Back to the Basics—Biopsy Devices

One of the most commonly performed procedures by IR specialists is biopsies, which are defined as any procedure in which tissue is obtained for laboratory analysis. Biopsy sampling, coupled with cellular and genetic analysis, provides clinicians with a deeper and more accurate understanding of targeted pathologies, allowing for more personalized and effective treatment plans. The variety of available biopsy devices, each with its own strengths and limitations, offers flexibility in approaching different clinical scenarios. A thorough understanding of these devices is crucial for optimizing procedural outcomes, ensuring higher technical yield, and ultimately improving patient care.

With technological advances, percutaneous biopsy is now commonplace due to relatively low risk, ease of device use, accessibility, and ability to reach deeper tissue in a minimally invasive manner.[1] There are a plethora of options for soft tissue and visceral biopsy; the breakthrough development in this field was the introduction of the core needle biopsy (CNB) device. Readily available in numerous shapes and sizes, the CNB is a mainstay in many procedures via direct percutaneous applications. Biopsy can be performed from a variety of access routes, whether percutaneous, intravascular, or trans-vascular.

The objective of this article is to provide a back-to-the-basics overview of biopsy needles. We explain the historical development of needles, various types of needles, and their respective advantages/disadvantages, and ultimately, the general considerations in choosing the right biopsy device.

Publication History

Article published online:
02 July 2025

• References

• 1 Kline TS. General considerations. In: Kline TS. ed. Handbook of Fine Needle Aspiration. Biopsy Cytology. New York, Edinburgh, London, and Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 1988: 1
• 2 DiMagno EP, Buxton JL, Regan PT. et al. Ultrasonic endoscope. Lancet 1980; 1 (8169): 629-631
• 3 Filippiadis DK, Charalampopoulos G, Mazioti A, Keramida K, Kelekis A. Bone and soft-tissue biopsies: what you need to know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018; 35 (04) 215-220
• 4 Exner GU, Kurrer MO, Mamisch-Saupe N, Cannon SR. The tactics and technique of musculoskeletal biopsy. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 2 (02) 51-57
• 5 Simard-Meilleur MC, Troyanov S, Roy L, Dalaire E, Brachemi S. Risk factors and timing of native kidney biopsy complications. Nephron Extra 2014; 4 (01) 42-49
• 6 Augusto JF, Lassalle V, Fillatre P. et al. Safety and diagnostic yield of renal biopsy in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38 (11) 1826-1833
• 7 Schaible J, Utpatel K, Verloh N. et al. Full-core biopsy systems take larger liver tissue samples with lower fragmentation rates than conventional side-notch systems: a randomized trial. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12: 1121-1128
• 8 Pritchard WF, Wray-Cahen D, Karanian JW, Hilbert S, Wood BJ. Radiofrequency cauterization with biopsy introducer needle. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15 (2 Pt 1): 183-187
• 9 Wu YW, Chan G, Huang IKH. et al. Combined biopsy and imaging-guided microwave ablation by using a coaxial guiding needle. J Belg Soc Radiol 2021; 105 (01) 25
• 10 Wong P, Johnson KJ, Warner RL, Merz SI, Kruger GH, Weitzel WF. Performance of biopsy needle with therapeutic injection system to prevent bleeding complications. J Med Device 2013; 7 (01) 0110021-0110027
• 11 Khamene A, Wacker F, Vogt S. et al. An augmented reality system for MRI-guided needle biopsies. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 94: 151-157
• 12 Park J, Choi WM, Kim K, Jeong WI, Seo JB, Park I. Biopsy needle integrated with electrical impedance sensing microelectrode array towards real-time needle guidance and tissue discrimination. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 264
• 13 Baratella E, Cernic S, Minelli P. et al. Accuracy of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis of thoracic lesions suspicious for primitive malignancy of the lung: a five-year retrospective analysis. Tomography 2022; 8 (06) 2828-2838
• 14 Patra A, Keshava SN. Biopsy with side-cutting coaxial needle-knowing the “cutting length” and “throw length”. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2022; 31 (04) 933-938
• 15 Gazelle GS, Haaga JR. Biopsy needle characteristics. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1991; 14 (01) 13-16