Vergleich wiederholter und statischer Dehnung der LWS in Extensionsrichtung bei gesunden Erwachsenen[*]

Zusammenfassung

Übliche Mittel zur Steigerung des Bewegungsausmaßes lumbaler Extension sind statisches oder wiederholtes Dehnen bis zum Ende des Bewegungsbereichs. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist herauszufinden, welche der beiden Techniken zur Steigerung des Bewegungsausmaßes lumbaler Extension im Vergleich zu einer Kontrollgruppe den größeren Zuwachs an Beweglichkeit bewirkte.

Gesunde Erwachsene steigern das Bewegungsausmaß ihrer lumbalen Extension häufiger durch wiederholte Dehnung im Endbereich der Bewegung als durch statisches Dehnen und signifikant mehr, als wenn die LWS nicht in Extensionsrichtung gedehnt wird.

Abstract

Common means to increase lumbar extension are static or repeated end-range stretching. The purpose of this study is to determine which of 2 techniques for increasing lumbar extension yielded greater motion increase in comparison to a conrol group.

Healthy adults increase lumbar extension more frequently through repetitive stretching end of range than through static stretching and significantly more than not stretching.

Flexibilität - unterer Rücken - Bewegungsausmaß

Flexibility - low back - range of motion

Literatur

• 1 Bandy W D, Irion J M. The Effect of Time of Static Stretch on the Flexibility of the Hamstring Muscles.  Phys Ther. 1994;  74 845-850
• 2 Battie M C, Bigos S J, Sheehy A. et al . Spinal Flexibility and Individual Factors that Influence It.  Phys Ther. 1987;  67 653-658
• 3 Beattie P, Rothstein J M, Lamb R L. Reliability of the Attraction Method for Measuring Lumbar Spine Backward Bending.  Phys Ther. 1987;  67 364-369
• 4 Biering-Sorensen F. Physical Measurements as Risk Indicators for Low-Back Trouble over a One-year Period.  Spine. 1984;  9 106-119
• 5 Burton A. Regional Lumbar Sagittal Mobility: Measurements of Flexicurves.  Clin Biomech. 1986;  1 20-26
• 6 Dopf C A, Mandel S S, Geiger D F. et al . Analysis of Spine Motion Variability Using a Computerized Goniometer Compared to Physical Examination: A Prospective Clinical Study.  Spine. 1994;  19 586-595
• 7 Draper N R, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd. ed. New York; Wiley & Sons 1998
• 8 Dvorak J, Vajda E G, Grob D. et al . Normal Motion of the Lumbar Spine as Related to Age and Gender.  Eur Spine J. 1995;  4 18-23
• 9 Engelburg A. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Chicago; American Medical Association 1988
• 10 Erhard R E, Delitto A, Cibulka M T. Relative Effectiveness of an Extension Program and a Combined Program of Manipulation and Flexion and Extension Exercises in Patients with Acute Low Back Syndrome.  Phys Ther. 1994;  74 1093-1100
• 11 Fitzgerald G K, Wynveen K J, Rheault W. et al . Objective Assessment with Establishment of Normal Values for Lumbar Spinal Range of Motion.  Phys Ther. 1983;  63 1776-1781
• 12 Howell D W. Musculoskeletal Profile and Incidence of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Lightweight Women Rowers.  Am J Sports Med. 1984;  12 278-282
• 13 Hsieh C J, Pringle R K. Range of Motion of the Lumbar Spine Required for Four Activities of Daily Living.  Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994;  17 353-358
• 14 Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good Prognosis for Low Back Pain when Left Untampered.  Spine. 1995;  20 473-477
• 15 Keeley J, Mayer T G, Cox R. et al . Quantification of Lumbar Function: Part 5: Reliability of Range-of-Motion Measurements in the Sagital Plane and In Vivo Torso Rotation Measurements.  Spine. 1986;  11 31-35
• 16 Khalil T M, Shihab S A, Lorgia M M. et al . Stretching in the Rehabilitation of Low-Back Pain Patients.  Spine. 1992;  17 311-317
• 17 Kisner C, Colby L A. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundation and Techniques. 4th ed. Philadelphia; F.A. Davis 2002
• 18 Kramer J. Intervertebral Disk Diseases: Causes, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prophylaxis. 2nd ed. New York; Thieme Medical Publishers 1990
• 19 Loebl W. Measurement of Spinal Posture and Range in Spinal Movements.  Ann Phys Med. 1967;  9 103-10
• 20 Mayer T G, Tencer A F, Kristoferson S. et al . Use of Noninvasive Techniques for Quantification of Spinal Range-of-Motion in Normal Subjects and Chronic Low-back Dysfunction Patients.  Spine. 1984;  9 588-595
• 21 McKenzie R A. The Lumbar Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand; Spinal Publications 1981
• 22 Mellin G, Harkapaa K, Vanharanta H. et al . Outcome of a Multimodal Treatment Including Physical Training of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.  Spine. 1993;  18 825-829
• 23 Miller S A, Mayer T, Cox R. et al . Reliability Problems Associated with the Modified Schober Technique for True Lumbar Flexion Measurement.  Spine. 1992;  17 345-348
• 24 Moll J MH, Wright V. Normal Range of Spinal Mobility.  Ann Rheumatol Dis. 1971;  30 381-386
• 25 Moll J MH, Liyanage S P, Wright V A. An Objective Clinical Method to Measure Spinal Extension.  Rheumatol Rehabil. 1972;  11 293-312
• 26 Norkin C C, White D J. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. Philadelphia; F.A. Davis 1985
• 27 Peterson C M, Johnson R D, Schuit D. et al . Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Asymptomatic Subjects: Thoracolumbar Range of Motion Using the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;  20 207-212
• 28 Portney L G, Watkins M P. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River; Prentice Hall Health; 2000. 
• 29 Rondinelli R, Murphy J, Esler A. et al . Estimation of Normal Lumbar Flexion with Surface Inclinometry: A Comparison of Three Methods.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;  71 219-224
• 30 Smith R L, Mell D B. Effects of Prone Spine Extension Exercise on Passive Lumbar Extension Range of Motion.  Phys Ther. 1987;  67 1517-1521
• 31 Sturrock R D, Wojtulewski J A, Hart F D. Spondylometry in a Normal Population and in Ankylosing Spondylitis.  Rheumatol Rehabil. 1973;  12 135-142
• 32 Sullivan M S, Dickinson C E, Troup J DG. The Influence of Age and Gender on Lumbar Spine Sagital Plane Range of Motion: A Study of 1126 Healthy Subjects.  Spine. 1994;  19 682-686
• 33 Vujnovich A L, Dawson N J. The Effect of Therapeutic Muscle Stretch on Neural Processing.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;  20 145-153
• 34 Wessling K C, DeVane D A, Hylton C R. Effects of Static Stretch versus Static and Ultrasound Combined on Triceps Surae Muscle Extensibility in Healthy Women.  Phys Ther. 1987;  67 674-679
• 35 Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R. et al . Reliability of the Modified-Modified Schober and Double Inclinometry Methods for Measuring Lumbar Flexion and Extension.  Phys Ther. 1993;  73 26-37

1 *Gebilligt vom Institutional Review Board, University of Texas at El Paso.