Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18(2): 095-100
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32199
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Introduction to Cost Analysis in Facial Plastic Surgery

Eric James Kezirian1 , Bevan Yueh1, 2
  • 1Dept. of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • 2VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 June 2002 (online)

ABSTRACT

Resource allocation in health care is increasingly guided by financial considerations. The cost of care influences treatment decisions not only for health care organizations but also for patients, especially in the fee-for-service marketplace that typifies cosmetic surgery. The purposes of this article are to improve the facial plastic surgeon's understanding of cost analyses and to facilitate critical reading of the literature. We describe basic concepts in economic analyses, such as perspective of analysis, the difference between costs and charges, and the importance of discounting. We also introduce the importance of assessing treatment effectiveness and quality of care. In a review of existing cost-based studies in facial plastic surgery, we found a paucity of rigorous treatment analyses. There are numerous opportunities to pursue economic analysis in facial plastic surgery. We discuss potentially rewarding directions for future research.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gold M R, Siegel J E, Russell L B, Weinstein M C. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.  New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996
  • 2 Russell L B, Gold M R, Siegel J E, Daniels N, Weinstein M C. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.  JAMA . 1996;  276 1172-1177
  • 3 Weinstein M C, Siegel J E, Gold M R, Kamlet M S, Russell L B. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.  JAMA . 1996;  276 1253-1258
  • 4 Siegel J E, Weinstein M C, Russell L B, Gold M R. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.  JAMA . 1996;  276 1339-1341
  • 5 Udvarhelyi I S, Colditz G A, Rai A, Epstein A M. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in the medical literature. Are the methods being used correctly?.  Ann Intern Med . 1992;  116 238-244
  • 6 Blackmore C C, Magid D J. Methodologic evaluation of the radiology cost-effectiveness literature.  Radiology . 1997;  203 87-91
  • 7 Blackmore C C, Smith W J. Economic analyses of radiological procedures: a methodological evaluation of the medical literature.  Eur J Radiol . 1998;  27 123-130
  • 8 Smith W J, Blackmore C C. Economic analyses in obstetrics and gynecology: a methodologic evaluation of the literature.  Obstet Gynecol . 1998;  91 472-478
  • 9 Chang W Y, Henry B M. Methodologic principles of cost analyses in the nursing, medical, and health services literature, 1990-1996.  Nurs Res . 1999;  48 94-104
  • 10 Kezirian E J, Yueh B. Accuracy of terminology and methodology in economic analyses in otolaryngology.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2001;  124 496-502
  • 11 Eisenberg J M. Clinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices.  JAMA . 1989;  262 2879-2886
  • 12 Krieger L M, Shaw W W. The effect of increased consumer demand on fees for aesthetic surgery: an economic analysis.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104 2312-2317
  • 13 Krieger L M, Shaw W W. The financial environment of aesthetic surgery: results of a survey of plastic surgeons.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104 2305-2311
  • 14 Krieger L M, Shaw W W. Aesthetic surgery economics: lessons from corporate boardrooms to plastic surgery practices.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2000;  105 1205-1202
  • 15 Krieger L M, Shaw W W. Pricing strategy for aesthetic surgery: economic analysis of a resident clinic's change in fees.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  103 695-700
  • 16 Alsarraf R, Larrabee Jr F W, Johnson Jr M C. Cost outcomes of facial plastic surgery: regional and temporal trends.  Arch Facial Plast Surg . 2001;  3 44-47
  • 17 Lineaweaver W C, Hui K, Krave K, Mailhot C. Economics of microsurgical cases and routine cases in a medical center.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2000;  105 46-54
  • 18 Galdino G M, Swier P, Manson P N, Vander Kolk A C. Converting to digital photography: a model for a large group or academic practice.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2000;  106 119-124
  • 19 Hollenbeak C S, Kokoska M, Stack Jr C B. Cost considerations of converting to digital photography.  Arch Facial Plast Surg . 2000;  2 122-123
  • 20 Concannon M J, Malaney K B, Wiemer M S, Puckett C L. Omiderm: an inexpensive dressing after CO2 laser resurfacing.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  101 1981-1983
  • 21 Disa J J, Alizadeh K, Smith J W, Hu Q, Cordeiro P G. Evaluation of a combined calcium sodium alginate and bio-occlusive membrane dressing in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites.  Ann Plast Surg . 2001;  46 405-408
  • 22 Moulton-Barrett R, Rubinstein A J, Salzhauer M A. Complications of mandibular fractures.  Ann Plast Surg . 1998;  41 258-263
  • 23 Talesnik A, Markowitz B, Calcaterra T, Ahn C, Shaw W. Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1996;  97 1167-1178
  • 24 Kroll S S, Evans G R, Goldberg D. A comparison of resource costs for head and neck reconstruction with free and pectoralis major flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1997;  99 1282-1286
  • 25 Schmidt B L, Kearns G, Gordon N, Kaban L B. A financial analysis of maxillomandibular fixation versus rigid internal fixation for treatment of mandibular fractures.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 2000;  58 1206-1211
  • 26 Abubaker A O, Lynam G T. Changes in charges and costs associated with hospitalization of patients with mandibular fractures between 1991 and 1993.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1998;  56 161-168
  • 27 Tsue T T, Desyatnikova S S, Deleyiannis F W. Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx. Free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1997;  123 731-737
  • 28 Kizer K W. Establishing health care performance standards in an era of consumerism.  JAMA . 2001;  286 1213-1217
  • 29 Eisenberg L. Good technical outcome, poor service experience: a verdict on contemporary medical care?.  JAMA . 2001;  285 2639-2641
  • 30 Fihn S D. The quest to quantify quality.  JAMA . 2000;  283 1740-1742
  • 31 Halm E A, Chassin M R. Why do hospital death rates vary?.  N Engl J Med . 2001;  345 692-694
  • 32 Brennan T A. The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors-could it do harm?.  N Engl J Med . 2000;  342 1123-1125
  • 33 Bodenheimer T. The American health care system-the movement for improved quality in health care.  N Engl J Med . 1999;  340 488-492
  • 34 Alsarraf R, Larrabee Jr F W, Anderson S, Murakami C S, Johnson Jr M C. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study.  Arch Facial Plast Surg . 2001;  3 198-201
  • 35 Barnett P G, Rodgers J H. Use of the decision support system for VA cost-effectiveness research.  Med Care . 1999;  37(4 suppl Va) AS63-AS70
  • 36 Menke T J, Wray N P. Use of a cost accounting system to evaluate costs of a VA special program.  Med Care . 1999;  37(4 suppl Va) AS45-AS53
    >