Key words: Anatomical apex - apical constriction - apical foramen
INTRODUCTION
Biomechanical cleaning of the pulp chamber and preparation of a root canal system
are mandatory steps when aiming to achieve long-term success in root canal therapy.
Insufficient cleaning and shaping of the apical zone usually lead to infected tissue
and debris remaining in the canal. These undesirable residues in the apical area can
lead the resistance of periapical lesions and root canal therapy failure.[1 ]
In normal root canals, the apical constriction (AC) is considered the narrowest and
more apical area to the apex. From AC or minor apical diameter, the canal widens as
it approaches the apical foramen (AF) or major apical diameter.[2 ] The main path between pulp tissue and periodontal tissue is through the apical and
lateral foramen. Treatment is only likely to be successful when the entire path of
the root has been cleaned and shaped in accordance with a predetermined precise working
length (WL).[3 ]
The exact location of the reference point and obturation can affect the results. By
studying preradicular tissue, researchers have concluded that the best prognosis is
achieved when root canal treatment terminates at the cementodentinal junction (CDJ).[4 ] Although the exact location of CDJ is immeasurable, AC is an appropriate and reliable
location as the terminus of root canal procedures.[4 ]
New methods of measuring WL such as electronic apex locators can locate CDJ, and thus,
it can be used as the termination point of procedures.[5 ] All modern canal preparation techniques aim to differentiate between the canal and
apical tissue.[6 ] AF does not normally exit at the anatomical apex (AA), but it is laterally offset
0.5−2.0 mm in the coronal of AA.[2 ] Conditions such as aging and root resorption can affect the position of AC, for
example, aging and cementum apposition in the apical area cause increased space between
AC and AF.[3 ] AC can be a simple constriction, tapering constriction, multiple constriction, or
parallel constriction, and in a few cases, it is filled with restorative dentin or
cementum.[6 ] Various methods have been used to study root canal morphology, including tooth decalcification,
staining and clearing techniques, root sectioning and radiographic examination (in vitro ),[7 ] alternative radiographic techniques,[8 ] and evaluation with contrast media.[9 ]
Modern radiographic techniques such as spiral computed tomography and micro-computed
tomography are very useful.[10 ],[11 ] Despite the accuracy of these modern techniques, they require expensive equipment.[12 ] In view of the importance of the precise WL[4 ] and variable root canal systems in different races[13 ],[14 ] and the difference between incisors and molars,[15 ],[16 ] the current study attempted to determine the distances from AC to AF and AA and
compare the mean distances in incisors and molars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this cross-sectional study, 90 teeth including 45 incisors (single-rooted tooth)
and 45 molars (multi-rooted tooth) that had been gathered from personal offices, clinics,
and the dental faculty of Isfahan Province, Iran, were used. The results of a pilot
study were used to determine the sample size. In the pilot study, the difference between
AC and AA in both incisors and molars was 0.1 mm, with a standard deviation of 0.25
mm. Incorporating α = 0.05 and 80% power of the final sample size, 90 teeth were used
in the current study.
No information about the age or sex of the tooth donors was available. All the teeth
included had a reasonably intact crown and a relatively complete root - specifically
a well-formed apex without any resorption or fracture. The reasons for tooth extraction
were periodontal disease or orthodontic treatment. Classification of the teeth as
incisors or molars was performed separately by endodontics experts, through Woelfel’s
standard. Only teeth selected by both experts were used in this study. The teeth selected
were cleared of any soft tissue, bone fractions, and mass through manual scaling.
For disinfection, the teeth were then put in 2.5% NaOCl (Orkyd, Tehran, Iran) for
2 days, washed with running water for 4 h, and floated in 10% formalin (Pars Chemistry,
Tehran, Iran) before analysis.
To determine the position of AC, the following procedures were performed:
First, the crown of each tooth was sectioned using a diamond bur (D + Z, Frankfurt,
Germany) to expose the root canal system. It was then rinsed with 2.5% NaOCl. The
side where AF emerged was visualized by means of a stereoscopic magnifying glass (Citoval
2; Carl Zeiss, Germany). This allowed the roots to be oriented in such a way that
the longitudinal sections were possible. If the foramen was located somewhat toward
the mesial or distal side of the apex, the cut was made mesiodistally. If it was toward
the buccal or lingual side, the section was made accordingly. If there were two foramens,
the section was made on the same plane to enclose both of them. Root sections were
divided with a modeling spatula (Schuler, Ulm, Germany). Sectioned roots were observed
through a stereomicroscope (Hp, California, USA) with a magnification of ×25, and
the distances from AC to AF and AA were measured through a digital camera (Motic Instruments
Inc., California, USA) and Motic Images Plus software (Motic instruments Inc.). Microscopy
images of AC and AF in the molar tooth root apex are shown in [Figure 1 ], and corresponding images derived from incisors are shown in [Figure 2 ].
Figure 1: Microscopic view of molar root tooth apex, apical constriction, apical foramen, and
anatomical apex
Figure 2: Microscopic view of incisor root tooth apex, apical constriction, apical foramen,
and anatomical apex
Mean distances from AC to AF and AA and associated standard deviations were calculated
and recorded, and data were analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
22, SPSS( IBM, NY, USA). The independent t -test was used to compare the distances measured, and P < 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance.
RESULTS
The mean distances between AC and AF were 0.84 ± 0.33 mm in incisors and 0.70 ± 0.27
mm in molars [Table 1 ]. The mean distances between AC and A A were 1.123 ± 0.389 mm in incisors and 1.010
± 0.384 mm in molars [Table 2 ]. The mean distances between AC and AF differed significantly in incisors and molars
(P = 0.035), but the mean distances between AC and AA did not (P = 0.172).
Table 1:
Distance between apical constriction and apical foramen (mm)
Tooth type
Average
Standard deviation
P
Incisor
0.847
0.330
0.035
Molar
0.709
0.278
Table 2:
Distance between apical constriction and anatomical apex (mm)
Tooth type
Average
Standard deviation
P
Incisor
1.123
0.369
0.172
Molar
1.010
0.384
DISCUSSION
One of the important goals of endodontic treatment is biomechanical cleaning of the
root canal system. This biomechanical cleaning involves mechanical removal and chemical
dissolution and neutralizes content of the canal, while the primary aims of canal
preparation include due determination of obligate canal geometrics for adequate obturation
without any extension beyond the apical region. AC is an appropriate terminus location
in root canal therapy.[4 ]
Few studies have investigated AC in Iranians; hence, determining the distances between
AC and AF and AA in this race is important. Dummer et al.
[6 ] investigated the apical anatomy of central and lateral incisors, canines, and premolars.
On average, AC was 0.89 mm coronal to AA.
Arora and Tewari[17 ] reported that this distance was 0.63-0.99 mm in posterior multi-rooted teeth. Nasseri
et al.
[18 ] reported a 0.9 mm distance between AA and AC. Marroquin et al.
[19 ] reported that AC was 0.86 mm from AA in mandibular molars and 1.00 mm from it in
maxillary molars [Table 3 ]. In the current study, the mean distances between AC and AA were 1.14 mm in single-rooted
teeth and 1.03 mm in multi-rooted teeth. Kuttler[3 ] reported that the mean distance from AC to AF was 524 μ in a group aged 18-25 years
and that it was 659 μ in a group aged over 55 years. Stein and Corcoran[20 ] reported a 0.91 mm distance [Table 3 ]. In the current study, the mean distances between AC and AF were 0.86 mm in single-rooted
teeth and 0.72 mm in multi-rooted teeth. The results were concordant with the aforementioned
previous studies. Piasecki et al.
[21 ] investigated single-rooted premolars, and the 0.59 mm distance they reported from
AC to AF is not similar to the corresponding observations in the present study. The
smaller sample size in Piasecki et al.[21 ] and the more accurate measurement tool used in the current study may have contributed
to the discrepancy between the two studies. Notably, Hassanien et al.
[22 ] reported an average distance of 1.2 mm between AC and AF in mandibular premolar
teeth - a greater distance than has been reported in previous studies and in the current
study - which may also be related to the precision of the method they used and the
lower number of samples.
Table 3:
Last studies about apical constriction, apical foramen, and anatomic apex
Researchers
Year
Studied tooth
Studied distance
Measured distance
AC: Apical constriction, AF: Apical foramen, AA: Anatomical apex
Piasecki
2016
Single-rooted premolar
AC to AF
0.59 mm
Nasseri et al.
2012
Second maxillary premolar
AA to AC
0.9 mm
Arora and Tewari
2009
Posterior teeth
AA to AC
0.63-0.99 mm
Hassanien et al.
2008
Mandibular premolar
AC to AF
1.2 mm
Marroquin et al.
2004
Molar teeth
AA to AC
0.86-0.1 mm
Stein et al.
1991
Not mentioned
AC to AF
0.91 mm
Dummer et al.
1984
Central, lateral, canine and premolar
AA to AC
0.89 mm
Kuttler
1955
Anterior and posterior teeth
AC to AF
524 μ (18-25-year-old) 659 μ (over 55-year-old)
In the current study, the distances from AC to AF differed significantly in single-rooted
and multi-rooted teeth. This may be due to a difference in root diameter size between
these teeth in the apical third; nevertheless, there was no corresponding significant
difference in the mean distance from AC to AA. Although AC is often considered the
terminus of obturation[4 ] and Electronic Apex Locators can show this region as the termination point of obturation,[23 ] some clinicians obturate based on the radiographic apex. As the apical termination
of obturation does not differ significantly between single-rooted and multi-rooted
teeth despite vital and necrotic teeth, clinician judgment should not affect which
based on radiography.
The current study was rendered more precise than some of the aforementioned studies
by the use of modern observation and measurement tools such as a digital camera and
the Motic Images Plus software. Furthermore, vertical root sectioning facilitated
informative observation and measurement of different parts of the apex, whereas previous
studies have used radiographic, tooth decalcification, and staining techniques that
preclude direct observation.
One of the limitations of the current study relates to evolutional tooth age. With
aging, cementum absorption in the apex zone and the distance from AC to AF increase.
Although the age of root formation is an important source of variation and incisor
growth is faster than molar growth, it is not practically possible to source enough
teeth of the same developmental age to perform a meaningful study. Another issue pertains
to the anatomic variation in root canal systems.[13 ],[14 ] Teeth were sourced from five provinces in Iran. A bigger sample size would have
been preferable to reduce the potential effects of these variations.
CONCLUSION
The mean distances from AC to AF were 0.84 mm in incisors and 0.70 mm in molars. Since
the prognosis is better when AC is considered the termination point of treatment,
the terminus points should be 0.84 mm more coronal than AF in incisors and 0.70 mm
more coronal in molars and 1.12 mm and 1.01 mm shorter than AA, respectively.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
