Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1939-9322
Entwicklung und psychometrische Überprüfung eines Kurzfragebogens zur Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung im Umgang mit psychisch belastenden Situationen (SWEP)
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Short Questionnaire on Self-Efficacy Expectations in Dealing with Psychologically Difficult Situations (SWEP) Fördermittel Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: ZMVI1–2517FSB117Zusammenfassung
Ziel der Studie Entwicklung und psychometrische Überprüfung eines 6-Item-Instruments zur Erfassung von Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, sich in psychisch belastenden Situationen Unterstützung suchen zu können (SWEP).
Methodik Entwicklung von Items, Ermittlung von Verteilungscharakteristika, Faktorenstruktur und interner Konsistenz der Skala anhand einer Paper-Pencil-Befragung (N=269) und einer Untersuchung einer Online-Intervention zur Suizidprävention (N=802). Bestimmung der Retest-Reliabilität und diskriminanten Validität zu Skalen, die suizidspezifisches Wissen und einen Aspekt von Suizidstigma erfassten.
Ergebnisse Die Hauptkomponentenanalyse ergab für die SWEP-Skala ein eindimensionales Konstrukt mit hoher interner Konsistenz (Cronbachs α=0,83 bzw. α=0,89). Es zeigten sich inhaltlich plausible Korrelationen zu anderen Konstrukten und erste Hinweise auf eine hohe Retest-Reliabilität.
Schlussfolgerung Die SWEP-Skala ist ein reliables, augenscheinlich valides, kurzes Instrument zur Erfassung von Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, sich in psychisch belastenden Situationen Unterstützung suchen zu können.
Abstract
Objective Development and psychometric evaluation of a German 6-item instrument to assess self-efficacy expectations to seek support in psychologically difficult situations (SWEP).
Methods Development of items, determination of distribution characteristics, factor structure, and internal consistency of the scale based on a paper-pencil survey (N=269) and a survey of an online intervention on suicide prevention (N=802).
Results Principal component analysis revealed the SWEP scale to be a one-dimensional construct with high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.83 and α=.89). We found content-plausible correlations to other constructs and initial evidence of a high retest reliability.
Conclusion The SWEP provides a reliable, valid, brief instrument for assessing self-efficacy expectations of being able to seek support.
Schlüsselwörter
Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung - Fragebogenentwicklung - Suizidalität - Psychometrische ÜberprüfungKey words
self-efficacy expectation - questionnaire development - suicidality - psychometric evaluationPublication History
Received: 20 April 2022
Accepted: 27 July 2022
Article published online:
15 November 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191-215 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191.
- 2 Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, Hrsg. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing; 2006: 307-337
- 3 Bandura A. On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited. Journal of Management 2012; 38: 9-44 DOI: 10.1177/0149206311410606.
- 4 Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman. 1997
- 5 Zhou M. A Revisit of General Self-Efficacy Scale: Uni- or Multi-dimensional. Curr Psychol 2016; 35: 427-436 DOI: 10.1007/s12144-015-9311-4.
- 6 Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer-und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Freie Universität Berlin; 1999
- 7 Maddux J, Meier L. Self-Efficacy and Depression In: Maddux J, Hrsg. Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment. Boston: Springer; 1995. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_5
- 8 DiClemente C. Self-Efficacy and the Addictive Behaviors. J J Soc Clin Psychol 1986; 4: 302-315 DOI: 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.302.
- 9 Dreier M, Ludwig J, Härter M. et al. Development and evaluation of e-mental health interventions to reduce stigmatization of suicidality – a study protocol. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19: 152 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2137-0.
- 10 Dreier M, Baumgardt J, Bock T. et al. Development of an online suicide prevention program involving people with lived experience: ideas and challenges. Res Involv Engagem 2021; 7: 60 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00307-9.
- 11 World Health Organization. Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014
- 12 Mackenzie CS, Knox VJ, Gekoski WL. et al. An adaptation and extension of the attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help scale. J Appl Soc Psychol 2004; 34: 2410-2433 DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01984.x.
- 13 Picco L, Abdin E, Chong SA. et al. Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help: Factor Structure and Socio-Demographic Predictors. Front Psychol 2016; 7 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00547.
- 14 Wilson CJ, Deane FP, Ciarrochi JV. et al. Measuring help seeking intentions: properties of the general help seeking questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Counselling 2005; 39: 15-28
- 15 Bock T, Urban A, Schulz G. et al. “Irre menschlich Hamburg” – An Example of a Bottom-Up Project. In: Gaebel W, Rössler W, Sartorius N, Hrsg. The Stigma of Mental Illness – End of the Story?. 2017: 469-483 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27839-1_25
- 16 Woods D. Process-Tracing Methods for the Study of Cognition Outside of the Experimental Psychology Laboratory. In: Klein G, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Hrsg. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood. 1993: 228-251
- 17 Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1984
- 18 Bühner M, Ziegler M. Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. Pearson; 2009
- 19 Döring N, Bortz J. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Springer; 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5
- 20 Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research 1966; 1: 245-276
- 21 Ludwig J, Liebherz S, Dreier M. et al. Die Stigma of Suicide Scale: psychometrische Überprüfung der deutschen Kurzversion (SOSS-SF-D). Psychiat Prax 2020; 47: 433-439 DOI: 10.1055/a-1145-3992.
- 22 Calear AL, Batterham PJ, Trias A. et al. The Literacy of Suicide Scale - Development, Validation, and Application. Crisis 2021; 1-6 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000798.
- 23 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge; 1988. DOI: 10.4324/9780203771587
- 24 Reynders A, Kerkhof AJ, Molenberghs G. et al. Help-seeking, stigma and attitudes of people with and without a suicidal past. A comparison between a low and a high suicide rate country. J Affect Disord 2015; 178: 5-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.02.013.
- 25 Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011; 2: 53-55 DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
- 26 Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess 2003; 80: 99-103 DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18.
- 27 Isaac V, Wu C-Y, McLachlan CS. et al. Associations between health-related self-efficacy and suicidality. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18: 126 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1705-z.
- 28 Chesney MA, Neilands TB, Chambers DB. et al. A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. Br J Health Psychol 2006; 11: 421-437 DOI: 10.1348/135910705X53155.
- 29 Wei Y, McGrath PJ, Hayden J. et al. Measurement properties of mental health literacy tools measuring help-seeking: a systematic review. J Ment Health 2017; 26: 543-555 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1276532.
- 30 Divin N, Harper P, Curran E. et al. Help-Seeking Measures and Their Use in Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Adolescent Research Review 2018; 3: 113-122 DOI: 10.1007/s40894-017-0078-8.
- 31 Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D. et al. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3: 646-659 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30030-x.