Curriculum Development and Teaching Strategies in Dental Education

Importance of Curriculum Development and Theoretical Framework

A curriculum is a comprehensive managerial and planning document that encompasses a multitude of vital aspects. It serves as a guiding map not only for learners but also for teachers and institutional stakeholders. A curriculum outlines for learners the contents of the educational program, admission requirements, program duration, available resources, and assessment methods while aiding teachers in content delivery and learner support. For institutional stakeholders, it sets up appropriate assessments and relevant evaluations and reflects an institute's commitment to fulfilling its responsibility toward society by yielding the next generation of health care professionals. A well-designed curriculum integrates educational theories such as constructivism and cognitive load theory, ensuring that teaching strategies align with student-centered learning approaches. These theories emphasize active learning, knowledge construction, and cognitive processing, thereby backing up modern educational methodologies.[1] [2]

Integrated Curriculum in Dental Education

Many institutions are evaluating and redesigning curricula through integration across and within disciplines.[3] However, the dental education literature needs more clarity regarding integrated curricula, raising challenges for curriculum developers. Integration in education refers to structuring learning in a way that encourages connections between disciplines. Integration can be categorized as horizontal integration in which it combines subjects within the same academic year, such as integrating restorative with periodontology dentistry. Also, there is vertical integration aligning basic sciences with clinical practice, ensuring students can apply theoretical knowledge to real-case scenarios. Several models, such as the SPICES model (Student-centered, Problem-based, Integrated, Community-based, Electives, Systematic), have demonstrated effectiveness in medical and dental education.[4]

As there are continuous developments in all fields in this era, the learner's needs are changing, therefore, teaching and educational modalities require adaptions. In current medical and dental education, competency-based education (CBE) has gained importance.[5] CBE emphasizes preparing predefined competencies rather than completing a proposed curriculum. It requires aligning assessment methods with learning objectives, ensuring students accomplish essential skills before progressing. Assessments must be established using structured methods to evaluate competency achievement. Two main types of assessments include formative and summative assessments. Formative assessment focuses on continuous evaluation and feedback mechanisms, such as Objective Structured Clinical Examinations. The summative assessment focuses on end-of-course evaluations of students' ability and learning in clinical sceneries.[6]

Various structure approaches such as Kirkpatrick's Model and Bloom's Taxonomy are often implied to evaluate curriculum effectiveness, ensuring continuous improvement. Kirkpatrick's model systematically measures educational programs' outcomes at various stages while Bloom's Taxonomy categorizes learning objectives, evolving from basic recall to complex problem-solving. Blending these models allows educators to redesign, fine-tune, and implement curricula focusing on student-centered learning and enhancing patient care. Accordingly, a curriculum aligned with Bloom's Taxonomy facilitates learners to gradually develop cognitive skills, ranging from basic knowledge to critical thinking and clinical decision-making.[7]

Modern Teaching Strategies in Dental Education

A wide range of student-centered approaches can enhance the learning experiences of dental students:

1. e-Learning: As a valuable component of blended courses, it enhances student engagement, self-learning abilities, and learning outcomes. However, accessibility challenges and technical issues must be carefully managed.

2. Simulation and virtual reality: To practice various procedures, virtual reality simulators provide controlled environments for dental students, which facilitate improving psychomotor skills and confidence prior to treating real patients. However, due to potential engagement and accessibility issues, the digital learning tools should complement—not replace—hands-on training.

3. Case-based learning: This approach involves presenting actual patient cases to students to analyze diagnostic data for the identification of clinical problems and developing treatment plans. It fosters clinical reasoning skills, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills.

4. Flipped classroom: Involves assigning preclass learning materials to enhance learners' engagement in discussions and problem-solving activities. This approach is known to motivate students for self-paced and higher-order cognitive learning.

5. Problem-based learning (PBL): Learners are encouraged to learn through solving real-world problems, discovery, promoting teamwork, and lifelong learning.

6. Interprofessional education (IPE): Facilitates collaborative practices of dental students with other health care professionals to improve patient care outcomes.

7. Community engagements: Integration of community services with learning objectives facilitates the development of practical skills while addressing patients' dental needs in populations.

Global Perspectives on Dental Curriculum

North American dental schools widely implemented PBL and IPE approaches to encourage student collaboration and practical learning experiences, preparing them for interdisciplinary health care environments. Meanwhile, Europe increasingly adopted integrated curriculum designs and incorporating simulation technologies to enhance clinical training. Furthermore, Asia is increasingly adopting digital learning platforms and simulation-based training, which aim to promote students' hands-on experience before their clinical exposure, utilizing advanced technologies to enhance educational outcomes.[8]

Implementation Challenges and Faculty Development

Effective curriculum implementation depends on faculty expertise. Modern pedagogical approaches have many advantages, but they require training of faculty members in digital tools and technology-enhanced learning, case-based learning facilitation, and interprofessional collaboration for general patient care. Institutions face many barriers and challenges in implementing such training, which include faculty resistance to change, limited resources, and rigid institutional policies. Overcoming these challenges requires institutional commitment to innovation and well-structured faculty development programs.[9]

Conclusion

A well-structured curriculum is essential for a robust dental education. Educators and policymakers should integrate the established educational theories to promote student-centered learning. Also, they should adopt horizontally and vertically integrated curricula for high-quality dental educational experience. Moreover, they should align assessments with competency-based teaching to ensure proper clinical skills. Faculty development programs are crucial for equipping educators with modern teaching strategies including digital tools that should be used to complement, not replace, hands-on training. IPE and community-based learning foster teamwork and patient-centered care. Continuous curriculum evaluation using models like Kirkpatrick's and Bloom's ensures ongoing improvements. By embracing these strategies, dental education can evolve to meet future health care challenges and produce competent, adaptable professionals.

Future Research

Future research should explore the long-term impact of curriculum changes on student competencies in dental education, assessing how innovative teaching strategies influence clinical skills and professional growth. Moreover, applicable faculty training programs should be developed to ensure faculty can adapt to modern pedagogical approaches, including active teaching and digital learning methodologies. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in curriculum design and medical education provides another promising avenue, offering data-driven insights to optimize tailored learning and assessment strategies.[10] Furthermore, encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration and IPE such as incorporating joint training with medical students can enhance patient-centered care by promoting a general understanding of health care.[11] [12] By addressing these ideas, future research can contribute to enhancement of dental education, ensuring it remains adaptive, evidence-based, and aligned with evolving health care needs.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

None.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology: M.S.Z.

Data curation and formal analysis: W.E.

Investigation and resources: G.G.

Original draft preparation: W.E.

Writing, reviewing, and editing: M.S.Z.

Supervision and project administration: W.E.

• References

• 1 Grant J. Principles of Curriculum Design. In: Swanwick T. ed. 3rd ed.. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2019: 71-88
• 2 Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach 2015; 37 (04) 312-322
• 3 Young JQ, Van Merrienboer J, Durning S, Ten Cate O. Cognitive load theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86. Med Teach 2014; 36 (05) 371-384
• 4 Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ 1984; 18 (04) 284-297
• 5 Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT. et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach 2010; 32 (08) 638-645
• 6 O'Shaughnessy SM, Joyce P. Summative and formative assessment in medicine: the experience of an anaesthesia trainee. Int J High Educ 2015; 4 (02) 198-206
• 7 Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006
• 8 Perry S, Burrow MF, Leung WK, Bridges SM. Simulation and curriculum design: a global survey in dental education. Aust Dent J 2017; 62 (04) 453-463
• 9 Gratz E, Looney L. Faculty resistance to change: an examination of motivators and barriers to teaching online in higher education. IJOPCD 2020; 10 (01) 1-14
• 10 Sarfaraz S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Use of artificial intelligence in medical education: a strength or an infirmity. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2023; 18 (06) 1553-1554
• 11 Alqutaibi AY, Rahhal MM, Awad R. et al. Foundations of interprofessional education in dental schools: a narrative review. Eur J Dent 2025;
• 12 Alqutaibi AY, Rahhal MM, Awad R. et al. Implementing and evaluating interprofessional education for dental students: a narrative review. Eur J Dent 2025;

Publication History

Article published online:
24 April 2025