Breast Biopsy Procedure Toolkit: Ultrasound, 2D Stereotactic, 3D Tomosynthesis, and MRI-Guided Procedures

Abstract

This article explores various techniques and tips for performing successful percutaneous biopsies of the breast and axillary lymph nodes using different imaging modalities. The discussion includes detailed image guidance on ultrasound-guided, stereotactic/tomosynthesis-guided, and MRI-guided biopsies. Advice for draining fluid collections in the breast is also reviewed. Key findings include the comparative effectiveness of different imaging techniques and practical advice for improving procedural outcomes. This information is particularly relevant for radiologists involved in diagnostic and interventional breast care. Recommendations for optimizing biopsy procedures and managing complications are also presented.

Keywords

breast biopsy - ultrasound - stereotactic - MRI - interventional radiology

Publication History

Article published online:
10 December 2024

• References

• 1 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions. II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1168-1184.e1
• 2 Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 2003; 97 (08) 1824-1831
• 3 Harvey JA, Moran RE. US-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique and pitfalls. Radiographics 1998; 18 (04) 867-877
• 4 Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK. Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 2007; 27 (01) 79-94
• 5 Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA. et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187 (02) 507-511
• 6 Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L. et al. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 2008; 248 (02) 406-413
• 7 Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR. et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166 (02) 341-346
• 8 Apesteguía L, Pina LJ. Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of breast lesions. Insights Imaging 2011; 2 (04) 493-500
• 9 Abe H, Schacht D, Sennett CA, Newstead GM, Schmidt RA. Utility of preoperative ultrasound for predicting pN2 or higher stage axillary lymph node involvement in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (03) 696-702
• 10 Bhatt AA, Whaley DH, Lee CU. Ultrasound-Guided breast biopsies: basic and new techniques. J Ultrasound Med 2021; 40 (07) 1427-1443
• 11 Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS, Newstead GM. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy–clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology 2009; 250 (01) 41-49
• 12 Ganott MA, Zuley ML, Abrams GS. et al. ultrasound guided core biopsy versus fine needle aspiration for evaluation of axillary lymphadenopathy in patients with breast cancer. ISRN Oncol 2014; 2014: 703160
• 13 Huang ML, Hess K, Candelaria RP. et al. Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (07) 2928-2933
• 14 Yeh ED, Jacene HA, Bellon JR. et al. What radiologists need to know about diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Radiographics 2013; 33 (07) 2003-2017
• 15 Huppe AI, Brem RF. Minimally invasive breast procedures: practical tips and tricks. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214 (02) 306-315
• 16 Huang ML, Adrada BE, Candelaria R, Thames D, Dawson D, Yang WT. Stereotactic breast biopsy: pitfalls and pearls. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 17 (01) 32-39
• 17 Shin K, Teichgraeber D, Martaindale S, Whitman GJ. Tomosynthesis-guided core biopsy of the breast: why and how to use it. J Clin Imaging Sci 2018; 8: 28
• 18 Vijapura CA, Wahab RA, Thakore AG, Mahoney MC. Upright tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsy: tips, tricks, and troubleshooting. Radiographics 2021; 41 (05) 1265-1282
• 19 Esserman LE, Cura MA, DaCosta D. Recognizing pitfalls in early and late migration of clip markers after imaging-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiographics 2004; 24 (01) 147-156
• 20 Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008; 246 (01) 116-124
• 21 Spick C, Baltzer PA. Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2014; 273 (02) 401-409
• 22 Plantade R, Thomassin-Naggara I. MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95 (09) 779-801
• 23 Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA. et al; European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), with language review by Europa Donna–The European Breast Cancer Coalition. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (12) 3669-3678
• 24 McGrath AL, Price ER, Eby PR, Rahbar H. MRI-guided breast interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46 (03) 631-645