Abstract
Aims: With the aging of populations in industrialized countries, managing osteoporosis
in the primary care setting becomes increasingly important. General practitioners
(GPs) are in an ideal position to identify and manage patients who are at an increased
risk of osteoporosis and fracture. In a cross-sectional survey we studied whether
German GPs (1) are aware of osteoporosis as an urgent health problem, (2) felt competent
to manage patients with osteoporosis, (3) knew and used the national guideline for
osteoporosis treatment and if not, (4) which barriers prevented them from doing so.
Participants and Methods: A representative random sample of German GPs were sent a 30-item standardized questionnaire
by mail. Chi-square statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to detect
associations between knowledge of guidelines and explanatory variables.
Results: Of 2,194 doctors addressed, 892 (41.1%) answered the questionnaire. The majority
of doctors (82.7%) felt competent in osteoporosis management (95% confidence interval:
80.2 - 85.2) and only 11.2% (8.2 - 13.1) did not consider osteoporosis an important
problem in their practice. About half (459/892) reported knowing the national osteoporosis
guideline well (51.7%; 48.4 - 55.0), whereas 22.6% (19.9 - 25.4) admitted to not being
familiar with it at all. Knowledge of the guideline was positively associated with
being a female doctor (OR=1.36; 1.01-1.85), having Internet access (OR=1.40, 1.06
- 1.85), seeing institutionalized patients (OR=1.67; 1.03 -2.69), and caring for patients
with osteoporosis at a higher frequency (OR=2.60; 1.93 - 3.50). Nearly 43% (39.7 -
46.2) used the guideline in their practice without problems. In free-text fields,
GPs reported most frequently that budgetary restrictions preventing the prescription
of appropriate medication represented a severe problem for osteoporosis management.
Conclusion: Although most GPs are aware of osteoporosis as an important health problem and felt
competent in the management of this disease, only half of the respondents knew and
used the national guideline. This may explain deficits in diagnosis and therapy of
osteoporosis in Germany. Since guideline knowledge and frequency of consultations
for osteoporosis strongly correlate, proper dissemination of the guideline may further
enhance awareness of, and evidence-based treatment for, osteoporosis.
Key words
attitude of health personnel - family practice - guidelines - health knowledge - osteoporosis
References
- 1 Allison PD. Logistic Regression Using the SAS System: Theory and Application. Cary
NC: SAS Institute 1999
- 2 Belsley D, Kuh E, Welsh RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data
and Sources of Collinearity. Hoboken: Wiley 1980
- 3
Borgström F, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B, Rehnberg C.
At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention
thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Osteoporos Int.
2006;
17
1459-1471
- 4
Butzlaff M, Kempkens D, Schnee M, Dieterle WE, Bocken J, Rieger MA.
German ambulatory care physicians' perspectives on clinical guidelines-a national
survey.
BMC Fam Pract.
2006;
7
47
, doi:10.1186/1471-2296-7-47
- 5
Eisman J, Clapham S, Kehoe L.
Osteoporosis prevalence and levels of treatment in primary care: the Australian BoneCare
Study.
J Bone Miner Res.
2004;
19
1969-1975
- 6
Feely J, McGettigan P, Kelly A.
Growth in use of statins after trials is not targeted to most appropriate patients.
Clin Pharmacol Ther.
2000;
67
438-441
- 7
Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, Greenberg SB,
Greisinger AJ.
Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive
CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA.
2006;
9
1043-1051
- 8
Häussler B, Gothe H, Gol D, Glaeske G, Pientka L, Felsenberg D.
Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany-the BoneEVA Study.
Osteoporos Int.
2007;
18
77-84
- 9
Jaglal SB, McIsaac WJ, Hawker G, Carroll J, Jaakkimainen L, Cadarette SM, Cameron C,
Davis D.
Information needs in the management of osteoporosis in family practice: an illustration
of the failure of the current guideline implementation process.
Osteoporos Int.
2003;
14
672-676
- 10 Machin D, Campbell MJ, Fayers PM, Pinol APY.
Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies. Oxford: Blackwell 1997
- 11
McGuirk B, King W, Govind J Lowry J, Bogduk N.
Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management
of acute low back pain in primary care.
Spine.
2001;
26
2615-2622
- 12
National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians .
Basic data of health care.
2005;
http://www.kbv.de/publikationen/125.html
, (last accessed 2007/06/04)
- 13
Ouimet M, Landry R, Amara N, Belkhodja O.
What factors induce health care decision-makers to use clinical guidelines? Evidence
from provincial health ministries, regional health authorities and hospitals in Canada.
Soc Sci Med.
2006;
62
964-976
- 14
Perez-Edo L, Ciria Recasens M, Castelo-Branco C, Orozco Lopez P, Gimeno Marques A,
Perez C, Manasanch Dalmau J.
Management of osteoporosis in general practice: a cross-sectional survey of primary
care practitioners in Spain.
Osteoporos Int.
2004;
15
252-257
- 15
Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L.
Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians
and orthopedic surgeons.
Mayo Clin Proc.
2002;
77
334-338
- 16
Solomon DH, Brookhart MA, Gandhi TK, Karson A, Gharib S, Orav EJ, Shaykevich S, Licari A,
Cabral D, Bates DW.
Adherence with osteoporosis practice guidelines: a multilevel analysis of patient,
physician, and practice setting characteristics.
Am J Med.
2004;
12
919-924
- 17
Taylor JC, Sterkel B, Utley M, Shipley M, Newman S, Horton M, Fitz-Clarence H.
Opinions and experiences in general practice on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis
and management.
Osteoporos Int.
2001;
12
844-848
- 18
Werner P.
Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes.
Osteoporos Int.
2005;
16
115-127
- 19
Werner P, Vered I.
Management of osteoporosis: a survey of Israeli physicians' knowledge and attitudes.
Isr Med Assoc J.
2000;
2
361-364
- 20
Werner P, Vered I.
The diagnosis of osteoporosis: attitudes and knowledge of Israeli physicians.
Aging Clin Exp Res.
2002;
14
52-59
Correspondence
Dr. R. Chenot
Department of General Practice
University of Göttingen
Humboldtallee 38
37073 Göttingen
Germany
Phone: +49/551 39 26 48
Fax: +49/551 39 95 30
Email: rheiden@gwdg.de