A Completely Thoracoscopic Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Primary Lung Cancer - Technique, Feasibility, and Advantages

Abstract

Introduction: A completely thoracoscopic lobectomy/segmentectomy for primary lung cancer was designed to maximize the benefits of this type of minimally invasive surgery. The technique, feasibility, and advantages of this surgical modality over the conventional procedure were investigated. Materials and Methods: Between January 2003 and December 2004, 38 patients underwent a lobectomy (n = 30) or segmentectomy (n = 8) for clinical stage IA primary lung cancer. A resection using a standard thoracotomy (Thoracotomy Group) was performed in 19 patients, and a completely thoracoscopic resection was performed in 10 cases (CTR Group). Conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery with a mini-thoracotomy was performed in 9 cases. Results: All CTR lobectomies or segmentectomies were carried out safely without any major complications. The number of resected mediastinal lymph nodes was similar in both groups. There was a tendency for the hospital stay to be somewhat shorter in the CTR Group. With respect to postoperative pain as evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS), the CTR Group showed a significantly lower level of pain in comparison to the Thoracotomy Group (p = 0.024 on day 2). Conclusions: We concluded that a complete thoracoscopic lung resection is a safe and technically feasible surgical procedure which enables us to make thoracoscopic lung resections less invasive.

Key words

Lung cancer - video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) - minimally invasive surgery - lobectomy

References

• 1 Iwasaki A, Shirakusa T, Shiraishi T, Yamamoto S. Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  26 58-64
• 2 Inada K, Shirakusa T, Yoshinaga Y. et al . The role of video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: lung lobectomy by thoracoscopy versus the standard thoracotomy approach.  Int Surg. 2000;  85 6-12
• 3 Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 879-884
• 4 Walker W S, Codispoti M, Soon S Y, Stamenkovic S, Carnochan F, Pugh G. Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;  23 397-402
• 5 Houck W V, Fuller C B, McKenna Jr R J. Video-assisted thoracic surgery upper lobe trisegmentectomy for early-stage left apical lung cancer.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  78 1858-1860
• 6 Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 362-365
• 7 Craig S R, Leaver H A, Yap P L, Pugh G C, Walker W S. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;  20 455-463
• 8 Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 1644-1646
• 9 Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T, Iwasaki A. et al . VATS segmentectomy for small-sized peripheral lung cancer - Intermediate results.  Surg Endosc. 2004;  18 1657-1662
• 10 Yim A P, Wan S, Lee T W, Arifi A A. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 243-247
• 11 Kawahara K, Iwasaki A, Shiraishi T, Okabayashi K, Shirakusa T. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for treating lung cancer.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;  7 219-222
• 12 Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Margolis M, Alexander E P. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I lung cancer.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  76 1009-1014
• 13 Demmy T L, Plante A J, Nwogu C E, Takita H, Anderson T M. Discharge independence with minimally invasive lobectomy.  Am J Surg. 2004;  188 698-702