Keywords
MRI brain scoring - neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy - post-cooling therapy
Introduction
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the leading causes of birth complications
and acquired brain injury affecting full-term infant,[[1]] leading to long-term neurological sequela or death.[[2]] Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become the preferred neuroimaging modality
following HIE because of its sensitivity[[3]] that can be graded and related to neurodevelopmental outcome.[[4]]
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the severity of MRI
brain findings and the neurodevelopmental outcome among HIE babies in our institution.
A new scoring system by Trivedi et al. was used for MRI brain evaluation and scoring.[[5]]
Subjects and Methods
Study population
This was a retrospective study conducted in a Radiology Department of a tertiary university
hospital. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this cross-sectional
retrospective study. Institution ethics committee approval was received on the 13th May 2016.
The patients’ data were collected from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) records
from 2007 to 2016. These neonates underwent cooling therapy with the core body temperature
maintained at 33.5°C and monitored by a rectal thermometer probe for 72 h after birth,
when the diagnosis of HIE was made clinically. This is then followed by a re-warming
phase for at least 4 h. After discharge, they were then followed up at 18–24 months
to determine their developmental outcome; either (a) normal, or (b) adverse (died/cerebral
palsy).
The inclusion criteria were (a) term and preterm babies which include babies more
than 36 weeks, (b) MRI brain performed within 2 weeks after birth, (c) hypothermic
therapy completed for 72 h, and (d) developmental outcome was assessed at 18 to 24
months. Cases with the incomplete sequence of the MRI images were excluded from the
study.
MRI brain
The MRI was performed in our Radiology Department using 1.5 T (Avanto, Siemens, Erlangen
Germany) MR scanners with 12-channel phased-array head coil. Patients had the MRI
either with general anesthesia, sedation, or using feed and sleep technique. Images
were obtained following HIE protocols, which include: T1, T2, and DWI sequences. T1-weighted
spin-echo sequences (TR/TE, 205–730/4–16 ms), T2-weighted spin-echo sequences (TR/TE,
1553–5897/80–200 ms), and DWI sequences by using single-shot spin-echo echo-planar
sequences (TR/TE, 5132–5000/74–68 ms with a b-value of 800–1000 s/min) were routinely
obtained in the axial plane. Section thickness ranged from 4–7 mm with an intersection
gap of 0.4–0.7 mm.
MRI brain scoring
One pediatric radiologist (Reader 1) and one radiology resident (Reader 2) scored
the MRI studies independently. Both observers were blinded to all clinical data. The
images were reviewed using the institution picture archiving system (PACS). Five regions
of each cerebral hemisphere were evaluated and scored 0–3 according to Trivedi et al. for each of the sequences; T1W, T2W, and DWI. These regions were: (I) subcortical
region, (a) globus pallidus, (b) caudate nucleus, (c) thalamus, and (d) posterior
limb internal capsule; (II) white matter; (III) cortex; (IV) brainstem; and (V) cerebellum.
The sum of the score was then determined the severity of the brain injury. Score of
0 was taken as normal while sum of 1–11 was graded as mild, 12–32 as moderate, and
33–138 as severe. This scoring system emphasizes on subcortical injury in the deep
nuclear gray matter and posterior limb of the internal capsule.[[5]]
Patients’ developmental outcomes at 2 years old were obtained from the medical record.
The outcome was divided into normal developmental outcome versus adverse outcome;
the latter includes cerebral palsy (CP) and death, which were stated by the clinicians
in the medical record.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software package IBM version 23.
Statistics were estimated for demographic data as means and standard deviations [SD].
An inter-reader correlation is considered significant when the P value is less than 0.050. Reader 1 MRI scoring and patient’s outcome was then correlated
using the Fisher’s Exact test. A significant correlation was defined asP- value less
than 0.05.
Results
Between 2007–2016, a total of 102 patients were diagnosed with HIE in our center.
Unfortunately, therapeutic hypothermic cooling was only started in mid-2010. Therefore
only 23 of 49 patients who underwent cooling therapy were eligible for this study,
since 26 patients had to be excluded as MRI was performed after 2 weeks of postnatal
period (n = 5) and there was no subsequent follow-up at 2 years of age (n = 21). Nineteen of them were term and four were preterm. The rest of the demographic
data is presented in [[Table 1]].
Table 1
Demographics of study population
|
n (%)
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Term
|
19 (82.6)
|
|
Preterm
|
4 (17.4)
|
|
Birth location
|
|
|
Inborn
|
22 (95.7)
|
|
Outborn
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
Year of birth
|
|
|
2010
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
2012
|
5 (21.7)
|
|
2013
|
5 (21.7)
|
|
2014
|
8 (34.8)
|
|
2015
|
2 (8.7)
|
|
2016
|
2 (8.7)
|
|
Delivery
|
|
|
Vaginal
|
11 (47.8)
|
|
Cesarean section
|
12 (52.2)
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
Male
|
11 (47.8)
|
|
Female
|
11 (47.8)
|
|
Ambiguous
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
Ethnic
|
|
|
Malay
|
19 (82.6)
|
|
Chinese
|
3 (13.0)
|
|
Others
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
SARNAT score
|
|
|
Mild
|
3 (13.0)
|
|
Moderate
|
16 (69.6)
|
|
Severe
|
4 (17.4)
|
|
Outcome
|
|
|
Normal
|
15 (65.2)
|
|
CP
|
4 (17.4)
|
|
Died
|
4 (17.4)
|
|
Birth weight (g)
|
|
|
Mean (SD)
|
2941.83 (493.43)
|
|
Cord blood pH
|
|
|
Median (IQR)
|
6.99 (0.32)
|
|
APGAR score (1 min) Median (IQR)
|
2.0 (4.0)
|
|
APGAR score (5 mins) Median (IQR)
|
4.0 (4.0)
|
Reader I scored 3 mild, 12 moderate, and 8 severe HIE patients while reader 2 scored
3, 14, and 6 patients as mild, moderate, and severe HIE respectively. We also reviewed
other associated findings in our neonatal cohort, which includes cephalohematoma or
intracranial bleed. The summaries of the MRI findings are tabulated in [[Table 2]].
Table 2
MRI findings
|
MRI score
|
Mean score
|
Median score
|
No. of patients (%)
|
|
Reader 1
|
Reader 2
|
Reader 1
|
Reader 2
|
Reader 1
|
Reader 2
|
|
Total
|
33.91
|
28.17
|
26.00
|
20.00
|
23 (100)
|
23 (100)
|
|
Mild (1-11)
|
7.00
|
9.33
|
6.00
|
10.00
|
3 (13.0)
|
3 (13.0)
|
|
Moderate (12-32)
|
22.08
|
18.71
|
22.00
|
20.00
|
12 (52.2)
|
14 (60.9)
|
|
Severe (33-138)
|
61.75
|
59.67
|
49.00
|
50.00
|
8 (24.8)
|
6 (26.1)
|
|
Cephalohaematoma
|
|
|
No. (%)
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
17 (73.9)
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
6 (26.1)
|
|
|
|
Intracranial Bleed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
16 (69.6)
|
|
|
|
Subdural hemorrhage
|
|
|
3 (13.0)
|
|
|
|
Intraventricular hemorhage
|
|
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
|
|
Left parietal extradural, left parietal cortical hemorrhage
|
|
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
|
|
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
|
|
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
|
|
Severe petechial hemorrhage
|
|
|
1 (4.3)
|
|
|
All 3 patients with mild MRI brain grading had a normal developmental outcome. 12
patients had moderate MRI brain grading of which 8 were normal in terms of developmental
outcome at 2 years of age and the rest (n = 4) had adverse outcome (death = 1, cerebral palsy = 3). 8 patients had severe
MRI brain grading whereby 50% (n = 4) suffered adverse outcome (death = 3, cerebral palsy = 1) and another 50% (n = 4) had normal developmental outcome at 2 years old [[Table 3]].
Table 3
Association between MRI reader 1 and outcome
|
Outcome
|
Total (n=23)
|
P
a
|
|
Adverse (n=8)
|
Normal (n=15)
|
|
aFisher’s Exact Test
|
|
MRI score severity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mild HIE
|
0 (0.0)
|
3 (20.0)
|
3 (13.0)
|
0.350
|
|
Moderate HIE
|
4 (50.0)
|
8 (53.3)
|
12 (52.2)
|
|
|
Severe HIE
|
4 (50.0)
|
4 (26.7)
|
8 (34.8)
|
|
We present examples of severe HIE in term neonates with adverse and normal outcome
respectively [[Figures 1] and [2]]. An additional image of an uncommon presentation of intraventricular hemorrhage
in a term neonate is also included [[Figure 3]].
Figure 1 (A-F): This is a MRI brain of a term neonate who has been classified as moderate Sarnat
clinically. T1W (A and B), T2W (C and D), DWI (E), ADC (F). (A and B) Absent myelination
[black arrowheads] of the posterior limb of both internal capsules (PLIC), which is
better depicted on T1WI (3 + 3). Abnormal signal demonstrated in the caudate nucleus
(1 + 1) [white arrows], globus pallidus/putamen (3 + 3) [black arrows], thalamus (2
+ 2) [white thin arrows] and cortex (1 + 1) [white arrowheads] on T1WI. Abnormal signal
in brainstem (1 + 1) and white matter (1 + 1) (not shown). (C and D) On T2WI, there
is presence of PLIC myelination (0 + 0) [black arrowheads]. Normal signal of caudate
nucleus (0 + 0) [white arrowheads]. Also noted abnormal signal of globus pallidus/putamen
(2 + 2) and thalamus (1 + 1) (not shown). Abnormal signal of brainstem (1 + 1) [white
arrows], cerebellum (1 + 1) [white stars] and white matter (2 + 2) [black arrows]
on T2WI. (E and F) Restricted diffusion noted at the corpus callosum on DWI and ADC
(1 + 1) [black arrows]. Therefore, the total score is 40which is classified as severe
HIE. The child has cerebral palsy at 2 years old
Figure 2 (A-F): This is an MRI brain of a term neonate who had been classified as moderate Sarnat
clinically. T1W (A-C), T2W (D-F). (A-C) Absent myelination [black arrows] of PLIC,
on T1WI (3 + 3). Normal caudate nucleus (0 + 0) [white arrowheads]. Abnormal signal
in globus pallidus/putamen (3 + 3) [white arrows], thalamus (1 + 1) (not shown) and
cortex (1 + 1) [double black arrows] on T1WI. Abnormal signal in brainstem (1 + 1)
[double white arrow], cerebellum (1 + 1) [white stars] and white matter (1 + 1) [black
arrowheads] on T1W1. (D-F) On T2WI there is also absence of PLIC myelination (3 +
3) [black arrows]. Normal signal of caudate nucleus (0 + 0). However abnormal signal
of globus pallidus/putamen (3 + 3) [white arrows] and thalamus (2 + 2) [black arrowheads]
on T2WI. Abnormal signal in cerebellum (1 + 1) [white arrows] and white matter (2
+ 2) [black stars] on T2WI. No areas of restricted diffusion on DWI and ADC images
(not shown). Therefore, the total score is 44 which is classified as severe HIE. The
child, however, had normal developmental outcome at 2 years of age
Figure 3 (A and B): MRI brain of a term neonate; day 5 of life, term baby at 38-week gestations was born
via emergency low cesarean section for fetal distress and thick meconium-stained liquor
had poor Apgar score at birth. There is focal T1 hyperintensity and T2 hypointensity
within left lateral ventricle on T1WI (A) and T2WI (B) represents intraventricular
hemorrhage [white arrow]. Child was investigated for venous sinus thrombosis and coagulopathy
which were turned out to be negative
Interclass correlation coefficient
The two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine the interclass
correlation between readers 1 and 2 for MRI scoring. There were strong inter-reader
correlations for single measures (ICC = 0.793, 95% CI = 0.577–0.906, P < 0.001) and average measures (ICC = 0.885, 95% CI = 0.732–0.951, P < 0.001) between both readers.
MRI brain grading and 2 years developmental outcome
The MRI brain scoring from Reader 1 was correlated with the 2 years outcome of these
patients with a significant value taken as P value less than 0.05. According to Fisher’s Exact Test, there was no significant
association between reader 1’s MRI score and outcome (P = 0.350) [[Table 3]].
Discussion
We validated the MRI brain assessment using the new scoring system by Trivedi et al.[[5]] emphasizing on subcortical injury in the deep nuclear gray matter and posterior
limb of the internal capsule,.[[6],[7]] All of the neonates with moderate and severe brain injury had predominant subcortical
injury when assessed with Trivedi et al. scoring system. The deep nuclear gray matter and posterior limb of the internal
capsule were strongly associated with poor developmental outcome as per well-documented
by previous studies.[[2],[4],[8]] A most recent study published in 2018 concluded that the deep gray matter injury
among infants treated with hypothermia is associated with adverse outcome in general
and motor impairment. The authors also used modified scoring system utilizing T1,
T2, and DWI sequences and concluded that the gray matter subscore can be used independently
to predict the neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years old.[[9]]
Miller et al. demonstrated that the clinical presentations and neurodevelopmental outcome of children
with HIE correlates with the pattern of brain injury. The intensity of resuscitation
at birth, the severity of encephalopathy, and the severity of seizures were associated
more strongly with the basal ganglia/thalamus predominant pattern (all P < 0.0001), compared with watershed pattern.[[4]] Liauw et al. also reported that the presence of abnormal signal intensity in the basal ganglia
and/or thalamus, or abnormal signal intensity on T1-weighted images in the posterior
limb of the internal capsule are predictive of poor outcome.[[8]] Children with predominant basal ganglia/thalamus predominant pattern were associated
with severely impaired motor and cognitive outcomes at 30 months of age, so do children
with watershed predominant pattern of brain injury which initially does not show any
cognitive impairment at 12 months but at later at 30 months of age.[[2]] In our study, there was no significant correlation between MRI grading and patient’s
2 years developmental outcome (P value = 0.350). One of the reasons why we had such result could be due to the small
sample size, which primarily contributed by our strict inclusion criteria to obtain
a homogenous sample population.
Van Handel et al. described that none of the children with mild HIE developed cerebral palsy, which
was also seen in our study. The authors also showed that 23% to 82% of moderate HIE
developed CP indicating a wide range of presentations.[[10]] In our study, 4 out of 12 patients with moderate MRI brain grading had an adverse
outcome (CP/died) of which 3 had CP and 1 died [[Figure 1]]. A local study in 2010 reviewed the outcome of 72 h post-hypothermic cooling of
which two out of 17 patients with severe HIE succumbed with their MRI/CT showed global
ischemic changes.[[11]] Despite that, 4 patients with severe MRI brain grading in our study had a normal
developmental outcome at 18–24 months. When we re-reviewed this subset group of patient
we noticed that most of the abnormality was predominantly depicted by T2-weighted
images whereas the DWI and T1 hyperintensity abnormalities are scanty. White matter
injury, which is primarily detected by T2-weighted images are not associated with
increased severity of the outcome. The previous study discussed that most of the cases
with white matter injury alone would present with mild-to-moderate lesion that did
not have significant cognitive impairment later in life.[[9]] An example of this scenario is described in [[Figure 2]].
This study shows that there was a strong inter-reader correlation for single and average
measures between the 2 readers with P value <0.001. This means that the objective assessment from the MRI scoring system
proposed by Trivedi et al. is reproducible and reliable between readers of different levels of exposure and
experience to pediatric neuroimaging review of HIE. This scoring system is easy to
use, well-structured, and comprehensive as it covers all the different structures
that need to be assessed in neonatal HIE MRI assessment. Furthermore, the fact that
different sequence namely T1, T2, and DWI were taken into consideration for summation
of the MRI score. Thus, this made the scoring system highly recommended for objective
assessment, especially for research purpose based on our experience using this scoring
system.
Although the exact pathophysiology of HIE is poorly understood, it is well-documented
that a cascade of deleterious events leads to vascular autoregulation failure, reperfusion
injury, eventual neuronal cell death, and diffuse brain injury in HIE.[[12],[13]] In HIE, the nature of the injury is very much dependent on the degree of brain
maturation and the severity of the hypotension. The blood supply to the brain differs
with brain maturation. In the preterm brain, the arteries extend in a ventriculopetal
configuration while in term infants, the blood supply is in a ventriculofugal pattern.[[13]] The most important areas of the deep gray matter of the brain are the thalami and
the brainstem that are most metabolically active in the preterm brain. On the other
hand, injury involving the lateral thalami, globus pallidus, posterior putamina, hippocampi,
brainstem, and sensorimotor cortex is seen more in term infants.[[13]]
Therapeutic hypothermia is shown to improve survival with normal neurological function
as well as reducing the rates of severe disability following HIE which include cerebral
palsy, mental, and psychomotor developmental.[[14]] TOBY study was carried out from 2002–2006 to study the outcome of moderate whole-body
hypothermia therapy which showed reduction in basal ganglia, thalami, white matter,
and posterior limb of internal capsule lesions. Cooled infants are more likely to
have normal brain MRI findings and fewer scans predictive of later neuromotor abnormalities[[15]] Another study showed that at 18 months of age, therapeutic hypothermia for HIE
has shown to reduce death rates or severe disability.[[2]] However, death and disability continue to occur in 30%–70% of infants with moderate-to-severe
encephalopathy despite treatment with cooling.[[4]]
It is well known that intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is commonly seen in premature
neonates due to its premature brain autoregulation.[[16]] However, in our study, there was one (4.3%) term neonate with IVH. IVH itself is
rare in term neonate and its correlation with HIE and hypothermic cooling therapy
is not well documented. A study by Al Yazzidi et al. described that IVH in term neonates is usually associated with severe hypoxia that
underwent therapeutic cooling therapy caused by fluctuating cerebral blood flow.[[17]] Our patient had moderate MRI brain grading and eventually demonstrated normal 2
years developmental outcome. Another study by Gorelik et al. showed that 7% of term infants developed IVH and it was more prevalent in those
treated with hypothermic cooling therapy.[[16]]
Limitations
Our study is restricted to a few limitations due to the retrospective nature of the
study. Firstly, it is subjected to potential bias. Secondly, the cooling therapy in
our center was only started in mid- 2010. Therefore many patients had to be omitted
from this study. Some patients had incomplete cooling due to hemodynamic instability
and no MRI was performed since children were not stable to be sent to MRI suite. These
patients were also excluded. The majority of patients with neonatal HIE defaulted
or lost in follow-up in our institution. Therefore, no developmental assessment was
carried out at 18–24 months even though they had completed cooling therapy and MRI
brain within the desired time frame. Lastly, the neurodevelopmental assessment is
not adequate since we only include general clinical assessment of either normal development,
cerebral palsy, or death.
The best developmental assessment is using Bayleys Scales of Infant and Toddler developmental
III (Bayley-III) score to assess the cognitive, motor, and language domains in children
with HIE at 18 to 24 months of age since the component of the development is broad
and involves different type of assessment. The score of <85 were associated with adverse
outcome while score of >85 was associated with good outcome in all 3 individual domains.
The score was then correlated with the MRI brain grading.[[5]] This was a better neurodevelopmental assessment tool than what we used in this
study. Unfortunately not all of our patients had this Bayley neurodevelopmental assessment
and thus could not be used in this research. Patients that came for follow up were
mainly assessed on their motor skills to determine whether they were normal or CP.
Developmental and speech delay was not fully emphasized during this assessment. Hence
this study showed that even though the MRI brain grading was high, some patients do
have normal neurodevelopmental outcome.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we revealed that there is no correlation between the MRI grading and
the patient’s 2 years neurodevelopmental outcome due to several limitations as mentioned
above. Further studies with larger number of patients should be carried out to further
determine this correlation and better assessment. The MRI scoring tool established
by Trivedi et al. is an objective measurement for assessment of MRI in neonatal HIE and shows strong
interobserver correlation.