RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2641-0265
Patient Participation in Monitoring Potential Adverse Drug Events
Autoren
Funding The research was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte; J.F., grant no.: 2014–4990).
Abstract
Background
Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been suggested to be helpful in detecting and preventing drug-related problems such as adverse drug events (ADEs). However, patient participation systems monitoring self-reported data, such as symptoms, are still sparsely described in the literature.
Objectives
This study aimed to investigate if the use of a patient participating CDSS (PCDSS) can facilitate early detection of ADEs, thereby contributing to safer drug treatment in older adults.
Methods
A 1-year prospective observational study of elderly patients using a free web-based PCDSS to register symptoms over time at home. Initially, the PCDSS analyzed the extent and quality of the patient's drug use, based on a Swedish national set of criteria, and assessed drug-related symptoms using a standardized scale (PHASE-20). Thereafter, the patients recorded symptoms at home for 1 year—the first 6 months in free text, the second 6 months selecting from 19 predefined symptoms. The PCDSS signaled when symptoms were registered on three occasions in a 3-week period. The patient was then asked to contact his/her nurse at the healthcare center (HCC) for assessment of the symptoms and decisions on further contacts with the nurse or doctor. We analyzed the extent of signals generated, accompanying contacts, and associated medication reviews and adjustments.
Results
The 48 study participants registered 1,275 symptoms during the monitoring period, 61% by women. The PCDSS generated a total of 171 signals, of which 58% from women. Seventy-one percent (121) occurred under the first registration (free text) period. Of all signals, 44% (75) led to activities at the HCC, of which 48% (36) were physician contacts. In total, they contributed to medication reviews in 42% (15) and medication adjustments in 64% (23), with a total of 33 adjustments.
Conclusion
Patient participation by self-reporting symptoms via a PCDSS can contribute to safer drug use.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Sweden (approval no.: 2016/1494–31/4; 2017/1072–32).
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 10. Dezember 2024
Angenommen: 22. Juni 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Craftman ÅG, Johnell K, Fastbom J, Westerbotn M, von Strauss E. Time trends in 20 years of medication use in older adults: Findings from three elderly cohorts in Stockholm, Sweden. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2016; 63: 28-35
- 2 Sera LC, McPherson ML. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic changes associated with aging and implications for drug therapy. Clin Geriatr Med 2012; 28 (02) 273-286
- 3 Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2014; 13 (01) 57-65
- 4 Fastbom J, Johnell K. National indicators for quality of drug therapy in older persons: the Swedish experience from the first 10 years. Drugs Aging 2015; 32 (03) 189-199
- 5 Salvi F, Marchetti A, D'Angelo F, Boemi M, Lattanzio F, Cherubini A. Adverse drug events as a cause of hospitalization in older adults. Drug Saf 2012; 35 (Suppl. 01) 29-45
- 6 Paul E, End-Rodrigues T, Thylén P, Bergman U. Läkemedelsbiverkan vanlig orsak till sjukhusvård av aldre. En klinisk retrospektiv studie. Lakartidningen 2008; 105 (35) 2338-2342
- 7 Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare [Socialstyrelsen]. Läkemedelsorsakad sjuklighet hos äldre. Kartläggning och förslag till åtgärder (in Swedish). Socialstyrelsen 2014-12-13. Accessed July 8, 2025 at: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/ovrigt/2014-12-13.pdf
- 8 Clayman ML, Bylund CL, Chewning B, Makoul G. The impact of patient participation in health decisions within medical encounters: a systematic review. Med Decis Making 2016; 36 (04) 427-452
- 9 Richard C, Glaser E, Lussier MT. Communication and patient participation influencing patient recall of treatment discussions. Health Expect 2017; 20 (04) 760-770
- 10 Shortell SM, Poon BY, Ramsay PP. et al. A multilevel analysis of patient engagement and patient-reported outcomes in primary care practices of accountable care organizations. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32 (06) 640-647
- 11 Phillips NM, Street M, Haesler E. A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (02) 110-117
- 12 Kim JM, Suarez-Cuervo C, Berger Z. et al. Evaluation of patient and family engagement strategies to improve medication safety. Patient 2018; 11 (02) 193-206
- 13 Lee JL, Dy SM, Gurses AP. et al. Towards a more patient-centered approach to medication safety. J Patient Exp 2018; 5 (02) 83-87
- 14 Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163 (12) 1409-1416
- 15 Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R. et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (01) 29-43
- 16 Souza NM, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA. et al; CCDSS Systematic Review Team. Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 87
- 17 Ranji SR, Rennke S, Wachter RM. Computerised provider order entry combined with clinical decision support systems to improve medication safety: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23 (09) 773-780
- 18 Nuckols TK, Smith-Spangler C, Morton SC. et al. The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 56
- 19 Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés M, Pérez-Menéndez-Conde C, Bermejo-Vicedo T. Systematic review of computerized prescriber order entry and clinical decision support. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2018; 75 (23) 1909-1921
- 20 Liberati EG, Ruggiero F, Galuppo L. et al. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation. Implement Sci 2017; 12 (01) 113
- 21 Koskela T, Sandström S, Mäkinen J, Liira H. User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16: 6
- 22 Johansson-Pajala RM, Gustafsson LK, Jorsäter Blomgren K, Fastbom J, Martin L. Nurses' use of computerised decision support systems affects drug monitoring in nursing homes. J Nurs Manag 2017; 25 (01) 56-64
- 23 Lagerin A, Lundh L, Törnkvist L, Fastbom J. District nurses' use of a decision support and assessment tool to improve the quality and safety of medication use in older adults: a feasibility study. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2020; 21: e15
- 24 Ibáñez-Garcia S, Rodriguez-Gonzalez C, Escudero-Vilaplana V. et al. Development and evaluation of a clinical decision support system to improve medication safety. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 513-520
- 25 Jia P, Zhang L, Chen J, Zhao P, Zhang M. The effects of clinical decision support systems on medication safety: an overview. PLoS One 2016; 11 (12) e0167683
- 26 Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 17
- 27 Shahmoradi L, Safdari R, Ahmadi H, Zahmatkeshan M. Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: a systematic literature review on features and effects. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2021; 35: 27
- 28 Taheri Moghadam S, Sadoughi F, Velayati F, Ehsanzadeh SJ, Poursharif S. The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21 (01) 98
- 29 Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare [Socialstyrelsen]. Indikatorer för god läkemedelsterapi hos äldre (in Swedish). Socialstyrelsen 2010–6-7. Accessed June 27, 2025 at: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/ovrigt/2017-6-7.pdf
- 30 Hedström M, Lidström B, Åsberg K. PHASE-20; ett nytt instrument för skattning av möjliga läkemedelsrelaterade symtom hos äldre personer i äldreboende. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research and Clinical Studies. Vard Nord Utveckl Forsk 2009; 4: 9
- 31 Jyrkkä J, Enlund H, Korhonen MJ, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S. Polypharmacy status as an indicator of mortality in an elderly population. Drugs Aging 2009; 26 (12) 1039-1048
- 32 Hovstadius B, Hovstadius K, Astrand B, Petersson G. Increasing polypharmacy - an individual-based study of the Swedish population 2005-2008. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2010; 10: 16
- 33 Modig S, Elmståhl S. Kidney function and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among elderly people: a cross-sectional study on potential hazards for an at risk population. Int J Clin Pharm 2018; 40 (04) 870-877
- 34 Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR. et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 2003; 289 (09) 1107-1116
- 35 Weingart SN, Gandhi TK, Seger AC. et al. Patient-reported medication symptoms in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165 (02) 234-240
- 36 Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J. et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (16) 1556-1564
- 37 Lindsey PL. Psychotropic medication use among older adults: what all nurses need to know. J Gerontol Nurs 2009; 35 (09) 28-38
- 38 Huang AR, Mallet L. Prescribing opioids in older people. Maturitas 2013; 74 (02) 123-129
- 39 Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006; 10 (04) 287-333
- 40 Gibson SJ. IASP global year against pain in older persons: highlighting the current status and future perspectives in geriatric pain. Expert Rev Neurother 2007; 7 (06) 627-635
- 41 Gibson SJ, Lussier D. Prevalence and relevance of pain in older persons. Pain Med 2012; 13 (Suppl. 02) S23-S26
- 42 Larsson C, Hansson EE, Sundquist K, Jakobsson U. Chronic pain in older adults: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. Scand J Rheumatol 2017; 46 (04) 317-325
- 43 Teixeira A, Arrigo M, Tolppanen H. et al. Management of acute heart failure in elderly patients. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2016; 109 (6-7): 422-430
- 44 Tsiligianni I, Kocks JWH. Daytime symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2020; 30 (01) 6
- 45 Watson S, Caster O, Rochon PA, den Ruijter H. Reported adverse drug reactions in women and men: aggregated evidence from globally collected individual case reports during half a century. EClinicalMedicine 2019; 17: 100188
- 46 Zucker I, Prendergast BJ. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women. Biol Sex Differ 2020; 11 (01) 32
- 47 Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S, Hauser D, Mauer E, Kaushal R. with the HITEC Investigators. Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17 (01) 36
- 48 Olakotan OO, Yusof MM. Evaluating the alert appropriateness of clinical decision support systems in supporting clinical workflow. J Biomed Inform 2020; 106: 103453
- 49 Olakotan OO, Mohd Yusof M. The appropriateness of clinical decision support systems alerts in supporting clinical workflows: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 2021 ;27(2):14604582211007536
- 50 Morrison-Griffiths S, Pirmohamed M. Specialist nurse reporting of adverse drug reactions. Prof Nurse 2000; 15 (05) 300-304
- 51 Morrison-Griffiths S, Walley TJ, Park BK, Breckenridge AM, Pirmohamed M. Reporting of adverse drug reactions by nurses. Lancet 2003; 361 (9366) 1347-1348
- 52 O'Malley PA. Preventing and reporting adverse drug events: pharmacovigilance for the clinical nurse specialist. Clin Nurse Spec 2012; 26 (03) 136-137
- 53 Griffith R. Nurses must report adverse drug reactions. Br J Nurs 2013; 22 (08) 484-485
- 54 Johansson-Pajala RM, Martin L, Fastbom J, Jorsäter Blomgren K. Nurses' self-reported medication competence in relation to their pharmacovigilant activities in clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21 (01) 145-152
- 55 De Angelis A, Colaceci S, Giusti A, Vellone E, Alvaro R. Factors that condition the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions among nurses: an integrative review. J Nurs Manag 2016; 24 (02) 151-163
- 56 Bigi C, Bocci G. The key role of clinical and community health nurses in pharmacovigilance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 73 (11) 1379-1387
- 57 Salehi T, Seyedfatemi N, Mirzaee MS, Maleki M, Mardani A. Nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practice in relation to pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review. BioMed Res Int 2021; 2021: 6630404
- 58 Hazell L, Cornelius V, Hannaford P, Shakir S, Avery AJ. Yellow Card Study Collaboration. How do patients contribute to signal detection?: a retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the UK's yellow card scheme. Drug Saf 2013; 36 (03) 199-206
- 59 Inácio P, Cavaco A, Airaksinen M. The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 83 (02) 227-246
- 60 Hasford J, Bruchmann F, Lutz M, Thürmann P, Schmiedl S. A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77 (11) 1697-1704
- 61 Lancaster K, Abuzour A, Khaira M. et al. The use and effects of electronic health tools for patient self-monitoring and reporting of outcomes following medication use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (12) e294
- 62 Chrischilles EA, Hourcade JP, Doucette W. et al. Personal health records: a randomized trial of effects on elder medication safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (04) 679-686
- 63 Schiff GD, Klinger E, Salazar A. et al. Screening for adverse drug events: a randomized trial of automated calls coupled with phone-based pharmacist counseling. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (02) 285-292
- 64 Weingart SN, Carbo A, Tess A. et al. Using a patient internet portal to prevent adverse drug events: a randomized, controlled trial. J Patient Saf 2013; 9 (03) 169-175
- 65 Bauer J, Busse M, Kopetzky T, Seggewies C, Fromm MF, Dörje F. Interprofessional evaluation of a medication clinical decision support system prior to implementation. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (03) 637-649
