Keywords
Vitamin B 12 Deficiency - Small Fiber Neuropathy - Galvanic Skin Response - Reflex,
Abnormal - Electrodiagnosis
INTRODUCTION
Vitamin B12 deficiency is a prevalent condition with significant neurological consequences
worldwide. It can lead to various disorders affecting both the central and peripheral
nervous systems. The most well-known neurological manifestations include sensory-motor
axonal polyneuropathy and subacute combined degeneration, which may present symptoms
such as muscle weakness, numbness, paresthesia, balance impairment, and gait disturbances.[1]
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN), primarily affecting thinly myelinated A-delta and unmyelinated
C fibers, can also result from vitamin B12 deficiency. Small fiber neuropathy is often
characterized by sensory symptoms such as paresthesia, burning sensations, and pain.
In addition to sensory dysfunction, SFN may involve autonomic nervous system impairment,
leading to cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and other systemic effects. Early diagnosis
is crucial for effective management and to improve the quality of life of affected
individuals. However, routine nerve conduction studies (NCS) may not detect early-stage
SFN, requiring the use of more specialized diagnostic tools.[2]
Noninvasive electrophysiological techniques play a critical role in the early diagnosis
and monitoring of SFN. Günes et al. demonstrated through biopsy studies that both
symptomatic and asymptomatic small fiber loss can occur in individuals with vitamin
B12 deficiency.[2] This highlights the need for objective and reliable diagnostic methods for early
detection.
The cutaneous silent period (CSP) is one such noninvasive electrophysiological test
that assesses the function of thinly myelinated A-delta fibers. It is considered a
sensitive tool for detecting SFN and monitoring disease progression.[3]
[4]
[5] The sympathetic skin response (SSR), another noninvasive method, is used to evaluate
autonomic nervous system function. Compared to other autonomic electromyography (EMG)
techniques, SSR requires minimal preparation, is quick to perform, and is a practical
assessment tool. In conditions such as vitamin B12 deficiency, SSR serves as an auxiliary
tool for evaluating autonomic nervous system functions and is useful in detecting
autonomic dysfunction associated with small fiber impairment.[6]
The present study aims to assess SFN using CSP and SSR measurements to facilitate
the early diagnosis of neurological symptoms related to vitamin B12 deficiency. By
evaluating these noninvasive electrophysiological techniques, we seek to demonstrate
their effectiveness in detecting small fiber dysfunction before more severe symptoms
develop.
METHODS
The present observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in the Clinical Neurophysiology
Department of Eskişehir City Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkey, between 2022 and 2024, with
approval from the local ethics committee (ESH/BAEK 2024/20). Twenty-eight patients
were enrolled after low serum vitamin B12 (< 190 pg/mL) was incidentally detected during routine laboratory testing and were
subsequently referred for EMG with a preliminary diagnosis of polyneuropathy secondary
to vitamin B12 deficiency. At presentation, each patient reported at least one mild, nonspecific
complaint (e.g., headache, fatigue, subjective sensory discomfort). All had Douleur
Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4)[7] scores < 4 and normal neurological examinations, indicating an absence of clinically
overt neuropathic pain. The mean vitamin B12 level was 156.9 ± 20.4 pg/mL (range: 97–186). These inclusion criteria – DN4 < 4,
normal large-fiber NCS, and planned SSR and CSP testing – were designed to capture
early, clinically silent small-fiber involvement.
Exclusion criteria comprised diabetes mellitus, renal or hepatic failure, thyroid
disorders, autoimmune disease, active infection, alcohol abuse, use of neurotoxic
drugs such as chemotherapy agents, amiodarone, or statins, and any previously diagnosed
central or peripheral nervous-system disorder. Alternative causes of small-fiber neuropathy
were ruled out with complete blood count, HbA1c, renal, hepatic, and thyroid function
tests, folate, vitamin D, lipid profile, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive
protein. Methylmalonic acid and homocysteine measurements were unavailable at our
center; this limitation is discussed later. Brain and spinal 3-Tesla magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) was performed in all patients, and no structural abnormalities were
identified.
The control group consisted of 25 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals who attended
the hospital for routine periodic health screening. All controls had serum vitamin
B12 levels > 250 pg/mL and no systemic disease, neurotoxic medication use, or neurological
symptoms.
Both groups underwent the following standardized assessment protocol: detailed neurological
examination; motor nerve-conduction studies (median, ulnar, tibial, and peroneal nerves)
and sensory studies (sural and superficial peroneal nerves); F-wave and tibial H-reflex
analyses; sympathetic skin-response recordings from all four limbs; CSP measurements
after median and sural stimulation; needle EMG when clinically indicated; and brain
and spinal 3-Tesla MRI. In addition, a complete blood count—including mean corpuscular
volume (MCV)—and a comprehensive biochemical panel (HbA1c, renal, hepatic and thyroid
function tests, folate, vitamin D, lipid profile, erythrocyte sedimentation rate,
and C-reactive protein) were obtained in every participant to exclude alternative
causes of neuropathy. All electrophysiological, radiological, and laboratory findings
lay within age-appropriate reference ranges in both patients and controls.
Electrophysiological examinations
The present study was conducted in the Clinical Neurophysiology Unit of Eskişehir
City Hospital, with all evaluations performed by the same specialist using a Natus
Synergy on Nicolet EDX electromyography device (Natus). Recordings were taken between
10:00 AM and 12:00 PM in a quiet, well-lit, air-conditioned room maintained at a temperature
of 24 ± 1°C. All participants were positioned comfortably in a supine posture, and
their skin temperature was ensured to be > 32°C.
Nerve conduction studies
Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS): Sensory NCS were done on right median, ulnar, radial,
bilateral sural, and superficial peroneal nerves. Motor NCS were done on right median,
ulnar and bilateral peroneal, and posterior tibial nerves.
H-reflex and F-latency
Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and F-wave latency (F-latency) were assessed according
to standard protocols. Right tibial nerve stimulation elicited the H-reflex in the
soleus muscle and the F-latency response in the median and tibial nerves. The intensity
for both measures was set to 1.5 times the sensory threshold, with a pulse width of
0.2 milliseconds (ms). Each pair of stimuli was delivered seven or eight times (preferably
seven) for averaging. For soleus H-reflex recordings, a 10 ms train of stimuli was
applied, incorporating three stimulation patterns with 1-second intervals between
them. All final measurements represent the average of 10 trials.[8]
[9]
Cutaneous silent period measurements
Cutaneous silent period measurements were obtained by means of electrically stimulating
the right index finger digital nerve (D2) and sural nerve, focusing on the abductor
pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles, respectively. Muscle activity
was monitored while participants were comfortably positioned in a supine position,
with visual and auditory feedback provided.
Stimulation was administered to the digital nerve of the right index finger for the
abductor pollicis brevis muscle and to the sural nerve for the TA muscle. Electrodes
were positioned in a belly-tendon arrangement. Electrical stimuli comprised rectangular
pulses lasting 0.5 ms, administered at 8 to 10 times the sensory threshold, with a
minimum interval of 10 seconds between stimuli.
Recordings were conducted with a low cutoff frequency of 30 Hz and a high cutoff frequency
of 10,000 Hz. Each recording had a duration of 600 ms, comprising a 120-ms prestimulus
(baseline) interval and a 480-ms poststimulus interval. The gain was established at
100–500 µV/division.[5]
Participants maintained ∼ 50% of their maximal isometric force during stimulation;
recordings were paused if fatigue appeared. Silent-period onset latency and duration
were measured in six trials and averaged for analysis ([Figure 1]).
Figure 1 Cutaneous silent period recordings from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (upper
extremity) and tibialis anterior muscle (lower extremity). Abbreviation: CSP, cutaneous
silent period.
Sympathetic skin responses
Recordings were obtained with a sweep speed of 10 seconds, sensitivity 500 µV, band-pass
0.2 to 100 Hz. Stainless steel disc electrodes with 6-mm diameter were used for recordings.
The active electrodes were attached to the palmar and plantar surfaces of the hands
and feet, and the reference electrodes were placed on the dorsal surfaces.
For SSR recordings at the palm level, electrical stimulation of the left median nerve
at the wrist and for SSR recordings at the plantar level and electrical stimulation
of the left posterior tibial nerve behind the medial malleolus were performed. Stimulation
intensity was 25 mA, with a pulse duration of 0.2 ms; to minimize the risk of habituation,
stimuli were applied with randomized intervals of 30 to 60 seconds.
Latency corresponded to the time interval between the stimulation artifact and the
first moment of deflection from baseline. Amplitude was defined as the difference
in distance from the onset of the negative deflection to the peak of the negative
potential.[10]
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (IBM Corp.)
version 26.0. The Shapiro-Wilk test assessed normality of continuous variables. Normally
distributed variables were compared with the independent samples t-test (Welch correction
applied if the Levene's test indicated unequal variances); non-normal variables would have been examined with the Mann-Whitney U-test, although
this was not required for the key outcomes. Categorical variables such as sex were
compared with the Pearson χ2 test. Effect sizes were expressed as Cohen's d together with bias-corrected bootstrap
95% confidence intervals (CIs) (5,000 resamples). Linear associations between serum
vitamin B12 levels and electrophysiological measures were assessed with two-tailed Pearson correlation;
Spearman's ρ was used if either variable deviated from normality. A 2-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
When the demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the patient and control
groups were compared, no significant differences emerged in gender, age, height, or
body mass index (all p > 0.05). In contrast, serum vitamin B12 concentrations were markedly lower in the patient group (156.9 ± 20.4 pg/mL) than
in controls (335.8 ± 103.8 pg/mL; p < 0.001; Cohen d = - 2.03; 95%CI: - 2.77–-1.25), while MCV was modestly but significantly
higher (91.6 ± 8.6 fL versus 85.9 ± 5.5 fL; p < 0.0001; d = 0.78; 95%CI: 0.23–1.30). Macrocytosis (MCV > 96 fL) was present in
8/28 patients (2%) and in none of the controls ([Table 1]). Routine nerve-conduction studies were within normal limits for all participants.
Table 1
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study groups
Variable
|
Patients (n = 28)
|
Controls (n = 25)
|
p-value
‡
|
Age, years old
|
35.6 ± 13.4
|
35.4 ± 8.1
|
0.92
|
Male/Female, n (%)
|
9/19 (32/68)
|
10/15 (40/60)
|
0.76†
|
Height, cm
|
167.9 ± 9.8
|
169.5 ± 9.3
|
0.53
|
BMI, kg m−2
|
25.6 ± 3.7
|
25.0 ± 5.1
|
0.68
|
Vitamin B12, pg mL−1
|
156.9 ± 20.4
|
335.8 ± 103.8
|
< 0.001
|
MCV, fL
|
91.6 ± 8.6
|
85.9 ± 5.5
|
< 0.0001
|
Macrocytosis (MCV > 96 fL), n (%)
|
8 (29)
|
0 (0)
|
0.001†
|
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; MCV, mean corpuscular volume.
Notes: Continuous variables are mean ± SD; categorical data are n (%). P-values from independent-samples t-test, except †χ2 test for categorical comparisons; ‡two-sided.
All 28 patients reported at least 1 mild, nonspecific symptom – headache (25%), fatigue
(25%), forgetfulness (18%), musculoskeletal pain (14%), transient paresthesia/burning
(11%), insomnia (4%), or tinnitus (4%) – yet none met neuropathic-pain criteria (DN4 < 4).
Electrophysiologically, median-nerve cutaneous silent-period (MN-CSP) duration was
significantly shorter in patients than in controls (40.9 ± 11.7 ms versus 53.6 ± 13.5 ms;
p = 0.001; Cohen's d = - 1.00; 95%CI: - 1.52–- 0.46). A comparable reduction was observed
for tibialis-anterior/sural CSP (TA-sural CSP) duration (40.5 ± 10.4 ms versus 48.8 ± 10.5 ms;
p = 0.004; d = - 0.79; 95%CI: - 1.29–- 0.27). In contrast, MN-CSP end latency and TA-sural
CSP onset latency were longer in patients (p = 0.010; d = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.15–1.26; p = 0.032; d = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.04–1.07, respectively) ([Table 2]).
Table 2
Electrophysiological parameters and laboratory reference ranges
Parameter
|
Patients (mean ± SD)
|
Controls (mean ± SD)
|
p-value
|
Normal range
|
d (95% CI)*
|
Median CSP duration (ms)
|
40.9 ± 11.7
|
53.6 ± 13.5
|
0.001
|
27–81
|
- 1.00 (-1.52–-0.46)
|
Tibial CSP duration (ms)
|
40.5 ± 10.4
|
48.8 ± 10.5
|
0.004
|
28–70
|
- 0.79 (-1.29–-0.27)
|
Hand SSR latency (s)
|
1.40 ± 0.13
|
1.28 ± 0.12
|
0.002
|
≤ 1.52
|
0.99 (0.45–1.52)
|
Foot SSR latency (s)
|
2.03 ± 0.18
|
1.85 ± 0.16
|
< 0.0001
|
≤ 2.17
|
1.07 (0.51–1.60)
|
H-reflex latency (ms)
|
30.24 ± 2.19
|
28.99 ± 2.13
|
0.032
|
≤ 33
|
0.58 (0.05–1.09)
|
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CSP, cutaneous silent period; ms, milliseconds;
s, seconds; SSR, sympathetic skin response.
Notes: Values are mean ± SD; p from two-tailed t-test. Normal ranges derived from an independent cohort; within ± 2 SD of our lab
mean and concordant with IFCN standards.
Sympathetic skin responses latencies were prolonged in patients for both the right
foot (2.03 ± 0.18 s versus 1.85 ± 0.16 s; p < 0.001; d = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.51–1.60) and the right hand (1.40 ± 0.13 s versus 1.28 ± 0.12 s;
p = 0.002; d = 0.99; 95%CI: 0.45–1.52), whereas amplitudes were comparable ([Table 2]). H-reflex latency was modestly increased (30.24 ± 2.19 ms versus 28.99 ± 2.13 ms;
p = 0.032; d = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.05–1.09).
All control subjects fell within our laboratory reference limits (MN-CSP 27–81 ms;
TA-sural CSP 28–70 ms; hand-SSR latency ≤ 1.52 s; foot-SSR latency ≤ 2.17 s; H-reflex
latency ≤ 33 ms). These cutoffs align with the recommendations of the International
Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN). Consequently, covert small-fiber neuropathy
was effectively excluded in the control group. The consistently large Cohen's d values
underline the clinical relevance of the somatic and autonomic small-fiber abnormalities
observed in vitamin B12-deficient patients.
DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrates that SSR and CSP testing, when applied together, reliably
detect subclinical SFN in early vitamin B12 deficiency. Prolonged SSR latencies signaled early autonomic C-fiber impairment,
whereas markedly shortened CSP durations – accompanied by prolonged onset and end
latencies – indicated somatic A-δ-fiber involvement. Large effect sizes – despite
all individual values remaining within laboratory limits – underscore the clinical
relevance of these group-level abnormalities.
Untreated cobalamin deficiency can progress to irreversible central and peripheral
damage, most notably subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord. Because serum
B12 levels correlate poorly with clinical severity and ancillary biomarkers such as homocysteine
or methylmalonic acid have limited accuracy,[11] objective functional tests are essential. Metabolic axonal injury first targets
thinly myelinated A-δ and unmyelinated C fibers, producing neuropathic pain and autonomic
symptoms before large-fiber involvement emerges.[12]
[13]
[14]
[15] By documenting shortened CSP and prolonged SSR latencies in otherwise asymptomatic
individuals, our findings support incorporating these tests into the early diagnostic
work-up of vitamin B12 deficiency.
Axonal or demyelinating neuropathy due to vitamin B12 deficiency is typically detected on nerve-conduction studies and EMG, which reveal
prolonged distal latencies, low amplitudes, slowed velocities, and axonal loss.[11]
[12] Oral or intramuscular B12 replacement improves peripheral-neuropathy symptoms in 10 to 87% of patients and
also lessens autonomic complaints and small-fiber dysfunction.[13]
[15]
Numerous studies have demonstrated a clear association between vitamin B12 deficiency
and autonomic dysfunction. Previous research has shown that reduced sympathetic and
parasympathetic activity may result from vitamin B12 deficiency, and that these functions
can be restored through replacement therapy.[16]
[17]
[18] Prolonged SSR latency and/or reduced amplitude may suggest demyelination or axonal
damage in sympathetic pathways; however, SSR cannot localize the lesion precisely,
and complementary tests (e.g., Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test (QSART) or
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) are required for definitive topography. Typically, demyelination
is associated with delayed latency, whereas axonal damage leads to reduced amplitude.[5]
[10]
[19]
Improvements in SSR latency and amplitude have been linked to the functional recovery
of the sympathetic nervous system following B12 replacement therapy.[19]
[20] Consistent with previous work, our study showed significantly prolonged SSR latencies
– most evident in the feet (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.07) – highlighting foot latency as a sensitive marker of early
autonomic dysfunction even without predefined diagnostic cutoffs. Although these latencies
remained within IFCN normal limits, their ≈ 1 SD right-shift relative to controls
indicates subclinical slowing. Although SSR amplitudes were lower in the patient group
than in controls, the difference was not statistically significant. This pattern suggests
that latency changes may precede overt amplitude loss, indicating the earliest stage
of demyelinating or axonal injury. Furthermore, vitamin B12 supplementation has been reported to improve autonomic parameters, including heart-rate
variability, even in healthy individuals.[21]
[22] These observations support the use of SSR not only for early diagnosis but also
for monitoring post-treatment recovery, while recognizing that SSR cannot localize
the lesion precisely and should be interpreted alongside complementary tests. In this
context, our findings confirm the potential of SSR to detect both pre- and postganglionic
sympathetic dysfunction in vitamin B12 deficiency.
Cutaneous silent period, a marker of spinal inhibition, is especially sensitive to
A-δ-fiber dysfunction.[3]
[5] In vitamin B12 deficiency, prolonged CSP latency suggests demyelination, whereas shortened duration
indicates axonal loss from fiber dropout.[5]
[23] The pattern depends on disease length: acute deficiency chiefly causes axonal degeneration,
while chronic deficiency leads to secondary demyelination, myelin loss, and some axonal
regeneration.[23]
[24]
In our study, both upper- and lower-extremity CSP measurements revealed significantly
shortened MN-CSP and TA-sural CSP durations, demonstrating considerable diagnostic
value for small-fiber neuropathy. Tibialis-anterior/sural CSP onset latency was also
significantly prolonged in the patient group. Although these values remained within
our laboratory reference ranges (MN-CSP: 27–81 ms; TA-sural CSP: 28–70 ms), the ≈
1 SD right-shift relative to controls indicates subclinical involvement. The medium
effect size for TA-sural latency (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.04–1.07) further supports
its practical value in early detection.
Similar to the prolonged SSR latencies observed, this finding may indicate an underlying
demyelinating process. Conversely, the strong diagnostic performance of shortened
CSP durations points toward axonal loss.
Post-treatment CSP gains show that B12 replacement benefits both demyelinating and axonal recovery.[5]
[25] Cutaneous silent period latency and duration track SFN and therapy response, while
combining CSP with SSR can sharpen autonomic assessment.
Our results are in line with prior work showing the impact of vitamin B12 deficiency on SFN.[25]
[26] Histopathological studies have demonstrated reduced intraepidermal nerve-fiber density
even in asymptomatic B12-deficient individuals,[2] indicating that nerve damage may begin before overt symptoms appear.
In our study, patients presenting with nonspecific complaints and DN4 scores < 4 exhibited
early signs of SFN. Sympathetic skin responses and CSP were found to be effective
in detecting early small fiber dysfunction. Foot-recorded SSR latencies separated
patients from controls with a large effect size (Cohen's d ∼ 1.1), underscoring their value as early markers of autonomic impairment.
Prolonged tibial H-reflex latencies provide additional evidence of subclinical involvement
of large myelinated fibers; when F-wave latency is normal, this delay is attributed
chiefly to conduction slowing along the most distal segment of the Ia-afferent/α-motor
loop, a recognized electrophysiological marker of length-dependent (distally predominant)
neuropathy.[9]
[27]
Cutaneous silent period measurements also revealed significant findings. Both MN-CSP
and TA-sural CSP durations exhibited large effect sizes (Cohen's d ≥ 0.8), underscoring their high clinical utility. A shortening of CSP duration typically
reflects axonal loss, whereas a prolonged latency is more consistent with demyelination.[5]
[25]
The combined use of SSR and CSP enables a comprehensive evaluation of both autonomic
and somatic small-fiber involvement, highlighting their complementary clinical roles.[19]
[25]
The present study shows that SSR and CSP can reveal probable sub-clinical small-fiber
dysfunction in early-stage vitamin B12 deficiency. Its main limitations are:
-
The modest sample size;
-
Case definition based solely on serum B12 concentration, because cost- and logistics-related constraints prevented measurement
of functional biomarkers such as methylmalonic acid or homocysteine;
-
Absence of gold-standard confirmation of small-fiber loss (skin biopsy or quantitative
sensory testing);
-
Lack of post-treatment follow-up;
-
The inherent susceptibility of SSR to habituation and intersession variability despite
stimulus randomization.
Addressing these issues in future, larger cohorts—ideally with histological or Quantitative
Sensory Testing [QST] validation and longitudinal reassessment after B12 replacement—will clarify the full clinical utility of SSR and CSP.
In conclusion, the present study underscores the utility of SSR and CSP as complementary,
noninvasive tools for evaluating autonomic and somatic small-fiber dysfunction in
early-stage vitamin B12 deficiency. Sympathetic skin response capture dysfunction of sympathetic unmyelinated
C fibers but, by itself, cannot precisely localize the lesion within the autonomic
pathway, while CSP reflects A-delta fiber impairment, enabling the identification
of small-fiber pathology even in patients with nonspecific or subclinical symptoms.
Incorporating these techniques into routine clinical practice may facilitate earlier
diagnosis and allow objective monitoring of treatment response. Future studies with
larger cohorts, posttreatment assessments, and the addition of functional biomarkers
such as Methylmalonic Acid (MMA) and homocysteine are warranted to enhance diagnostic
accuracy and clinical applicability. Establishing normative values across different
age groups and populations will further support personalized management strategies
in B12-related neuropathies.
Bibliographical Record
Elif Simin Issi. Assessment of possible small fiber Neuropathy in early-stage vitamin
B12 deficiency using electrophysiological methods. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2025; 83: s00451811722.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811722