Autogenous Reconstruction of Infected Arterial Prosthetic Grafts Utilizing the Superficial Femoral Vein[1]

Background: Prosthetic infection after reconstructive vascular surgery is a most serious complication, associated with high mortality and amputation rates. Following excision of the infected graft, several methods of reconstruction are available. We present here our experience with autogenous reconstruction of infected prosthetic arterial grafts using the superficial femoral vein (SFV). Methods: From November 1995 to December 1999, we used the SFV in seven patients (mean age 70 years) for reconstruction of an infected aortobifemoral (n = 2), aortoiliac (n = 1), femorofemoral bypass (n = 1), femorotibial (n = 2) and carotid crossover bypass (n = 1). Treatment encompassed complete prosthetic excision and autogenous reconstruction with the SFV alone or as a spliced graft with the greater saphenous vein (GSV) or basilic vein. Results: There were no perioperative deaths or amputations. Two patients exhibited transient moderate swelling of the donor limb. In the follow-up, six patients are alive and well without any signs of recurrent infection. One patient died with an unrelated cause 24 months postoperatively. All donor limbs were asymptomatic for venous congestion in the long-term follow-up. Conclusion: The SFV provides a reliable tool for autogenous reconstruction after resection of infected prosthetic arterial grafts. Harvesting the SFV is well tolerated as long as the deep femoral and the popliteal vein are preserved.

Key words:

Prosthetic graft infection - Autogenous reconstruction - Superficial femoral vein

1 This work has been presented in part at the Annual meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Societies for Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, February 9 - 12, 2000, Lucerne, Switzerland

References

• 1 Gröschel D H M, Strain B. Arterial graft infections from a microbiologist's view. In: Calligaro KD, Veith FJ (Eds.) Management of infected arterial grafts. St. Louis, Missouri; Quality Medical Publishing 1994: 3-15
• 2 Hollier L H. Management of aortic graft infections. In: Greenhalgh RM (Ed.) Vascular and endovascular surgical techniques. London; WB Saunders 1994: 158-167
• 3 Ehrenfeld W K, Wilbur B G, Olcott C N, Stoney R J. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the management of infected prosthetic grafts.  Surgery. 1979;  85 82-92
• 4 Koskas F, Plissonnier D, Bahnini A, Ruotolo C, Kieffer E. In situ arterial allografting for aortoiliac graft infection: a 6-year experience.  Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;  4 495-499
• 5 Torsello G, Sandmann W, Gehrt A, Jungblut R M. In situ replacement of infected vascular protheses with rifampin-soaked vascular grafts: early results.  J Vasc Surg. 1993;  17 768-773
• 6 Claggett J P, Valentine R J, Hagino R T. Autogenous aortoiliac/femoral reconstruction from superficial femoral-popliteal veins: feasibility and durability.  J Vasc Surg. 1997;  25 255-270
• 7 Harrington M E, Harrington E B, Haimov M, Schanzer H, Jacobson J H. Axillofemoral bypass: compromised bypass for compromised patients.  J Vasc Surg. 1994;  20 195-201
• 8 Yeager R A, Taylor L M, Moneta G L. et al . Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection.  J Vasc Surg. 1999;  30 76-83
• 9 Curl G P, Ricotta J J. Total prosthetic graft excision and extra-anatomic bypass. In: Calligaro KD, Veith FJ (Eds.) Management of infected arterial grafts. St. Louis, Missouri; Quality Medical Publishing 1994: 82-94
• 10 Vogt P R, Brunner-La-Rocca H P, Carrel T, von-Segesser L K, Ruef C, Debatin J, Seifert B, Kiowski W, Turina M I. Cryopreserved arterial allografts in the treatment of major vascular infection: a comparison with conventional surgical techniques.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  116 965-972
• 11 Vogt P R, Turina M I. Management of infected aortic grafts: Development of less invasive surgery using cryopreserved homografts.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 1986-1989
• 12 Nevelsteen A, Lacroix H, Suy R. Autogenous reconstruction with the lower extremitiy deep veins: An alternative treatment of prosthetic infection after reconstructive surgery for aortoiliac disease.  J Vasc Surg. 1995;  22 129-134
• 13 Franke S, Voit R. The superficial femoral vein as arterial substitute in infections of the aortoiliac region.  Ann Vasc Surg. 1997;  11 406-412
• 14 Gibbons C P, Ferguson C J, Edwards K, Roberts D E, Osman H. Use of superficial femoropopliteal vein for suprainguinal arterial reconstruction in the presence of infection.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 771-776
• 15 Schulman M L, Badhey M R, Yatco R. Superficial femoral-popliteal veins and reversed saphenous veins as primary femoropopliteal bypass grafts: A randomized comparative study.  J Vasc Surg. 1987;  6 1-10
• 16 White J V, Nessel C C, Whang K. Differential Effect of Type of bacteria on peripheral graft infection. In: Calligaro KD, Veith FJ (Eds.) Management of infected arterial grafts. St. Louis, Missouri; Quality Medical Publishing 1994: 25-42
• 17 Wells J K, Hagino R T, Vargmann K M. et al . Venous morbidity after superficial femoral-popliteal vein harvest.  J Vasc Surg. 1999;  29 282-291
• 18 Coburn M, Ashworth C, Francis W, Morin C, Broukhim M, Carney W I. Venous stasis complications of the use of the superficial femoral and popliteal veins for lower extremity bypass.  J Vasc Surg. 1993;  17 1005-1009
• 19 Sladen J G, Reid J D S, Maxwell T M, Downs A R. Superficial femoral vein: a useful autogenous harvest site.  J Vasc Surg. 1994;  20 947-952

1 This work has been presented in part at the Annual meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Societies for Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, February 9 - 12, 2000, Lucerne, Switzerland