Percutaneous Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the B-Twin Expandable Spinal Spacer

Abstract

Sixty-two suitable subjects (mean age: 49.3 years) underwent percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PPLIF) using the B-Twin expandable spinal spacer (B-Twin ESS) and were followed thereafter for 2 years or longer. The clinical outcome was expressed by the change in pain intensity as scored on a visual analogue scale and the change in degree of disability as scored by the Oswestry Disability Index. The results were compared with those of a previous trial of PLIF using the B-Twin ESS in which the latter was introduced via the open surgical approach (OPLIF). Mean duration of operation was 103 minutes. Blood loss was negligible. No operative difficulties or complications were encountered. No participant was lost to follow-up. Disc space height had increased by a mean of 10 %. At that time there were no radiographic signs of non-union in any patient. The mean pain intensity and disability scores decreased by 66 % and 61 %, respectively, as compared to those on admission. The clinical outcome of the percutaneous method was comparable to that of the open procedure using the B-Twin ESS; however, the results can be interpreted as favoring the former in the context of minimal invasiveness. Should this outcome be validated in further trials, the technique may be adopted in selective cases.

Key words

Low back pain - instrumentation - interbody fusion - percutaneous

References

• 1 Abumi K, Panjabi M M, Kramer K M, Duranceau J, Oxland T, Crisco J J. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spine stability after graded facetectomies.  Spine. 1990;  15 1142-1147
• 2 Agazzi S, Reverdin A, May D. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  91 186-192
• 3 Elias W J, Simmons N E, Kaptain G J. Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device.  J Neurosurg. 2000;  93 45-52
• 4 Folman Y, Lee S-H, Silvera I R, Gepstein R. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a minimally invasive B-Twin expandable spinal spacer.  J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;  5 455-460
• 5 Lu K, Liang C L, Cho C L, Chen J I, Hsu H C, Yiin S I, Chern C L, Chen Y C, Lee T C. Oxidative stress and heat shock protein response in human paraspinal muscles during retraction.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  97 75-81
• 6 Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Aivaksinen O, Partanen I, Tapeninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome.  Spine. 1993;  18 575-581
• 7 Taylor H, McGregor A H, Medhi-Zadeh S, Richards S, Kahn N, Zadeh I A, Hughes S P. The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery.  Spine. 2002;  27 2758-2762
• 8 Zoidl G, Grifka I, Boluki D, Willburger R E, Zoidl C, Kramer I, Dermietzel R, Faustmann P M. Molecular evidence for local denervation of paraspinal muscles in failed-back surgery/postdiscotomy syndrome.  Clin Neuropathol. 2003;  22 71-77
• 9 Auld A W. Chronic spinal arachnoiditis. A postoperative syndrome that may signal its onset.  Spine. 1978;  3 88-91
• 10 Benner B, Ehni G. Spinal arachnoiditis. The postoperative variety in particular.  Spine. 1978;  3 40-44
• 11 Maroon I C, Abla A, Bost I. Association between pedidural scar and persisting low back pain after lumbar discectomy.  Neurol Res. 1999;  21 43-46
• 12 Ross I S, Roberson I T, Frederickson R C, Petrie I L, Obuchowski N, Modic M T, Tribolet N de. Association between epidural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy. Magnetic resonance evaluation.  Neurosurgery. 1996;  38 855-863
• 13 Brantigan J W, Steffee A D, Lewis M L, Quinn L M, Persenaire J M. Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system.  Spine. 2000;  25 1437-1446
• 14 Lee C K, Vessa P, Lee J K. Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements. The result of disc excision and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.  Spine. 1995;  20 356-361
• 15 Ray D C. Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusion.  Spine. 1997;  22 667-680
• 16 Kotilainen E, Alanen A, Parkkola R, Helenius H, Valtonen S, Kormano M. Cross-sectional areas of lumbar muscles after surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A study with magnetic resonance imaging after microdiscectomy or percutaneous necleotomy.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;  133 7-12
• 17 Cervellini P, Curri D, Volpin L, Bernardi L, Pinna V, Beneditti A. Computed tomography of epidural fibrosis after discectomy: comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  23 710-713
• 18 Coskun E, Suzer T, Topuz O, Zencir M, Pakdemirli E, Tahta K. Relationships between epidural fibrosis, pain disability, and psychological factors after lumbar disc surgery.  Euro Spine J. 2000;  9 218-223
• 19 Muramatsu K, Hachiya Y, Morita C. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar disc herniation. Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and Love's method.  Spine. 2001;  26 1599-1605