Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27(1): 050-057
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1270419
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Forehead Lifting: State of the Art

Patrick C. Angelos1 , Christian L. Stallworth2 , Tom D. Wang1
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • 2Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 January 2011 (online)

ABSTRACT

Forehead lifting serves to restore a more youthful appearance as well as a more functional and aesthetically pleasing brow position. The purpose of this review is to describe the pertinent anatomy and forehead aesthetics, then to discuss the patient evaluation, surgical approaches, complications, and nonsurgical adjuncts. Anatomic features reviewed include the layers of the forehead and scalp, blood supply, innervation, musculature, and the temporal branch of the facial nerve anatomy. Forehead aesthetics described include the aging process, with its contributing factors and consequences, and the ideal brow position in women and men. Key aspects of the patient evaluation include assessment of skin type; ptosis; hairline, brow, and lid position; symmetry; and bony contours. Pertinent past medical/surgical history as well as family history are reviewed, and the need for ophthalmology evaluation is discussed. Surgical indications and approaches, including direct, coronal, mid-forehead, endoscopic, and trans-blepharoplasty, are reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed and techniques briefly described. Complications are mentioned, and the article concludes with a review of nonsurgical adjuncts.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Knize D M. Anatomic concepts for brow lift procedures.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  124 2118-2126
  • 2 Ridgway J M, Larrabee W F. Anatomy for blepharoplasty and brow-lift.  Facial Plast Surg. 2010;  26 177-185
  • 3 Stuzin J M, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto H K, Wolfe S A. Anatomy of the frontal branch of the facial nerve: the significance of the temporal fat pad.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  83 265-271
  • 4 Sabini P, Wayne I, Quatela V C. Anatomical guides to precisely localize the frontal branch of the facial nerve.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;  5 150-152
  • 5 Norwood O T. Male pattern baldness: classification and incidence.  South Med J. 1975;  68 1359-1365
  • 6 Ludwig E. Classification of the types of androgenetic alopecia (common baldness) occurring in the female sex.  Br J Dermatol. 1977;  97 247-254
  • 7 Glogau R G. Aesthetic and anatomic analysis of the aging skin.  Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1996;  15 134-138
  • 8 Fitzpatrick T B. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI.  Arch Dermatol. 1988;  124 869-871
  • 9 Cook T A, Brownrigg P J, Wang T D, Quatela V C. The versatile midforehead browlift.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;  115 163-168
  • 10 Isse N G. Endoscopic facial rejuvenation: endoforehead, the functional lift. Case reports.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1994;  18 21-29
  • 11 Punthakee X, Mashkevich G, Keller G S. Endoscopic forehead and brow-lift.  Facial Plast Surg. 2010;  26 239-251
  • 12 Byrne P J. Efficacy and safety of endotine fixation device in endoscopic brow-lift.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;  9 212-214
  • 13 Malata C M, Abood A. Experience with cortical tunnel fixation in endoscopic brow lift: the “bevel and slide” modification.  Int J Surg. 2009;  7 510-515
  • 14 Morrison C, Zins J. An alternative approach to brow lift fixation: temporoparietal fascia, galeal, and periosteal imbrication.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 1433-1434; author reply 1434–1435
  • 15 Pascali M, Gualdi A, Bottini D J, Botti C, Botti G, Cervelli V. An original application of the Endotine Ribbon device for brow lift.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  124 1652-1661
  • 16 Punthakee X, Keller G S, Vose J G, Stout W. New technologies in aesthetic blepharoplasty and brow-lift surgery.  Facial Plast Surg. 2010;  26 260-265
  • 17 Romo III T, Sclafani A P, Yung R T. Endoscopic foreheadplasty: temporary vs. permanent fixation.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;  23 388-394
  • 18 Thomas J R, Lee A S, Patel A B. Brow-lift: subgaleal vs subperiosteal flap adherence in the rabbit model.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;  9 101-105
  • 19 Kim B P, Goode R L, Newman J P. Brow elevation ratio: a new method of brow analysis.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;  11 34-39
  • 20 Cilento B W, Johnson Jr C MJ. The case for open forehead rejuvenation: a review of 1004 procedures.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;  11 13-17
  • 21 Connell B F, Lambros V S, Neurohr G H. The forehead lift: techniques to avoid complications and produce optimal results.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1989;  13 217-237
  • 22 Ahn M S, Catten M, Maas C S. Temporal brow lift using botulinum toxin A.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 1129-1135 discussion 1136-1139
  • 23 Maas C S, Kim E J. Temporal brow lift using botulinum toxin A: an update.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112 (5, Suppl) 109S-112S discussion 113S-114S

Patrick C AngelosM.D. 

Resident, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University

3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code PVO1, Portland, OR 29239

Email: angelosp@ohsu.edu

    >