Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1610381
Diastereoselectivities in Reductions of α-Alkoxy Ketones Are Not Always Correlated to Chelation-Induced Rate Acceleration
Acknowledgment is made to the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund for support of this research (57206-ND1). The Shared Instrumentation Facility in the Department of Chemistry was constructed through the support of the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, under Research Facilities Improvement Award Number C06 RR-16572-01. The cryogenic probe for the 600 MHz NMR was acquired through the support of the National Institute of Health S10 grant under Award Number OD016343.Publication History
Received: 15 October 2018
Accepted: 18 October 2018
Publication Date:
08 November 2018 (online)
Published as part of the 50 Years SYNTHESIS – Golden Anniversary Issue
Abstract
The chelation-control model is used to predict stereochemical outcomes of many organometallic reactions. Diastereoselectivity arises due to reaction with a chelated intermediate with sterically differentiated faces. Earlier studies with dimethylmagnesium established that the chelated intermediate is a minor component of the reaction mixture, so reaction with the chelated intermediate must be faster than reaction with a non-chelated intermediate. High diastereoselectivity and chelation-induced rate acceleration are correlated with some hydride reducing agents. There are examples in which diastereoselectivity is high, but chelation-induced rate acceleration is not observed, however. In other cases, chelation-induced rate acceleration is observed, but diastereoselectivity remains low. These experiments illustrate that a revision to the chelation-control model is needed.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1610381.
- Supporting Information
-
References
- 1 Chen X, Hortelano ER, Eliel EL, Frye SV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 6130
- 2 Chen X, Hortelano ER, Eliel EL, Frye SV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 1778
- 3 Eliel EL, Frye SV, Hortelano ER, Chen X, Bai X. Pure Appl. Chem. 1991; 63: 1591
- 4 Mori S, Nakamura M, Nakamura E, Koga N, Morokuma K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 5055
- 5 Frye SV, Eliel EL, Cloux R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987; 109: 1862
- 6 Reetz MT. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993; 26: 462
- 7 Reetz MT, Raguse B, Marth CF, Hügel HM, Bach T, Fox DN. A. Tetrahedron 1992; 48: 5731
- 8 Read JA, Yang Y, Woerpel KA. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 3346
- 9 Takahashi T, Miyazawa M, Tsuji J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985; 26: 5139
- 10 Iida H, Yamazaki N, Kibayashi C. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 3769
- 11 Nakata T, Tanaka T, Oishi T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983; 24: 2653
- 12 Frye SV, Eliel EL. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986; 27: 3223
- 13 Corey EJ, Cho H, Rücker C, Hua DH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981; 22: 3455
- 14 Stanton GR, Johnson CN, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 4399
- 15 Anh NT, Eisenstein O, Lefour JM, Trân Huu Dâu M.-E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973; 95: 6146
- 16 Chérest M, Felkin H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968; 2205
- 17 Chérest M, Felkin H, Prudent N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968; 2199
- 18 Hepp A, Labbow R, Reiß F, Schulz A, Villinger A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018; 2905
- 19 Ko K.-Y, Frazee WJ, Eliel EL. Tetrahedron 1984; 40: 1333
- 20 Das G, Thornton ER. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 5360
- 21 Winterfeldt E. Synthesis 1975; 617
- 22 Seeman JI. Chem. Rev. 1983; 83: 83
- 23 Tietze LF, Kinzel T, Schmatz S. Chem. Eur. J. 2009; 15: 1706
- 24 Wigfield DC. Tetrahedron 1979; 35: 449
- 25 Bartolo ND, Woerpel KA. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 10197
- 26 Cho BT, Chun YS. J. Org. Chem. 1998; 63: 5280
- 27 Paterson I, Fink SJ, Lee LY. W, Atkinson SJ, Blakey SB. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 3118
- 28 Nadkarni D, Hallissey J, Mojica C. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 594
- 29 Shibata I, Yoshida T, Kawakami T, Baba A, Matsuda H. J. Org. Chem. 1992; 57: 4049