Comparison of Ultrasonic Scalpel Versus Argon-Beam and Conventional Electrocautery for
Internal Thoracic Artery Dissection

Abstract

Background: We used an ultrasonic scalpel (USS) and an argon beam coagulator (ABC) to test their effectiveness and feasibility in comparison to conventional electrocautery for Internal Thoracic Artery (ITA) takedown, time for takedown, number of clips, thermal impact, along with morphological integrity assessed by histology. Patients and Methods: Ninety-three patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery were prospectively randomized into three groups. In thirty-one patients, either an ultrasonic scalpel (USS, group A), an argon-beam coagulator (ABC, group B) or conventional electrocautery (CEC, group C) was used for ITA harvesting. Results: Harvest times for ITA takedown using CEC (16.7 ± 6 min) was significantly faster compared to ABC (21.6 ± 8.1 min; p = 0.02) and USS (24.1 ± 8.1 min; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference comparing harvest times of USS and ABC (p = 0.1). The number of hemostatic clips used was significantly lower when using USS (5.5 ± 4.6 clips) compared to both CEC (16.6 ± 6.2 clips; p < 0.001) and ABC (20.4 ± 6.5 clips; p < 0.001) and significantly lower using CEC compared to ABC (p < 0.007). There were no significant differences in bleeding points within the tissue bed among the groups (ABC 11/31 patients, CEC 11/31 patients and USS 12/31 patients). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that dissection of the ITA pedicle can be safely done with USS, ABC, and CEC. However, USS is associated with less hemostatic clip demand but prolonged harvest time compared it to ABC and CEC; histological assessment revealed no significant difference when comparing groups and equipment used. A variety in design of the hooks may probably ease ultracision practicability.

Key words

Harmonic scalpel - Argon-Beam-Coagulator - Conventional electrocautery - Internal Thoracic Artery - CABG

References

• 1 Grondin C M, Campeau L, Lesperance J. Comparison of late change in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in ten consecutive series of patients, ten years after operation.  Circulation. 1984;  70 208-221
• 2 Farin G, Grund K E. Technology of argon plasma coagulation with particular regard to endoscopic applications.  End Surg. 1994;  2 71-77
• 3 Amaral J F. The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;  4 92-99
• 4 Wolf R K, Ohtsuka T, Flege J r. Early results of thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvest using an ultrasonic scalpel.  Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 1998;  14 54-57
• 5 Gundry S R, Jones M, Ishihara T, Ferrans V J. Intraoperative trauma to human saphenous veins: scanning electron microscopic comparison of preparation techniques.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1980;  30 40-47
• 6 Ohtsuka T, Wolf R K, Hiratzka L F, Wumig P, Flege J B. Thorascopic IMA harvest for MICABG using the Harmonic Scalpel.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  63 107-109
• 7 Acar C, Jebara V A, Portoghese M. et al . Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;  54 652-660
• 8 Choi J B, Lee S Y. Skeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts: effect on free flow during bypass.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  61 (3) 909-913
• 9 Gaudino M, Toesca A, Nori S L, Glieca F, Possati G. Effect of skeletonization of the internal thoracic artery on vessel wall integrity.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 (5) 1623-1627
• 10 Epstein M R, Mayer J E, Duncan B W. Use of an ultrasonic scalpel as an alternative to electrocautery in patients with pacemakers.  Ann Thorac Surg.. 1998;  65 (6) 1802-1804