Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811702
Innovative Blended Learning Curriculum in Noninvasive Ventilation for Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows
Authors
Funding None.
Abstract
Introduction
There is a lack of a standardized curriculum for the appropriate use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), which is readily accessible. Management of NIV is a core competency for physicians training in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM). We present a blended model of instruction that was highly successful in our pilot program.
Methods
The curriculum targeted eight first-year PCCM fellows to assess knowledge and confidence in key competencies of NIV management. After a baseline assessment, fellows engaged in both hands-on instruction and traditional didactics in NIV. Following, fellows were encouraged to use the e-learning modules for enhanced instruction. The modules were designed to cover all major aspects of NIV management and with unique interactive patient cases for both inpatient and outpatient uses of NIV.
Results
Eight first-year PCCM fellows completed the training and responded to the posttest assessment 4 weeks later. The average multiple-choice questions (MCQs) score increased from 13.5 ± 3.2 (54.0%) to 18.4 ± 1.6 (73.6%) and was significant (p = 0.004). A Likert assessment of learner confidence also showed significant improvement across several key competency domains.
Conclusion
This curriculum represents a successful and novel approach to NIV education, a critical but challenging core competency in pulmonary medicine for physicians training in PCCM.
Keywords
noninvasive ventilation - hypoxic respiratory failure - hypercapnic respiratory failure - blended learning - graduate medical educationIntroduction
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is a well-validated form of respiratory support for hypoxic and hypercapnic forms of respiratory failure in acute and chronic settings.[1] [2] [3] Use of NIV in patients with respiratory failure improves lung function, reduces hospital admissions, intubations, and is associated with improved mortality.[4] [5] [6] Use of NIV for respiratory failure is not always appropriate in all clinical settings. It is advisable to consider NIV as a tool that leads to the desired outcome if applied to the appropriate clinical and physiologic context, and if the appropriate equipment and appropriate monitoring are in place. Meeting each of those important steps in the best use of NIV is a core competency in training for pulmonary physicians and is tested by the American Board of Internal Medicine certification exam for pulmonary medicine.
Inadequate staff training has been associated with NIV failure. In a small prospective observational study of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) who were being treated with NIV, inadequate staff training was strongly associated with NIV failure (p = 0.007). In this study, some of the errors detected included the following: poor mask fit with excessive air leaks, lack of training in recognizing ventilator alarms, and even simple ventilator setup.[7] Staff education may be one explanation for the notable divergence of the reported low mortality in ARF reported in literature versus that observed in the real-world clinical practice.[8] Though the use of NIV in acute and chronic respiratory failure is well established, many pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship programs lack dedicated training curricula to achieve competency in this topic.
What should this curriculum look like? An international panel of experts has released a consensus statement with a “call to action” to improve educational resources regarding NIV for physicians in training.[9] This call to action also included recommendations for formulating such a curriculum, providing emphasis on the theory of NIV as well as key practical steps toward equipment setup, using a multimodality approach with internet-based resources and hands-on simulation, along with working closely with a senior expert in NIV.
Currently published curricula aimed at educating physicians in NIV have focused on simulation.[10] [11] Simulation is a highly effective tool in medical education, but it is also associated with a high startup cost and does not have the flexibility of online resources that trainees can turn to repeatedly. Other efforts to address this problem have included proprietary online resources that are not widely accessible to all.[12] For this reason, we were interested in structuring a curriculum that would represent a blended model of both online and in-person hands-on instruction wherein the online component is freely available for all. Online learning or “e-learning” can effectively teach hands-on skills and has even been used successfully to improve novice surgeons' laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique.[13] [14] [15] Blended learning using a combination approach, where a component of instruction occurs synchronously in person and is coupled to asynchronous online resources, is used by the learners in a complementary fashion. Blended learning encourages self-directed learning, enhances learner self-efficacy, and is effective for graduate medical learners.[16] [17]
Our objective was to devise a curriculum that leverages impactful online resources to augment face-to-face instruction for physicians training in pulmonary and critical care. This initiative aims to equip these physicians with the necessary skills to provide superior quality care to patients requiring noninvasive ventilatory support.
Methods
Learner Selection
The target learner group included first-year fellows in critical care and pulmonary and critical care (N = 8) at a single large tertiary care hospital. The curriculum was implemented during fellow orientation, prior to starting any clinical rotation. This study was declared exempt by the Wayne State University (WSU) Institutional Review Board Administration Office.
Curriculum Development
The learning objectives for this curriculum were designed by a panel of experts in graduate medical education, PCCM, and sleep medicine. The e-learning modules were developed using an online platform, which generated high-quality animated characters representing intensivists and pulmonologists in inpatient and outpatient settings, along with nurses, respiratory therapists, and patients. The goal of these animated videos was to create life-like clinical scenarios focusing on the use of NIV in ARF in the intensive care unit (ICU) and chronic respiratory failure in the outpatient setting. Then, these animated videos were uploaded to the website Edpuzzle.com, which is a free-to-use video platform with wide availability. Embedded in the videos are interactive questions aimed at answering the learning objectives and promoting an active learning style.
E-Learning Module Design
The curriculum consisted of four e-learning modules ([Appendix A]). The first module (17:30 minutes in length) introduced NIV. It contained a detailed explanation of the breath cycle, ventilation, oxygenation, and pathophysiology behind using NIV in respiratory failure and sleep. It also included general recommendations on initial NIV settings, NIV titration, optimal patient selection, contraindications to use of NIV, how to wean from NIV, and, finally, signs of NIV failure. This module also included a detailed overview of a typical NIV machine interface, including patient setup, how to assess mask fit, and knobology. In the second module (11:07 minutes in length), we presented a case of a patient with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure from underlying chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD). The learner assesses forms of respiratory support, titrates the NIV based on patient laboratory data, optimizes the patient/mask interface, and finally assesses for NIV failure. In the third module (11:08 minutes in length), we present a case of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure from COPD. Here, the learner assesses indications for NIV in the outpatient setting, key phrases for how to elicit history from the patient to assess for dyssynchrony, and how to monitor compliance with downloaded device reports. The fourth module (run time of 5:57 minutes) includes a detailed explanation of the diverse types of dyssynchrony during a breath cycle and a recommended approach for how to improve it. These dyssynchronies were illustrated with ventilator waveforms and the expected clinical signs and symptoms of the patient. These modules are further described in [Table 1].
Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NIV, noninvasive ventilation.
Assessment
Learners were first given a pre-test questionnaire to assess baseline knowledge prior to participating in the curriculum. This test consisted of 25 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to assess cognitive skills and medical knowledge on NIV use in the different settings of ICU, general wards, and outpatient pulmonary clinics (see [Appendix A], available in the online version only). These MCQs were created using the most recent evidence-based guidelines and practices published on NIV and approved by our panel of experts involved in curriculum design. The backgrounds of this panel included physicians board-certified in sleep medicine and pulmonary medicine with between 2 and 16 years of clinical practice experience. Additionally, a pretraining confidence survey was created using a 5-point Likert scale used for subjective evaluation of comfort level using NIV in different practice settings.
Blended Model of Instruction
Following completion of the questionnaire, the learners then participated in a 1-hour didactic with a senior chief PCCM fellow and board-certified sleep medicine physician. This didactic focused on unique indications for NIV not addressed in the online modules detailed earlier. Following this, the learners then engaged in 30 minutes of hands-on instruction in the practical aspects of how to set up NIV for a patient with a certified respiratory therapist. The learners were then given access to the e-learning modules detailed above. The fellows were strongly encouraged to utilize this resource, but it was not required. To assess for longer-term knowledge retention, a 4-week posttest was conducted.
Results
In our pilot study of a blended model of NIV curriculum, we describe results for eight first-year fellows, six PCCM and two critical care medicine. We had 100% participation in the posttest assessment conducted at 4 weeks (N = 8). The assessment included MCQs for a knowledge assessment and Likert scales assessing confidence in key management steps of NIV. The average MCQ score increased from 13.5 ± 3.2 (54.0%) to 18.4 ± 1.6 (73.6%), which was significant (p = 0.004; [Fig. 1]). The Likert assessment of learner confidence in managing NIV also revealed improved scores for all competencies ([Tables 1] and [2]).


Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; NIV, noninvasive ventilation.
Note: Values in italics indicate statistical significance.
Discussion
We present a successful curriculum of NIV, which covers all major aspects of appropriate use of NIV in common clinical scenarios and addresses a core competency in training pulmonary and critical care physicians. Unlike other published curricula, our educational tool does not require any specialized equipment for setup or proprietary online resources. We used a blended model of instruction where our learners engaged in traditional didactic models of instruction in core concepts of NIV and utilized highly detailed e-learning modules for self-directed learning. The e-learning modules were vetted by our panel of experts and can stand alone as their own educational tool should other programs be interested in expanding their own curriculum in NIV management and do not have dedicated faculty support for hands-on instruction. The e-learning modules are hosted on Edpuzzle.com, which is a free-to-use platform available wherever there is an internet connection.
Our findings show a significant increase in longer-term knowledge assessed by improved knowledge scores at a 4-week time point (54.0–73.6%), and significant improvement in several NIV competencies. Moreover, this is the first curriculum that uses a blended modality of instruction with e-learning and hands-on instruction, which can be scalable to other programs with limited resources. However, our curriculum does have limitations that are important to consider. This curriculum was piloted for our incoming classes of fellows (N = 8), and it is noteworthy to consider how the findings may or may not be replicated in larger groups. Our learner group included incoming fellows during orientation, where they are exposed to lots of incoming information, though we assumed no prior knowledge of NIV. Inherent in our assessment strategy is the use of pre- and posttest questionnaires, which are subject to biases such as the maturation effect and testing effect, which may augment the positive outcome of the curriculum seen in our study. It is unknown to what extent the learners engaged in additional study on the topic of NIV or relevant clinical exposure following the hands-on lecture and the eventual posttest 4 weeks later, which may have an independent effect on the significantly improved scores. Our assessment strategy is optimized to evaluate improved knowledge, key NIV competencies, and confidence in NIV, but it is not optimized to assess bedside skills application, which is another limitation. This could be addressed through a standardized, observed, structured clinical examination or through case logs of NIV bedside titration with attending cosignature.
In summary, our curriculum represents a successful approach to blended learning instruction on comprehensive NIV management for the pulmonary and critical care fellow in training.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Note
Dates of earlier presentations: 3/8/2023 at the Association of Pulmonary & Critical Care Program Directors in Portland, Oregon. 5/21/2023 at the American Thoracic Society in Washington, DC.
* Co-first author.
-
References
- 1 Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW. et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2017; 50 (02) 1602426
- 2 Bourke SC, Piraino T, Pisani L, Brochard L, Elliott MW. Beyond the guidelines for non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: implications for practice. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6 (12) 935-947
- 3 Munshi L, Mancebo J, Brochard LJ. Noninvasive respiratory support for adults with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 (18) 1688-1698
- 4 Jayadev A, Stone R, Steiner MC, McMillan V, Roberts CM. Time to NIV and mortality in AECOPD hospital admissions: an observational study into real world insights from national COPD audits. BMJ Open Respir Res 2019; 6 (01) e000444
- 5 Raveling T, Vonk J, Struik FM. et al. Chronic non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 8 (08) CD002878
- 6 Hall J, Turner AM, Dretzke J, Moore D, Jowett S. Cost-effectiveness of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2022; 77 (10) 976-986
- 7 Lopez-Campos JL, Garcia Polo C, Leon Jimenez A, Arnedillo A, Gonzalez-Moya E, Fenandez Berni JJ. Staff training influence on non-invasive ventilation outcome for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2006; 65 (03) 145-151
- 8 Roberts CM, Stone RA, Buckingham RJ, Pursey NA, Lowe D. National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project implementation group. Acidosis, non-invasive ventilation and mortality in hospitalised COPD exacerbations. Thorax 2011; 66 (01) 43-48
- 9 Karim HMR, Burns KEA, Ciobanu LD. et al. Noninvasive ventilation: education and training. A narrative analysis and an international consensus document. Adv Respir Med 2019; 87 (01) 36-45
- 10 Naran P, Devani N, Murray J, Mandal S. Peer-to-peer simulation-based education for non-invasive ventilation: bridging the knowledge gap. Future Healthc J 2022; 9 (Suppl. 02) 35-35
- 11 Turner D, Picton G, Harrod E, Bossy M. Using a breathing simulator to improve simulation-based education for noninvasive ventilation. Breathe (Sheff) 2021; 17 (02) 200285
- 12 Chatwin M, Hare A, Kurosinski P, Martin D, Simonds A. Evaluation of the educational outcomes of simulation-based training (SBT) for NIV. In: 2.2 Noninvasive Ventilatory Support. European Respiratory Society; 2015: OA4778
- 13 Harel-Sterling M. Can you teach a hands-on skill online? A scoping review of e-learning for point-of-care ultrasound in medical education. Can Med Educ J 2023; 14 (06) 66-77
- 14 Sinclair P, Kable A, Levett-Jones T. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports 2015; 13 (01) 52-64
- 15 Jang HW, Kim KJ. Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14 (01) 56
- 16 Viljoen CA, Millar RS, Manning K, Burch VC. Effectiveness of blended learning versus lectures alone on ECG analysis and interpretation by medical students. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20 (01) 488
- 17 Chung JYS, Li WHC, Cheung AT, Ho LLK, Chung JOK. Efficacy of a blended learning programme in enhancing the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of nursing students in conducting clinical handovers: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22 (01) 275
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
26 September 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW. et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2017; 50 (02) 1602426
- 2 Bourke SC, Piraino T, Pisani L, Brochard L, Elliott MW. Beyond the guidelines for non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: implications for practice. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6 (12) 935-947
- 3 Munshi L, Mancebo J, Brochard LJ. Noninvasive respiratory support for adults with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 (18) 1688-1698
- 4 Jayadev A, Stone R, Steiner MC, McMillan V, Roberts CM. Time to NIV and mortality in AECOPD hospital admissions: an observational study into real world insights from national COPD audits. BMJ Open Respir Res 2019; 6 (01) e000444
- 5 Raveling T, Vonk J, Struik FM. et al. Chronic non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 8 (08) CD002878
- 6 Hall J, Turner AM, Dretzke J, Moore D, Jowett S. Cost-effectiveness of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2022; 77 (10) 976-986
- 7 Lopez-Campos JL, Garcia Polo C, Leon Jimenez A, Arnedillo A, Gonzalez-Moya E, Fenandez Berni JJ. Staff training influence on non-invasive ventilation outcome for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2006; 65 (03) 145-151
- 8 Roberts CM, Stone RA, Buckingham RJ, Pursey NA, Lowe D. National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project implementation group. Acidosis, non-invasive ventilation and mortality in hospitalised COPD exacerbations. Thorax 2011; 66 (01) 43-48
- 9 Karim HMR, Burns KEA, Ciobanu LD. et al. Noninvasive ventilation: education and training. A narrative analysis and an international consensus document. Adv Respir Med 2019; 87 (01) 36-45
- 10 Naran P, Devani N, Murray J, Mandal S. Peer-to-peer simulation-based education for non-invasive ventilation: bridging the knowledge gap. Future Healthc J 2022; 9 (Suppl. 02) 35-35
- 11 Turner D, Picton G, Harrod E, Bossy M. Using a breathing simulator to improve simulation-based education for noninvasive ventilation. Breathe (Sheff) 2021; 17 (02) 200285
- 12 Chatwin M, Hare A, Kurosinski P, Martin D, Simonds A. Evaluation of the educational outcomes of simulation-based training (SBT) for NIV. In: 2.2 Noninvasive Ventilatory Support. European Respiratory Society; 2015: OA4778
- 13 Harel-Sterling M. Can you teach a hands-on skill online? A scoping review of e-learning for point-of-care ultrasound in medical education. Can Med Educ J 2023; 14 (06) 66-77
- 14 Sinclair P, Kable A, Levett-Jones T. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports 2015; 13 (01) 52-64
- 15 Jang HW, Kim KJ. Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14 (01) 56
- 16 Viljoen CA, Millar RS, Manning K, Burch VC. Effectiveness of blended learning versus lectures alone on ECG analysis and interpretation by medical students. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20 (01) 488
- 17 Chung JYS, Li WHC, Cheung AT, Ho LLK, Chung JOK. Efficacy of a blended learning programme in enhancing the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of nursing students in conducting clinical handovers: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22 (01) 275

