Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2011; 105(05): 920-921
DOI: 10.1160/TH11-02-0131
Letters to the Editor
Schattauer GmbH

More on advances in imaging angiogenesis and inflammation in atherosclerosis

Arend F. L. Schinkel
1   Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology and the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Daniel Staub
2   Department of Angiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
,
Gerrit L. ten Kate
1   Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology and the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Stijn C. H. van den Oord
1   Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology and the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Folkert J. ten Cate
1   Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology and the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Eric J. G. Sijbrands
1   Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology and the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, Vascular and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Steven B. Feinstein
3   Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 25 November 2011

Accepted after minor revision: 18 March 2011

Publication Date:
28 November 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • References

  • 1 Zagorchev Z, Mulligan-Kehoe MJ. Advances in imaging angiogenesis and inflammation in atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 820-827.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sirsi S, Feshitan J, Kwan J. et al. Effect of micro-bubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 935-948.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Decano JL, Moran AM, Ruiz-Opazo N. et al. Molecular imaging of vasa vasorum neovascularization via DEspR-targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound micro-imaging in transgenic atherosclerosis rat model. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010 epub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 ten Kate GL, Sijbrands EJ, Valkema R. et al. Molecular imaging of inflammation and intraplaque vasa vasorum: a step forward to identification of vulnerable plaques?. J Nucl Cardiol 2010; 17: 897-912.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Feinstein SB. Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 236-243.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schinkel AF, Krueger CG, Tellez A. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for imaging vasa vasorum: comparison with histopathology in a swine model of atherosclerosis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 659-664.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shah F, Balan P, Weinberg M. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis?. Vasc Med 2007; 12: 291-297.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Staub D, Patel MB, Tibrewala A. et al. Vasa vasorum and plaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced carotid ultrasound imaging correlates with cardiovascular disease and past cardiovascular events. Stroke 2010; 41: 41-47.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hurks R, Peeters W, Derksen WJ. et al. Biobanks and the search for predictive biomarkers of local and systemic outcome in atherosclerotic disease. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 48-54.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Eijgelaar WJ, Heeneman S, Daemen MJ. The vulnerable patient: refocusing on the plaque?. Thromb Haemost 2009; 102: 231-239.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar