ABSTRACT
In 1984, the Scientific and Standardization Committee (formerly ICTH) recommended the use of the International Sensitivity Index and International Normalized Ratio (INI/INR) System for the monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. This system was introduced because the sensitivity of thromboplastin reagents used for the measurement of prothrombin time (PT) was widely different and comparison among hospitals employing different reagents was virtually impossible. In this study, we simultaneously measured the plasma from 7 patients with warfarin therapy at 4 different institutions for PT seconds, PT-INR, thrombotest (TT) seconds and TT-INR. The comparison between these laboratories revealed clinically important variances between the 4 laboratories even when PT was converted to PT-INR. Laboratory 1 and laboratory 3 were using the same thromboplastin reagents for the measurement of PT. The PT (seconds) in both laboratories showed similar numbers, but when they converted into INR, the variances were significant (maximum coefficient of variance 10.44). We investigated the reason why these differences occurred and found that the PT seconds (11.40) for normal control at laboratory 3 were somewhat larger than those of other laboratories. If we assume that PT-INR is identical to TT-INR, the estimated PT (second) for normal control at laboratory 3 can be calculated from TT-INR, and was found to be 10.56 ± 0.10 seconds. This was nearly the same as the one that was used at laboratory 1. In conclusion, there still exist some difficulties that must be overcome bfore the ISN/INR system can be used reliably, and we suggest attention be given to the PT seconds used as normal control plasma.
KEYWORD
Oral anticoagulant - ISI/INR system
