Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000121.xml
Orthopedic Trauma Directions 2006; 4(2): 1-8
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-932195
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-932195
Clinical topic
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New YorkTibial fractures
Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailingFurther Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
24 April 2006 (online)

Summary
This report suggests that time to union may be faster and the proportion of patients
with nonunion lower with the use of reamed compared with unreamed nails. The rate
of complications appears to be similar between groups.
Additional studies with stronger methods and adequate power, that measure patient
function and quality of life, should be performed to substantiate these findings and
provide more definitive evidence regarding advantages of reamed versus unreamed nailing
of tibial fractures.