
[16] These assessments confirmed that, in vitro, rivaroxaban had a predictable, dose-dependent
PK/PD profile across age groups of neonates and children.[15]
[16] A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to estimate the
appropriate dosing schedule for rivaroxaban in children, which incorporated growth/maturation
and variability in anthropometrics (e.g., body height, weight, and body mass index),
anatomy (e.g., organ weight), physiology (e.g., blood flow rates), metabolism, and
excretion.[17]
[18]
[19] The dosing schedule determined from this model was then confirmed in the EINSTEIN
JUNIOR phase I study (n = 59), which demonstrated that the PK of rivaroxaban in children with VTE was within
the expected range predicted by the PBPK model for the area under the plasma concentration–time
curve zero to 24 hours, maximum plasma concentration and minimum plasma concentration
measured 20 to 24 hours after rivaroxaban administration across all age groups from
0.5 to <18 years.[19] The phase I trial also demonstrated that the PD parameters of rivaroxaban (e.g.,
prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-factor Xa activity)
showed a linear relationship with rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and aligned with
previous data from adults.[19] Rivaroxaban use in the pediatric population underwent a complete investigational
program, consisting mainly of one phase I PK/PD trial, three phase II trials, and
one phase III trial.[19]
[20]
[21] Phase I, II, and III were conducted in parallel, with staggered age groups. In the
phase I trial two different rivaroxaban dose levels were tested (10 and 20 mg) and
two different formulations (tablet and oral suspension). PD parameters (prothrombin
time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-factor Xa activity) showed a
linear relationship versus rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and were in line with
previously acquired adult data. The rivaroxaban pediatric PDPK model, used to predict
the doses for the individual body weight groups, was confirmed. No episodes of bleeding
were reported.[19] The phase II trials (93 patients) investigated the safety and efficacy to define
rivaroxaban treatment regimens; therapeutic rivaroxaban exposures were confirmed with
once daily dose in children ≥30 kg and twice daily in children 20 < 30 kg. Children
with even lower body weights (<20 kg, particularly <12 kg) showed low exposures so
rivaroxaban dosages were revised.[20] The phase III trial enrolled 500 patients from birth to <18 years and documented
the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban regimens at a 20 mg equivalent dose for the
prevention of fatal or symptomatic nonfatal recurrent VTE and safety regarding major
bleeding versus heparin/VKA ([Table 1]).[21] Results were similar to those in rivaroxaban studies in adults.[22]
Table 1
Efficacy and safety study outcomes[21]
|
Rivaroxaban
n (%)
|
Heparin or VKA
n (%)
|
Hazard ratio
(95% CI)
|
|
Intention-to-treat population
|
335
|
165
|
–
|
|
Symptomatic recurrence of VTE
|
4 (1)
|
5 (3)
|
0.40 (0.11–1.41)
|
|
Symptomatic recurrence of VTE or deterioration on repeat imaging
|
5 (1)
|
6 (4)
|
0.41 (0.12–1.36)
|
|
Net clinical benefit[a]
|
4 (1)
|
7 (4)
|
0.30 (0.08–0.93)
|
|
Mortality[b]
|
1 (<1)
|
0 (0)
|
–
|
|
Safety population
|
329
|
162
|
–
|
|
Major bleeding
|
0 (0)
|
2 (1)
|
–
|
|
Major or CRNM bleeding
|
10 (3)
|
3 (2)
|
1.58 (0.51–6.27)
|
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRNM, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding;
VKA, vitamin K antagonist; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
a First occurrence of recurrent VTE or major bleeding.
b Only cancer-related occurred.
EINSTEIN Program Complete Data
EINSTEIN Program Complete Data
The results from EINSTEIN JUNIOR support existing data on management of VTE with rivaroxaban
in challenging patient populations; subgroup analyses of the pooled data from the
EINSTEIN Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and EINSTEIN Pulmonary Embolism (PE) trials in
adults have demonstrated a favorable benefit–risk profile in several challenging patient
populations including frail patients (defined as one or more of aged > 75 years, creatinine
clearance [CrCl] < 50 mL/min, low body weight [≤50 kg]),[22] patients with renal impairment,[23] and patients with cancer.[24] Further evidence in adult patients with cancer-associated thrombosis has also been
obtained from the SELECT-D pilot study.[25] The rates of recurrent VTE reported in frail patients were 2.7% with rivaroxaban
and 3.8% with enoxaparin/VKA (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39–1.18).[22] In patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl = 30–49 mL/min), 3.4% treated with
rivaroxaban and 3.2% treated with enoxaparin/VKA had a recurrent VTE event (HR = 1.05;
95% CI = 0.44–2.47).[23] Rates of major bleeding were also lower in these patient populations; 1.3 and 4.5%
for rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA, respectively, in frail patients (HR = 0.27; 95%
CI = 0.13–0.54) and 0.9 and 3.9% for rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA, respectively,
in patients with moderate renal impairment (HR = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.06–0.81).[22]
[23] The composite of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in frail patients was 4.6% for
rivaroxaban and 8.4% for enoxaparin/VKA, indicating an improvement in net clinical
benefit (HR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.34–0.77).[22] A similar profile of net clinical benefit has also been observed in patients with
cancer-associated thrombosis, in both the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE subgroup analysis
and the dedicated cancer-associated thrombosis trial, SELECT-D.[24]
[25] The overall incidence of recurrent VTE is higher in patients with cancer, with rates
of 4.5 and 6.6% for rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA, respectively, in the pooled analysis
of patients with active cancer in EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.35–1.30).[3] In SELECT-D, the 6-month cumulative rate of VTE recurrence was 4% in patients treated
with rivaroxaban and 11% in patients receiving dalteparin (HR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.19–0.99).[4] Major bleeding rates in patients with cancer in EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE were
2.3% with rivaroxaban and 5.0% with enoxaparin/VKA (HR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18–0.99),
corresponding to an overall trend toward an improvement in net clinical benefit (HR = 0.50;
95% CI = 0.24–1.03).[24] Low major bleeding rates were also demonstrated in SELECT-D, with a 6-month cumulative
incidence of major bleeding of 6% in patients treated with rivaroxaban and 4% in patients
treated with dalteparin (HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 0.68–4.96).[25] In EINSTEIN JUNIOR 56 children with cancer were included, allocated to either therapeutic
dose bodyweight-adjusted oral rivaroxaban and received a median of 30 concomitant
medications. Rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulants appeared safe and efficacious
and were associated with reduced clot burden in most children with cancer-associated
VTE, including those who had anticoagulant treatment interruptions (thrombocytopenia,
invasive procedures or adverse events).[26] During the 3 months of treatment, no recurrent VTE or major bleeding occurred (95%
CI = 0.0–6.4%), and 3-month repeat imaging showed complete or partial vein recanalization
in 20 and 24 of 52 evaluable children (38 and 46%, respectively).
The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in children reported in the EINSTEIN JUNIOR
trial provides further support to previous trials in adults, which demonstrate a favorable
profile for the use of rivaroxaban for the management of VTE in challenging patient
populations ([Fig. 1A–C]).[21]
Fig. 1 Recurrent VTE (A), major bleeding (B), and net clinical benefit (C) in the EINSTEIN program in adults and in the EINSTEIN JUNIOR. CI, confidence interval;
HR, hazard ratio; VKA, vitamin K antagonist; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Consistency with Other Clinical Evidence
Consistency with Other Clinical Evidence
A single center, retrospective, observational cohort study by Hassan and Motwani[27] reported on the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in 52 pediatric VTE patients
aged 0 to 16 years in a real-world clinical setting. All patients initially received
parenteral anticoagulation with LMWH for at least 5 days prior to rivaroxaban initiation.
Patients weighing <30 kg received body weight-adjusted liquid formulation and those
weighing ≥30 kg received rivaroxaban tablets of 15 or 20 mg. Overall, no bleeding
events were reported, and recurrence of thrombosis occurred in only two (3.6%) patients.
About 35% had normalized reimaging, 40.3% improved, 9.6% were unchanged, and 11.5%
stopped rivaroxaban without reimaging. Twenty-six (47.2%) patients had CVC-related
thrombosis, which was either normalized or improved after 6 weeks, whereas those who
required longer duration of anticoagulation had more extensive thrombosis. Of the
11 (20%) patients in the cohort with a CVT, none experienced bleeding or recurrent
thrombosis. Rivaroxaban was used for secondary VTE prophylaxis after acute treatment
in six (11%) patients in the cohort, with no recurrence of thrombosis or bleeding
reports. Twenty-five patients were <2 years old and represented 45% of the cohort
including three patients with CVT. Among the 25 patients, 19 (34%) were between 1
month and 2 years of age. Only 3 (16%) out of the 19 patients <2 years of age had
their thrombosis unchanged on reimaging, of whom 1 had recurrent thrombosis. Of the
6 (11%) patients who were less than 1 month old at the time of start of rivaroxaban,
on reimaging, three patients had normalized results, one improved, one was unchanged,
and one stopped rivaroxaban without reimaging based on clinical improvement. The authors
concluded that this study demonstrated that the rivaroxaban treatment regimens were
well tolerated and as effective as reported in published trials in children. Further
real-world data and observational studies are essential to investigate the use of
rivaroxaban among different risk groups in pediatric VTE treatment.[27] Marten et al[28] presented data on the preliminary findings from the prospective Dresden NOAC registry
to evaluate the use of rivaroxaban in adolescents for the treatment of VTE. Until
September 19, 2018, a total of 23 patients <18 years of age were enrolled (19 female,
4 male; mean age of 15.7 ± 1.1 years; mean body mass index: 22.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2). During follow-up (median: 1,454 days; interquartile range: 915.5/1737.5 days),
three recurrent VTE events were observed (one recurrent DVT 3 years after stopping
rivaroxaban, one early recurrent DVT during rivaroxaban therapy with suspected anticoagulation
gap due to vomiting, and a late recurrent VTE 590 days after the first VTE in the
same patient). A total of 35 bleeding events occurred (International Society on Thrombosis
and Haemostasis definition: 26 minor, 8 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, 1 major
bleeding). The authors concluded that rivaroxaban treatment for VTE seems feasible
and effective in adolescent patients, in whom the prevalence of thrombophilia and
a positive family history for VTE is high.[28]
[29]
Venous Thromboembolism Setting Patients
Venous Thromboembolism Setting Patients
Rivaroxaban is used not only to treat DVT usually in the leg and PE and to prevent
DVT and PE from recurring in adults, but also to treat VTE and prevent VTE from recurring
in children and adolescents aged less than 18 years; in this case there is a broad
possibility to treat our young patients based on the EINSTEIN JUNIOR trial data.[21] The result relies in part on extrapolation of data obtained with rivaroxaban in
adults. As a prerequisite for extrapolation according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
and European Medicines Agency, on the basis of comparison of the results of this pediatric
study with those of large randomized studies in adults, we can deduce a similar clinical
outcome of VTE.[21] On the other hand, whereas in the trial in adults with VTE there were only symptomatic
proximal DVT and symptomatic PE, in the JUNIOR population we can find a variety of
thrombosis phenotypes, such as CVT or sinus thrombosis, catheter-related VTE, lower
extremities, caval, renal, or portal vein, right heart, upper extremities, jugular
vein, noncatheter-related VTE, symptomatic VTE, first episode of VTE, initial heparinization,
plus thrombolysis, or thrombectomy.[21] In particular, safety and efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in pediatric CVT was
analyzed in a prespecified substudy of EINSTEIN JUNIOR trial. Children (0–18 years)
with CVT were randomized to rivaroxaban or heparin/VKA to assess the safety and efficacy
of the two treatments ([Table 2]).[30] Children with CVT treated with rivaroxaban or heparin/VKA had a favorable clinical
outcome, with a low risk of recurrent thrombosis or clinically relevant bleeding.[30] In another subgroup, anticoagulant therapy of symptomatic or asymptomatic CVC-VTE
in children was safe, efficacious and associated with reduced clot burden.[31] There was no recurrent thrombosis, 90% thrombus resolution, no major bleeding, 2%
clinically relevant bleeding.[31] In conclusion, in clinical practice, the use of a pediatric dose has multiple uses
in each vascular bed, etiology, and patient setting. The Committee for Medicinal Products
for Human Use—European Medicines Agency's Committee, in the light of the overall data
submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, issued a positive opinion
for granting a marketing authorization to rivaroxaban (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany)
on November 12, 2020. It was authorized for the treatment of VTE and prevention of
VTE recurrence in children and adolescents aged less than 18 years weighing from 30
to 50 kg and more than 50 kg, after at least 5 days of initial parenteral anticoagulation
treatment. The dose and frequency of administration are determined based on body weight
([Table 3]). It is necessary to monitor the child's weight, and the dose of rivaroxaban should
be reviewed regularly, especially for children weighing less than 12 kg to ensure
maintenance of a therapeutic dose. Oral suspension is available in two presentations
each consisting of a folding box containing:
Table 2
Efficacy and safety study outcomes[30]
|
Outcomes at 3 mo
|
Rivaroxaban
n = 73
|
Heparin or VKA
n = 41
|
|
Recurrent thrombosis
|
0
|
2%
|
|
Major bleeding
|
0
|
2%
|
|
Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding
|
7%
|
0
|
|
More help with activities of daily living than before CVT
|
5%
|
7%
|
Abbreviations: CVT, cerebral venous thrombosis; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
Table 3
Recommended dose of rivaroxaban in pediatric patients from term newborns
|
Body weight (kg)
|
Formulation
|
Regimen
|
Total daily dose (mg)
|
|
Once daily
|
Twice daily
|
Thrice daily
|
|
2.6– < 3
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
0.8
|
2.4
|
|
3– < 4
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
0.9
|
2.7
|
|
4– < 5
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
1.4
|
4.2
|
|
5– < 7
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
1.6
|
4.8
|
|
7– < 8
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
1.8
|
5.4
|
|
8– < 9
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
2.4
|
7.2
|
|
9– < 10
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
2.8
|
8.4
|
|
10– < 12
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
–
|
3.0
|
9
|
|
12– < 30
|
Oral suspension
|
–
|
5
|
–
|
10
|
|
30– < 50
|
Tablet/oral suspension
|
15
|
–
|
–
|
15
|
|
≥50
|
Tablet/oral suspension
|
20
|
–
|
–
|
20
|
• For children weighing less than 4 kg: one brown 100 mL glass bottle containing 2.625 g
granules, corresponding to 51.7 mg rivaroxaban, closed with a child-resistant screw
cap, two oral dosing syringes 1 mL (blue syringe, marked as liquid dosing device [LDD])
with 0.1 mL marked graduations, one adapter for bottles and oral syringes, one water
syringe 50 mL with 1 mL marked graduations.
• For children weighing 4 kg and more: one brown glass bottle 250 mL containing 5.25 g
granules, corresponding to 103.4 mg rivaroxaban, closed with a child-resistant screw
cap, two oral dosing syringes 5 mL (blue syringe, marked as LDD) with 0.2 mL marked
graduations, two oral dosing syringes 10 mL (blue syringe, marked as LDD) with 0.5 mL
marked graduations, one adapter for bottles and oral syringes, one water syringe 100 mL
with 2 mL marked graduations.
Conclusion
Progress in anticoagulant therapy of the pediatric population with VTE has been slow.
A strong medical need is for improving knowledge about different subtypes of thrombosis
by age, location, and benefits of treatment more specific to these patients. As for
rivaroxaban, the EINSTEIN JUNIOR randomized trial provides a strong support to the
evidence in this setting of patient. The results from clinical practice studies are
comparable with this trial; these confirm the benefit–risk profile of rivaroxaban
for the treatment of VTE in challenging patient populations either in retrospective
cohort study, including CVC-related thrombosis, or in the Dresden Registry observational
study.[27]
[28] Availability of a safe and effective oral agent with pediatric data to support use
is of clear benefit. Further advances in VTE management of neonates and children might
be obtained from international registries. It would be of interest to investigate
the setting of pediatric patients, where clinical evidence is too poor in terms of
genetic thrombophilia or in a larger cohort of cancer patients. Another challenge
could be to demonstrate improved compliance with oral therapy for the pediatric patients
and that this is associated with greater efficacy. Many knowledge gaps remain and
require further investigations, which will help advance the treatment of VTE in pediatrics.
