Download PDF
Homœopathic Links 2024; 37(01): 031-037
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1778698
Technical Note

A Guide to Cross-Sectional Studies in Homeopathic Research: Part 3 of the Research Method Series

Abhijit Dutta 
1   International Cooperation Section, Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The cross-sectional study design, a prominent feature in the realm of health research, entails the simultaneous measurement of outcomes and exposures among study participants. This study design finds frequent application in homeopathic contexts, particularly in population-based surveys and the evaluation of disease prevalence or understanding the patient preferences in clinic-based samples. Notably, the utilisation of cross-sectional studies in homeopathy brings forth advantages such as expeditiousness and cost-effectiveness. These studies, serving as valuable precursors, play a pivotal role in offering crucial information before embarking on more extensive research endeavours, such as planning comprehensive cohort studies or establishing baseline measurements. While their rapid and economical nature allows for the efficient assessment of prevalence and associations, it is imperative to exercise caution when drawing causal inferences, given the singular nature of exposure and outcome measurements. This paper is meticulously designed to serve as a guide, aiding readers in comprehending the intricate nuances of cross-sectional study design and their judicious application in real-world scenarios, particularly within the dynamic landscape of homeopathy. By delving into the deeper aspects of conducting and reporting such studies, this paper aims to equip researchers and practitioners with the knowledge and insights needed to navigate the technicalities of cross-sectional research within the distinctive context of homeopathic practice.

Keywords

cross-sectional study - observational study - homeopathy - research method


Publication History

Article published online:
01 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Dutta A. Navigating the budding researchers through different study designs in homeopathy: Part 1 of research method series. Homoeopath Links 2023; 36: 128-136
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bell IR. The evolution of homeopathic theory-driven research and the methodological toolbox. Am Homeopath 2008; 14: 56-74
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Setia MS. Methodology series module 3: cross-sectional studies. Indian J Dermatol 2016; 61 (03) 261-264
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Dutta A. Unleashing the power of narratives: crafting compelling homeopathic case reports—part 2 of the research method series. Homoeopath Links 2023; 36 (03) 208-214
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Dutta A. A guide to writing case series in homeopathy: a supplement to part 2 of the research method series. Homoeopath Links 2023; 36 (03) 215-218
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J 2003; 20 (01) 54-60
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R. Study designs: part 3 - analytical observational studies. Perspect Clin Res 2019; 10 (02) 91-94
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Ramji S. Study design: observational studies. Indian Pediatr 2022; 59 (06) 493-498
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Setia MS. Methodology series module 5: sampling Strategies. Indian J Dermatol 2016; 61 (05) 505-509
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2013; 6 (01) 14-17
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Naing L, Nordin RB, Abdul Rahman H, Naing YT. Sample size calculation for prevalence studies using Scalex and ScalaR calculators. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22 (01) 209
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Andrade C, Menon V, Ameen S, Kumar Praharaj S. Designing and conducting knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys in psychiatry: practical guidance. Indian J Psychol Med 2020; 42 (05) 478-481
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Louie C, D'Agostino EN, Han D, Ryken TC. Determining an appropriate outcome measure in neurosurgical research: investigating meaningful, valid, and practical metrics. Cureus 2019; 11 (09) e5610
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Dutta A. Unveiling the Patient Tapestry: Harnessing the Importance of Patient Perspectives in Advancing Homeopathy Research. Homeopathy 2023; Dec 4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775995. . Epub ahead of print
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Thompson CB. Descriptive data analysis. Air Med J 2009; 28 (02) 56-59
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Tenny S, Hoffman MR. Prevalence. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [cited 2023 Dec 13]. Accessed January 3, 2023 at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430867/
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. Restor Dent Endod 2017; 42 (02) 152-155
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126 (05) 1763-1768
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Pisică D, Dammers R, Boersma E, Volovici V. Tenets of good practice in regression analysis. A brief tutorial. World Neurosurg 2022; 161: 230-239.e6
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Sudheesh K, Duggappa DR, Nethra SS. How to write a research proposal?. Indian J Anaesth 2016; 60 (09) 631-634
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG. et al; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007; 4 (10) e297
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Teut M, Walach H, Varanasi R. et al. Recommendations for designing, conducting and reporting observational studies in homeopathy. Homeopathy 2020; 109 (03) 114-125
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Wade DT. Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey. BMJ 2005; 330 (7489): 468-471
    Google Scholar
  • 24 What Is Ethics in Research & Why Is It Important? - by David B. Resnik, J.D., Ph.D. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 17]. Accessed January 3, 2023 at: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm
  • 25 Heiervang E, Goodman R. Advantages and limitations of web-based surveys: evidence from a child mental health survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2011; 46 (01) 69-76
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Levi R, Ridberg R, Akers M, Seligman H. Survey fraud and the integrity of web-based survey research. Am J Health Promot 2022; 36 (01) 18-20
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Dutta A, Mitra S, Mitra D. A preliminary survey of the postacute symptoms of COVID-19 among hospital-discharged patients and a proposed quantitative framework for assessment. J Health Allied Sci NU 2023; 13 (01) 90-97
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Nishigori H, Takahashi O, Sugimoto N, Kitamura K, McMahon GT. A national survey of international electives for medical students in Japan: 2009-2010. Med Teach 2012; 34 (01) 71-73
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Dutta A, Sharma A. Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Promot Perspect 2021; 11 (02) 161-170
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Dutta A, Sharma A, Torres-Castro R, Pachori H, Mishra S. Mental health outcomes among health-care workers dealing with COVID-19/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Psychiatry 2021; 63 (04) 335-347
    Google Scholar