Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2780-8167
Diagnosis and Clinical Assessment of Arthrofibrosis after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Challenges and Evolving Standards
Authors
Abstract
Arthrofibrosis is a common complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), characterized by excessive fibrous tissue formation within the joint, leading to restricted range of motion (ROM), pain, and functional impairment. Accurate diagnosis is essential for distinguishing arthrofibrosis from other causes of postoperative knee stiffness, such as infection, mechanical block, or malalignment. This review aims to explore current diagnostic methods and evolving standards for arthrofibrosis after TKA, focusing on (1) clinical differentiation from other causes of knee stiffness; (2) assessment and diagnostic criteria; (3) imaging, laboratory, and histopathological techniques; and (4) an integrated diagnostic algorithm and future directions. Diagnosis is primarily based on persistent ROM limitation (flexion <90 degrees or extension >5 degrees) for more than 12 weeks, after excluding infection and mechanical causes. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with metal artifact reduction techniques can be used to visualize intra-articular fibrosis, with an MRI-based synovial classification correlating with ROM deficits and severity. Synovial fluid analysis helps rule out infection, and histopathology is employed when the diagnosis remains unclear. The study proposes a stepwise diagnostic algorithm that integrates clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings and discusses future directions for optimizing diagnosis and treatment pathways to improve patient outcomes.
Publication History
Received: 02 November 2025
Accepted: 02 January 2026
Accepted Manuscript online:
05 January 2026
Article published online:
27 January 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Thompson R, Novikov D, Cizmic Z. et al. Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Orthop Clin North Am 2019; 50 (03) 269-279
- 2 Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, Bade MJ, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (08) 2604-2611
- 3 Walker EA, Fox MG, Blankenbaker DG. et al; Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® imaging after total knee arthroplasty: 2023 update. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20 (11S): S433-S454
- 4 Attard V, Li CY, Self A. et al. Quantification of intra-articular fibrosis in patients with stiff knee arthroplasties using metal-reduction MRI. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B (10) 1331-1340
- 5 Sacher SE, Chiu Y-F, Potter HG. et al. Arthrofibrosis severity in knees with failed total knee arthroplasties differs with magnetic resonance imaging synovial classification. J Arthroplasty 2025; 40 (10) 2518-2524.e1
- 6 Limberg AK, Salib CG, Tibbo ME. et al. Immune cell populations differ in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 22627
- 7 Haffar A, Goh GS, Fillingham YA, Torchia MT, Lonner JH. Treatment of arthrofibrosis and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: An updated review of the literature. Int Orthop 2022; 46 (06) 1253-1279
- 8 Zhunussov Y, Danenov Y, Alimbek G. Arthroscopic arthrolysis of the knee joint following total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2025; 14 (14) 4917
- 9 Zaffagnini S, Di Paolo S, Meena A. et al. Causes of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Int Orthop 2021; 45 (08) 1983-1999
- 10 Patel R. Periprosthetic joint infection. N Engl J Med 2023; 388 (03) 251-262
- 11 Tibbo ME, Limberg AK, Salib CG. et al. Acquired idiopathic stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (14) 1320-1330
- 12 Kalson NS, Borthwick LA, Mann DA. et al. International consensus on the definition and classification of fibrosis of the knee joint. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (11) 1479-1488
- 13 Thomas NP, Liu C, Varady N, Iban YC, Schwab PE, Chen AF. High complication rate associated with arthroscopic lysis of adhesions versus manipulation under anesthesia for arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31 (04) e216-e225
- 14 Volchenko E, Schwarzman G, Robinson M, Chmell SJ, Gonzalez MH. Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with manipulation under anesthesia versus manipulation alone in the treatment of arthrofibrosis after TKA: A matched cohort study. Orthopedics 2019; 42 (03) 163-167
- 15 Landy DC, Baral EC, Potter HG. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging synovial classification is associated with revision indication and polyethylene insert damage. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37 (6S): S342-S349
- 16 Schröder FF, Post CE, Wagenaar FBM, Verdonschot N, Huis In't Veld RMHA. MRI as diagnostic modality for analyzing the problematic knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51 (02) 446-458
- 17 De Filippo M, Bertellini A, Pogliacomi F. et al. Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the knee: Diagnostic accuracy and indications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70 (02) 342-351
- 18 Berquist TH. Imaging of articular pathology: MRI, CT, arthrography. Clin Anat 1997; 10 (01) 1-13
- 19 Boldt JG, Munzinger UK, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty: Gray-scale and power Doppler sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (02) 337-340
- 20 Ory PA. Radiography in the assessment of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003; 17 (03) 495-512
- 21 O'Shea KJ, Murphy KP, Heekin RD, Herzwurm PJ. The diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, and radiographs in the evaluation of traumatic knee disorders. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (02) 164-167
- 22 Tubb CC, Polkowksi GG, Krause B. Diagnosis and prevention of periprosthetic joint infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28 (08) e340-e348
- 23 Miller JM, Binnicker MJ, Campbell S. et al. A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2018 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67 (06) e1-e94
- 24 Uvodich ME, Dugdale EM, Osmon DR, Pagnano MW, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. The effectiveness of laboratory tests to predict early postoperative periprosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B (6 Supple A): 177-184
- 25 Goud A, Nützinger D, van der Bij A. et al. Synovial-based tests outperform serum markers to rule out infection in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37 (04) 802-808.e5
- 26 Carli AV, Abdelbary H, Ahmadzai N. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of serum, synovial, and tissue testing for chronic periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee replacements: A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (07) 635-649
- 27 Salib CG, Reina N, van Wijnen AJ, Hanssen AD, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. Absence of signature inflammatory markers in synovial fluid for total knee arthroplasties revised for arthrofibrosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107 (03) 102870
- 28 Abdul N, Dixon D, Walker A. et al. Fibrosis is a common outcome following total knee arthroplasty. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 16469
- 29 Ruppert M, Theiss C, Knöß P. et al. Histopathological, immunohistochemical criteria and confocal laser-scanning data of arthrofibrosis. Pathol Res Pract 2013; 209 (11) 681-688
- 30 Ly T-D, Sambale M, Klösener L. et al. Understanding of arthrofibrosis: New explorative insights into extracellular matrix remodeling of synovial fibroblasts. PLoS One 2023; 18 (05) e0286334
- 31 Bayram B, Thaler R, Bettencourt JW. et al. Human outgrowth knee fibroblasts from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty exhibit a unique gene expression profile and undergo myofibroblastogenesis upon TGFβ1 stimulation. J Cell Biochem 2022; 123 (05) 878-892
- 32 Faust I, Traut P, Nolting F. et al. Human xylosyltransferases–mediators of arthrofibrosis? New pathomechanistic insights into arthrofibrotic remodeling after knee replacement therapy. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 12537
- 33 Mayr HO, Fassbender FF, Prall WC, Haasters F, Bernstein A, Stoehr A. Immunohistochemical examination in arthrofibrosis of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (03) 383-391
- 34 Bayram B, Limberg AK, Salib CG. et al. Molecular pathology of human knee arthrofibrosis defined by RNA sequencing. Genomics 2020; 112 (04) 2703-2712
- 35 Butnaru M, Senioris A, Pagenstert G. et al. Arthroscopic management of unexplained pain following total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142 (06) 1109-1115
- 36 Chen X, Wang Z, Huang Y. et al. Identification of novel biomarkers for arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty in animal models and clinical patients. EBioMedicine 2021; 70: 103486
- 37 Jenkins D, Phalke S, Bell R. et al. Adaptive immune responses in patients requiring revision after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2023; 41 (05) 984-993
- 38 Hall RP, Verhey JT, Deckey DG. et al. Which medications are effective in reducing the risk of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2025; S0883-5403 (25)00880-0