J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40(03): 205-210
DOI: 10.1055/a-2110-0350
Original Article

Preoperative Imaging Mapping of DIEP Perforators and Intraoperative Selection: Does It Correlate?

Paula Gravina
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Aspinder Singh
2   Michael E. DeBakey Department of General Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Aldona Spiegel
3   Center for Breast Restoration, Houston Methodist Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Funding Drs. Gravina, Singh, Conlon, and Spiegel have nothing to disclose. No funding was received for this article.

Abstract

Background Preoperative imaging prior to deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest is a common practice to locate perforators and identify aberrant anatomy.

Methods We report a retrospective review of 320 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The locations relative to the umbilicus of preoperatively identified perforators were compared with the selected intraoperative perforators. The diameter of all intraoperative perforators was also measured.

Results Across the 320 patient, 1,833 potentially suitable perforators were identified on preoperative imaging. A total of 564 of the 795 perforators selected intraoperatively for DIEP flap harvest were within 2 cm of a predicted perforator, for a rate of 70.1%. The size of the perforator was unrelated to the detection rate.

Conclusion We were able to demonstrate a sensitivity of 70% of clinically selected DIEP perforators identified on preoperative imaging in this large series. This contrasts with the nearly 100% predictive value reported by others. Continued reporting of findings and methods of measuring are needed to improve the practical efficacy of CTA and raise awareness about the limitations of CTA, despite its well-documented usefulness.

Presented at (if applicable)

World Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery (WSRM) 2019 in Bologna, Italy; Texas Society of Plastic Surgery (TSPS) 2019 in Galveston, Texas.




Publication History

Received: 24 February 2023

Accepted: 08 June 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
14 June 2023

Article published online:
10 August 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68 (06) 394-424
  • 2 Nassar AH, Maselli AM, Manstein S. et al. Comparison of various modalities utilized for preoperative planning in microsurgical reconstructive surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 170-180
  • 3 Smit JM, Dimopoulou A, Liss AG. et al. Preoperative CT angiography reduces surgery time in perforator flap reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (09) 1112-1117
  • 4 Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M, Band B, Ramakrishnan VV, Griffiths M. Preoperative computed tomography angiography for planning DIEP flap breast reconstruction reduces operative time and overall complications. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 93-98
  • 5 Clavero JA, Masia J, Larrañaga J. et al. MDCT in the preoperative planning of abdominal perforator surgery for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. AJR 2008; 191 (03) 670-676
  • 6 Phillips TJ, Stella DL, Rozen WM, Ashton M, Taylor GI. Abdominal wall CT angiography: a detailed account of a newly established preoperative imaging technique. Radiology 2008; 249 (01) 32-44
  • 7 Pauchot S, Kastler A, Laurent O. et al. Preoperative imaging for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Eur J Plast Surg 2012; 35: 795-801
  • 8 Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Stella DL, Phillips TJ, Taylor GI. The accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for mapping the perforators of the DIEA: a cadaveric study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 363-369
  • 9 DeFazio MV, Arribas EM, Ahmad FI. et al. Application of three-dimensional printed vascular modeling as a perioperative guide to perforator mapping and pedicle dissection during abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (05) 325-338
  • 10 Masia J, Kosutic D, Clavero JA, Larranaga J, Vives L, Pons G. Preoperative computed tomographic angiogram for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (01) 21-28
  • 11 Uppal RS, Casaer B, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P. The efficacy of preoperative mapping of perforators in reducing operative times and complications in perforator flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (07) 859-864
  • 12 Cina A, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P. et al. Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23 (08) 2333-2343
  • 13 Oliva IB, Day K, Dill KE. et al; Expert Panel on Vascular Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® imaging of deep inferior epigastric arteries for surgical planning (breast reconstruction surgery). J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14 (11S): S456-S461
  • 14 Boer VB, van Wingerden JJ, Wever CF, Beets MR, Verhaegen PD, Hamdi M. Perforator mapping practice for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap reconstructions: a survey of the Benelux region. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 111-118
  • 15 Teunis T, Heerma van Voss MR, Kon M, van Maurik JF. CT-angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (06) 496-502