Complete Arterial Revascularization in the Diabetic Patient - Early Postoerative Results[*]

Background: The prognostic benefit of arterial grafts appears to be particularly high in patients with diabetes mellitus, but has been limited by availability of grafts and sternal complications. Complete arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (caCABG) using skeletonized grafts, radial arteries (RA) and the T-graft approach may reduce the perioperative risk particularly in the diabetic patient. Methods: The perioperative data of 174 diabetic (group I) and 402 non-diabetic patients (group II) who underwent caCABG were studied retrospectively. The operations were performed using bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITA) (I : 20 %; II : 21 %; ns) or ITA and RA (I : 80 %; II : 79 %; ns). Diabetic patients presented with a higher incidence of 3-vessel disease (I : 93 %; II : 83 %; p < 0.05) and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (I : 55 ± 16 %; II : 60 ± 16 %; p < 0.05). Results: No differences were found regarding need of intraaortic balloon pump (I : 1.7 %; II : 2.7 %; ns), incidence of myocardial infarction (I : 1.2 %; II : 1.7 %; ns) and sternal complications (I : 2.3 %; II : 1.0 %; ns). In-hospital mortality was 1.7 %(I) versus 2.2 % (II) (p = ns). Conclusions: Using skeletonized arterial grafts and the T-graft approach, caCABG in diabetic patients is as safe as in non-diabetics. With the RA as a second graft, bilateral ITA harvesting is avoidable.

Key words:

Diabetes mellitus - Coronary surgery - Skeletonization - Arterial - Conduits - Radial artery

1 Presented at the 3^rd Meeting of the Austrian, Switzerland and German Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 2000

References

• 1 Webster M W I, Scott R S. What cardiologists need to know about diabetes.  Lancet. 1997;  350 (suppl I) 23-28
• 2 The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators . Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 217-225
• 3 Loop F D, Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M. et al . Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events.  N Engl J Med. 1986;  314 1-6
• 4 Morris J J, Smith L R, Jones R H. et al . Influence of diabetes and mammary artery grafting on survival after coronary artery bypass.  Circulation. 1991;  84 (suppl III) III-275-III-284
• 5 Lytle B W, Blackstone E H, Loop F D. et al . Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;  117 (5) 855-872
• 6 Bergsma T M, Grandjean J G, Voors A V, Boonstra P W, den Heyer P, Ebels T. Low recurrence of angina pectoris after coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries.  Circulation. 1998;  97 2402-2405
• 7 Tatoulis J, Buxton B F, Fuller J A, Royse A G. Total arterial coronary revascularization: Techniques and results in 3220 patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 2093-2099
• 8 Grossi E A, Esposito R, Harris L J. et al . Sternal wound infections and use of internal mammary artery grafts.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;  102 342-347
• 9 The Parisian Mediastinitis Study Group . Risk factors for deep stemal wound infection after sternotomy: a prospective, multicenter study.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;  111 1200-1207
• 10 Uva M S, Braunberger E, Fisher M. et al . Does bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting increase surgical risk in diabetic patients?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 2051-2055
• 11 Tector A J, Amundsen S, Schmahl T M, Kress D C, Peter M. Total revascularization with T-Grafts.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;  57 33-39
• 12 Wendler O, Hennen B, Markwirth T. et al . T grafts with the right internal thoracic artery to left internal thoracic artery versus the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery: flow dynamics in the internal thoracic artery main stem.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;  118 841-848
• 13 Acar C, Jebara V A, Porthoghese M. et al . Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;  54 652-660
• 14 Calafiore A M, Giammarco G D, Teodori G. et al . Radial artery and inferior epigastric artery in composite grafts: improved midterm angiographic results.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  60 517-524
• 15 Hennen B, Markwirth T, Scheller B, Schäfer H J, Wendler O. Do changes in blood flow in the subclavian artery affect flow volume and flow dynamics in IMA grafts in patients who have undergone complete arterial revascularization with the T-graft technique?. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000: in press
• 16 Parish M A, Asai T, Grossi E A. et al . The effects of different techniques of internal mammary artery harvesting on sternal blood flow.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  104 1303-1307
• 17 Calafiore A M, Vitolla G, Iaco A L. et al . Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: Midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 1637-1642
• 18 Matsumoto M, Konishi Y, Miwa S, Minakata K. Effect of different methods of internal thoracic artery harvest on pulmonary function.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  63 (3) 653-655
• 19 Wendler O, Tscholl D, Huang Q, Schäfers H J. Free flow capacity of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts in CABG.  Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 1999;  15 247-250
• 20 Gaudino M, Toesca A, Nori S L, Glieca F, Possati G. Effect of skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery on vessel wall integrity.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 1623-1627
• 21 Huddleston C B, Stoney W S, Alford W C. et al . Internal mammary artery grafts: technical factors influencing patency.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;  42 543-549
• 22 Wendler O, Shahangi E, Georg T G. et al .Complete arterial CABG versus conventional revascularization. Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 2000: in press

1 Presented at the 3^rd Meeting of the Austrian, Switzerland and German Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 2000