Cardiac troponin I: A potent biomarker for myocardial damage assessment following high voltage electric burn

ABSTRACT

Myocardial infarction (MI) following high voltage electric burn is very rare, and its pathogenesis remains controversial. Electrical burns represent only 4% of all burns. Hence, clinical managements have taken a slow pace in developing. The recent guidelines laid down by the cardiology societies include cardiac troponin I (cTnI) as the gold standard marker for the assessment of myocardial damage assessment. Two patients were admitted to our hospital at the different time with the same kind of high voltage electric burn. Both patients had complained with chest discomfort during admission, and cardiac parameter assessment was done for both the patients. cTnI was also measured for both patients, and marked increase in the values was seen within 5 h of onset of myocardial damage and got into normal range within 72 h. Myocardial damage following electric burn needs to be suspected and assessed as early as possible. Hence, cTnI should be the valuable tool to detect the severity of myocardial damage incurred in the electric burn cases.

KEY WORDS

Cardiac troponin I - high voltage electric burn - myocardial necrosis

 

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Lee RC. Electrical injuries. In: Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL. editors Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 15th ed.. Vol. 393. New York: McGraw Hill; 2001: p. 2583-4
• 2 Akkas M, Hocagil H, Didam AY, Erbil B, Kunt MM, Ozamen MM. Cardiac monitoring in patients with electrocution injury. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg 2012; 18: 301-4
• 3 Arnoldo B, Klein M, Gibran NS. Practice guidelines for the management of electrical injuries. J Burn Care Res 2006; 27: 439-47
• 4 Hanson GC, McIlwraith GR. Lightning injury: Two case histories and a review of management. Br Med J 1973; 4: 271-4
• 5 Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined – A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 959-69
• 6 Wu AH, Apple FS, Gibler B, Jesse R, Warshaw M, Valdes Jr R. Use of Cardiac Markers in Coronary Artery Disease. Standards of Laboratory Practices Draft Recommendations. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. Presented at: American Association for Clinical Chemistry 1998 National Meeting; Chicago, IL: 1998. Available from: http://www.nacb.org/nacb_SOLP_draft.html [Last accessed on 1998 Sep 02; Last updated on 1998 Apr 09]
• 7 Escudero-Nafs FJ, Leiva-Oliva RM, Collado-Aromir F, Rabanal-Suirez F, De Molina-Nofiez JM. High-tension electrical burns. Primary treatment of seventy patients. Ann Mediterr Burns Club 1990; 3: 256-61
• 8 Abbas AD, Dabkana TM, Tahir C, Naaya HU. High-tension Electrical Burns: Report of Two Cases. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2009; 22 (03) 160-2
• 9 Haberal M. Electrical burns: A five-year experience-1985 Evans lecture. J Trauma 1986; 26: 103-9
• 10 Hussmann J, Kucan JO, Russell RC, Bradley T, Zamboni WA. Electrical injuries – Morbidity, outcome and treatment rationale. Burns 1995; 21: 530-5
• 11 Baubion N, Metzger JP, Heulin A, Grosdemouge A, De Vernejoul P, Vacheron A. Myocardial infarction caused by electric injury Value of coronarography. Ann Med Interne (Paris) 1985; 136: 659-62
• 12 Das RN, Kumar J. High tension electric current injury and silent myocardial infarction – A case report. Internet J Med Update 2006; 1: 3-5