Eur J Pediatr Surg 2008; 18(4): 237-240
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038672
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Patency of the “Third Inguinal Ring” in Children with Unilateral Cryptorchidism: Fact or Fiction?

L. H. Braga1 , A. J. Lorenzo1 , J. L. Pippi Salle1 , M. E. Miranda2 , E. S. Tatsuo2 , J. C. Lanna2
  • 1Department of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
  • 2Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received December 31, 2007

accepted after revision May 8, 2008

Publikationsdatum:
14. August 2008 (online)

Abstract

Background: The entrance to the scrotum, or the so-called “third inguinal ring” (3rd IGR), was thought to be an important finding and etiological factor for cryptorchidism at the beginning of the 20th century. Historical reports of its association with undescended testis suggest that it was considered by many to be a true anatomical entity. As the understanding of testicular descent has changed, the description of this anatomical passage has vanished from textbooks and publications. In order to evaluate the findings that led to its original report, we sought to assess the patency of the expected testicular path of descent into the scrotum in children with unilateral cryptorchidism. Methods: Two hundred consecutive children who underwent unilateral orchidopexy were prospectively evaluated at the time of surgery to determine the anatomical patency of the area thought to represent the 3rd IGR. We also evaluated its association with the patient's age at surgery, the affected side, position of the undescended testis, macroscopic epididymal anomalies (MEA), and the patency of the processus vaginalis (PV). Results: The mean age at surgery was 5.2 ± 3.0 years, ranging from 1 to 13 years. The 3rd IGR was closed in 118 boys (59.0 %) and open in 82 (41.0 %). A closed 3rd IGR was found significantly more frequently in patients with intra-abdominal testes (p < 0.01). No significant association was observed between patency of the 3rd IGR and other evaluated factors. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the so-called 3rd IGR may represent the passage point of the testicle into the scrotum, which was not patent during the intraoperative examination in ⅔ of children with unilateral cryptorchidism. This observation by surgeons at the beginning of the 20th century may represent an anatomical curiosity rather than an important factor in the pathogenesis of cryptorchidism.

References

  • 1 Backhouse K M. The gubernaculum testis hunteri: testicular descent and maldescent.  Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl. 1964;  35 15-33
  • 2 Backhouse K M. The natural history of testicular descent and maldescent.  Proc Roy Soc Med. 1966;  59 357-68
  • 3 Barthold J S, Kumasi-Rivers K, Upadhyay J, Shekarriz B, Imperato-Mcginley J. Testicular position in the androgen insensitivity syndrome: implications for the role of androgens in testicular descent.  J Urol. 2000;  164 497-501
  • 4 Barthold J S, Gonzalez R. The epidemiology of congenital cryptorchidism, testicular ascent and orchiopexy.  J Urol. 2003;  170 2396-2401
  • 5 Browne D, Sydney M B. Some anatomical points in the operation for undescended testicle.  Lancet. 1933;  4 460-464
  • 6 Browne D. The diagnosis of undescended testicle.  Br Med J. 1938;  23 168-171
  • 7 Browne D. Treatment of undescended testicle.  Proc Roy Soc Med. 1949;  42 643-645
  • 8 Dean A G, Dean J A, Coloumbier D. EPI INFO version 6: a word processing database and statistics programs of epidemiology on microcomputers. Atlanta; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1994
  • 9 Hand J R. Undescended testes: report of 153 cases with evaluation of clinical findings, treatment, and results on follow-up to thirty-three years.  Tr Am A Genito-urin Surg. 1955;  47 9-50
  • 10 Heyns C F, Hutson J M. Historical review of theories on testicular descent.  J Urol. 1995;  153 754-767
  • 11 Hutson J M, Beasley S W, Bryan A D. Cryptorchidism in spina bifida and spinal cord transection: a clue to the mechanism of transinguinal descent of the testis.  J Ped Surg. 1988;  23 275-277
  • 12 Jackson M B, Gough M H, Dudley N E. Anatomical findings at orchidopexy.  Br J Urol. 1987;  59 568-571
  • 13 McGregor A L. The third inguinal ring.  Surg Gynec Obst. 1929;  49 273-307
  • 14 Rajfer J, Walsh P C. Hormonal regulation of testicular descent: experimental and clinical observations.  J Urol. 1977;  118 985-990
  • 15 Scorer C G. The natural history of testicular descent.  Proc Roy Soc Med. 1965;  58 933-947
  • 16 Scorer C G, Farrington G F. Failure of testicular maldescent. Scorer CG, Farrington GF Congenital Deformities of the Testis and Epididymis. London; Butterworths 1971: 28-44

Dr. M.D. Luis H. Braga

Division of Pediatric Urology
McMaster Children's Hospital
McMaster University

1200 Main Street West

Hamilton ONL8N 3Z5

Canada

eMail: lhpbraga@gmail.com

    >