Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2803-3295
Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: A Single-Center Experience
Authors
Abstract
Guidelines recommend placement of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in patients with acute proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and a contraindication to anticoagulation. IVCF placement during pregnancy or immediately postpartum presents technical challenges and is not extensively described in the existing literature.
This study aimed to describe the use of IVCFs in the obstetric population along with outcomes related to filter placement.
Retrospective chart review of all patients at Mayo Clinic from 2001 to 2020 with an IVCF at the time of conception or who underwent placement during pregnancy/postpartum.
About 24 pregnancies in 23 women (mean age 26.3 years, range 18–41) were included: 5 (21%) with IVCF placement prior to pregnancy, 7 (29%) during pregnancy, and 12 (50%) during postpartum. IVCFs placed during pregnancy were frequently in the suprarenal position, in 5 (71%) cases. Meanwhile, 16 (94%) were deployed in an infrarenal position prior to pregnancy and postpartum. Complications included multiple attempts to remove the IVCF (n = 2), severe angulation (n = 4), embedded struts (n = 3), fracture (n = 1), and one case of cardiac tamponade (n = 1). Complications were more common when placement was performed prior to pregnancy or during pregnancy (2, 40% and 4, 57% respectively) versus postpartum (2, 17%).
IVCF placement prior or during pregnancy/postpartum is uncommon and is associated with a high incidence of complications, although most did not fundamentally impact clinical outcomes. While IVCFs remain an option for clinicians treating pregnant and postpartum patients, these should be considered a last resource.
Keywords
inferior vena cava filter - obstetric - venous thromboembolism - pregnancy - postpartum - outcomesContributors' Statement
J.S.B.: Data curation, formal analysis, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. N.E.B.: Writing–review and editing. D.T.V.: Conceptualization, writing–review and editing. D.E.H.: Conceptualization, data curation, methodology, supervision, writing–review and editing. W.E.W.: Conceptualization. I.R.M.: Conceptualization, writing–review and editing. C.R.: Conceptualization, writing–review and editing. A.I.C.: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, writing–review and editing.
Publication History
Received: 11 September 2025
Accepted: 02 February 2026
Accepted Manuscript online:
04 February 2026
Article published online:
12 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton III LJ. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: A 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143 (10) 697-706
- 2 Pomp ER, Lenselink AM, Rosendaal FR, Doggen CJM. Pregnancy, the postpartum period and prothrombotic defects: Risk of venous thrombosis in the MEGA study. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (04) 632-637
- 3 Devis P, Knuttinen MG. Deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: Incidence, pathogenesis and endovascular management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017; 7 (Suppl. 03) S309-S319
- 4 Lutfi A, O'Rourke E, Crowley M. et al. VTE risk assessment, prevention and diagnosis in pregnancy. Thromb Res 2024; 235: 164-174
- 5 Kearsley R, Stocks G. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy-diagnosis, management, and treatment. BJA Educ 2021; 21 (03) 117-123
- 6 Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (02) 366-373
- 7 Ortel TL, Neumann I, Ageno W. et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood Adv 2020; 4 (19) 4693-4738
- 8 Cotrufo M, De Feo M, De Santo LS. et al. Risk of warfarin during pregnancy with mechanical valve prostheses. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99 (01) 35-40
- 9 Kaufman JA, Barnes GD, Chaer RA. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline for Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Patients with Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Developed in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, American Heart Association, Society for Vascular Surgery, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (10) 1529-1544
- 10 Grewal S, Chamarthy MR, Kalva SP. Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2016; 6 (06) 632-641
- 11 Jia Z, Wu A, Tam M. Caval penetration by inferior vena cava filters: A systematic literature review of clinical significance and management. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63 (05) 1406
- 12 Baheti A, Sheeran D, Patrie J, Sabri SS, Angle JF, Wilkins LR. Suprarenal inferior vena cava filter placement and retrieval: Safety analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (02) 231-235
- 13 Caplin DM, Nikolic B, Kalva SP, Ganguli S, Saad WEA, Zuckerman DA. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22 (11) 1499-1506
- 14 Kalva SP, Chlapoutaki C, Wicky S, Greenfield AJ, Waltman AC, Athanasoulis CA. Suprarenal inferior vena cava filters: A 20-year single-center experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (07) 1041-1047
- 15 Bistervels IM, Geerlings AE, Bonta PI, Ganzevoort W, Zijlstra IAJ, Middeldorp S. Pregnancy in women with an inferior vena cava filter: A tertiary center experience and overview of the literature. Blood Adv 2021; 5 (20) 4044-4053
- 16 Rottenstreich A, Kalish Y, Elchalal U, Klimov A, Bloom AI. Retrievable inferior vena cava filter utilization in obstetric patients. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 32 (18) 3045-3053
- 17 Radke SM, Smeins L, Ryckman KK, Gruca TS. Closure of Labor & Delivery units in rural counties is associated with reduced adequacy of prenatal care, even when prenatal care remains available. J Rural Health 2023; 39 (04) 746-755