Intrinsic platelet reactivity before start with clopidogrel as predictor for on-clopidogrel platelet function and long-term clinical outcome

Willibald Hochholzer; Christian M. Valina; Timo Bömicke; Michael Amann; Christian Stratz; Thomas Nührenberg; Dietmar Trenk; Franz-Josef Neumann

doi:10.1160/TH14-10-0900

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Table of Contents

Thromb Haemost 2015; 114(01): 109-114
DOI: 10.1160/TH14-10-0900

Cellular Haemostasis and Platelets

Schattauer GmbH

Intrinsic platelet reactivity before start with clopidogrel as predictor for on-clopidogrel platelet function and long-term clinical outcome

Authors

Willibald Hochholzer
Christian M. Valina
Timo Bömicke
Michael Amann
Christian Stratz
Thomas Nührenberg
Dietmar Trenk
Franz-Josef Neumann

Abstract

Summary

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity is associated with worse clinical outcome. Previous data suggest that intrinsic platelet reactivity before initiation of clopidogrel contributes significantly to on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity. It is unknown whether intrinsic reactivity can sufficiently predict on-clopidogrel reactivity and therefore identify patients with insufficient response to clopidogrel before initiation of treatment and at risk for worse clinical outcome. This analysis included 765 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (5 µM ADP) before administration of clopidogrel 600mg and after intake of first maintenance dose of clopidogrel on day 1 following coronary stenting. Patients were followed for up to seven years. The combined primary endpoint was death of any cause or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Intrinsic and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity were significant correlated (r=0.31; p < 0.001). Among all tested clinical and genetic factors including the cytochrome P450 2C19*2 polymorphism, intrinsic platelet reactivity was the strongest predictor for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity. However, intrinsic platelet reactivity could only explain 8 % of variability of on-clopidogrel platelet function. Only on-treatment platelet reactivity was predictive for long-term clinical outcome (HR 1.47, 95 % CI 1.05–2.05; p = 0.02) whereas intrinsic platelet reactivity was not (HR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.74–1.43; p = 0.86). In conclusion, intrinsic platelet reactivity before initiation of clopidogrel is the strongest predictor of early on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity but can only explain a minor proportion of its variability and is not significantly associated with clinical outcome. Thus, baseline testing cannot substitute on-clopidogrel platelet function testing.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT00457236).

Keywords

Clopidogrel - platelet reactivity - risk prediction - mortality - coronary disease

Full Text

References

References
1 Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL. et al. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circ 2003; 107: 2908-2913.
2 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D. et al. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ 2005; 111: 2560-2564.
3 Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R. et al. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 919-933.
4 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Bestehorn HP. et al. Impact of the degree of peri-interventional platelet inhibition after loading with clopidogrel on early clinical outcome of elective coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1742-1750.
5 Sibbing D, Braun S, Morath T. et al. Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel treatment assessed with point-of-care analysis and early drug-eluting stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 849-856.
6 Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G. et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet 2013; 382: 614-623.
7 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Fromm MF. et al. Impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism and of major demographic characteristics on residual platelet function after loading and maintenance treatment with clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2427-2434.
8 Trenk D, Hochholzer W, Fromm MF. et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 681G>A polymorphism and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity associated with adverse 1-year clinical outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1925-1934.
9 Shuldiner AR, O’Connell JR, Bliden KP. et al. Association of Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genotype With the Antiplatelet Effect and Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel Therapy. J Am Med Assoc 2009; 302: 849-857.
10 Frelinger 3rd AL, Bhatt DL, Lee RD. et al. Clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics vary widely despite exclusion or control of polymorphisms (CYP2C19, ABCB1, PON1), noncompliance, diet, smoking, co-medications (including proton pump inhibitors), and pre-existent variability in platelet function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 872-879.
11 Frelinger 3rd AL, Michelson AD, Wiviott SD. et al. Intrinsic platelet reactivity before P2Y12 blockade contributes to residual platelet reactivity despite high-level P2Y12 blockade by prasugrel or high-dose clopidogrel. Results from PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 219-226.
12 Michelson AD, Linden MD, Furman MI. et al. Evidence that pre-existent variability in platelet response to ADP accounts for ’clopidogrel resistance’. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 75-81.
13 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Bestehorn HP. et al. Impact of the Degree of Peri-Interventional Platelet Inhibition after Loading with Clopidogrel on Early Clinical Outcome of Elective Coronary Stent Placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1742-1750.
14 Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS. et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2551-2567.
15 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D. et al. Whole blood aggregometry for evaluation of the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. Thromb Res 2007; 119: 285-291.
16 Campo G, Valgimigli M, Gemmati D. et al. Value of platelet reactivity in predicting response to treatment and clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary coronary intervention: insights into the STRATEGY Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2178-2185.
17 Breet NJ, van Werkum JW, Bouman HJ. et al. Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. J Am Med Assoc 2010; 303: 754-762.
18 Sibbing D, Koch W, Gebhard D. et al. Cytochrome 2C19*17 allelic variant, platelet aggregation, bleeding events, and stent thrombosis in clopidogrel-treated patients with coronary stent placement. Circ 2010; 121: 512-518.
19 Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS. et al. Standard- vs High-Dose Clopidogrel Based on Platelet Function Testing After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Med Assoc 2011; 305: 1097-1105.
20 Trenk D, Stone GW, Gawaz M. et al. A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 2159-2164.
21 Collet JP, Cuisset T, Range G. et al. Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2100-2109.
22 Geisler T, Grass D, Bigalke B. et al. The Residual Platelet Aggregation after Deployment of Intracoronary Stent (PREDICT) score. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 06: 54-61.
23 Angiolillo DJ, Bernardo E, Sabate M. et al. Impact of platelet reactivity on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1541-1547.
24 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Mega JL. et al. Impact of smoking on antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and prasugrel after loading dose and on maintenance therapy. Am Heart J 2011; 162: 518-526e5.
25 Sibbing D, von Beckerath O, Schomig A. et al. Impact of body mass index on platelet aggregation after administration of a high loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 203-205.
26 Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP. et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2010; 304: 1821-1830.
27 Bellemain-Appaix A, O’Connor SA, Silvain J. et al. Association of clopidogrel pretreatment with mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2012; 308: 2507-2516.