Random Motor Unit Activation by Electrostimulation

Abstract

Whether the involvement of motor units is different between surface neuromuscular electrostimulation and voluntary activation remains an unresolved issue. The aim of this pilot study was to verify if motor unit activation during electrostimulation is nonselective/random (i.e., without obvious sequencing related to fibre type), as recently suggested by Gregory and Bickel [6]. Sixteen healthy men randomly performed submaximal isometric contractions (10-s duration) of the quadriceps femoris muscle at 20, 40 and 60 % of maximal voluntary torque under both stimulated and voluntary conditions. During the contractions, paired stimuli were delivered to the femoral nerve (twitch interpolation technique) and the characteristics of the superimposed doublet were compared between the two conditions. For each torque level, time-to-peak torque was significantly longer (p range = 0.05 - 0.0002) during electrostimulation compared to voluntary contractions. Moreover, time-to-peak torque during voluntary trials decreased significantly when increasing the torque level from 20 to 60 % of maximal voluntary torque (p range = 0.03 - 0.0001), whereas it was unchanged during electrostimulation. In conclusion, over-the-muscle electrostimulation would neither result in motor unit recruitment according to Henneman's size principle nor would it result in a reversal in voluntary recruitment order. During electrostimulation, muscle fibres are activated without obvious sequencing related to fibre type.

Key words

time‐to‐peak torque - motor unit recruitment - neuromuscular electrical stimulation

References

• 1 Adams G R, Harris R T, Woodard D, Dudley G A. Mapping of electrical muscle stimulation using MRI.  J Appl Physiol. 1993;  74 532-537
• 2 Binder-Macleod S A, Halden E E, Jungles K A. Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;  27 556-565
• 3 Conwit R A, Stashuk D, Tracy B, McHugh M, Brown W F, Metter E J. The relationship of motor unit size, firing rate and force.  Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;  110 1270-1275
• 4 Enoka R M. Activation order of motor axons in electrically evoked contractions.  Muscle Nerve. 2002;  25 763-764
• 5 Feiereisen P, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Motor unit recruitment order during voluntary and electrically induced contractions in the tibialis anterior.  Exp Brain Res. 1997;  114 117-123
• 6 Gregory C M, Bickel C S. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation.  Phys Ther. 2005;  85 358-364
• 7 Heyters M, Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Twitch analysis as an approach to motor unit activation during electrical stimulation.  Can J Appl Physiol. 1994;  19 451-461
• 8 Knaflitz M, Merletti R, De Luca C J. Inference of motor unit recruitment order in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions.  J Appl Physiol. 1990;  68 1657-1667
• 9 Lake D A. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation. An overview and its application in the treatment of sports injuries.  Sports Med. 1992;  13 320-336
• 10 Lieber R L, Kelly M J. Factors influencing quadriceps femoris muscle torque using transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation.  Phys Ther. 1991;  71 715-721
• 11 Shield A, Zhou S. Assessing voluntary muscle activation with the twitch interpolation technique.  Sports Med. 2004;  34 253-267
• 12 Todd G, Gorman R B, Gandevia S C. Measurement and reproducibility of strength and voluntary activation of lower-limb muscles.  Muscle Nerve. 2004;  29 834-842
• 13 Trimble M H, Enoka R M. Mechanisms underlying the training effects associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation.  Phys Ther. 1991;  71 273-282