The present letter focuses on the pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing of variants of the
dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene available at Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, for cancer
patients who are candidates for treatment with the fluoropyrimidines 5-fluorouracil
(5-FU) and/or capecitabine.[1] The rationale for DPYD genotyping is as follows: DPYD encodes the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which accounts for approximately
85% of 5-FU elimination in humans; consequently, reduction in or absence of DPD activity
due to reduced or no-function DPYD variants leads to 5-FU accumulation and increased risk of toxicity. This also affects
patients treated with capecitabine, since 5-FU is capecitabine's active metabolite.
The original DPYD genotyping panel adopted at INCA assessed 4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
listed in the Clinical Pharmacology Implementation[2] (CPIC) and the Dutch Pharmacogenomic Working Group[3] (DWPG) guidelines, namely rs391820 (DPYD*2A), rs55886062 (DPYD*13), rs56038477, and rs67376798. After genotyping 230 patients, we reported minor allele
frequencies (MAFs) of rs391820, rs67376798, and rs56038477, similar to other Brazilian
cohorts,[4]
[5] whereas rs55886062 was consistently absent.[6]
Based on these data and on the current structure of the Brazilian population,[7] our DPYD genotyped panel was updated by replacing rs55886062 with rs115232898, a reduced-function
SNP,[8] tightly linked to African ancestry, listed among the Tier-1 variants in the Joint
Consensus for DPYD genotyping recommendations.[9] As the present letter is written, 285 patients have been genotyped at INCA for rs115232898
and 4 were heterozygous for the variant T allele (MAF = 0.74%); of notice, these 4
patients self-identified as Black (Preto, in Portuguese), according to the race/skin color classification of the Brazilian
Census.
At MAF = 0.74%, rs115232898 was the second most common SNP of the DPYD genotyping panel; only rs56038477 was detected at a higher MAF (1.07%) in our cohort.
The rs56038477 SNP is commonly used to identify the reduced-function DPYD HapB3 haplotype, based on the assumption of its complete linkage disequilibrium (LD) with
rs75017182 (c.1129–5923C > G), which defines the HapB3 haplotype. However, a recent report[10] of incomplete, albeit extensive (D' = 0.985) LD between these two SNPs prompted
the suggestion that, in rare cases, the recommendation for reduced fluoropyrimidine
dosing, based on the rs56038477 genotype, would be inappropriate and could negatively
impact the drug response. This concern led us to genotype rs75017182 in all patients
who had received fluoropyrimidine dosing recommendations based on the rs56038477 genotype.
This analysis verified a perfect LD between the two SNPs: the 6 patients heterozygous
for rs56038477 were also carriers of rs75017182 in heterozygosis, whereas all other
patients had the reference allele in homozygosis at both loci. Perfect LD of these
two SNPs in Brazilians may also be inferred from their identical MAF (0.43%) in a
large, admixed cohort of elderly individuals.11. Thus, we feel confident about fluoropyrimidine dosing recommendations based on rs56038477
as a surrogate marker for DPYD HapB3.
Collectively, the genotyping panel for the 4 SNPs (rs391820, rs55886062, rs56038477,
and 115232898) currently in use at INCA identified 10 patients as carriers of 1 of
the reduced or no-function DPYD alleles, plus 1 patient heterozygous for rs3918290 and rs56038477. These patients
were assigned the intermediate (IM; N = 10; frequency: 3.5%) and the poor DPD metabolizer phenotype (PM; N = 1; frequency: 0.4%) respectively, and received recommendations for fluoropyrimidine
initial dosing according to the CPIC[2] and DWPG[3] guidelines. These data were then used to predict the diagnostic performance of 12
commercial laboratories offering DPYD tests in Brazil, identified through an internet search.[12] Five of these laboratories genotype all SNPs in our panel; thus, they are expected
to reproduce our results. By contrast, the other 7 laboratories do not include rs56038477
nor rs115232898 in their genotyping panels and would misclassify 9 of the 10 IMs as
normal metabolizers (NMs), and, most importantly, misclassify the high-risk PM patient
as IM. This high rate of misclassification (90.9%) derives from the fact that the
missing rs56038477 and rs115232898 SNPs are the most prevalent in our patient cohort,
as aforementioned. This analysis extends to Brazilian patients the reported concerns
regarding the limitations and variability in DPYD variant detection by commercial laboratories in the United States, and the potential
deleterious impact on PGx-informed dosing recommendations for fluoropyrimidines.[13]
In conclusion, the implementation and updating of PGx testing of DPYD variants at INCA conforms to the requirement/recommendation by several drug regulatory
agencies (such as the European Medicines Agency [EMA], the United States Food and
Drug Administration [FDA], and Health Canada/Santé Canada [HSCS]) for DPYD genotyping prior to fluoropyrimidine administration.14 Accordingly, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância
Sanitária, ANVISA, in Portuguese) package insert for capecitabine states that “the
test for DPD deficiency should be considered according to the local availability and
current guidelines.”15 However, the package insert for 5FU16 makes no reference to DPYD or DPD testing.
Bibliographical Record
Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz. Pharmacogenetic Testing for Fluoropyrimidines at Instituto
Nacional de Câncer, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oncology 2025; 21: s00451809889.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809889
