Introduction
Until recently, there has been a relative lack of research into the incidence of venous
thromboembolism (VTE) in Asian populations,[1] perhaps partly due to early impressions that VTE was rare in Asia.[2] However, the past 15 years have seen a marked increase in the number of publications,
especially from mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and Singapore. Most
of these studies have reported significant VTE rates in the respective Asian populations,
although reported rates were generally lower than those in western populations where
VTE has an estimated annual incidence of 1 per 1,000 per annum, which makes VTE a
major health issue. Although VTE is ranked the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular
death in Western countries,[3] there remains a lack of acknowledgement of this condition in Asian populations.
This systematic review aims to encapsulate the latest findings from Asia and raise
awareness of VTE as an important condition in this region.
The effective management of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism
(PE) requires early confirmation of clinically suspected disease. In turn, early confirmation
is reliant on both clinicians and the public having a high local awareness of these
disorders. A recent global survey indicated that clinical awareness regarding VTE
is generally low in Asian countries.[4] Since the nations that comprise Asia account for more than half the world's population,
such low local awareness about VTE is likely to add considerably to the avoidable
burden from this disease.
The purpose of this systematic review is to examine evidence about the incidence of
symptomatic VTE, reported between January 1995 and February 2016, in publications
from East Asia. The focus is on population-based and other studies of VTE incidence,
temporal trends in reported VTE rates, and the contributions of age and other major
predisposing conditions. The results may help increase awareness about the importance
of VTE in Asian populations.
Existing Asian VTE guidelines are summarized in [Table 1]. The present synthesis of evidence on the incidence of VTE and predisposing factors
may inform future refinements and updates of VTE-related guidelines in Asia.
Table 1
List of Asian guidelines and expert recommendations on prevention and/or management
of venous thromboembolism (VTE)
Guideline title
|
Year
|
Reference
|
|
Asian venous thromboembolism guidelines: updated recommendations for the prevention
of venous thromboembolism
|
2017
|
Int Angiol 2017;36(1):1–20
|
[68]
|
Management of venous thromboembolisms: part I. The consensus for deep vein thrombosis
|
2016
|
Acta Cardiol Sin 2016;32(1):1–22
|
[69]
|
Prevention of venous thromboembolism, 2nd edition: Korean Society of Thrombosis and
Hemostasis Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines
|
2014
|
J Korean Med Sci 2014;29(2):164–171
|
[70]
|
Asia-Pacific Thrombosis Advisory Board consensus paper on prevention of venous thromboembolism
after major orthopaedic surgery
|
2010
|
Thromb Haemost 2010;104(5):919–930
|
[71]
|
Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism
and deep vein thrombosis (JCS 2009)
|
2011
|
Circ J 2011;75(5):1258–1281
|
[72]
|
Management of venous thromboembolism
|
2007
|
J Assoc Physicians India 2007;55:49–70
|
[73]
|
Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines: prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism
|
2013
|
http://www.moh.gov.my/penerbitan/CPG2017/9005.pdf
|
[74]
|
The HKSCCM Position Statement: Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Intensive Care
Units in Hong Kong
|
2010
|
http://hksccm.org
|
[75]
|
Methods
For the purposes of this study only symptomatic VTE was considered and Asian populations
were defined as people from the geographical regions of East Asia including China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Taiwan, Mongolia, Korea (North and
South) and Japan, Southeast Asia including Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore and Philippines, and
South Asia including India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
A systematic search of the literature using the PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison,
Outcome, Type) approach[5] and the PRISMA checklist[6] was conducted to identify English-language publications. The predetermined inclusion
criteria were the following: (1) the population studied included at least 90% Asian
participants or the study was conducted in one of the specified Asian countries; (2)
the full publication was available in English; (3) the reported study included at
least 100 subjects from the Asian population of interest; (4) the publication reported
the disease burden and/or risk and demographic factors associated with symptomatic
VTE; (5) the publication date was from 1995 to 2016.
Data Collection and Analysis
Selection of Studies
A wide, all-encompassing search string was developed through an iterative process
and the final literature search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE) on 23 February 2016
(see Appendix A for search string). Two reviewers independently screened the title
and abstract for each manuscript against the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria
(see [Fig. 1]). Full-text manuscripts were obtained for all abstracts that were deemed potentially
eligible by at least one reviewer. Two reviewers then independently screened the full-text
articles for eligibility using a standardised data extraction form. Any discrepancies
were resolved by discussion and/or consultation with a third reviewer (n = 42).
Fig. 1 Flow chart.
Searching Other Resources
The reference lists of all papers included were hand searched to identify any additional
manuscripts that may have been omitted in the initial search; the ‘related article’
feature in PubMed was also used to identify additional articles. Google Scholar, EMBASE
and the grey literature were also searched to cross-check for additional relevant
articles (see [Fig. 1]).
Grouping of Studies
Included studies were grouped, according to the study protocol, as belonging to one
of the following categories: (1) population-based studies, defined as population-based
estimates of VTE incidence or mortality in the general population, from sources such
as national health system registries or health insurance databases; (2) hospital evidence,
defined as single institution or multicentre estimates of VTE incidence or mortality
in the general population, or reports of VTE rates in consecutive hospitalized patients,
surgical patients or general oncology patients; (3) autopsy evidence, defined as studies
of PE incidence in series of autopsy records or death certificates; (4) special interest
studies based on large population or patient groups; (5) studies of VTE in subpopulations
or patient cohorts. Only high-quality studies with a low risk of bias were reported.
For population-based studies, ICD-9 or ICD-10-CM classifications were used. This system
is the ninth or tenth revision of the World Health Organization International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) clinical modification
(CM).
Results
The search strategy identified a total of 1,095 manuscripts. Initial title and abstract
searches identified 227 potentially relevant studies. Hand searching of reference
lists and additional searches identified a further 25 potentially relevant studies.
Detailed abstract and/or full-text review identified 95 potentially relevant studies
that met the criteria for data extraction. The following full-text review publications
were excluded for the following reasons: small sample size ([Supplementary references], 1–3); letter to the editor or literature review without new data (S4–S6); lack
of denominator value, therefore no incidence reported or calculable (S7–S9); survey-based
studies with poor response rates (S10–S13); duplicated data (S14); only non-symptomatic/sub-clinical
disease, for example, VTE diagnosed by systematic screening with venous ultrasound
imaging, or after D-dimer assay; incidence estimate extrapolated from less than 90%
of the population of interest (S15); the report concerned predisposition for PE in
people with a DVT(S16); or VTE was not a main study outcome of interest (S17). A total
of 73 manuscripts met the eligibility criteria for data extraction ([Fig. 1]). These were from Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, China, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines,
Thailand, Japan and India.
Population-Based Estimates of Incidence
Population-Wide Annual Incidences of VTE
Population-wide estimates derived from international classification of disease-coded
population health data sets (ICD-9 or ICD-10-CM) were identified from Korea,[7] Taiwan[8] and Hong Kong[9] ([Table 2]).
Table 2
Population-wide incidence estimates
Country
|
Reference
|
Study years
|
Population based or extrapolated
|
Data source
|
N per 100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
Japan[10]
|
Sakuma M, et al. Circ J 2002; 66:1144
|
1951–2000
|
Population based
|
Annual reports from ‘Vital Statistics of Japan’
|
|
Attributed death rates: 0.08 (1956); 0.77 (1996); 0.8 (2000)
|
|
Korea[7]
|
Jang MJ, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9:85
|
2004–2008
|
Population based
|
National Health Insurance database; ICD-0-coded data for PE and/or DVT (includes intra-abdominal
and site not specified)
|
3.91 (2004); 5.31 (2008)
|
3.74 (2004); 7.01 (2008)
|
8.83 (2004); 13.8 (2008)
|
Taiwan[8]
|
Lee CH, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8:1515
|
2001–2002
|
Population based
|
National Health Insurance claims database; ICD-9-CM-coded data for inpatient or outpatient
VTE
|
|
|
15.9
|
Hong Kong[9]
|
Cheuk BL, et al. Br J Surg 2004;91:424
|
2000–2001
|
Population based
|
Hong Kong Hospital Authority Clinical Data Analysis and Report System (95% of secondary
and tertiary inpatient services); ICD-9-CM codes
|
17.1
|
3.9
|
19.9
|
Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
The Korean study utilized a data set containing all inpatient and outpatient encounters
recorded from 2004 to 2008 and investigated DVT alone and PE, with or without DVT.[7] The Taiwanese study utilized data from the National Health Insurance programme,
covering 99% of the population and 97% of hospitals and clinics, and recorded VTE
rates from 2001 to 2002 in people older than 18 years.[8] The Hong Kong study was derived from public hospital admission and discharge statistics
in 2000 and 2001, covering 95% of the population.[9]
In Korea, the age- and sex-adjusted annual VTE rates per 100,000 were 8.83 in 2004
and 13.8 in 2008. In Taiwan, the crude incidence of VTE was 15.9 per 100,000 person-years;
in Hong Kong, the crude rates were 17.1 per 100,000 for DVT, 3.9 for PE and 19.9 for
VTE ([Table 2]).
A Japanese study reported death certificate data in which death was attributed to
PE, as recorded in ‘Vital Statistics of Japan’ from 1951 to 2000, and data were adjusted
to the population size in 1985. The reported rate of ‘fatal PE’ increased from 0.08
per 100,000 in 1956 to 0.77 per 100,000 in 1996.[10]
Population-Based VTE Rates in Patients with Specific Chronic or Acute Disorders
We identified 24 population-based retrospective cohort studies of specific disorders,
injuries, toxicities or drug therapies, all derived from the Taiwan National Health
Insurance databases. Each study reported absolute DVT, PE or VTE rates in cases and
matched controls, together with adjusted incidence hazard ratios (HR; [Table 3]).
Table 3
Population-based estimated incidence in medical subgroups
Predisposition
|
Reference
|
Study period
|
Cases
|
Controls
|
Mean age (y)
|
Cases: VTE/10,000 patient-years adjusted HR (95% CI)
|
Controls: VTE/10,000 patient-years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
Inflammatory disorders
|
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)[11]
|
Chung WS, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2014;12:452
|
Index 1998–2008; median 7-y follow-up to 2010
|
13,084
|
matched 4:1
|
35.5
|
15.1
HR 12.8 (9.06, 32.8)
|
10.2
HR 19.7 (11.9, 32.8)
|
|
1.13
|
0.47
|
|
Sjogren's syndrome (SS)[16]
|
Chung, WS, et al. J Rheumatol 2014;41:909
|
Index 1998–2008; median 5.1-y follow-up to 2010
|
8,920
|
matched 4:1
|
53.5
|
5.81
HR 1.83 (1.16, 2.89)
|
6.43
HR 3.29 (2.03, 5.31)
|
|
3.11
|
1.97
|
|
Rheumatoid arthritis[17]
|
Chung, WS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1774
|
Index 1998–2008; follow-up to 2010
|
29,238
|
matched 4:1
|
52
|
10.7
HR 3.36 (2.79, 4.03)
|
3.6
HR 2.07 (1.55, 2.76)
|
|
3.22
|
1.75
|
|
Rheumatoid arthritis[18]
|
Kang JH et al, J Vasc Surg 2012;56:1642
|
Index 2001–2009
|
5,193 first DVT
|
matched 4:1
|
|
OR 1.96 (1.45, 2.64)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systemic sclerosis (SSc)[12]
|
Chung WS, et al, Rheumatology 2014;53:1639
|
Index 1998–2008; follow-up to 2010
|
1,895
|
matched 4:1
|
50
|
10.9
HR 10.5 (3.64, 30.3)
|
10.8
HR 7.00 (2.64, 18.5)
|
|
1.08
|
1.51
|
|
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)[76]
|
Chung WS, et al, Thromb Res 2015;135:492
|
Index 2000–2010; follow-up to 2011
|
11,445
|
matched 4:1
|
53
|
9.81
HR 1.98 (1.45,2.7)
|
3.98
HR 1.80 (1.11, 2.90)
|
|
4.5
|
2.15
|
|
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)[13]
|
Chen WJ, et al, COPD 2014;11:438
|
2000–2008; follow-up to 2009
|
355,878
|
matched 1:1
|
71
|
|
12.31
HR 3.45 (3.10, 3.83)
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
Asthma[14]
|
Chung WS et al, Eur Respir J;43(3):801–807
|
2002–2008; follow-up to 2010
|
31,356
|
matched 4:1
|
39
|
|
10.2
HR 3.24 (1.74, 6.01)
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
Dermatomyositis/polymyositis[77]
|
Chung WS et al, Thromb Res 2014;134:622
|
Index 2000–2010
|
2,031
|
matched 4:1
|
47.5
|
|
|
25.0
HR 11.1 (5.2, 23.6)
|
|
|
2.08
|
Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB)[21]
|
Chung WS et al, Thromb Haemost 2014;112:1325
|
Index 2000–2010
|
9,985
|
matched 4:1
|
59
|
|
2.10
HR 2.46 (1.10, 5.51)
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)[13]
|
Chen CY and KM Liao 2015; Medicine (Balt.) 94:e1741
|
Index 1998–2008; followed to Dec 2009
|
8,810
age >40 years
|
matched 2:1
|
72
|
18.78
HR 1.38
(1.06, 1.80)
|
|
|
13.26
|
|
|
Pneumococcal pneumonia[19]
|
Chen YG et al Respirology 2015;20:799
|
1998–2010
|
18,928
|
matched 4:1
|
66
|
12.4
HR 1.78
(1.39,2.28)
|
7.8
HR 1.97
(1.43,2.72)
|
|
6.4
|
|
3.5
|
Osteomyelitis[20]
|
Lin TY, et al. Thromb Haemost 2014;112:573
|
1998–2008; follow-up to end 2010
|
24,335
|
matched 1:1
|
55.4
|
12.7crude HR 2.49 (1.76, 3.52)
|
4.11crude HR 1.77(0.97, 3.20)
|
|
6.71
|
3.58
|
|
Hepatitis C virus infection[22]
|
Wang CC et al. Medicine 2015;94:e1585
|
1998–2011; mean 5.14 year follow-up
|
3,686
|
matched 4:1
|
51.9
|
7.92
HR 1.96
(1.03,3.73)
|
4.22
HR 2.10
(0.88, 5.06)
|
|
3.51
|
1.93
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
Spinal cord Injury[24]
|
Chung WS et al, Thromb Res 2014;133(4):579–84
|
Index 1998–2008; follow-up to 2010
|
47,916
|
matched 4:1
|
50
|
8.99 HR 2.46 (2.11, 2.87)
|
3.24 HR 1.57 (1.23, 1.99)
|
|
3.52
|
1.9
|
|
Organophosphate toxicity[25]
|
Lim YP et al, Medicine 2015;94:1
|
Index 2000–2011
|
9,223
|
matched 4:1
|
54
|
6.35 HR 1.55 (1.03, 2.34)
|
3.27 HR 1.44 (0.83, 2.52)
|
|
3.67
|
2.15
|
|
Liver cirrhosis[23]
|
Ng KJ et al, J Thromb Haemost 2015;13:206
|
2005–2010; mean 3.2 year follow-up
|
2,779
|
755,161
|
59 (LC) 44 (no LC)
|
|
|
HR 7.7 (5.2, 11.4)
|
|
|
|
Type 2 diabetes[30]
|
Chung WS et al. Thromb Haemost 2015;114:812
|
2000–2011; follow-up to 2011
|
56,158
|
168,474
|
57.1 (T2DM)
56.4 (no T2DM)
|
8.96
HR 1.43
(1.23, 1.65)
|
3.92
HR 1.52
(1.22, 1.90)
|
12.0
HR 1.44
(1.27, 1.63)
|
5.61
|
2.33
|
7.51
|
Metformin use in type 2 diabetes[31]
|
Lu D et al. BMC Cardio Dis 2014;14:187
|
1997–2003; mean 3.74 year follow-up
|
7,154
|
7,778
|
57.70
|
0.22%
HR 0.43
(0.24, 0.76)
|
|
|
0.56%
|
|
|
Carbon monoxide poisoning[26]
|
Chung WS et al J Epi Comm Health 2015;69(5):557
|
Index 2000–2011
|
8,316
|
matched 4:1
|
39.6
|
5.67
HR 3.85
(2.17,6.83)
|
1.97
HR 1.66
(0.70,3.92)
|
|
1.47
|
1.02
|
|
Pregnancy[40]
|
Jang MJ et al J Thromb Haemost 2011;9(12):2519
|
2006–2010
|
147
|
1,795,064 deliveries
|
|
|
|
0.82 (per 10,000 deliveries)
|
|
|
|
Sleep disorders[28]
|
Chung WS, et al. Sleep Med 2015;16:168
|
Index 1998–2001
|
46,371
|
Matched 2:1
|
52.2
|
|
|
6.05
HR 1.79 (1.49, 2.16)
|
|
|
3.7
|
Schizophrenia[27]
|
Hsu WY, et al. Schizophr Res 2015;162:248
|
Index 2000–2011, 6.4-y follow-up
|
60,264
|
matched 1:1
|
38.8
|
4.17
HR 2.02 (1.52, 2.70)
|
1.43
HR 1.99 (1.21, 3.27)
|
|
2.02
|
0.69
|
|
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)[29]
|
Lee CH, et al. Circ J 2015;79:1107
|
1998–2008 2-y follow-up
|
499,594
|
424,963
|
60.7
|
|
|
4.4
HR 1.796 (1.27, 2.54)
|
|
|
2.6
|
Atrial fibrillation[78]
|
Wang CC et al. Thromb Haemost 2015;113:185
|
2000–2010
|
11,458
|
matched 4:1
|
71.6
|
2.69
HR 1.74 (1.36, 2.24)
|
1.55
HR 2.18 (1.51, 3.15)
|
|
1.12
|
0.46
|
|
Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; PE, pulmonary
embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Medical Disorders, Injuries and Toxicities
The estimated incidence of PE was significantly higher in patients with chronic inflammatory
disorders than in age- and sex-matched controls. The disorders included systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE; PE rate of 10.2 per 10,000 patient-years; HR: 19.7; 95% confidence
interval [CI]: 11.9; 32.8),[11] systemic sclerosis (SSc) (10.8 per 10,000 patient-years),[12] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 12.31 per 10,000 patient-years)[13] and asthma (10.2 per 10,000 patient-years).[14] Estimated incidence rates of DVT were also significantly higher in patients with
COPD,[13]
[15] SLE,[11] Sjogren's syndrome (SS),[16] SSc,[12] rheumatoid arthritis,[17]
[18] inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), pneumococcal pneumonia,[19] osteomyelitis,[20] tuberculosis[21] and hepatitis C virus infection[22] compared with controls ([Table 3]). Two studies only recorded VTE incidence, and both showed significantly higher
rates in patients with dermatomyositis (HR: 11.1; 95% CI: 5.2, 23.6) and liver cirrhosis
(HR: 7.7; 95% CI: 5.2, 11.4)[23] compared with controls.
Other conditions with higher estimated incidence rates of DVT or VTE, compared with
controls, included spinal cord injury,[24] organophosphate toxicity,[25] carbon monoxide poisoning,[26] schizophrenia,[27] sleep disorders,[28] hormone replacement therapy[29] and type 2 diabetes mellitus.[30] Metformin use in type 2 diabetes was associated with a reduced risk of DVT with
0.22% of cases compared with 0.56% of controls affected (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.56;[31] [Table 3]).
Post-surgical VTE Rates
Seven population-based studies reported the rates of VTE recorded within 4 to 5 weeks,
or within 3 months, of surgery[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38] ([Table 4]). Five studies were of patients who had major joint surgery (Taiwan n = 3; Korea n = 2), another (Korea) examined VTE rates after major surgery (including joint surgery)
and a study from Japan investigated rates after spinal surgery. The estimated incidences
of symptomatic VTE following total hip arthroplasty (THA) were 0.15,[37] 0.27,[32] 0.40,[34] 0.98[36] and 1.35%[39] in five separate studies. After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the reported incidence
ranged from 0.22 to 1.2%. Hip fracture surgery (1.60%) and cancer surgery (0.67%)
were associated with high VTE incidence rates in Korea[36] ([Table 4]).
Table 4
Population-wide estimates of post-surgical VTE rates
Procedures
|
Country
|
Reference
|
Study Years
|
Study Design
|
Procedure
|
Incidence (%)
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
THA and TKA[32]
|
Taiwan
|
Wu PK et al, Thromb Res 2014;133:719
|
2002–2006
|
Population based: National Health Insurance Research Database (VTE within 28 days).
|
61,460 THA
|
0.22%
|
0.04%
|
0.27%
|
52,556 TKA
|
0.57%
|
0.07%
|
0.64%
|
THA and TKA (primary or revision)[34]
|
Taiwan
|
Lee CH et al, J Thromb Haemost 2013;11:1930
|
1998–2007
|
Population based: National Health Insurance Research Database; age ≥ 45 y
|
107,679 THA
|
|
|
0.40%
|
113,844 TKA
|
|
|
0.46%
|
TKA[33]
|
Taiwan
|
Lee CH et al, J Thromb Haemost 2012;10:56
|
1998–2007
|
Population based: National Health Insurance Research Database (VTE within 3 mo)
|
113,844 TKA
|
|
|
0.46%
|
Major joint surgery, Surgery for Cancer, Prostate, Benign Gynecology[36]
|
Korea
|
Yhim HY et al, J Thromb Haemost 2014;12:1035
|
2007–2011
|
Population based: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database; ICD-10
coding (VTE within 5 wk)
|
993,459 (All)
|
0.44% (DVT alone)
|
0.27% (PE ± DVT)
|
0.71%
|
349,696 Joint
|
|
|
1.24%
|
190,341 TKA
|
0.71%
|
0.37%
|
1.08%
|
41,271 THA
|
0.62%
|
0.36%
|
0.98%
|
118,084 HFS
|
0.66%
|
0.94%
|
1.60%
|
384,192 cancer
|
|
|
0.67%
|
259,571 benign
|
|
|
0.05%
|
Spinal Surgery[35]
|
Japan
|
Masuda K et al, Spine J 2012;12:1029
|
2007 and 2008 (July–Dec)
|
Extrapolated: DRG-like database: 855 hospitals in 2008; including 42.7% of acute admissions
in Japan; in-hospital deaths from PE
|
49,867 (47,743 eligible)
|
|
4 deaths from PE
|
|
Major orthopaedic surgery[37]
|
Korea
|
Lee SY et al, Yonsei Med J 2015;56:139
|
2007–2011 (2008–2011 for TKA)
|
Population based: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database; ICD-10
coding (VTE within 4 wk)
|
THA 89,710
TKA 180,611
HFS 75,328 (not known if prophylaxis)
|
0.15%
0.22%
0.16%
|
|
|
THA and TKA[39]
|
Korea
|
Lee S et al, J Korean Med Sci 2016;31:80
|
2010 (Jan to Dec).
|
Population based: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database; ICD-10
coding (VTE within 90 days)
|
THA 13,868/22,127
TKA 27,305/52,882 (without/with chemoprophylaxis)
|
1.35%
1.2%
|
0.9%
0.4%
|
2.0%
1.5%
|
Abbreviations: DRG, diagnosis-related group; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; HFS, hip fracture
surgery; PE, pulmonary embolism; THA, hip arthroplasty; TKA, knee arthroplasty; VTE,
venous thromboembolism.
Pregnancy-Related VTE Rates
Only one large-scale population study investigating pregnancy-related VTE rates was
identified, and reported the annual rate increased from 2006 to 2010 in South Korea
(the overall incidence was 0.82 per 10,000 deliveries during the 5-year period).[40]
VTE as a Hospital Discharge Diagnosis
Prevalence of VTE among All Hospital Inpatients
Nine studies[9]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48] reported the number of patients with a discharge diagnosis of DVT, PE or VTE per
10,000 hospital inpatients, as recorded in hospital or registry databases in mainland
China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea and Singapore. These ranged widely from 11 to
65 per 10,000 for DVT, 2.5 to 23 per 10,000 for PE and 11 to 88 per 10,000 for VTE.
In Singapore, the prevalence of DVT among inpatients increased from 16 cases per 10,000
admissions in 1996/1997 to 65 cases per 10,000 admissions in 2006 ([Table 5]).
Table 5
Prevalence of VTE as a proportion of hospital admissions, from hospital and registry
databases
Country
|
Reference
|
Study period
|
Data source
|
Admissions or procedures
|
Subjects
|
Clinical VTE (N per 10,000 admissions or N per 100 procedures)
|
Case-fatality rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
|
China[41]
|
Yang Y et al, PLoS ONE 2011;6:e26861
|
1997–2008
|
PE registry; 60 level 3 hospitals. All imaging independently reviewed
|
16,972,182
|
18,206 first or recurrent PE
|
N/R
|
10.7
|
N/R
|
25.1% (in 1997); 8.6% (in 2008)
|
China[79]
|
Zhou HX et al, Thromb Res 2012;130:735
|
2010–2011
|
Retro/prospective search. Hospital VTE registry and discharge coding (ICD-10)
|
∼66,000
|
347 VTE: 92 PE, 82 PE + DVT, 173 DVT
|
N/R
|
N/R
|
26
|
|
Hong Kong[9]
|
Cheuk BL et al, Br J Surg 2004;91:424
|
2000–2001
|
Hong Kong Hospital Authority database (ICD-9)
|
2,082,045 admissions
|
2,304 DVT and 526 PE (150 with DVT)
|
11.1
|
2.5
|
N/R
|
7.3% for DVT; 23.8% for PE
|
India[43]
|
Lee AD et al, Eur J Endovasc Surg 2009;37:482
|
1996–2005
|
Hospital database (ICD codes)
|
438,667
|
722 VTE
|
N/R
|
N/R
|
17.46
|
All VTE: 13% suspected; PE: 50% confirmed; PE: 14%
|
Japan[44]
|
Kishimoto M et al, Thromb Haemost 2005;93:876
|
1987–1999
|
Hospital database (ICD-9-CM)
|
131,060
|
141 VTE
|
N/R
|
N/R
|
11
|
N/R
|
Korea[45]
|
Choi WI et al, Clin Appl Thromb Haem 2011;17:297
|
2005–2007
|
Hospital database (ICD-9-CM)
|
61,542
|
247 VTE (51 PE, 37 PE + DVT, 159 DVT alone)
|
31.9 (±PE)
|
14.3 (±DVT)
|
40.1
|
N/R
|
Singapore[46]
|
Lee LH et al, Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002;31:761
|
1996–1997
|
Hospital vascular laboratory database for confirmed DVT
|
202,869
|
388 DVT
|
15.8
|
N/R
|
N/R
|
N/R
|
Singapore[47]
|
Ng HJ, Lee LH. Thromb Haemost 2009;101:1095
|
2002–2003
|
Hospital vascular laboratory database and inpatient records search (ICD-9-CM)
|
109,217
|
495 DVT
|
45.3
|
N/R
|
N/R
|
12.3% (61 patients); deaths from PE: 6
|
Singapore[48]
|
Molina JA, et al. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009;38:470
|
2006
|
Hospital database (ICD-9-CM)
|
98,121
|
860 VTE (636 DVT, 224 PE)
|
65
|
23
|
88(73[a])
|
N/R
|
Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
a Age adjusted.
Prevalence of VTE in Medical Inpatients
Three studies of symptomatic VTE among medical or ‘high-risk’ medical inpatients in
Thailand and Singapore[49] and one study of VTE after an ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke in Taiwan are shown
in [Table 6]. The reported VTE prevalence was 0.2 to 0.9% of inpatients (1.6% in patients with
chronic liver disease).
Table 6
Prevalence of VTE as a proportion of non-surgical and surgical subgroup admissions
to hospital (from hospital or registry databases)
Predisposition or procedure
|
Country
|
Reference
|
Study period
|
Procedures
|
Outcomes
|
VTE rate per 100 procedures or predispositions
|
Case-fatality rate
|
Non-surgical
|
|
|
|
|
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
|
Adult medical, ICU and stroke unit admissions
|
Thailand[80]
|
Aniwan S, Rojnuckarin P. Blood Coag Fibrinol 2010;21:334
|
2007–2008
|
7,126
|
42 VTE (23 PE; 20 confirmed + 3 possible fatal PE (32 per 100); 4 DVT and PE
|
32
|
32
|
59
|
50%: 21/42 deaths, 9 attributed to PE
|
High-risk medical admissions
|
Thailand[81]
|
Rojnuckarin P et al. Thromb Haemost 2011;106:1103
|
2009
|
1,290
|
20 VTE (13 DVT, 7 PE) in hospital and 7 VTE (5 DVT, 2 PE) after discharge); total
18 DVT and 9 PE
|
14
|
7
|
21
|
|
All medically managed patients (chronic liver disease the subgroup of interest)
|
Singapore[49]
|
Yang Y et al. Thromb Res 2015;136:548
|
2004–2011
|
199,904 (all); 193,532 (not CLD); 6,372 (CLD, with or without cirrhosis)
|
1,744 (0.9%) VTE; 1,541 (0.8%) VTE; 102 (1.6%) VTE (non-cirrhosis 1.5%, cirrhosis
2.0%)
|
N/R; 0.7%; 1.15%;
|
N/R; 0.3%; 0.6%
|
0.9%; 0.8%; 1.6%
|
2567 (1.3%) total, number attributable to VTE not stated
|
Ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke
|
Taiwan[82]
|
Chen CC et al. Top Stroke Rehabil 2012;19:361
|
2002–2009
|
Ischaemic: 21,129
|
45 DVT and 14 PE
|
0.21%
|
0.07%
|
N/R
|
5/15 (35.7%)
|
Haemorrhagic: 5,662
|
15 DVT and 1 PE
|
0.27%
|
0.02%
|
N/R
|
|
Surgical
|
|
|
|
|
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
|
Major trauma
|
Singapore[83]
|
Wong TH et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2013;39:495
|
1998–2007
|
8,615 patients
|
34 VTE; 13 PE (7 with DVT); 21 DVT alone
|
0.24%
|
0.15%
|
0.39%
|
3/34 (8.8%)
|
General surgery with G-E and major joint surgery subgroups
|
Japan[50]
|
Kunisawa S et al. World J Surg 2012;36:280
|
2008–2010
|
All: 1,016,496
|
2,485 VTE (1,947 DVT; 538 PE ± DVT)
|
0.24%
|
0.05%
|
0.24%
|
67/1947 (3.44%) DVT; 123/538 (22.86%) PE
|
G-E: 86,181
|
200 VTE (118 DVT, 82 PE)
|
0.14%
|
0.10%
|
0.23%
|
2/118 (1.69%) DVT; 19/82 (23.17%) PE
|
Joint: 50,226
|
931 VTE (817 DVT, 114 PE)
|
1.63%
|
0.23%
|
1.85%
|
4/817 (0.49%) DVT; 15/114 (13.16%) PE
|
Elective TKA or THA
|
Korea[84]
|
Won MH et al. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1106
|
1996–2009
|
1,608
|
32 VTE (32 DVT, 4 PE)
|
1.99%
|
0.24%
|
1.99%
|
N/R
|
TKA
|
Taiwan[85]
|
Wu PK et al. J Chinese Med Ass 2014;77:155
|
2007–2010
|
1,768
|
4 PE
|
|
0.23%
|
|
0/4 PE
|
Major joint surgery (TKA, THA, Hip)
|
Multinational[86]
|
Leizorovicz A et al. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:28
|
2001–2002
|
All: 2,420
|
22 DVT, 6 PE, 24 VTE
|
0.91%
|
0.25%
|
1.0%
|
|
TKA: 944
|
13 DVT, 3 PE, 13 VTE
|
1.38%
|
0.32%
|
1.38%
|
|
THA: 408
|
4 DVT and 0 PE, 4 VTE
|
0.98%
|
0%
|
0.98%
|
|
Hip #: 1,068
|
5 DVT, 3 PE and 7 VTE
|
0.47%
|
0.28%
|
0.66%
|
|
TKA
|
Korea[87]
|
Park YG et al. J Arthroplasty 2016;31:1072
|
2002–2011
|
TKA: patients 1,933 (2,891 operations)
|
26/2891 TKA (0.90%) VTE
|
10 (0.35%) DVT alone
|
16 (0.55%) PE (5 with DVT)
|
26/2891 TKA (0.90%); 0.86% primary TKA; 1.98% revision TKA
|
0/16 (0%)
|
Haemi-arthroplasty (for femoral neck fracture)
|
Japan[88]
|
Tsuda Y Orthop Sci 2014;19:991
|
2007–2010
|
22,776 total # NOF; 17,984 receiving mechanical but not chemical prophylaxis
|
160/17,984 PE (non-chemical prophylaxis group)
|
|
0.89%
|
|
21/160 (13.1%)
|
Gynaecological surgery
|
Hong Kong[89]
|
Chan LY et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:343
|
1998–2000
|
6,077
|
31 VTE (29 DVT, 2 PE); 27/29 DVT limited to calf veins
|
0.48%
|
0.03%
|
0.51% (overall); 0.17% (1998) 0.76% (1999); 0.69% (2000)
|
N/R
|
Gynaecological surgery
|
China[90]
|
Qu H et al. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(39):e1653
|
2008–2013
|
739
|
16 symptomatic DVT; 6 symptomatic PE
|
2.17%
|
0.81%
|
|
0/739
|
Colorectal surgery
|
Korea[91]
|
Yang SS et al. World J Surg 2011;35:881
|
2006–2008
|
3,645
|
31 VTE: 23 DVT (8 with PE), 16 PE (8 with DVT)
|
0.63%
|
0.44%
|
0.85%
|
2/16 PE
|
Abbreviations: CLD, chronic liver disease; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; G-E, gastroenterological;
ICU, intensive care unit; N/R, not recorded; PE, pulmonary embolism; THA, hip arthroplasty;
TKA, knee arthroplasty; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Note that rates of DVT and of PE may add up to more than the VTE rate, because some
patients had both DVT and PE.
Prevalence of VTE among Surgical Inpatients
The rates of symptomatic post-surgical VTE in 10 single hospital studies or multicentre
registries from East Asia, with various times of clinical follow-up, are presented
in [Table 6]. The reported rates were 0.39% (major trauma), 0.23 to 0.24% (general and gastric
and bowel surgery), 0.85% (colorectal surgery), 0.51% (gynaecological surgery in Hong
Kong [0.17% in 1998, rising to 0.76% and 0.69% in 1999 and 2000]; higher in mainland
China), 0.66% after hip fracture and 1.0 to 1.85% after major joint arthroplasties.
Old Age, Gender and Other Potentially Contributing Conditions
Old Age
Four population-based studies ([Table 2]) describe strong associations of VTE risk with advancing age. In Korea, relative
to the 30- to 39-year age group, there was a sixfold increase in risk by age 60 to
69 years, and a 15-fold increase by age greater than 80 years when the absolute annual
rate was just over 1/1,000 people.[7] The absolute annual VTE rate of 0.02 per 1,000 women and 0.03 per 1,000 men aged
less than 30 years, increased to 1.2 and 0.8 per 1,000 among women and men aged greater
than 80 years.[8] Observations were similar in Hong Kong and Japan.[9]
[10]
Gender
Three population-wide studies reported on gender and VTE risks. In one study, women
were less likely to have a diagnosis of VTE (relative risk [RR]: 0.96) or DVT alone
(RR: 0.87) but more likely to have a diagnosis of PE (RR: 1.11).[7] In a second study, 54% of patients with VTE were female,[8] while the third study reported no significant difference.[9] Women slightly outnumbered men in seven of nine hospital or registry-based cohorts
of patients with VTE (a tendency most pronounced in two of the three studies from
Japan; [Table 7]).[44]
[50]
Table 7
Predisposing conditions in hospital cohorts
Country
|
Reference
|
Study period
|
VTE (N)
|
Male (%)
|
Age ≥70, 75 or 80 y
|
BMI ≥ 25
|
Open surgery
|
Acute or chronic lung
|
Heart
|
Acute infection
|
Not mobile
|
Stroke paresis
|
Cancer
|
Inflammatory bowel or joint
|
Auto-imm
|
Pregnt
|
Prior
VTE
|
Fam history
|
None
|
All admissions
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
China[79]
|
Zhou HX et al. Thromb Res 2012;130:735
|
2010–2011
|
347
|
55
|
15 (≥75)
|
27
|
12
|
36
|
6
|
1
|
11
|
–
|
13
|
1
|
–
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
–
|
Hong Kong[92]
|
Liu HS et al. Hong Kong Med J 2002;8:400
|
1997–2000
|
376
|
46
|
42 (>70) from Fig
|
–
|
21
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
−
|
–
|
16.5
|
–
|
–
|
5
|
3
|
–
|
42
|
India[43]
|
Lee AD, et al. Eur J Endovasc Surg 2009;37:482
|
1996–2005
|
722
|
48
|
–
|
–
|
30
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
31
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Japan[44]
|
Kishimoto M, et al. Thromb Haemostas 2005;93:876
|
1987–1999
|
141
|
30
|
40 (≥70)
|
40
|
21
|
–
|
10
|
–
|
53
|
18
|
16
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
8.5
|
–
|
–
|
Korea[45]
|
Choi WI, et al. Clin Appl Thromb Haem 2011;17:297
|
2005–2007
|
88
|
–
|
42 (≥70)
|
22
|
–
|
22
|
16
|
–
|
45
|
19
|
27
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Singapore[46]
|
Lee LH, et al. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002;31:761
|
1996–1997
|
388
|
–
|
7 (≥80)
|
–
|
30
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
67
|
–
|
33
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
9
|
1
|
–
|
Singapore[48]
|
Molina JA et al. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009;38:470
|
2006
|
860
|
45
|
31 (≥75)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Singapore[47]
|
Ng HJ, Lee LH. Thromb Haemost 2009;101:1095
|
2002–2003
|
495
|
40
|
12 (≥80)
|
–
|
32
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
23
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
8
|
–
|
–
|
Taiwan[8]
|
Lee CH et al, J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:1515
|
2001–2002
|
5,347
|
54
|
13 (≥80)
|
–
|
46
|
30
|
18
|
–
|
–
|
14
|
22
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
16
|
–
|
27
|
Medical
|
Hong Kong[93]
|
Cheng G et al, Thrombosis 2011
|
2005–2008
|
687
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
16
|
14
|
24
|
–
|
7
|
45
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Japan[94]
|
Nakamura M et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2006;21:131
|
1994–2003
|
133
|
46
|
30 (≥70)
|
17 (≥26.4)
|
–
|
10
|
16
|
3
|
62
|
28
|
24
|
–
|
3
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Thailand[80]
|
Aniwan S, Rojnuckarin P. Blood Coag Fibrinol 2010;21:334
|
2007–2008
|
42
|
–
|
–
|
12
|
–
|
12
|
2
|
–
|
74
|
–
|
52
|
5
|
7
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Thailand[81]
|
Rojnuckarin P et al. Thromb Haemost 2011;106:1103
|
2009
|
27
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
41
|
–
|
7
|
48
|
–
|
22
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Surgical
|
Japan[50]
|
Kunisawa S et al, World J Surg 2012;36:280
|
2008–2010
|
2,485
|
33
|
44 (≥ 75)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
62
G-E surg
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); G-E, gastroenterological; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Other Comorbidities and Potential Predispositions
In Taiwan, a population-based analysis of VTE rates and associated risk factors, or
predispositions, showed that 16% of cases had previous VTE, and most VTE was associated
with predisposing conditions (22% malignancy, 17% serious neurological disease, 8%
major trauma 8% and 38% major surgery during the preceding 3 months), although 27%
had no recorded predisposition.[8] Similar potentially contributing conditions were recorded among hospital inpatients
with VTE ([Table 8]): age older than 70, 75 or 80 years (15–42% of patients); cancer (13–52% of patients);
previous VTE (1–16% of patients); immobility (up to 74% of patients), acute or chronic
heart or lung conditions (up to 36% of patients); stroke or paresis; various inflammatory
disorders; and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2.
Table 8
Population, registry and hospital-based VTE rates in patients with cancer
Reference
|
Index cases
|
Study design
|
Patients
|
n (%) VTE (n/patient-years)
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
DVT
|
PE
|
VTE
|
|
Yu YB et al. Thromb Haemost 2012;108:225[51]
|
1997–2005
|
All admissions newly diagnosed cancer (National Health Insurance Database, NHID, Taiwan).
Median follow-up: 21 (0–120) mo to end 2006
|
497,180
|
0.94% (163/105 pt y)
|
0.16% (28/105 pt y)
|
1.07% (185/105 pt y)
|
28.5% VTE at cancer presentation; median 5.8 mo to VTE after diagnosis; lower survival
if DVT or PE (p < 0.001)
|
Chew TW et al. BMC Cancer 2015;15:298[52]
|
2001–2008
|
Admissions newly diagnosed cancer, from random 15% subset of NHID, Taiwan. Two algorithms
to identify VTE:[1] if coded as having VTE;[2] if coded and treated as VTE. Up to 10 y follow-up
|
43,855
|
|
|
Algorithm 1: 3.2% (9.9/103 pt y); algorithm 2: 1.1% (3.4/103 pt y)
|
Algorithm 2 includes fewer intra-abdominal DVT (19 vs. 53% with algorithm 1). Highest
VTE risks if cancer of pancreas, lung, liver, multiple myeloma or sarcoma
|
Lee YG et al. Thromb Haemost 2014;111:1112[53]
|
2006–2010
|
Retrospective cohort all non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at Seoul National University
Hospital, Korea. Median 3.8-y follow-up. Search electronic medical records for VTE
|
1,998
|
|
|
6.6% (cumulative 4.2% after 6 mo, 6.4% after 2 y)
|
2-y cumulative incidence: 2.5% (localized), 5.5% (locally advanced) and 14.1% (metastatic)
disease. Reduced survival if VTE and localized NSCLC
|
Wang Z et al. Support Care Cancer 2015;23:635[54]
|
2004–2013
|
Retrospective 10-y cohort all primary lung cancer; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou,
China
|
4,726
|
45 DVT alone (0.95%)
|
16 (0.3%); (11 with DVT)
|
61 (1.3%)
|
All patients with VTE had NSCLC (no VTE if SCLC). 2 PE subclinical, at staging CT.
|
Tsai SJ et al. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:316[55]
|
2003–2008
|
Retrospective cohort newly diagnosed cancer cervix. NHID (Taiwan); Median 5-y follow-up
|
1,013
|
|
|
3.3% (5-y cumulative)
|
VTE associated with reduced survival. 5-y VTE risk = 0.3% in age- and sex-matched
appendectomy patients
|
Oranratanaphan S et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:6705[56]
|
2004–2013
|
Retrospective cohort gynaecologic oncology at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital,
Bangkok, Thailand
|
2,316
|
11 alone (0.5%)
|
19 (0.8%), 14 with DVT
|
30 (1.3%)
|
9 VTE before (up to 13 mo before); 6 VTE at the time of and 15 VTE after cancer diagnosis.
18/30 VTE in 5.9% of cases with ovarian cancer
|
Kang MJ et al. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:492[57]
|
2000–2008
|
9-y retrospective cohort inoperable advanced gastric cancer (metastatic or recurrent
after initial resection); Oncology Dept., Asan Medical Centre, Seoul, Korea
|
3,095
|
N/R
|
N/R
|
103 (3.3%); cumulative = 3.5% after 1 y and 4.9% after 2 y (1.88/100 pt y)
|
Median time from cancer diagnosis to VTE = 4.6 (0–41) mo
|
Kato A et al. Thromb Res 2013;131:140[58]
|
2009–2010
|
Japanese post-marketing data on registered refractory or relapsed myeloma treated
with thalidomide for median of 31 d; median follow-up of 112 d
|
1,035
|
14 (1.4%)
|
3 (0.3%)
|
14 (1.4%)
|
12 leg DVT, 1 superficial VT, 1 thrombosis ‘unknown vein of lower extremity’
|
Lee YG et al. Thromb Haemost 2015;113:201[59]
|
2007–2011
|
Retrospective cohort all acute myeloid leukaemia (AML); two referral hospitals, Seoul,
Korea
|
811
|
4 (0.5%)
|
2 (0.25%)
|
|
26 vein thromboses (13 catheter related, 2 cerebral vein, 2 splanchnic, 3 ‘others’,
4 leg DVT, 2 PE)
|
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; N/R, no result;
NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer; PE, pulmonary embolism; pt y, patient-years; VTE,
venous thromboembolism.
Cancer-Related Venous Thromboembolism
[Table 8] shows the incidences of symptomatic VTE in patients with various cancers, reported
from East Asia. One population-based cohort study from Taiwan searched all hospital
admissions for any form of newly diagnosed cancer;[51] another searched a randomly selected 15% subset of all admissions.[52] The studies estimated that 1.85 and 3.4 patients per 1,000 patient-years of follow-up
developed VTE (using somewhat different identifying algorithms). VTE was more likely
if there was previous VTE,[51] or cancer of the pancreas, lung or liver, a sarcoma or multiple myeloma,[52] and VTE was associated with reduced survival. In a large cohort of Korean patients
with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 6.4% developed VTE during 2 years of observation,
and this was associated with reduced survival if patients had limited stage disease.[53] In a study from China, 1.3% of patients with any form of lung cancer developed VTE
(all VTE patients had NSCLC).[54] Patients with a gynaecological malignancy had VTE rates of 3.3% during 5 years of
follow-up in a population-based study from Taiwan,[55] and 1.3% in a hospital cohort from Thailand (where most VTE was associated with
ovarian cancer).[56] The 2-year incidence of VTE was 4.9% after inoperable gastric cancer (metastatic
or recurrent) in a cohort from Korea.[57] VTE rates were 1.4% during 4 months after starting thalidomide for relapsed or refractory
multiple myeloma in Japan,[58] and less than 1% in Korean patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.[59]
Other Observations: Recurrence Rates and Case Fatality Rates
A population-wide study of over 5,000 Taiwanese adults discharged from hospital after
an admission with VTE in 2001 or 2002 found that annual crude recurrence rates were
5.1% in men and 5.2% in women, during up to 4 years (average 2.26 years) of follow-up.[8] A recurrence was most likely during the first 12 months after VTE (with cumulative
rates of 4.6, 6.7 and 9.4%, after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, which reached
14.4% at 4 years), and was three to four times more likely in patients with a previous
VTE or cancer than if the predisposition was transient or the index VTE was apparently
unprovoked.[8]
This and another population-based report found high case fatality rates. In Taiwan,
4.3% of patients with VTE died in hospital, 7.5% died within 1 month and 14.9% died
within 6 months; mortality was higher after PE than DVT.[8] In Hong Kong, 7.3% of admissions with a DVT and 23.8% of those with PE died in hospital,
and VTE-associated mortality was greatest in the elderly.[9] High 30-day or in-hospital mortalities were also reported in a questionnaire-based
survey from Japan (7% after DVT, 13% after PE),[60] a PE registry from China (9% in 2008)[41] and hospital cohorts in Singapore (12%)[47] and India (13%).[43]
Temporal Trends
The reported incidence of VTE has increased during recent decades, in population-wide
studies from Korea and Japan (see above) in registries, and in hospital databases.
There was an almost fivefold increase in the annual number of patients recorded between
1997 and 2008 in a very large Chinese PE registry,[41] and a fivefold rise in admissions with acute DVT at a Singaporean hospital between
1990 and 1997.[46]
[47] In China, the start of a nationwide project to improve diagnosis and management
of VTE coincided with a sharp upturn in the number of patients registered as having
PE.[41]
Discussion
This systematic literature review of evidence regarding the population-based incidence
of symptomatic VTE in East Asian populations confirms the frequency and importance
of this disease is increasing, especially among the aged. Our search for evidence
was focused on symptomatic VTE, because it is symptomatic DVT or PE that determines
the clinical burden from VTE.
VTE Incidence in Asia Compared with the West
Recently published population-wide estimates of annual symptomatic VTE rates in Korea,
Taiwan and Hong Kong are approximately 15 to 20% of the level recorded in Western
countries (∼100 per 100,000 people).[61] However, the reported annual incidence in East Asian populations increases to approximately
1 per 1,000 people aged ≥80 years,[7]
[8]
[9] as compared with 3 per 1,000 in some Caucasian populations.[57] In addition, the National Health Insurance data from Korea, Japanese vital statistics
of deaths attributed to PE, data from PE registries and hospital admission statistics
all indicate a rise in reported VTE rates over time across East Asia.[7]
[8]
[46]
Hospital data from large registries and databases corroborate the findings in population-health
studies and potentially provide more accurate and robust estimates of VTE rates in
certain patient groups ([Table 5]). Across nine studies, the prevalence of VTE and the increasing temporal trend across
three studies from Singapore echoed that of population-based studies. Rates of symptomatic,
post-operative VTE ([Table 6]) are difficult to compare with Western values due to differing methodologies. In
a South Korean population-based study,[40] the incidence of pregnancy-related VTE was 0.82 per 10,000 deliveries, much lower
than the Western rates of between 10 and 20 per 10,000 deliveries.
Accuracy of Population-Based Datasets
Estimates of population-wide VTE rates, based on population-wide databases, not only
require these to include both inpatient and outpatient encounters, but also rely on
accurate reporting using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or local disease
classification, evidence of anticoagulant therapy and the assumption that every patient
at discharge or at censure had confirmatory tests or a post-mortem to identify VTE.
Therefore, any attempt to estimate population-wide VTE rates has limitations and inherent
biases. There is a risk of under-reporting, because VTE must be identified in the
medical record to ensure a correct discharge diagnosis, and clinically significant
PE or DVT is often misdiagnosed or unrecognized.[62] It is also important to note that the algorithms used to define DVT, VTE and PE
based on ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes can vary from study to study and result in inaccurate
estimation. For example, in some studies, the category DVT also included inferior
vena cava (IVC) thrombosis, renal vein thrombosis and/or thrombophlebitis.[7]
[8]
[9]
A systematic review of studies done to validate the identification of VTE using administrative
and claims data showed that reliability varies considerably and positive predictive
values (PPVs) are highest when multiple codes are combined.[63] The range of PPVs reported using combined ICD-9 codes for DVT, PE or VTE was 65
to 95%. Ng et al[23] also validated their Taiwanese database by medical chart review of a random sample
and found a PPV of 94.0% for VTE.
The strengths of population-based data include large sample size and ability to capture
the entire population.
Risk Factors and Recurrence
It is of interest that the comorbidities and likely predispositions for VTE are similar
in East Asia and in the West, most notably old age, cancer, previous VTE, immobility,
trauma and surgery, and inflammation. Of particular note are the population-based
cohorts with case-control comparisons, from Taiwan, which show high HR for VTE in
many acute or chronic autoimmune and other inflammatory disorders (e.g. systemic lupus,
SS and rheumatoid arthritis) compared with controls. There is a noteworthy finding
that DVT rates were less in type 2 diabetes patients prescribed metformin;[31] recent laboratory studies have shown that metformin inhibits platelet activation
and release of mitochondrial DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid).[64]
Apart from the South Korean population study in pregnancy-related VTE,[40] it is important to acknowledge the lack of published evidence from large VTE studies
in Asian populations for the predispositions of pregnancy, the perinatal and post-partum
period, and gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
The overall recurrence rate of 10% during the first year after presenting with VTE,
recorded in a population-based study from Taiwan, is similar to 1-year recurrence
rates reported in the West of 5.6 to 12.9%.[65] Surprisingly, the risks of a recurrence after a transiently provoked or supposedly
unprovoked VTE were similar (∼5% during 1 year), which suggests that Western guidance
on treatment duration should be validated in Asia.
Lower Asian Venous Thromboembolism Rates
There has been much speculation about why the reported VTE rates might be lower in
Asia than the West.[61]
[66] Explanations have included under-diagnosis, low clinician awareness and the near
absence in Asia of thrombophilias commonly found in Caucasian populations, such as
factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations. Yet this review has confirmed a clear
trend of increasing VTE rates over time, across multiple population- and hospital-based
studies. It is likely that in part under-diagnosis and under-reporting in early studies,
followed by improved diagnosis in later years with greater awareness and perception
that VTE is an issue in Asian populations, have contributed to this trend. In Singapore[47] and Hong Kong,[67] it was shown that reported VTE rates have increased as Doppler ultrasound scans
were used more often and the institutions established a lower threshold for performing
diagnostic tests. Similarly, PE rates in China surged following a nationwide programme
to improve awareness and management of this condition.
Nevertheless, it seems likely that there has also been a genuine increase in VTE prevalence
in Asian populations, perhaps because of increasing population age, increasing cancer
rates and an increasing number of surgeries. The rates reported in elderly people
from Asian countries suggest that the gap between VTE rates in Asia and the West will
diminish further still.
Improving Awareness of VTE in Asia
A recent survey found variable public awareness of VTE worldwide and very low awareness
in Asia.[66] Low and inadequate clinician awareness as well as low public awareness of VTE in
Asia[61] is likely to result in a general trend towards under-diagnosis. This is exemplified
by the Chinese PE registry, where a sharp upturn in the number of reported patients
with PE coincided with a nationwide programme to improve awareness and management
of this condition.[9] The increase in reported VTE rates over time recorded by several studies identified
in this systematic review suggests initial under-diagnosis and rising diagnostic awareness.
Most of the population-based studies reviewed here were based on data collected more
than 10 years ago (2000–2008), and the current VTE rates may be considerably higher.
Implications for Guidelines and Other Asian Countries
Our estimates of population burden from VTE in East Asia come from Hong Kong, Korea,
Taiwan and (with less methodological confidence) Singapore. It is important to stress
that these estimates should not be directly extrapolated to places with different
health care systems and less extensive databases, so that similar statistics from
other countries in the region such as India, Malaysia, the Philippines and Indonesia
are much needed. Data on the population disease burden of VTE across Asia will also
allow racial and ethnic differences in VTE to be better studied.
[Table 1] lists guidelines and expert recommendations from Asia about VTE risk assessment,
prevention and management. Several of these include summaries of the literature on
VTE rates and VTE prevention trials in Asia. Most base their recommendations for anticoagulant
prophylaxis, explicitly or implicitly, on international guidelines derived from Western
data for Western populations, where the balance of absolute benefit and absolute risk
may not be the same as in Asia. This and other recent surveys of evidence[68] find an increasing incidence of VTE in Asian populations. This emphasizes the need
to validate Western VTE management guidelines in populations from Asia.