Mistakes in Musculoskeletal Imaging: How to Minimize the Inevitable

James F. Griffith; Filip M. Vanhoenacker

doi:10.1055/s-0045-1810113

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, Table of Contents

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2025; 29(05): 813-815
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810113

Review Article

Mistakes in Musculoskeletal Imaging: How to Minimize the Inevitable

Authors

James F. Griffith

¹Department of Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
Filip M. Vanhoenacker

²Department of Radiology, AZ Sint-Maarten Mechelen, Belgium, Antwerp University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universities of Antwerp and Ghent, Edegem, Belgium

Abstract

Most mistakes relate to either a lesion being missed or when a lesion is seen a wrong diagnosis being made. Clinicians and patients understandably want an accurate diagnosis. An accurate diagnosis, however, is not always possible given the complexities and inherent limitations of imaging. There is an inevitable trade off between committing to trying to provide a definitive diagnosis and occasionally getting it wrong. Better, and more useful, to being occasionally wrong though than habitually noncommittal.

Keywords

imaging: mistake - reports - diagnosis - error

Full Text

References

References
1 Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics 2015; 35 (06) 1668-1676
2 Bruno MA. 256 Shades of gray: uncertainty and diagnostic error in radiology. Diagnosis (Berl) 2017; 4 (03) 149-157
3 Scali EP, Harris AC, Martin ML. Peer review in radiology: how can we learn from our mistakes?. Can Assoc Radiol J 2017; 68 (04) 368-370
4 Brady AP.. Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable?. Insights Imaging 2017; 8 (01) 171-182
5 Smith JT. It's not about the errors, it's about the learning: How the Royal College of Radiologists has developed a Radiology Events and Learning process in the United Kingdom. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66 (02) 185-192
6 Fanti S, Lalumera E. Errors in imaging reading and reporting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50 (06) 1546-1548
7 Sorantin E, Grasser MG, Hemmelmayr A, Heinze S. Let us talk about mistakes. Pediatr Radiol 2025; 55 (03) 420-428
8 Kim YW, Mansfield LT. Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202 (03) 465-470
9 Griffith JF. Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it. J Ultrason 2023; 23 (95) e299-e312
10 Griffith JF. Tips for reporting musculoskeletal imaging studies: lessons learned. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25 (05) 646-651
11 Griffith JF. Five overlooked injuries on knee MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217 (05) 1165-1174
12 Hall FM. Language of the radiology report: primer for residents and wayward radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (05) 1239-1242
13 Wallis A, McCoubrie P. The radiology report-are we getting the message across?. Clin Radiol 2011; 66 (11) 1015-1022