Orthopädische Kraftausübung auf den Unterkiefer - Therapie mit der Kopf-Kinn-Kappe

Zusammenfassung

Heutzutage wird die Mehrzahl der Fälle mit umgekehrtem frontalem Überbiss mit einer Gesichtsmaske und, falls erforderlich, auch mit einer forcierten Gaumennahterweiterung behandelt. Der Verf. verwendet zur aktiven Korrektur einer umgekehrten Okklusion ebenfalls eine Gesichtsmaske. Bei der nächtlichen Retention kommt jedoch eine Kopf-Kinn-Kappe zum Einsatz, da bei der Rezidivbildung der Unterkiefer den wichtigsten Faktor darstellt. Die Kopf-Kinn-Kappe, obwohl gelegentlich als überholter Klassiker angesehen, ist zu diesem Zweck immer noch gut geeignet.

Abstract

Today, a majority of anterior cross bite cases are treated with a face mask appliance with RPE, if needed. The author also uses a face mask for active correction of reversed occlusion and a chin cup appliance for retention during sleep, because a main factor of skeletal post-treatment change is a mandible. The chin cup appliance, although considered a classic, is still useful.

Schlüsselwörter

Kopf-Kinn-Kappe - Gesichtsmaske

Key words

chin cup appliance - face mask appliance

Literatur

• 1 Deguchi T, Kitsugi A. Stability of changes associated with chin cup treatment.  Angle Orthod. 1996;  66 139-145
• 2 Mimura H, Deguchi T. Morphologic adaptation of temporomandibular joint after chin cup therapy.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;  110 541-546
• 3 Deguchi T, Iwahara K. Electromyographic investigation of chin cup therapy in Class III malocclusion.  Angle Orthod. 1998;  68 419-424
• 4 Deguchi T. Force distribution of the temporomandibular joint and temporal bone surface subjected to the head-chincup force.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  114 277-282
• 5 Deguchi T, Uematsu S, Mimura H. Case report KY: functional analysis of a follow-up chin cup patient with TMJ pain.  Angle Orthod. 1998;  68 425-430
• 6 Deguchi T, Uematsu S, Kawahara Y, Mimura H. Clinical evaluation of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) in patients treated with chin cup.  Angle Orthod. 1998;  68 91-94
• 7 Deguchi T, Iwahara K. Electromyographic investigation of chin cup therapy in Class III malocclusion.  Angle Orthod. 1998;  68 419-424
• 8 Deguchi T, Kanomi R, Ashizawa Y, Rosenstein S W. Very early face mask therapy in Class III children.  Angle Orthod. 1999;  69 349-355
• 9 Deguchi T, McNamara J A. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;  115 175-182
• 10 Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Hunt N P, Graber T M. Response to long-term chin cup therapy in adolescent patients with dolichofacial Class III abnormalities: effect of gender differences on mandibular growth rate.  World J Orthod. 2001;  2 323-330
• 11 Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Minoshima Y, Graber T M. Craniofacial features of patients with Class III abnormalities: growth-related changes and effects of short-term and long-term chincup therapy.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;  121 84-92
• 12 Sinclair P M. The clinical application of orthodontic forces: current capabilities and limitations. In: Carlson DS, Goldstein SA (eds). Bone Biodynamics in Orthodontic and Orthopedic treatment. Craniofacial Growth Series Monograf 27. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor 1992; 351-388
• 13 Thilander B. Chin-cap treatment for Angle Class 3 malocclusion.  Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc. 1965;  41 311-327
• 14 Herlyn K E, Ritter R, Kirschner M, Zenker R. Allgemeine und spezielle chirurgische Operationslehre. Bd. 4: Gesicht, Gesichtsschädel, Kiefer. 2. Aufl., Springer, Berlin 1956; 144-147
• 15 Takimoto K, Ishizawa M, Takada F. New extra-oral traction method.  J Jpn Orthod Soc. 1963;  22 36-40
• 16 Valco R M, Sather A H, Turlington E G. Indications for selecting surgical or orthodontic correction of mandibular protrusion.  J Oral Surg. 1968;  26 230-238
• 17 Sperry T P, Speidel T M, Issacson R J, Worms F W. Differenzial treatment planning for mandibular prognathism.  Am J Orthod. 1977;  71 531-541
• 18 Polk C E, Buchanan D. A new index for evaluating horizontal skeletal discrepancies and predicting treatment outcomes.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;  124 663-669
• 19 Schuster G, Lux C J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Children with Class III malocclusion: development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery.  Angle Orthod. 2003;  73 136-145
• 20 Cureton S L, Regennitter F J, Yancey J M. The role of the headgear calendar in headgear compliance.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;  104 387-394
• 21 Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study.  Eur J Orthod. 2002;  24 627-637
• 22 Bandai-Sakamoto E, Sugawara J, Umemori M, Mitani H. Craniofacial growth of mandibular prognathism in Japanese girls during pubertal growth period: longitudinal study from 9 to 14 years of age.  Orthodontic Waves. 2000;  59 77-89
• 23 Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;  98 127-133
• 24 Uner O, Yüksel S, Uçüncü N. Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment.  Eur J Orthod. 1995;  17 135-141
• 25 Uçüncü N, Uçem T T, Yüksel S. A comparison of chincap and maxillary protraction appliances in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions.  Eur J Orthod. 2000;  22 43-51
• 26 Katashiba S, Deguchi Sr T, Kegeyama T, Minoshima Y, Kuroda T, Roberts W E. The aggressive chin cup protocol (14 h / day for 2 years with excellent compliance) depends on commitment to overcorrection of the skeletal Class III malocclusion.  Orthodontic Waves. 2006;  65 57-63