RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2738-5771
The In Vitro Biomechanics of Locking Plates Used in a Supercutaneous Fashion Compared to a Type Ia External Skeletal Fixator
Autoren
Funding Information Funding for this research was provided by the Ontario Veterinary College PetTrust Fund. The research funder had no additional involvement in research design or manuscript preparation.
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to determine the biomechanics of a supercutaneously placed String of Pearls plate (SOP) and supercutaneously placed locking compression plate (LCP) to be used in lieu of a type Ia external fixator.
Study Design
Nine surrogate constructs of 3.5 mm SOP, 3.5 mm LCP and type Ia external fixator offset 20 mm from the cortex over a 10-mm fracture gap were tested in non-destructive loading to 200 N and then tested in load to 100% displacement.
Results
Maximum displacement was used to calculate median maximum displacement in non-destructive axial compression testing for the SOP, LCP and external fixator, measuring 8.5 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 8.23–8.95), 10.3 mm (IQR 9.99–10.40) and 1.2 mm (IQR 1.17–1.31), respectively. There was a difference between the external fixator to LCP (p = 0.0050), external fixator to SOP (p = 0.0050) and LCP to SOP (p = 0.0050). Maximum load was used in compression to 100% displacement to calculate the median maximum load. The SOP, LCP and external fixator, withstood median loads to 100% displacement of 244 N (IQR 231.83–257.19), 168 N (IQR 165.07–170.86) and 766 N (IQR 688.14–784.29), respectively. There was a difference between external fixator to SOP (p = 0.0047), external fixator to LCP (p ≤ 0.001) and LCP to SOP (p = 0.0024).
Conclusion
The type Ia external fixator is significantly stiffer compared with the supercutaneous 3.5 mm SOP and 3.5 mm LCP. Given the low stiffness and high displacement, supercutaneously placed locking plates may be unsuitable for clinical fracture repair in a 20-kg dog with an expected axial load of 200 N.
Contributors' Statement
A.P. contributed to the design of the study, compiled the data, analysed the data for statistical significance, interpreted the data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. M.M. was the primary advisor, developed the study idea, developed the design of the study, assisted with data interpretation, and provided scientific and in-line editing of the manuscript. N.M. contributed to the design of the study and provided scientific and in-line editing of the manuscript. J.R. contributed to the design of the study, instrumentation and experimental design. S.B. provided scientific and in-line editing of the manuscript. G.M. provided statistical analysis and in-line editing of the manuscript. All authors provided a critical review of the manuscript and endorse the final version. All authors are aware of their respective contributions and have confidence in the integrity of all contributions.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 02. April 2025
Angenommen: 04. November 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Dezember 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bigham-Sadegh A, Oryan A. Basic concepts regarding fracture healing and the current options and future directions in managing bone fractures. Int Wound J 2015; 12 (03) 238-247
- 2 Gautier E, Perren SM, Ganz R. (iii) Principles of internal fixation. Curr Orthop 1992; 6 (04) 220-232
- 3 Aron D, Johnson AL, Palmer R. Biologic strategies and a balanced concept for repair of highly comminuted long bone fractures. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1995; 17 (35) 69-83
- 4 Johnson AL, Eurell JAC, Losonsky JM, Egger EL. Biomechanics and biology of fracture healing with external skeletal fixation. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1998; 20 (04) 487-489
- 5 Palmer RH. Biological osteosynthesis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29 (05) 1171-1185 , vii
- 6 Kim PH, Leopold SS. In brief: Gustilo-Anderson classification. [corrected]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (11) 3270-3274
- 7 Beever L, Giles K, Meeson R. Postoperative complications associated with external skeletal fixators in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19 (07) 727-736
- 8 Beever LJ, Giles K, Meeson RL. Postoperative complications associated with external skeletal fixators in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31 (02) 137-143
- 9 Nicetto T, Longo F. Supercutaneous plating for the treatment of traumatic injuries of the appendicular skeleton in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (02) 149-157
- 10 Nicetto T, Longo F. Supracutaneous plating using a locking plate for the treatment of a tibial fracture in a cat. Can Vet J 2017; 58 (06) 585-590
- 11 Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 488-493
- 12 Uhl JM, Kapatkin AS, Garcia TC, Stover SM. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (07) 840-846
- 13 Vallefuoco R, Le Pommellet H, Savin A. et al. Complications of appendicular fracture repair in cats and small dogs using locking compression plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (01) 46-52
- 14 Johnston SA, Tobias KM. Internal fracture fixation. In: Johnston SA, Tobias KM. eds. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. 2nd ed.. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2018: 654-691
- 15 Greiwe RM, Archdeacon MT. Locking plate technology: current concepts. J Knee Surg 2007; 20 (01) 50-55
- 16 Kloen P. Supercutaneous plating: use of a locking compression plate as an external fixator. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (01) 72-75
- 17 Janssen SJ, Kloen P. Supercutaneous locking compression plate in the treatment of infected non-union and open fracture of the leg. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142 (11) 3201-3211
- 18 Kano WT, Rahal SC, Agostinho FS. et al. Kinetic and temporospatial gait parameters in a heterogeneous group of dogs. BMC Vet Res 2016; 12 (01) 2
- 19 Watrous GK, Moens NMM. Cuttable plate fixation for small breed dogs with radius and ulna fractures: Retrospective study of 31 dogs. Can Vet J 2017; 58 (04) 377-382
- 20 Ma CH, Wu CH, Jiang JR, Tu YK, Lin TS. Metaphyseal locking plate as an external fixator for open tibial fracture: Clinical outcomes and biomechanical assessment. Injury 2017; 48 (02) 501-505
- 21 Canapp Jr SO. External fracture fixation. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2004; 19 (03) 114-119
- 22 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP–how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B11-B19
- 23 Zhang J, Ebraheim N, Li M. et al. External fixation using locking plate in distal tibial fracture: a finite element analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015; 25 (06) 1099-1104
- 24 Piermattei D, Flo G, DeCamp C. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 4th Ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: 133
- 25 Sheen JR, Mabrouk A, Garla VV. Fracture Healing Overview. StatPearls [Internet]. 2023. Accessed June 22, 2025 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551678/
- 26 Muro NM, Gilley RS, Kemper AR, Benitez ME, Barry SL, McNally C. Stiffness of a type II external skeletal fixator and locking compression plate in a fracture gap model. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (03) 622-632
- 27 DeTora M, Kraus K. Mechanical testing of 3.5 mm locking and non-locking bone plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (04) 318-322
- 28 Malenfant RC, Sod GA. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (04) 465-470
- 29 Blake CA, Boudrieau RJ, Torrance BS. et al. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24 (06) 408-417
- 30 Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: When does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?. Injury 2007; 38 (03) 358-364
- 31 Evans A, Glyde M, Day R, Hosgood G. Effect of plate-bone distance and working length on 20-mm locking construct stiffness and plate strain in a diaphyseal fracture gap model: A biomechanical study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2024; 37 (01) 1-7
