Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2007; 11(5): 221-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963697
Literaturstudie

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effekt Manueller Therapie bei akutem und subakutem Rückenschmerz[1]

Systematischer ReviewEffect of Manual Therapy in Acute and Subacute Back PainSystematic ReviewG. Percht
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 2.8.2006

Manuskript akzeptiert: 18.9.2006

Publication Date:
07 December 2007 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Zusammenfassung

Der qualitative systematische Review untersuchte die Wirksamkeit der Manuellen Therapie im Vergleich zu anderen konservativen Behandlungsformen. Manuelle Therapie erzielte übereinstimmend statistisch signifikante Verbesserungen. Dagegen bestand Uneinigkeit darüber, ob andere gebräuchliche Therapien eine zusätzliche Verbesserung erreichen. Sehr gute Erfolge fanden sich nur bei den Studien, die eine Klassifizierung der Probanden in unterschiedliche Behandlungsgruppen vornahmen. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer gravierenden Nebenwirkung bei Manipulationen war sehr gering.

Abstract

This qualitative systematic review investigated the effectiveness of manual therapy compared to other conservative treatment modalities. Manual therapy produced consistent statistically significant improvement. However, there was disagreement whether other conventional therapy options can obtain an additional improvement. Sustained success was only found in studies which classified their subjects in different intervention groups. The probability of severe side-effects of manual therapy was very low.

Schlüsselwörter

Low back pain - Manipulation - Mobilisation - Manuelle Therapie - Wirksamkeit - Nebenwirkungen

Key words

low back pain - manipulation - mobilisation - manual therapy - effectiveness - side-effects

1 Die Arbeit wurde im Rahmen der OMT-Ausbildung 2004 - 2006 erstellt.

Literatur

  • 1 Assendelft W, Morton S, Yu E. et al . Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain. A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness Relative to Other Therapies.  Annual of Internal Medicine. 2003;  138 871-881
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Brealey S, Burton K, Coulton S. et al . UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (UK BEAM) Trial - National Randomised Trial of Physical Treatments for Back Pain in Primary Care: Objectives, Design and Interventions.  BMC Health Serv Res. 2003;  3 16
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R. et al . Efficacy of Spinal Manipulation and Mobilization for Low Back Pain and Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis.  Spine. 2004;  4 335-356
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Burton A, McClune T, Clarke R. et al . Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Low Back Pain Attending for Manipulative Care: Outcomes and Predictors.  Manual Therapy. 2004;  9 30-35
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Chaitow L, Comeaux Z, Dommerholt J. et al . Efficacy of Manipulation in Low Back Pain Treatment: The Validity of Meta-Analysis Conclusions.  Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2004;  8 25-31
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cherkin D, Sherman K, Deyo R. et al . A Review of the Evidence for Effectiveness, Safety and Cost of Acupuncture, Massage Therapy and Spinal Manipulation for Back Pain.  Ann Intern Med. 2003;  138 898-906
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Childs J, Fritz J, Flynn T. et al . A Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely to Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study.  Ann Intern Med. 2004;  141 920-928
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Crombie I. The Pocket Guide to Critical Appraisal. London; BMJ Publishing Group 1999 4th ed
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Delitto A, Erhard R, Bowling R. A Treatment-Based Classification Approach to Low Back Syndrome: Identifying and Staging Patients for Conservative Management.  Phys Ther. 1995;  75 470-489
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Ernst E, Canter P. A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews of Spinal Manipulation.  Journal of Royal Society of Medicine. 2006;  99 192-196
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ernst E. Does Spinal Manipulation Have Specific Treatment Effects?.  Family Practice. 2000;  17 554-556
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ernst E, Harkness E. Spinal Manipulation: A Systematic Review of Sham-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trials.  Journal of Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;  22 879-889
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 EuroQol Group . A New Facility for the Measurement of Health Related Quality of Life.  Health Policy. 1991;  16 199-208
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ferreira M, Ferreira P, Latimer J. et al . Efficacy of Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain of Less Than Three Months’ Duration.  J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003;  26 593-601
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Flynn T, Fritz J, Withman J. et al . A Clinical Prediction Rule for Classifying Patients with Low Back Pain Who Demonstrate Short-Term Improvement with Spinal Manipulation.  Spine. 2002;  27 2835-2843
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Fritz J, Delitto A. Comparison of Classification-Based Physical Therapy with Therapy Based on clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients with Acute Low Back Pain.  Spine. 2003;  28 1363-1372
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Fritz M, Irrgang J. A Comparison of a Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.  PhysTher. 2001;  81 776-788
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Frymoyer J. Back Pain and Sciatica.  N Engl J Med. 1988;  318 29-30
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Frymoyer J, Cats-Baril W. An Overview of the Incidence and Cost of Low Back Pain.  Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;  22 263-271
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Grunnesjö M, Begefeldt J, Svardsudd K. et al . A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Stay-Active Care versus Manual Therapy in Addition to Stay-active Care: Functional Variables and Pain.  Journal of Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;  27 431-441
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hoiriis K, Pfleger B, McDuffie F. et al . A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chiropractic Adjustments to Muscle Relaxants for Subacute Low Back Pain.  J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;  27 388-398
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Hsieh C, Adams A, Tobis J. et al . Effectiveness of Four Conservative Treatments for Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.  Spine. 2002;  27 1142-1148
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hurley D, McDonough S, Dempster M. et al . A Randomized Clinical Trial of Manipulative Therapy and Interferential Therapy for Acute Low Back Pain.  Spine. 2004;  29 2207-2216
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Hurley D, McDonough S, Baxter G. et al . A Descriptive Study of the Usage of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Techniques within a Randomized Clinical Trial in Acute Low Back Pain.  Manual Therapy. 2005;  10 61-67
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Koes B, Tulder van M, Ostelo R. et al . Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain in Primary Care - an International Comparison.  Spine. 2001;  26 2504-2514
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Licciardone J, Brimhall A, King L. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.  BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;  6 43
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Main C. The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire.  J Psychosom Res. 1983;  27 503-514
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Margo K. Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain.  American Family Physician. 2005;  71 464-465
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Melzack R. The McGill Pain Score Questionnaire: Major Properties and Scoring Methods.  Pain. 1975;  1 227-229
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Oxman Scale. 21.6.2006 www.phru.org.uk/casp/review.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 PEDro Scale. Physiotherapy Evidence Database. University of Sydney. Evidence Based Physiotherapy Workbook Adelaide; University of South Australia, Centre of Allied Health and Research 2001
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Pengel H, Maher C, Refshauge K. Systematic Review of Conservative Interventions for Subacute Low Back Pain.  Clin Rehabil. 2002;  16 811-820
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rasmussen-Barr E, Nilsson-Wikmar L, Arvidsson I. Stabilizing Training Compared with Manual Treatment in Sub-acute and Chronic Low Back Pain.  Man Ther. 2003;  8 233-241
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Roland M, Morris R. A Study of the Natural History of Low Back Pain. Part II: Development of a Reliable and Sensitive Measure of Disability in Low Back Pain.  Spine. 1983;  8 141-144
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Schoppink L, Tulder van M, Koes B. et al . Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Adaption of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.  Physical Therapy. 1996;  76 268-275
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Scott J, Huskisson E. Graphik Representation of Pain.  Pain. 1976;  2 175-184
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 37 Stevinson C, Ernst E. Risk Associated with Spinal Manipulation.  Am J Med. 2002;  112 566-571
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 38 Stratford P, Binkley J, Solomon P. et al . Assessing Change-over Time in Patients with Low Back Pain.  Physical Therapy. 1994;  74 528-533
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 39 Swinkels R, Oostendrop R. Outcomes Assessment and Measurement in Spinal Musculoskeletal Disorders. Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy. The Vertebral Column. Edingburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2004
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 40 Taylor S, Taylor A, Foy M. et al . Responsiveness of Common Outcome Measures for Patients with Low Back Pain.  Spine. 1999;  24 1805-1812
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 41 Van Tulder M, Koes B, Bouter L. Conservative Treatment of Acute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of the Most Common Interventions.  Spine. 1997;  22 2228-2256
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I. et al . A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), the Role of Fear Avoidance Beliefs in Chronic Low Back Pain and Disability.  Pain. 1993;  52 157-168
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 Waddell G. The Back Pain Revolution. London; Churchill Livingstone 1998
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Walker B. The Prevalence of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1966 to 1998.  J Spinal Dis. 2000;  13 205-217
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 45 Wand B, Bird C, McAuley J. et al . Early Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Biopsychosocial Education, Manual Therapy and Exercise.  Spine. 2004;  29 2350-2356
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Williams M, Wilkinson C, Russel I. Extending the Aberdeen Back Pain Scale to Include the Whole Spine: A Set of Outcome Measures for the Neck, Upper and Lower Back.  Pain. 2001;  94 261-274
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 47 Williams N, Wilkinson C, Russell I. et al . Randomized Osteopathic Manipulation Study (ROMANS): Pragmatic Trail for Spinal Pain in Primary Care.  Family Practice. 2003;  20 662-669
    Search in Google Scholar

1 Die Arbeit wurde im Rahmen der OMT-Ausbildung 2004 - 2006 erstellt.

Gerlinde Percht

Rohrmoos-Südweg 15

A-8971 Rohrmoos

Email: gerlinde.percht@aon.at