Open Access
CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2014; 01(01): 060-061
DOI: 10.4103/2348-0548.124852
Correspondence
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Pontine infarct during deep brain stimulation surgery as the cause of postoperative hemiparesis

Authors

  • Zulfiqar Ali

    Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar
  • Hemanshu Prabhakar

    1   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • Navid Wani

    2   Department of Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi
Further Information

Address for correspondence:

Dr. Zulfiqar Ali
Department of Neuroanaesthesiology
Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar - 190 010, Jammu and Kashmir
India   

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 April 2018 (online)

 

Sir,

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus is increasingly being used for treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other movement disorders. The procedure involves the stereotaxic placement of an implantable electrode with four active contacts within the target. This is followed by tunnelling of the external cables of the electrodes, which are connected to an externally implanted pulse generator. A wide array of complications can occur during this procedure. Complications reported in literature are related to the device, the procedure, the electrical stimulation and the spread of current.[1] [2]

Of particular concern to the anaesthesiologists are the perioperative complications; some of them, in our experience, were unusual. We report a case where a patient undergoing DBS for PD developed altered sensorium intraoperatively as a result of a lacunar infarct in the pons.

A 60-year-old male patient, weighing 62 kg was scheduled for DBS procedure. His past medical history was unremarkable. The first part of the procedure, that is, electrode placement, was done under monitored anaesthesia care. In the operation theatre, routine monitoring included 5-lead electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry and respiratory rate. Supplemental oxygen was administered via nasal prongs at a flow rate of 2 litres per minute. The patient was positioned supine on the operating table in a stereotactic frame with 10° head up tilt. Following placement of electrodes on the left side, as the electrodes were being placed on the right side, the patient was suddenly uncooperative. He stopped following commands from the neurologist and became restless. The procedure was abandoned and patient was shifted for computed tomography (CT) of head. The scan revealed a large pneumocephalus but no operative site haematoma or any other abnormality [Figure 1a].

Zoom
Figure 1: (a) A non-contrast computed tomographic scan of head showing large bifrontal haematoma and artifacts due to electrodes, (b) A right midbrain small lacunar infarct (white arrow)

On the second postoperative day, the patient developed hemiparesis on the left side. Meanwhile, his sensorium improved and he started following commands. A repeat CT scan was performed which now revealed right midbrain small lacunar infarct and reduced pneumocephalus [Figure 1b]. Later on, the patient recovered in the intensive care unit.

The various adverse effects of DBS related to the surgical procedure, the implanted device and electrical stimulation of areas adjacent to the target have been described in literature.[3] Some of these include intracerebral haematoma, ischaemic stroke, seizures, lead migration, erosion and breakage, dyskinesias, dysarthria, mood changes, Horner’s syndrome, etc., Of particular concern to the anaesthesiologists are the perioperative complications. Altered sensorium as a result of pneumocephalus is a known entity.[4] The clinical pattern depends on the territory involved in the pons. Pontine infarcts are known to produce a variegated clinical picture ranging from sensory to motor symptoms. Features like dysarthria, ataxia, vertigo, dizziness, tetra paresis, pseudobulbar palsy, etc., may be seen.[5] Our case illustrates altered mental status coinciding with the developing pneumocephalus and infarction in the pons.


No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).


Address for correspondence:

Dr. Zulfiqar Ali
Department of Neuroanaesthesiology
Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar - 190 010, Jammu and Kashmir
India   


Zoom
Figure 1: (a) A non-contrast computed tomographic scan of head showing large bifrontal haematoma and artifacts due to electrodes, (b) A right midbrain small lacunar infarct (white arrow)