CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2016; 49(03): 415-418
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.197230
Case Report
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Assessment of hand function after successful replantation of upper limb at arm

V. Koteswara Rao Rayidi
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Venkata Bhargava Velde
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Narsimha Rao
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
N Ram Babu
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Laxman Sambari
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Address for correspondence:

Dr. Venkata Bhargava Velde
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences
Hyderabad
India   

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2019 (online)

 

ABSTRACT

In upper arm replantation, a successful anastomosis guarantees the viability and good quality repair determines the overall function of the hand.There is paucity of successful arm replantation case reports in the literature. This is a case report of a successful arm replantation in a four year child with a near total functional outcome. We have used different scores to assess the functional outcome.


#

 


#

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Garner R. Upper limb replantation: Does the patient benefit?. Br J Occup Ther 1988; 51: 228-31
  • 2 Russell RC, O’Brien BM, Morrison WA, Pamamull G, MacLeod A. The late functional results of upper limb revascularization and replantation. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 623-33
  • 3 Papanastasiou S. Rehabilitation of the replanted upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 978-81
  • 4 Chan SW, LaStayo P. Hand therapy management following mutilating hand injuries. Hand Clin 2003; 19: 133-48
  • 5 Scheker LR, Hodges A. Brace and rehabilitation after replantation and revascularization. Hand Clin 2001; 17: 473-80
  • 6 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-8

Address for correspondence:

Dr. Venkata Bhargava Velde
Department of Plastic Surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences
Hyderabad
India   

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Garner R. Upper limb replantation: Does the patient benefit?. Br J Occup Ther 1988; 51: 228-31
  • 2 Russell RC, O’Brien BM, Morrison WA, Pamamull G, MacLeod A. The late functional results of upper limb revascularization and replantation. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 623-33
  • 3 Papanastasiou S. Rehabilitation of the replanted upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 978-81
  • 4 Chan SW, LaStayo P. Hand therapy management following mutilating hand injuries. Hand Clin 2003; 19: 133-48
  • 5 Scheker LR, Hodges A. Brace and rehabilitation after replantation and revascularization. Hand Clin 2001; 17: 473-80
  • 6 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-8