Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 54(1): 15-20
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-872961
Original Cardiovascular

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Valve Repair in Aortic Regurgitation without Root Dilatation - Aortic Valve Repair[1]

H. F. Lausberg1 , D. Aicher1 , A. Kissinger1 , F. Langer1 , R. Fries2 , H.-J. Schäfers1
  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospitals, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • 2Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Received September 29, 2004

Publication Date:
17 February 2006 (online)

Abstract

Background: Aortic valve repair was established in the context of aortic root remodeling. Variable results have been reported for isolated valve repair. We analyzed our experience with isolated valve repair and compared the results with those of aortic root remodeling. Methods: Between October 1995 and August 2003, isolated repair of the aortic valve was performed in 83 patients (REP), remodeling of the aortic valve in 175 patients (REMO). The demographics of the two groups were comparable (REP: mean age 54.4 ± 20.7 yrs, male-female ratio 2.1 : 1; REMO: mean age 60.8 ± 13.6 yrs, male-female ratio 2.4 : 1; p = ns). In both groups the number of bicuspid valves was comparable (REP: 41 %, REMO: 32 %; p = ns). All patients were followed by echocardiography for a cumulative follow-up of 8204 patient months (mean 32 ± 23 months). Results: Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.4 % in REP and 4.6 % in REMO (p = 0.62). Systolic gradients were comparable in both groups (REP: 5.8 ± 2.2, REMO: 6.5 ± 3.1 mm Hg, p = 0.09). The mean degree of aortic regurgitation 12 months postoperatively was 0.8 ± 0.7 after REP and 0.7 ± 0.7 after REMO (p = 0.29). Freedom from significant regurgitation (≥ II°) after 5 years was 86 % in REP and 89 % in REMO (p = 0.17). Freedom from re-operation after 5 years was 94.4 % in REP and 98.2 % in REMO (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Aortic regurgitation without concomitant root dilatation can be treated effectively by aortic valve repair. The functional results are equivalent to those obtained with valve-preserving root replacement. Aortic valve repair appears to be an alternative to valve replacement in aortic regurgitation.

1 Read at the 4th Joint Meeting of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Societies of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 15 - 18, 2004, Hamburg, Germany

References

  • 1 Starr A, Menashe V, Dotter C. Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency associated with ventricular septal defect.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1960;  111 71-76
  • 2 Cabrol C, Cabrol A, Guiraudon G, Bertrand M. [Treatment of aortic insufficiency by means of aortic annuloplasty].  Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1966;  59 1305-1312
  • 3 Trusler G A, Moes C A, Kidd B S. Repair of ventricular septal defect with aortic insufficiency.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;  66 394-403
  • 4 Turri M, Thiene G, Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Gallucci V. Surgical pathology of aortic valve disease. A study based on 602 specimens.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990;  4 556-560
  • 5 Agozzino L, de Vivo F, Falco A, Luca Tupputi S L, Cotrufo M. Non-inflammatory aortic root disease and floppy aortic valve as cause of isolated regurgitation: a clinico-morphologic study.  Int J Cardiol. 1994;  45 129-134
  • 6 O'Brien K P, Hitchcock G C, Barratt-Boyes B G, Lowe J B. Spontaneous aortic cusp rupture associated with valvular myxomatous transformation.  Circulation. 1968;  37 273-278
  • 7 de Oliveira N C, David T E, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Eriksson M J, Rakowski H, Webb G. Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;  125 789-796
  • 8 Yacoub M H, Gehle P, Chandrasekaran V, Birks E J, Child A, Radley-Smith R. Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  115 1080-1090
  • 9 Schafers H J, Aicher D, Langer F. Correction of leaflet prolapse in valve-preserving aortic replacement: pushing the limits?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 S1762-S1764
  • 10 Langer F, Graeter T, Nikoloudakis N, Aicher D, Wendler O, Schafers H J. Valve-preserving aortic replacement: does the additional repair of leaflet prolapse adversely affect the results?.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  122 270-277
  • 11 Burkhart H M, Zehr K J, Schaff H V, Daly R C, Dearani J A, Orszulak T A. Valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction: a comparison of techniques.  J Heart Valve Dis. 2003;  12 62-67
  • 12 Haydar H S, He G W, Hovaguimian H, McIrvin D M, King D H, Starr A. Valve repair for aortic insufficiency: surgical classification and techniques.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;  11 258-265
  • 13 Duran C. Aortic valve repair and reconstruction.  Operative Techniques in Cardiac Surgery. 1996;  1 15-29
  • 14 Wilkenshoff U M, Kruck I, Gast D, Schroder R. Validity of continuous wave Doppler and colour Doppler in the assessment of aortic regurgitation.  Eur Heart J. 1994;  15 1227-1234
  • 15 Edwards F H, Peterson E D, Coombs L P, DeLong E R, Jamieson W R, Shroyer A LW, Grover F L. Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;  37 885-892
  • 16 Jamieson W R, Edwards F H, Schwartz M, Bero J W, Clark R E, Grover F L. Risk stratification for cardiac valve replacement. National Cardiac Surgery Database. Database Committee of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 943-951
  • 17 Jamieson W R, Burr L H, Anderson Jr W N, Chambers J B, Gams J P, Dowd C M. Prosthesis-related complications: first-year annual rates.  J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;  11 758-763
  • 18 Khan S. Long-term outcomes with mechanical and tissue valves.  J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;  11 (Suppl 1) S8-14
  • 19 Mohty D, Enriquez-Sarano M. The long-term outcome of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse.  Curr Cardiol Rep. 2002;  4 104-110
  • 20 Casselman F P, Gillinov A M, Akhrass R, Kasirajan V, Blackstone E H, Cosgrove D M. Intermediate-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair for prolapsing leaflet.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;  15 302-308
  • 21 Minakata K, Schaff H V, Zehr K J, Dearani J A, Daly R C, Orszulak T A, Puga F J, Danielson G K. Is repair of aortic valve regurgitation a safe alternative to valve replacement?.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  127 645-653
  • 22 Ehrlich M P, Ergin M A, McCullough J N, Lansman S L, Galla J D, Bodian C A, Griepp R B. Favorable outcome after composite valve-graft replacement in patients older than 65 years.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  71 1454-1459
  • 23 Markowitz A. Utility of the full root bioprosthesis in surgery for complex aortic valve-ascending aortic disease.  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  13 12-15
  • 24 Aklog L, Carr-White G S, Birks E J, Yacoub M H. Pulmonary autograft versus aortic homograft for aortic valve replacement: interim results from a prospective randomized trial.  J Heart Valve Dis. 2000;  9 176-188
  • 25 Chambers J C, Somerville J, Stone S, Ross D N. Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: long-term results of the pioneer series.  Circulation. 1997;  96 2206-2214

1 Read at the 4th Joint Meeting of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Societies of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 15 - 18, 2004, Hamburg, Germany

Dr. med. Henning F. Lausberg

Abteilung für Thorax- und Herz-/Gefäßchirurgie
Chirurgische Universitätsklinik
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes

Kirrberger Straße 1

66421 Homburg/Saar

Germany

Phone: + 49(0)68411632011

Fax: + 49 (0) 6 84 11 63 20 05

Email: henning.lausberg@uniklinik-saarland.de

    >