Download PDF
Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2005; 40(8): 459-468
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826090
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Entwicklung und gegenwärtiger Stand der kombinierten Spinal-Periduralanästhesie

Development and Current Status of Combined Spinal Epidural AnaesthesiaB.  Neruda
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 August 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

Entwicklung und gegenwärtiger Stand der kombinierten Spinal-PeriduralanästhesieAnästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2005; 40(10): 630
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921043

Zusammenfassung

Die kombinierte Spinal-Peridural-Anästhesie/Analgesie stellt eine Methode dar, bei der Medikamente intrathekal als Einzeldosis und epidural entweder kontinuierlich oder intermittierend über einen Periduralkatheter appliziert werden. Bereits vor mehr als 50 Jahren wurden erste, wenig allgemein akzeptierte Versuche unternommen, die Methode in die klinische Praxis einzuführen. Erst während der letzten Jahrzehnte sind enorme Fortschritte durch die Entwicklung neuer ausgefeilter technischer Hilfsmittel gemacht worden. Dazu zählen auf einander abgestimmte Kombinationen von Peridural- und Spinalnadeln und Kathetern, Periduralnadeln mit einer seitlich angesetzten Führungskanüle für die Spinalnadel oder auch solche mit einer eigenen, vom Periduralkatheter unabhängigen Austrittstelle sowie spezielle Fixierungsvorrichtungen für die Spinalnadel. Ein spezifisches Merkmal des Verfahrens ist die erst vor wenigen Jahren entdeckte epidurale Volumenexpansion, die niedrig dosierte Medikamentenkombinationen mit ausreichender Analgesie, aber geringerer Kreislaufbelastung und weniger Nebenwirkungen einzusetzen erlaubt. Diese Übersichtsarbeit beschreibt die wesentlichen und wichtigsten Entwicklungsschritte der Methode und führt praktische Beispiele für deren Anwendung in der ambulanten Chirurgie der unteren Extremität, der sog. „walking epidural” sowie der Sectio caesarea an. Die Methode hat heute einen hohen Stellenwert erreicht, sie stellt eine Bereicherung des Handwerkszeugs des Anästhesisten dar und gehört an vielen Kliniken zur täglichen Routine.

Abstract

Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia/analgesia is a method whereby drugs are applied intrathecally as a single dose and epidurally either continuously or intermittently via an epidural catheter. More than 50 years ago, first attempts were made to introduce this method into clinical practice but they found little general acceptance. Only during the last decades has tremendous progress been made in developing new, highly-sophisticated equipment: matching spinal and epidural needles and catheters, epidural needles with a separate conduit for the spinal needle or with an additional hole for the exit of the spinal needle as well as fixation devices for the spinal needle. A specific feature of the method is the only recently recognised epidural volume extension, which allows the use of low-dose drug combinations with sufficient analgetic properties but less cardiovascular compromise and fewer side-effects. This review describes the main and most important developmental steps and offers practical examples for its use in day-case surgery of the lower limb, in the “walking epidural” in obstetrics and in caesarean section. The method has become a valuable new tool in the armamentarium of the anaesthetist and part of daily routine in many clinics.

Schlüsselwörter

Anästhesie/Analgesie - Periduralanästhesie - Spinalanästhesie - kombinierte Spinal-Periduralanästhesie, Methoden, Kanülen, Volumenextension - Geschichte der Anästhesie

Key words

Anaesthesia/analgesia - epidural anaesthesia - spinal anaesthesia - combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia, methods, needles, volume extension - history of anaesthesia

Literatur

  • 1 Albright G A, Forster R M. The safety and efficacy of combined spinal and epidural analgesia/anaesthesia (6002 blocks) in a community hospital.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;  24 117-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arkoosh V A, Sharkey S J, Jr, Norris M C, Isaacson W, Honet J E, Leighton B L. Subarachnoid labor analgesia. Fentanyl and morphine versus sufentanil and morphine.  Reg Anesth. 1994;  19 243-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Behar M, Magora F, Olshwang D, Davidson J T. Epidural morphine in treatment of pain.  Lancet. 1979;  1 527-529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bernard J M, Le Roux D, Barthe A, Jourdain O, Vizquel L, Michel C. The dose-range effects of sufentanil added to 0.125 % bupivacaine on the quality of patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor.  Anesth Analg. 2001;  92 184-188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bernards C M, Kopacz D J, Michel M Z. Effect of needle puncture on morphine and lidocaine flux through the spinal meninges of the monkey in vitro. Implications for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.  Anesthesiology. 1994;  80 853-858
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Birnbach D J, Ojea L S. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) for labor and delivery.  Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2002;  40 27-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Blumgart C H, Ryall D, Dennison B, Thompson-Hill L M. Mechanism of extension of spinal anaesthesia by extradural injection of local anaesthetic.  Br J Anaesth. 1992;  69 457-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Boskovski N, Lewinski A. Epidural morphine for the prevention of headache following dural puncture.  Anaesthesia. 1982;  37 217-218
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Braun B. Anästhesiebesteck. Patentschrift BRD, DE 3 922 406 C1 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Braun B. Fixiervorrichtung. Patentschrift BRD, DE 295 03 750.4 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Brownridge P. Epidural and subarachnoid analgesia for elective Caesarean section.  Anaesthesia. 1981;  36 70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Carrie L E. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for caesarean section.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988;  32 595-596
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Carrie L E, O’Sullivan G. Subarachnoid bupivacaine 0.5 % for caesarean section.  Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1984;  1 275-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Carter L C, Popat M T, Wallace D H. Epidural needle rotation and inadvertent dural puncture with catheter.  Anaesthesia. 1992;  47 447-448
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Casati A, D’Ambrosio A, De Negri P, Fanelli G, Tagariello V, Tarantino F. A clinical comparison between needle-through-needle and double-segment techniques for combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia.  Reg Anesth. 1998;  23 390-394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cascio M, Heath G. Meningitis following a combined spinal-epidural technique in a labouring term parturient.  Can J Anaesth. 1996;  43 399-402
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chestnut D H, Owen C L, Bates J N, Ostman L G, Choi W W, Geiger M W. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625 % bupivacaine/0.0002 % fentanyl versus 0.125 % bupivacaine.  Anesthesiology. 1988;  68 754-759
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Coates M B. Combined subarachnoid and epidural techniques: A single space technique for surgery of the hip and lower limb.  Anaesthesia. 1982;  37 89-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Collis R. Combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia is the preferred technique for labour pain relief.  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2002;  53 283-287
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Collis R E, Baxandall M L, Srikantharajah I D, Edge G, Kadim M Y, Morgan B M. Combined spinal epidural analgesia with ability to walk throughout labour.  Lancet. 1993;  341 767-768
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Collis R E, Davies D W, Aveling W. Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour.  Lancet. 1995;  345 1413-1416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Crampton Smith A. More on combined and subarachnoid and epidural techniques.  Anaesthesia. 1985;  40 823
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Crowhurst J A. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE): current status, Low-dose cse with epidural volume extension (‘EVE’). In: Rawal N, Van Zundert A Highlights in Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, XII. Limassol, Cyprus; Cyprint 2003: 84-85
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Curelaru I. Long duration subarachnoid anaesthesia with continuous epidural block.  Prakt Anästh. 1979;  14 71-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 D’Angelo R, Evans E, Dean L A, Gaver R, Eisenach J C. Spinal clonidine prolongs labor analgesia from spinal sufentanil and bupivacaine.  Anesth Analg. 1999;  88 573-576
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Davies J, Fernando R, McLeod A, Verma S, Found P. Postural stability following ambulatory regional analgesia for labor.  Anesthesiology. 2002;  97 1576-1581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Desira W R. A special needle for combined subarachnoid and epidural block.  Anaesthesia. 1985;  40 308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Duffy B L. “Don’t turn the needle!”.  Anaesth. Intensive Care. 1993;  21 328-330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Eldor J. Metallic particles in the spinal-epidural needle technique.  Reg Anesth. 1994;  19 219-220
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Eldor J. Aseptic meningitis using the needle-through-needle technique.  Can J Anaesth. 1996;  43 1183-1184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Eldor J. Metallic microparticle formation using the needle-through-needle technique.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;  41 326-327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Eldor J, Brodsky V. Danger of metallic particles in the spinal-epidural spaces using the needle-through-needle approach.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;  35 461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Eldor J, Chaimsky G. Combined spinal-epidural needle (CSEN).  Can J Anaesth. 1988;  35 537-539
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hanaoka K. Experience in the use of Hanaoka’s needles for spinal continuous epidural anaesthesia (500 cases).  Excerpta Medica Asia Pacific Congr Ser. 1986;  No 55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Harding S A, Collis R E, Morgan B M. Meningitis after combined spinal-extradural anaesthesia in obstetrics.  Br J Anaesth. 1994;  73 545-547
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hargreaves J. Metal particle generation caused by the combined spinal-extradural technique.  Br J Anaesth. 1993;  70 706
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Herman N, Molin J, Knape K G. No additional metal particle formation using the needle through needle combined epidural/spinal technique.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;  40 227-231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Herman N L. Metallic microparticles in the needle-through-needle technique.  Can J Anaesth. 1998;  45(3) 283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hinkle A J. A new technique for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.  Anesth.Analg. 2004;  76 908-909
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hody J L. Rachi-péri séquentielle pour césarienne.  Cah Anesthesiol. 1994;  42 627-631
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hogan Q. Anatomical issues for epidural and combined spinal/epidural block. In: Rawal N, Van Zundert A Highlights in Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, XII. Limassol, Cyprus; Cyprint 2003: 68-76
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Holmstrom B. Combined spinal epidural (CSE) block - Significance of dural hole. In: Van Zundert A Highlights in Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, VII. Limassol, Cyprus; Hodjigeorgiou 1998: 214-219
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Holmstrom B, Rawal N, Axelsson K, Nydahl P A. Risk of catheter migration during combined spinal epidural block: percutaneous epiduroscopy study.  Anesth Analg. 1995;  80 747-753
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Holst D, Mollmann M, Schymroszcyk B, Ebel C, Wendt M. No risk of metal toxicity in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.  Anesth Analg. 1999;  88 393-397
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Holt M, Liu W H. Shortcomings in the combined spinal-extradural technique.  Anaesthesia. 1996;  51 801-802
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Hughes J A, Oldroyd G J. A technique to avoid dural puncture by the epidural catheter.  Anaesthesia. 1991;  46 802-803
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 IBEES, Institute for Biomedical Equipment Evaluation and Services, Sheffield University and Health Authority .Contamination of fluid with metal particles after using the needle through needle technique. 1992 R301
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Jordan M J. Dural puncture. Rotating needle increases risk.  BMJ. 1993;  306 (6888) 1339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Joshi G P, McCarroll S M. Evaluation of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using two different techniques.  Reg Anesth. 1994;  19 169-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Katsiris S, Williams S, Leighton B L, Halpern S. Respiratory arrest following intrathecal injection of sufentanil and bupivacaine in a parturient.  Can J Anaesth. 1998;  45 880-883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Kox W J, Scherer R U. Fünf-Jahres-Bericht 1992 - 1997 der Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin Campus Charité Mitte. 1997: 48
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Lee J S. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone.  Br J Anaesth. 2003;  91 295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lew E, Yeo S W, Thomas E. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using epidural volume extension leads to faster motor recovery after elective cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.  Anesth Analg. 2004;  98 810-814
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Lu H, Scholz M, Neruda B. Unsuccessful intrathecal needle placement during combined spinal epidural puncture (CSE): a statistical analysis of its causes.  Minerva Anest. 1997;  63(Suppl 1) 201-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Lyons G, Macdonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Through the needle or in separate spaces?.  Anaesthesia. 1992;  47 199-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Mardirosoff C, Dumont L, Lemedioni P, Pauwels P, Massaut J. Sensory block extension during combined spinal and epidural.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;  23 92-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 McAndrew C R, Harms P. Paraesthesiae during needle-through-needle combined spinal epidural versus single-shot spinal for elective caesarean section.  Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;  31 514-517
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Meiklejohn B H. The effect of rotation of an epidural needle. An in vitro study.  Anaesthesia. 1987;  42 1180-1182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Molin J D, Knape K G, Herman N L, Husain F J. No metal particle contamination of epidural or subarachnoid spaces using needle-through-needle techniques.  Anesthesiology. 1992;  77 A1031
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Mononen P. Comparison of four different sets for combined spinal and epidural blocks.  Intern Mon Reg Anaesth. 1994;  6 186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Morgan B M, Kadim M Y. Mobile regional analgesia in labour.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;  101 839-841
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Mumtaz M H, Daz M, Kuz M. Combined subarachnoid and epidural techniques: Another single space technique for orthopaedic surgery.  Anaesthesia. 1982;  37 90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Myint Y, Bailey P W, Milne B R. Cardiorespiratory arrest following combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.  Anaesthesia. 1993;  48 684-686
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Nickalls R W, Dennison B. A modification of the combined spinal and epidural technique.  Anaesthesia. 1984;  39 935-936
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Norris M C, Grieco W M, Borkowski M, Leighton B L, Arkoosh V A, Huffnagle H J, Huffnagle S. Complications of labor analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal epidural techniques.  Anesth Analg. 1994;  79 529-537
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Pan P H. Laboratory evaluation of single-lumen, dual-orifice combined spinal-epidural needles: effects of bevel orientation and modified technique.  J Clin Anesth. 1998;  10 286-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Peutrell J M, Hughes D G. Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in babies.  Paediatr Anaesth. 1993;  4 221-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Pickering A E, Parry M G, Ousta B, Fernando R A. Maternal balance after low dose combined spinal-epidural analgesia using computerised dynamic posturography.  Anesthesiology. 1998;  83(Suppl) A23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Plantiko P. Erfahrungen mit der Kombination von Spinal- und Katheterperiduralanästhesie. Hannover; Zentrale Anästhesieabteilung der Städtischen Krankenanstalten 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Puolakka R, Pitkänen M T, Rosenberg P H. Comparison of technical and block characteristics of different combined spinal and epidural anesthesia techniques.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;  26 (1) 17-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Ranasinghe J S, Steadman J, Toyama T, La I M. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone for Caesarean delivery.  Br J Anaesth. 2003;  91 299-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Rawal N. European trends in the use of combined spinal epidural technique - a 17-nation survey.  Reg Anesth. 1995;  20 A162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Rawal N. The spinal-epidural technique. Barcelona, Spain; Permanyer Publications 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Rawal N, Holmstrom B. The combined spinal-epidural technique.  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003;  17 347-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Rawal N, Holmstrom B, Crowhurst J A, Van Zundert A. The combined spinal-epidural technique.  Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2000;  18 267-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Rawal N, Schollin J, Wesstrom G. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for Cesarean section.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988;  32 61-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Rodzinski R. Über eine neue Betäubungsmethode der unteren Körpergebiete: Sakrolumbalanästhesie.  Zentralbl Chir. 1923;  32 1249-1251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Russell R. Combined spinal epidural analgesia is the preferred technique for labour analgesia.  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2002;  53 331-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Rykowski J J, Simsa J, Hilgier M. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery; review of 2000 cases.  Intern Monitor Reg Anaesth Pain Therapy. 1996;  8 (2) 96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Sia A T, Camann W R, Ocampo C E, Goy R W, Tan H M, Rajammal S. Neuraxial block for labour analgesia - is the combined spinal epidural (CSE) modality a good alternative to conventional epidural analgesia?.  Singapore Med J. 2003;  44 464-470
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Soresi A L. Episubdural anesthesia.  Anesth Analg. 1937;  16 306-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Sprotte G, Schedel R, Pajunk H. Eine „atraumatische” Universalkanüle für einzeitige Regionalanästhesien.  Reg Anaesth. 1987;  10 104-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Stanek A, Wahlen B M, Bey T, Dick W. In the CSE the spinal needle touches the epidural catheter during advancement through the Tuohy needle. Is it only a harmless affair?.  Intern Monitor Reg Anaesth Pain Therapy. 1999;  11 23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Stienstra R, Dilrosun-Alhadi B Z, Dahan A, van Kleef J W, Veering B T, Burm A G. The epidural “top-up” in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: the effect of volume versus dose.  Anesth Analg. 1999;  88 810-814
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Stride P C, Cooper G M. Dural taps revisited. A 20-year survey from Birmingham Maternity Hospital.  Anaesthesia. 1993;  48 247-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Swenson J D, Owen J, Lamoreaux W, Viscomi C, McJames S, Cluff M. The effect of distance from injection site to the brainstem using spinal sufentanil.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;  26 306-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Takahashi R, Yamada K, Yoshiyama T, Nitta S, Hamatani K. Comparison of double-segment technique with single-space technique for cesarean section using combined spinal epidural anesthesia.  Masui. 1999;  48 57-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Tobias J D. Combined spinal/epidural in neonates and children.  Can J Anaesth. 1997;  44 1320-1321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Torrieri A, Aldrete J A. The T-A pair needle.  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1988;  39 65-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Torrieri A, Aldrete J A. Combined spinal-epidural needle (CSEN).  Can J Anaesth. 1989;  36 483
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Uibel W. Doppelkanüle für die Katheterperidural- und Spinalanästhesie. Patentschrift DDR DD 234 793 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 92 Urmey W F. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia.  Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. 2000;  4 13-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Urmey W F, Stanton J, Peterson M, Sharrock N E. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for outpatient surgery.  Anesthesiology. 1995;  83 528-534
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 van de Velde M, Teunkens A, Hanssens M, van Assche F A, Vandermeersch E. Post dural puncture headache following combined spinal epidural or epidural anaesthesia in obstetric patients.  Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001;  29 595-599
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 van de Velde M, Vercauteren M, Vandermeersch E. Fetal heart rate abnormalities after regional analgesia for labor pain: the effect of intrathecal opioids.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;  26 257-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Vandermeersch E. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia. Habilitationsschrift. Faculteit Geneeskunde, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 97 Vartis A, Collier C B, Gatt S P. Potential intrathecal leakage of solutions injected into the epidural space following combined spinal epidural anaesthesia.  Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998;  26 256-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Weninger E, Bauerfeind I. Kombinierte Spinal-Peridural-Anästhesie in der Geburtshilfe.  Anaesthesist. 2002;  51 1024-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Williams R K, McBride W J, Abajian J C. Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery in infants.  Can J Anaesth. 1997;  44 511-514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

1 Hier und nachfolgend wird die verbreitete Abkürzung CSE für „combined spinal epidural” verwendet, da sich das ebenfalls vorgeschlagene deutsche Akronym KSE nicht eingebürgert hat; die Bezeichnung CSE lässt jedoch offen, ob darunter die analgetische oder die anästhetische Wirkung des Verfahrens zu verstehen ist.

Dr. med. Boris Neruda

Eschbergstraße 28 · 54585 Esch

Email: boris.neruda@t-online.de

      >