DOI: 10.1055/s-00039246

British Homeopathic Journal

Ausgabe S 01 · Volume 89 · Januar 2000 DOI: 10.1055/s-008-39779

Plenary Session

  • S1
    Kleijnen, J:

    What research is needed to show the effectiveness of homeopathy?

  • S3
    Ling, T; Hadridge, P:

    The Madingley scenarios for the future context of healthcare: understanding today by imagining tomorrow

  • S8
    van Galen, E:

    Commentary to the Madingley scenarios: trust our guidance or the quest for enlightened authorities

  • S9
    Eskinazi, D:

    Commentary to the Madingley scenarios: anticipated presentation—‘Find my way’

  • S10
    Heger, M; Riley, DS; Haidvogl, M:

    International integrative primary care outcomes study (IIPCOS-2): an international research project of homeopathy in primary care

  • S14
    Peters, D; Pinto, GJ; Harris, G:

    Using a computer-based clinical management system to improve effectiveness of a homeopathic service in a fundholding general practice

  • S20
    Buxton, M:

    Assessing the cost-effectiveness of homeopathic medicines: are the problems different from other health technologies?

  • S23
    van Haselen, R:

    The economic evaluation of complementary medicine: a staged approach at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital

  • S27
    Chaufferin, G:

    Improving the evaluation of homeopathy: economic considerations and impact on health

  • S31
    Walach, H; Güthlin, C:

    Effects of acupuncture and homeopathy: prospective documentation. Interim results

  • S35
    Dantas, F; Rampes, H:

    Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review

    • Parallel Session

  • S39
    Steinsbekk, A; Data Collection Group, The:

    Data collection in homeopathic practice: A suggestion for an international standard

  • S40
    Biolchini, J:

    User study in homeopathic clinical practice: a fundamental tool for designing and improving a clinical information system

  • S41
    Rezzani, CM:

    WinCHIP: Computerised Homeopathic Investigation Program: a data collection tool to help the doctor in daily practice to prove and improve homeopathy

  • S42
    Haidvogl, M; Riley, DS; Heger, M; Fischer, M:

    Integrative Medicine Data Collection Network (IMDCN)

  • S43
    Treuherz, F:

    Homeopathy in general practice: a descriptive report of work with 500 consecutive patients

  • S44
    Spence, D:

    Clinical outcome audit: Bristol Homoeopathic Hospital

  • S46
    Steinsbekk, A:

    Patient-evaluated effect of homeopathic treatment

  • S47
    Jacobs, J:

    Effectiveness research in homeopathy—methodology and practical considerations

  • S48
    Vickers, A:

    Evaluation of specific and non-specific effects in homeopathy: feasibility study for a randomised trial

  • S50
    Kayne, S; Beattie, N; Reeves, A:

    Self-treatment using homeopathic remedies bought over the counter (OTC) in a sample of British pharmacies

  • S51
    Konitzer, M; Bahrs, O; Doering, Th; Fischer, GC:

    The homeopathic remedy as an agent of meaning in family interaction: a case study and textual model

  • S52
    Wiesenauer, ML; Ludtke, R:

    A meta-analysis of the homeopathic treatment of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca

  • S53
    Khan, MT; Khan, MT:

    Clinical application of homeopathic podiatry as used at The Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital (RLHH)

  • S54
    Clover, A:

    Patient benefit survey: Tunbridge Wells Homoeopathic Hospital 1997

  • S54
    Brenes-Valverde, A:

    Effectiveness of homeopathic treatment

  • S55
    Montfort, H:

    New homeopathic approach to neoplastic diseases: from cell destruction to carcinogen-induced apoptosis

  • S57
    Chemouny, B:

    Practical problems of developing clinical research in homeopathy in France

  • S58
    Brands, M:

    Features of homeopathic diagnosis relevant for scientific research

  • S59
    Sharples, F; van Rhijn, A:

    Improving the accessibility and quality of clinical and patient information in the patient’s medical notes

  • S60
    Chapman, EH:

    Homeopathic treatment of patients with persistent mild traumatic brain injury

  • S61
    Rastogi, DP:

    Utility of Boenninghausen’s repertory

  • S62
    Spranger, J:

    Testing the effectiveness of antibiotic and homeopathic medication in the frame of herd reorganisation of subclinical mastitis in milk cows

  • S63
    Sukul, NC; Ghosh, S; Sinhababu, SP; Sukul, A:

    Effect of Nux vomica mother tincture, strychnine and Nux vomica 30c on the alcohol addiction of albino rats

    • Posters

  • S64
    Chirila, M; Olinescu, A:

    The effect of Ecballum elatherium juice and its homeopathic dilutions on oxidative bursts of human polymorph neutrophils

  • S65
    Fleisbach, A; Fejfar, V; Spranger, J:

    Effects of homeopathic potencies: growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in potentised CuSO4 dilutions

  • S66
    Dellmour, F:

    Effectiveness in provings and clinical trials

  • S67
    Khan, MT; Khan, MT:

    Clinical evaluation of homeopathic podiatry in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

  • S68
    Malcolm, R:

    Audit methodology: evaluating the significance of change using intrinsic and contextual data in clinical homeopathic practice

  • S69
    Mallouk, JB:

    Training nurses working in the Ontario Canadian Health Care System: homeopathy and homotoxicology

  • S70
    Payrhuber, D; Pohl, K:

    Refined case analysis in daily practice based on two levels of repertorisation (Kent and Scholten)

  • S71
    Savulescu, AG; Crump, S; Iacob, C; Gheorghiu, S; Badila, C; Negrea, I; aCaravan, F; Randasu, I; Sararu, C; Bungetzianu, G:

    Proving of Quercus robur

  • S72
    Wilkens, J; Lüdtke, R:

    Arnica 30x after knee surgery