Zusammenfassung
Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit der Wertigkeit der Denture Frame
Analyse bei Europäern, die in zwei früheren Studien untersucht wurde,
nämlich bei 106 Patienten mit Angle Klasse I, II, III oder offenem Biss
sowie bei 122 Patienten, die in die Gruppen Neutral-, Distal- und Mesialokklusion
als auch offener Biss, Regelüberbiss und Tiefbiss eingeteilt wurden.
Bei den meisten Messungen gab es signifikante Gruppenunterschiede (p<0,05).
Die Denture Frame Analyse lieferte Hinweise, wie die Okklusionsebene ausgerichtet
sein soll. Der Winkel zwischen Okklusionsebene und Mandibularebene differenzierte
alle vertikalen Gruppen signifikant. Bei den horizontalen Gruppen waren der
Winkel zwischen A-B-Ebene und Mandibularebene bzw. die Neigung des oberen
Schneidezahnes zur A-B-Ebene signifikante Unterscheidungsparameter (p<0,05).
Die Denture Frame Analyse differenzierte somit die horizontalen und vertikalen
Gruppen.
Abstract
This article reviews the validity of the Denture Frame Analysis in Europeans
investigated in two former studies using 106 subjects assigned to four groups
(Angle Class I, II, III, anterior open bite) and 122 subjects assigned to
neutro-, disto-, and mesiocclusion as well as normal overbite, open bite,
and deep overbite. Significant differences among the groups were encountered
for most of the measurements investigated (p<0.05). The Denture Frame Analysis
indicated the occlusal plane orientation. The angle between occlusal plane
and mandibular plane differentiated all vertical groups significantly. The
horizontal groups differed significantly in the angle between A-B plane and
mandibular plane, and in the inclination of the upper incisor to A-B plane
(p<0.05). Therefore the Denture Frame Analysis distinuguished anteroposterior
and vertical groups.
Schlüsselwörter
Denture Frame Analyse - Okklusionsebene - Mandibularebene
Key words
Denture Frame Analysis - occlusal plane - mandibular plane
Literatur
- 1
Andersen W. S..
The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing
child.
Am J Orthod.
89
1986;
302-311
- 2
Battagel J. M..
The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion.
Eur J Orthod.
15
1993;
347-370
- 3
Battagel J. M..
Identification of Class III malocclusion.
Eur J Orthod.
16
89
1994;
70-80
- 4
Baumrind S., Miller D., Molthen R..
The reliability of head film measurements.
Am J Orthod.
70
1976;
617-644
- 5
Björk A., Skieller V..
Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible: a synthesis of longitudinal
cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years.
Eur J Orthod.
5
1983;
1-46
- 6
Čelar A. G., Freudenthaler J. W., Čelar R. M., Jonke E., Schneider B..
The Denture Frame Analysis: an Additional Diagnostic Tool.
Eur J Orthod.
20
1998;
579-587
- 7
Čelar A. G., Freudenthaler J. W., Schneider B..
Cephalometric differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusions
in 122 Europeans using the Denture Frame Analysis and standard measurements.
J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop.
60
1999;
195-204
- 8
Di Paolo R. J..
An individualized approach to locating the occlusal plane.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
92
1987;
41-45
- 9
Di Paolo R. J., Philip C., Maganzini A. L., Hirce J. D..
The quadrilateral analysis: An individual skeletal assessment.
Am J Orthod.
89
1983;
19-32
- 10
Ellis E., McNamara A. Jr..
Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion.
Am J Orthod.
86
1984;
277-290
- 11
Engel G., Spolter B. M..
Cephalometric and visual norms for a Japanese population.
Am J Orthod.
80
1981;
48-60
- 12
Enlow D. H., Di Gangi D., McNamara J. A., Mina M..
An evaluation of the morphogenic and anatomic effects of the functional
regulator utilizing the counterpart analysis.
Eur J Orthod.
10
1988;
192-202
- 13 Enlow D. H., Hans M. G.. Essentials of facial growth. W.B. Saunders Philadelphia;
1996: 77
- 14
Finlay F. A., Richardson A..
Outcome prediction in open bite cases.
Eur J Orthod.
17
1995;
519-523
- 15
Freudenthaler J. W., Čelar A. G., Čelar R. M..
Denture Frame Analyse-Posteriore Diskrepanz. Funktionelles Konzept nach
Sato.
Info Orthod Kieferorthop.
26
1994;
359-370
- 16
Freudenthaler J. W., Čelar A. G., Schneider B..
Overbite depth indicator and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: The
relationship between occlusal and skeletal patterns studied using receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Eur J Orthod.
22
2000;
75-83
- 17
Ishikawa H., Nakamura S., Iwasaki H., Kitazawa S..
Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: Postpubertal
prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
117
2000;
714-720
- 18
Jacobson A..
The „Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony.
Am J Orthod.
67
1975;
125-138
- 19
Järvinen S..
Floating norms for ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
Am Journal Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
90
1986;
383-387
- 20
Järvinen S..
Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
94
1988;
432-435
- 21
Kim Y. H..
Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite.
Am J Orthod.
65
1974;
586-611
- 22
Kirchner J., Williams S..
A comparison of five methods for describing sagittal jaw relationship.
Br J Orthod.
20
1993;
13-17
- 23
Lopez-Gavito G., Wallen T. R., Little R. M., Joondeph D. R..
Anterior open-bite malocclusion: A longitudinal 10-year postretention
evaluation of orthodontically treated patients.
Am J Orthod.
87
1985;
175-186
- 24 Marcotte M. R.. Biomechanics in orthodontics. B.C. Decker Toronto; 99 1990: 17
- 25 Marcotte M. R.:. Kurs Segmentierte Bogentechnik. Studienzirkel Bad Liebenstein
in Zusammenarbeit mit der Universität
Jena, Oktober/2000
- 26
Nanda S..
Patterns of vertical growth in the face.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
93
1988;
103-116
- 27
Nanda S..
Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
98
1990;
247-258
- 28
Nanda R. S., Merrill R. M..
Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
105
1994;
328-344
- 29
Platou C., Zachrisson B..
Incisor position in Scandinavian children with ideal occlusion. A comparison
with the Ricketts and Steiner standards.
Am J Orthod.
83
1983;
341-352
- 30
Ricketts R. M..
Diagnosis and treatment planning.
J Clin Orthod.
26
1992;
585-602
- 31 Sassouni V.. The face in five dimensions. West Virginia University Press Morgantown;
1962: 183-227
- 32
Sassouni V..
A classification of skeletal facial types.
American Journal of Orthodontics.
55
1969;
109-123
- 33
Sassouni V., Nanda S..
Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions.
Am J Orthod.
50
1964;
801-823
- 34
Sato S..
Alteration of occlusal plane due to posterior discrepancy related to development
of malocclusion - introduction to Denture Frame Analysis.
Bull Kanagawa Dent Col.
15
1987;
115-123
- 35
Sato S., Motoyanagi K., Suzuki T., Imasaka S., Suzuki Y..
Longitudinal study of the denture frame and its relationship with the
development of skeletal malocclusions.
J Jpn Orthod Soc.
47
1988 a;
186-196
- 36
Sato S., Takamoto K., Suzuki Y.
Posterior discrepancy and development of skeletal Class III malocclusion:
its importance in orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusions.
Orthod Review.
(Nov-Dec)
1988 b;
16-29
- 37 Schudy F. F.. The Occlusal plane and the vertical dimension of the human face.
Armstrong Co Inc Houston; 1992 a: 127
- 38
Schudy F. F..
The vertical dimension.
J Clin Orthod.
26
1992 b;
463-472
- 39
Taylor C. M..
Changes in the relationship of nasion and point A.
Am J Orthod.
56
1969;
143-163
- 40
Tollaro I., Baccetti T., Franchi L..
Craniofacial changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III
malocclusion.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
109
1996;
310-318
- 41
Trouten J. C..
1983;
Morphologic factors in open bite and deep bite.
Angle Orthod.
53
1983;
192-211
- 42
Viazis A. D..
Comprehensive assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
J Clin Orthod.
26
1992;
673-680
- 43
Williams S..
The morphology of the potential Class III pattern in the growing child.
Am J Orthod.
89
1986;
302-311
- 44
Williams S., Melsen B..
Interplay between sagittal and vertical growth factors.
Am J Orthod.
81
1982;
327-332
- 45
Zacchrisson B. U..
On excellence in finishing - part 1.
J Clin Orthod.
20
1986;
460-482
Dr. A. Čelar
Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde
Währinger Straße 25 a
A-1090 Wien
