Literatur
- 1
Klein C, Nekolla S G, Bengel F M, Momose M, Sammer A, Haas F. et al .
Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging:
comparison with positron emission tomography.
Circulation.
2002;
105
162-167
- 2
Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly T A, Elliott M D, Regenfus M, Parker M. et al .
Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging
study.
Lancet.
2003;
361
374-379
- 3
Kim R J, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen E L, Parker M A, Simonetti O. et al .
The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial
dysfunction.
N Engl J Med.
2000;
343
1445-1453
- 4
Wellnhofer E, Olariu A, Klein C, Grafe M, Wahl A, Fleck E. et al .
Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to scar quantification for
the prediction of functional recovery.
Circulation.
2004;
109
2172-2174
E. Nagel
Deutsches Herzzentrum
Augustenburger Platz 1
13353 Berlin
Email: eike.nagel@dhzb.de
